cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rudi Waluyo
Contact Email
basement@upr.ac.id
Phone
+6282158426142
Journal Mail Official
basement@upr.ac.id
Editorial Address
Editorial Office Basement Journal Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Palangka Raya, Kampus UPR Tunjung Nyaho Jalan Hendrik Timang, Palangka Raya (73111), Kalimantan Tengah Email : basement@upr.ac.id Website : https://e-journal.upr.ac.id/index.php/basement
Location
Kota palangkaraya,
Kalimantan tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil
Published by Universitas Palangka Raya
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29859247     DOI : 10.36873
Core Subject : Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture
All new theoretical and experimental findings in the fields of Structural Engineering, Water Resources Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering, Construction Engineering & Management and other civil engineering scope.
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Bangunan dan Konstruksi
Articles 73 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
Analisis Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Perkerasan Jalan Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Wahyu Saputra; Yunita Mauliana
Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36873/basement.v4i2.26838

Abstract

Road pavement construction projects involve various potential risks that may affect project success, particularly in terms of cost, quality, and time. Therefore, the implementation of risk management is required to identify and control potential risks that may occur. This study aims to identify potential risks, determine risk levels, and formulate risk control measures. The research was conducted on a road pavement project located on Jalan Teuku Cik Ditiro, Bandar Lampung City. Data collection was carried out through field observations, document studies, and questionnaires distributed to 10 respondents involved in the project. The analysis was performed using three FMEA parameters, namely Severity (S), Occurrence (O), and Detection (D), to obtain the Risk Priority Number (RPN) value. The results showed that 43 potential risks were identified, consisting of 12 low-risk categories, 22 moderate-risk categories, 6 high-risk categories, 2 very high-risk categories, and 1 extreme-risk category. Risk control measures were implemented through engineering controls, administrative controls, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). After implementing risk controls, the risk levels decreased, with 13 potential risks categorized as low risk, 28 potential risks categorized as moderate risk, 1 potential risk categorized as high risk, and 1 potential risk categorized as very high risk.
Evaluasi Kinerja Kapasitas Struktur Eksisting Terhadap Simulasi Penambahan Tingkat Berdasarkan SNI 1726:2019 (Studi Kasus: Gedung Rumah Susun Negara Kementerian Keuangan, Jakarta Barat) Rizci Purna Dewanti; Dedy Rutama; Agastyasa Ghea Amarta
Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36873/basement.v4i2.27216

Abstract

The increasing demand for vertical housing in urban areas has encouraged the optimization of existing buildings to expand residential capacity without additional land development. The State Apartment Building of the Ministry of Finance in West Jakarta was originally designed as a two-tower complex; however, only one 12-story tower was constructed, prompting an evaluation of its feasibility for expansion to 25 stories. This study evaluates the structural capacity of the existing building as a basis for determining the need for redesign or structural strengthening. Structural analysis was performed using ETABS v22.7 and the response spectrum method in accordance with SNI 1726:2019 and SNI 2847:2019. The existing 12-story structure was evaluated through 15, 18, 21, and 24-story simulations while maintaining the original member dimensions. The evaluation covered modal mass participation, natural period, base shear scaling, dual system performance, inter-story drift, torsional irregularity, and member capacity ratios. The results show that the existing structure satisfies all performance requirements under the 12-story condition. However, overstressed members appear in the 15-story model and increase significantly in the 18, 21, and 24-story models due to higher internal forces and seismic response.
The Impact of Infrastructure, Facilities, Utilities, and Overhead Costs on Affordable Housing in Magelang Vivid Lucha Deanggi; Syadza Nabila Yusna; Ety Fitriyani; Listiyani Desy Ratnasari
Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36873/basement.v4i2.27253

Abstract

This study aims to find the impact of infrastructure, facilities, utilities, and overhead costs on affordable housing construction in Magelang. While housing requires adequate infrastructure for livability, these components significantly influence lifecycle and project costs. The objective is to determine the specific percentage impact of these combined costs on the total construction costs of housing units. Secondary data was collected via field observations and interviews at the Asri Permai and Sun Garden 3 complexes. Data were analyzed using a descriptive quantitative cost analysis approach and historical costs were subsequently adjusted for 2025 inflation. Results indicate that these combined costs account for 20.84% and 39.4% of total costs for the respective complexes, averaging 30.12%. The study concludes that infrastructure, facilities, utilities, and overhead constitute 22%-39% of total production costs, with utilities representing the smallest component (2%-4%) and the basic unit cost being the largest (61%-78%).

Page 8 of 8 | Total Record : 73

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Basement : Jurnal Teknik Sipil