cover
Contact Name
Novianita Rulandari
Contact Email
admin@sinergi.or.id
Phone
+6281289935858
Journal Mail Official
admin@sinergi.or.id
Editorial Address
Editorial Office Jl. Cikini Raya No.9, RT.16/RW.1, Cikini Kec. Menteng, Kota Jakarta Pusat Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10330
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Sinergi International Journal of Law
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30217989     DOI : https://doi.org/10.61194/law
Core Subject : Social,
Sinergi International Journal of Law with ISSN Number 3021-7989 (Online) published by Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda, published original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of law. The journal attempts to assist in the understanding of the present and potential ability of law to aid in the recording and interpretation of international law practices.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): February 2025" : 5 Documents clear
International Legal Analysis of Human Rights Violations and Alleged Genocide in Palestine: A Normative Juridical Approach Aidatul Fitriyah
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): February 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v3i1.564

Abstract

This study examines alleged human rights violations in Palestine that may amount to genocide, using a normative juridical approach grounded in international law. It assesses whether Israel's actions meet the elements of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention and evaluates the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms in addressing such crimes. The research employs a normative juridical method integrating statutory, case-based, and conceptual approaches. It systematically analyzes international legal instruments, decisions of international courts, and relevant legal theories concerning genocide and human rights. The findings reveal that Israel's conduct—including targeted attacks on civilians, the destruction of vital infrastructure, the imposition of prolonged economic blockades, and the expansion of illegal settlements—exhibits strong indicators of war crimes and potentially fulfills the elements of genocide under international law. While the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) possess jurisdiction to address such violations, enforcing international legal norms encounters significant barriers. These include the influence of global political power, veto rights in the United Nations Security Council, and systemic biases that shield certain state actors from accountability. This study concludes that although a robust legal framework exists to respond to human rights violations in Palestine, the implementation of international law remains limited due to entrenched geopolitical interests. To address these shortcomings, the international community must pursue structural reforms in the global legal order and foster collective efforts to protect human rights and ensure accountability. By offering a critical legal analysis, this study contributes to the academic discourse on international human rights and humanitarian law and supports more effective advocacy strategies to combat impunity and uphold justice in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Legal Politics of Moving The State Capital City(Jakarta) From Java Island To Kalimantan Island Darusman, Yoyon Mulyana
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): February 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v3i1.394

Abstract

Jakarta as the center of the economy and central of government has a double burden which causes its performance as a capital city to not run optimally. Moving the country's capital from Jakarta to East Kalimantan will have impacts for changing the government administration structure in the new capital city. Apart from that, it is hoped that moving the nation's capital will create equality in various fields of justice. Indonesia is a very large country with a population of approximately 280 million people, it is impossible for economic and business development to only be centered on the Java’s island, so that it will create an imbalance in economic growth between Java and outside Java. This research aims to examine and analyze state legal politics regarding the deliver the capital city as regulated in the national capital city (IKN) Law. The research method used a normative research , namely a research method that focuses research on the study of legal norms related to the birth of Law no. 3 of 2002 concerning IKN. With various views, both agreeing and disagreeing, the government has begun implementing the development of the state capital in East Kalimantan with the mission of creating fair equality. With the construction of the Archipelago Capital, it is hoped that visionary governance can be formed and bring a fast change to the new Capital City and it is hoped that it can impact economic growth in the surrounding area
The Politics of Asylum: Evaluating Non-Refoulement and Protection Systems for At-Risk Populations Azzahra, Aisha
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): February 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v3i1.721

