cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dedi Junaedi
Contact Email
dedijunaedi@gmail.com
Phone
+628118114379
Journal Mail Official
thevisajournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Lembaga Publikasi Ilmiah (LPI) Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor Jl Raya Pemda Pajeleran Sukahati No 41 Cibinong, Bogor 16913 Telp 021-8757150 HP 08118114379 Email: visa@journal-laaroiba.com
Location
Kab. bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas
Published by Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor
ISSN : 28092643     EISSN : 28092058     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47467/visa
Core Subject : Economy, Health, Education, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health Social Sciences
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas is a scientific journal for the academic community of universities and research institutions with a scope covering the results of research, studies, thoughts and ideas related to vision and solutions to various problems in the economic, social, educational, communication, and science fields. knowledge and environment. Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA) is a peer-reviewed national journal published by the Laa Roiba Bogor National Islamic Institute (IAI-N) in collaboration with the Sharia Economic Society (MES) and the Intellectual Association for Islamic Studies (IAFORIS). ). It will be published three times every April, August and December. Starting from Volume 1 Number 1 to Volume 4 Number 1 of 2024 published on the website with the URL https://journal.laaroiba.ac.id/index.php/visa. Starting from Volume 4 Number 1 2024 onwards it will be published with the URL https://journal-laaroiba.com/ojs/index.php/visa
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 477 Documents
 44   45   46   47   48 
Kelemahan Pertanggungjawaban Negara dalam Kasus Gangguan Pusat Data Nasional Tahun 2024 di Indonesia Haidar Reynard Akbar; Adhining Prabawati Rahmahani
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The 2024 National Data Center (Pusat Data Nasional/PDN) disruption caused significant interruptions to digital public services and raised concerns regarding the protection of personal data in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing state responsibility in personal data protection and electronic systems, as well as to examine the weaknesses of state responsibility in the 2024 National Data Center disruption case. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The study relies on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that Indonesia has established an adequate legal framework for personal data protection and electronic system governance. However, weaknesses remain in cybersecurity implementation, information security governance, risk mitigation, and accountability mechanisms. From an ethical hacker perspective, strengthening national cybersecurity requires the implementation of security by design, defense in depth, and continuous security testing.
Kewenangan Hukum OJK Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Debitur Kredivo Dalam Konsep Hifz Al-Irdh Laras Scintha Nabilah; Nurbaiti Nurbaiti
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Financial Services Authority (OJK) has full authority to address issues of personal data misuse on the online lending platform Kredivo. The OJK can regulate, supervise, inspect, protect consumers, and impose penalties on technology-based financial service providers (fintech) that violate personal data regulations. This is how the OJK protects registered and supervised online loan consumers—both by preventing problems and by taking action against violations. However, these protection efforts still face many obstacles. Among them are the public’s limited digital literacy, the rising prevalence of illegal online loans, the OJK’s limited supervisory staff, and loopholes in the regulations. This study also examines the significant impact of Kredivo, as a digital platform, on how it manages personal data. Because Kredivo collects and processes such a vast amount of data, there is a significant potential for that data to be misused, which could harm an individual’s dignity and rights. From an Islamic legal perspective, the management of personal data by digital platforms must be based on the principles of hifz al-‘irdh (preserving dignity) and hifz al-ma’ (preserving wealth). Therefore, protecting personal data is not only a legal obligation established by the government but also a moral responsibility that must be fulfilled in accordance with the primary objectives of Sharia.
Ketimpangan Kekuatan Hukum dalam Perjanjian Jaringan Gas Rumah Pertagas Niaga: Tinjauan Hukum Perdata Perspektif Rechtsstaat dan Machtsstaat Analisa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 511 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021 Mohammad Farhan Dwynta; I Gede Hartadi Kurniawan
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the imbalance of bargaining power in household gas network (Jargas) agreements administered by Pertagas Niaga from a civil law perspective. The research focuses on the legal relationship between consumers and business actors in standard form contracts, which often place consumers in a weaker bargaining position. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the conformity of such agreements with the principles of justice and legal protection in civil law. The findings reveal that the use of standard agreements creates an unequal contractual relationship that may undermine the principle of fairness and potentially disadvantage consumers. From the perspective of rechtsstaat, contractual arrangements should guarantee justice, legal certainty, and the protection of individual rights. In contrast, the characteristics of machtsstaat may be reflected in the dominance of business actors who possess greater authority in determining contractual terms. The study concludes that stronger regulatory oversight and enhanced consumer protection mechanisms are necessary to promote a more balanced contractual relationship and ensure the realization of justice in household gas network agreements.
Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka Tanpa Didukung Alat Bukti yang Cukup: Analisis terhadap Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 2/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Jkt.Sel dalam Perspektif Rechtsstaat VS Machtsstaat Rafael Benaya Zachary; Idris Wasahua
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The designation of a suspect is a legal action that has significant implications for an individual's fundamental rights and therefore must be carried out in accordance with criminal procedural law and supported by sufficient preliminary evidence. However, in practice, suspects are sometimes designated without fulfilling the minimum evidentiary standard, as reflected in Pretrial Decision Number 2/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Jkt.Sel. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning behind the court's declaration that the suspect designation was unlawful and to examine the proper procedure for designating a suspect under Indonesian positive law from the perspectives of rechtsstaat and machtsstaat. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, analyzed descriptively through primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that the suspect designation was declared legally defective because it was not supported by at least two valid pieces of evidence at the time the designation was made, thereby violating the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, the principles of legality, legal certainty, and due process of law. Furthermore, to ensure the validity of a suspect designation, investigators must strictly comply with all procedural requirements, including preliminary inquiry, issuance of an investigation warrant, collection of at least two lawful pieces of evidence, case exposition, submission of the Notice of Commencement of Investigation, and protection of the suspect's legal rights. Therefore, the legitimacy of suspect designation must be grounded in strict adherence to legal procedures as an embodiment of the rechtsstaat principle and to prevent machtsstaat practices in criminal law enforcement.
Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka oleh Penyidik Kepolisian: Analisis Yuridis Normatif terhadap Putusan Prapradilan No. 13/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Kdi Idris Wasahua; Rafii Navalino
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

