cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ide Madya Muzaki
Contact Email
jurnalbawaslujabar@gmail.com
Phone
+6281320352333
Journal Mail Official
hukumdatin.jabar@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Turangga No.25, Lkr. Sel., Kec. Lengkong, Bandung, Provinsi Jawa Barat
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu
Published by Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Barat
ISSN : 27467880     EISSN : 28090926     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55108/jkp.v2i2.134
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other
Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu adalah Jurnal yang dihasilkan dari rumusan isue update pengawasan dan penegakan hukum elektoral. Dalam membangun keselarasan dinamika politik, hukum yang berkembang dalam proses penyelenggaraan Pemilu dan Pilkada. Hal tersebut dimaksudkan agar nilai-nilai demokrasi dan keadilan elektoral benar-benar bersifat mendasar dapat difahami dan diaplikasikan dalam pelaksanaan tugas dan fungsi Pengawas Pemilu.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 104 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
Model Demokrasi Pluralisme-Agonistik dalam Pemikiran Chantal Mouffe sebagai Alternatif Pembangunan Demokrasi di Indonesia Fajrin Sidek; Zaky Badruzzaman
Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55108/jkp.v6i2.612

Abstract

This article discusses the model of agonistic pluralism democracy in the thought of Chantal Mouffe as an alternative for democratic development in Indonesia. The background of this study is based on the problems of democracy in Indonesia, which often experience setbacks, both during the New Order era and in contemporary democratic practices that tend to eliminate conflict through pseudo-consensus and accommodative politics. This condition reflects a contradiction between the normative principles of democracy equality and freedom and political practices that tend to be hegemonic and anti-pluralistic. This research employs a library research method by examining the main works of Chantal Mouffe and comparing them with the ideas of John Rawls on liberal democracy through the concept of overlapping consensus and Jürgen Habermas on deliberative democracy through communicative action and discourse theory. The findings show that both liberal democracy (Rawls) and deliberative democracy (Habermas) emphasize the importance of rational consensus in political life, but tend to ignore the inherent dimension of conflict in plural societies. Mouffe criticizes these approaches for attempting to eliminate political antagonism and replace it with an exclusive form of consensus. As an alternative, Mouffe proposes the model of agonistic pluralism democracy, which recognizes conflict as a constitutive element of democracy and transforms antagonism into agonism, namely a relationship between adversaries rather than enemies. In the context of Indonesia, this agonistic approach is relevant for encouraging a more substantive democracy by opening space for differences, strengthening opposition, and avoiding the domination of power that suppresses criticism. Therefore, democracy should not merely be understood as an electoral procedure, but as a dynamic arena that manages conflict constructively within the framework of equality and freedom.
PUTUSAN MK TENTANG PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD: DARI KONSTITUSIONALITAS KE INSKONSTITUSIONALITAS Lili Romli; Efriza Efriza
Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55108/jkp.v6i2.613

Abstract

This study analyzes the issue of the presidential threshold (PT) the minimum supportrequirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs in general elections. Setat either 20 percent of total House of Representatives (DPR) seats or 25 percent of thenational valid vote share from the legislative election, the presidential threshold is oftenlinked to efforts to manage the number of candidate pairs, encourage early party coalitionformation, and strengthen the stability of the presidential government. Constitutionally,however, the PT provision was established as a requirement for serving as President andVice President, rather than as a prerequisite for *nominating* candidates, as stipulated in theElection Law. This research employs a case study approach regarding the presidentialthreshold. The methodology relies on library research, with primary data sourced fromvarious Constitutional Court (MK) rulings on judicial reviews of the PT retrieved from theofcial website (mkri.id) covering the period from 2017 to 2025.
Tantangan Demokrasi di Indonesia: Pemilu dan Pilkada Abdul Rahman
Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55108/jkp.v6i2.614

Abstract

Indonesia faces a complex political challenge. Regulations are established and enforced, but violations still occur in the general election and regional elections. Presidential and vice-presidential candidates, as well as regional head candidates at provincial, district, and municipal levels, strive to secure their seats. It is only natural that regulations, as a legal basis, be adhered to in order to uphold democracy. The General Elections Commission (KPU) and the Elections Supervisory Agency (BAWASLU) have established the correct rules of the game. These rules should serve as guidelines for healthy political competition. Dynastic politics and money politics, as problems that frequently arise in political practice, must be eliminated. Upholding democracy in political competition is a challenge in itself because many sharp obstacles still hinder the progress of democracy in Indonesia. It is best for policies to have a positive impact on society. It is beneficial to include public involvement in decision-making so that it is accepted by all parties. This pattern facilitates the work of the KPU and BAWASLU in the general election and regional elections.
INDONESIA EMAS 2045 DAN TANTANGAN MEMBANGUN HUKUM PEMILU YANG PROGRESIF Rendi Kurniawan; Hanifa Ramadhani Safitri; Bagas Suryandaru; M Khoirul Hadi Al-Asy ari
Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55108/jkp.v6i2.615

Abstract

This article wants to discuss an in-depth study related to the issue of Golden Indonesia 2045 and the Challenges of Building Progressive Election Laws. The idea for this article emerged when looking at the past few months before the Presidential and Vice Presidential elections which were inuenced by several decisions which were signaled as exceeding the main duties and functions and the inuence of existing power in Indonesia. There are three important things that will be discussed in this study. Firstly, is the inuence of the what Constitutional Court's decision on the progress of election law in Indonesia? and secondly, what is the concept of the Electoral Justice System in Election Law as a form of strengthening democracy towards a golden Indonesia 2045? and the third is what is the basis of the Electoral Justice System concept in election law? using a qualitative research method that is linked to normative reasoning using a conceptual approach and historical approach inlegal this research to read three things, namely the rst is the inuence of the Constitutional Court's decision on the progress of election law in Indonesia and the second is the concept of the Electoral Justice System in election law as a form of strengthening democracy towards a golden Indonesia 2045 and the third is the foundation of the Electoral Justice System concept in election law and this is also the aim of this research.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 104

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2020 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu More Issue