Abstract

This study explores the complex dynamics surrounding the implementation of non-refoulement and the protection of vulnerable refugee groups. The objective is to synthesize normative and empirical findings to examine systemic challenges and identify strategies for improvement. Using a narrative review approach, the study analyzes multidisciplinary literature across legal, political, and humanitarian domains to uncover patterns in refugee policy and practice. The review finds that despite widespread recognition of non-refoulement as a fundamental principle, implementation gaps persist due to bureaucratic inefficiencies, national security-driven policies, and political rhetoric. Vulnerable groups—such as women, children, and LGBTQ+ individuals—face systemic discrimination and reduced access to justice and social services. Comparative international analysis highlights disparities in protection standards between developed and developing nations, particularly in legal capacity and resource deployment. Solutions proposed in the literature include adopting intersectional approaches, establishing transparent asylum procedures, enhancing institutional coordination, and deploying digital systems to monitor claim evaluations. The study concludes that policy reform must prioritize inclusive frameworks grounded in human rights, with tailored protections for marginalized populations. Further research is needed to assess the impact of these strategies and address implementation constraints. These insights are critical to building responsive and equitable refugee protection systems that uphold international legal standards.
Reassessing Human Rights Protection and R2P in Southeast Asia: A Contextual Analysis of ASEAN’s Non-Intervention Doctrine and Institutional Limitations Fitriyah, Aidatul; Hamdan, Ahmad Harith Irfan bin
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): February 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v3i1.723

Abstract

This study aims to examine the structural gap between ASEAN’s rhetorical commitment to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and its practical implementation in Southeast Asia, particularly in addressing large-scale human rights violations. Using a qualitative research design, the study adopts a systematic and contextually grounded literature review method, integrating normative analysis and empirical case studies to assess how R2P is interpreted, contested, and operationalized within ASEAN’s legal-political frameworks. Data were sourced from peer-reviewed publications, legal documents, and institutional reports, and analyzed using contextual analysis and thematic coding. The findings reveal that despite formal support for R2P as articulated in the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, ASEAN’s operational response to humanitarian crises, such as the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar and the prolonged conflict in Papua, Indonesia, remains limited, symbolic, and diplomatically cautious. The region’s deep-rooted adherence to the principle of non-intervention, along with consensus-based decision-making and institutional inertia, has significantly constrained ASEAN’s ability to fulfill the third pillar of R2P: the international responsibility to act when a state fails to protect its population. This study concludes that effective implementation of R2P in Southeast Asia requires not only normative commitment but also institutional transformation. This includes redefining the principle of non-intervention, strengthening the mandate of ASEAN’s human rights mechanisms such as AICHR, and developing coordinated post-intervention strategies that involve local and regional actors. The significance of this research lies in its contribution to both scholarship and policy. It offers a region-specific, norm localization perspective on R2P, addressing gaps in the existing literature that often overlook Southeast Asia’s unique normative context. At the same time, it provides practical insights for reforming ASEAN’s institutional architecture to enable more responsive, legitimate, and context-sensitive humanitarian action.
Institutional Reform and Social Justice in Child Protection Systems Widaningsih
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): February 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v3i1.725

Abstract

This narrative review investigates the alignment between international child rights frameworks and domestic implementation practices across multiple regions, with a focus on vulnerable populations, including children in armed conflict, refugee contexts, and marginalized communities. Drawing on a systematic synthesis of empirical and theoretical literature, the study utilized databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, JSTOR, and HeinOnline to explore the themes of child justice, education, healthcare access, and protection from violence and exploitation. Results highlight persistent challenges in translating global norms, such as the UNCRC, into actionable national policies due to bureaucratic fragmentation, cultural resistance, and political instability. Comparative insights from conflict and post-conflict countries underscore the critical role of institutional maturity, legal reform, and interagency collaboration in enhancing child protection mechanisms. The discussion further emphasizes the importance of child participation, cross-sectoral policy coherence, and community-based approaches. Legal innovations such as specialized child courts and inclusive education policies are found to be effective when combined with capacity-building and sustained monitoring systems. This review concludes that child rights protection demands a multidisciplinary and culturally sensitive strategy that integrates legal, educational, and social sectors. Future research should address existing gaps by evaluating context-specific interventions and developing scalable models that strengthen national compliance with international norms.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5