An important part of any criminal inquiry is the official designation of a suspect, which must adhere to the KUHAP, the concept of due process, and be backed by legally acceptable evidence in accordance with Indonesian law. As a result of Constitutional Court Decision No 21/PUU-XII/2014, judges may now check the legitimacy of investigation activities by reviewing the suspect designation before trial. The purpose of this research is to look at the right way to designate suspects under Indonesian positive law and to investigate the judges' legal reasoning in Pretrial Decision No 13/Pid.Pra/2021/PN Kdi, which found that the police investigators' suspect identification was flawed. Statutory, case law, and conceptual techniques are used in this study as part of a normative legal research process. A qualitative analysis was conducted using library research on the legal resources, which include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Because the suspect designation did not completely satisfy the formal and substantive conditions outlined in KUHAP also Constitutional Court Decision No 21/PUU-XII/2014, the court found it legally invalid, according to the findings. In addition, the study confirms that to properly designate a suspect, one must first conduct an investigation, formal inquiry, gather at least two pieces of valid evidence, question witnesses, present the case (gelar perkara), and then issue a letter designating the suspect in compliance with relevant legal provisions. By following these protocols, Indonesia's criminal justice system demonstrates its commitment to human rights protection, legal clarity, and the rule of law. So, for law enforcement to be fair and to avoid abuse of power, it is crucial that suspects be designated in accordance with legal processes.
Ketimpangan Penegakan Hukum dalam Proses Penetapan Tersangka oleh Aparat Kepolisian dalam Kasus Pegi Setiawan Idris Wasahua; Enry Jenniefer Virgie Dien
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the inequality in law enforcement in the process of determining suspects by the police through the examination of Pretrial Decision Number 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg. The background of this study is rooted in the importance of the rule of law and the principle of fair legal process in the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in the determination of suspects, which must be carried out based on valid and fair legal procedures. The research problem focuses on the judge's legal considerations in declaring the determination of a suspect null and void, as well as how the procedure for determining suspects by police investigators must be carried out in accordance with the principle of fair legal process. This study uses normative legal research with a statutory, case, and conceptual legal approach. The existing findings describe that in Pretrial Decision Number 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg, the judge declared the determination of a suspect invalid because the investigator failed to examine the potential suspect before determining the suspect status and failed to present at least two valid pieces of evidence as outlined in Article 184 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. In conclusion, the determination of suspects must be carried out professionally, objectively, transparently, and accountably by upholding the principles of fair legal process, the presumption of innocence, and the protection of human rights to ensure legal certainty and justice in the criminal justice system.
Gejala Machtstaat dalam Regulasi Proyek Strategis Nasional Studi Kritis Ketiadaan Undang-Undang Khusus Makan Bergizi Gratis Louise Monichole Yolanda; Ahluddin Saiful Ahmad
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meals Program (Makan Bergizi Gratis/MBG) is a national strategic policy related to the fulfillment of citizens' rights to health and welfare. The program is regulated by Presidential Regulation Number 115 of 2025, but has not yet been supported by a specific statute. This study examines the limitations of sanctions under Presidential Regulation Number 115 of 2025 and the implications of the absence of a specific statute for the legal certainty and sustainability of the MBG Program from the perspectives of Rechtsstaat and Machtstaat. This normative legal study applies statutory and conceptual approaches. The results show that Presidential Regulation Number 115 of 2025 regulates supervision and risk management but does not provide comprehensive mechanisms for accountability and sanctions concerning risks that may threaten beneficiaries' health. The absence of a specific statute also makes the legal framework of MBG heavily dependent on executive regulations. This condition may indicate a tendency toward Machtstaat when executive authority is not adequately balanced by legislative oversight and checks and balances.

Page 48 of 48 | Total Record : 477

 44   45   46   47   48 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas (In Press) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas