cover
Contact Name
Firmansyah
Contact Email
panipahanf@gmail.com
Phone
+6281233282834
Journal Mail Official
jitp@uinsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
A. Yani Street
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy
ISSN : 28295625     EISSN : 28295323     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15642/jitp
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy is a peer-reviewed journal by the Master of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy Study Program at UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. This journal provides scientific publications for research related to the themes of Islamic thought and philosophy. Taking a broad view of the subject, the journal brings together all the disciplinary perspectives of Islamic scholarship and philosophy. Publishes peer-reviewed articles on historical, cultural, social, philosophical, social media, anthropological, literary, artistic and other aspects of Islamic theology, Islamic Philosophy, Islamic Theology, Islamic Thought. By promoting an understanding of diverse Islamic Theology, Islamic Philosophy, and Islamic Thought in thought, practice and in its cultural and social context, the journal aims to become one of the world’s leading platforms for new discoveries. and discussions from the fields of Islamic Thought, Islamic theology and Philosophy.
Articles 15 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December" : 15 Documents clear
Paradigma Tafsir Egalitarianisme Zaitunah Subhan dalam Tafsir Kebencian Khotimah, Husnul
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jitp.2023.2.2.185-207

Abstract

This article talks about Zaitunah Subhan's paradigm, which tries to interpret the verses on the equality of men and women with an egalitarian paradigm. The interpretation of the relationship between men and women, in general, is still dominated by the classical interpretation, which interprets women as originating from the rib of the Prophet Adam. This interpretation has implications for the marginalization of women as second-class creatures. The research results show that Zaitunah Subhan's paradigm in interpreting verses tends to follow the interpretation pattern of contemporary commentators such as Muhammad Abduh and Rasyid Ridha. In the context of Indonesian commentators, Zaitunah Subhan appears in line with the interpretations of Hamka, Quraish Shihab and Mahmud Yunus. These contemporary commentators do not agree with the meaning which states that women were created from the ribs of the Prophet Adam, but were created from one self (nafs wahidah). This meaning of Zaitunah Subhan has implications for opening up space for women to be able to live as equals as men. Men and women are essentially equal, except for devotion to God and the natural biological aspects that exist in women, that is the difference between men and women, more than that it is nothing but social ties that are deliberately created by patriarchy to marginalize women.
Criticism of Jacques Derrida's Deconstruction Application to Al-Qur'an Verses Fajriyaturrohmah, Fajriyaturrohmah; Labib, Muhammad Alfreda Daib Insan
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jitp.2023.2.2.208-218

Abstract

Derrida's deconstruction is one of the contemporary ideas in the world of philosophy of language. This concept seeks to completely overhaul the meaning of a text so that the reader is not trapped in a meaning that has been constructed for a long time. Studies related to Deconstruction are interesting to be studied from various aspects. In this article, the method used is descriptive analysis and the type of research is literature research. While the problems studied are the definition, background, urgency, and working concept of Deconstruction. In addition, the core of this paper discusses criticism of the application of Deconstruction to the Qur'anic verse contained in one of the articles in the Journal. The results of the study show that Derrida's Deconstruction is a new breakthrough in the world of linguistic philosophy that frees the reader to interpret what is in his mind from the results of reading the text. Other results show that the Deconstruction of Derrida is not suitable for use in the application of Qur'anic verses.
Makna Hari Akhir dalam QS. al-Haqqah Perspektif Semiotika Analitis Charles Sanders Pierce Zahrotun, Zahrotun
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jitp.2023.2.2.219-238

Abstract

This writing aims to examine the meaning of the Day of Judgment in Surah Al-Haqqah and analyze the vocabulary within it through the semiotics of Charles Sanders Pierce. Pierce's semiotics divides signs based on their relationship between the representamen and the object into three categories: icon, index, and symbol. Surah Al-Haqqah depicts a horrifying and tense atmosphere for those who are disobedient in this world. The depiction of human deeds, both good and bad, is evident. No creature can hide from Him. This research adopts a qualitative approach. The results of the analysis in this study are as follows: out of the fifty-two verses in Surah Al-Haqqah, there are six quoted icons related to the Day of Judgment. Secondly, there are ten scattered indexical quotes within Surah Al-Haqqah. Thirdly, out of the fifty-two verses in Surah Al-Haqqah, the most frequently found signs in the form of symbols, amounting to seventeen verses.
Analisis Intertekstual Kristeva; antara Metode Ilmiah Rudolf Carnap dan Pemahaman Hadis Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail Almuttaqin, Muhammad; Irwansya, Irwansya
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jitp.2023.2.2.239-258

Abstract

This study explores the differences in approach between the scientific method and critical discussion of hadith in the thought of Rudolf Carnap and Muhammad Shuhudi Ismail. Carnap emphasized empirical verification, while Shuhudi Ismail highlighted the historical and cultural context in the understanding of hadith. The research aims to analyze the implications and integration of these two approaches in hadith analysis, as well as identify their potential integration in the perspective of Julia Kristeva. This study uses text analysis to compare Carnap and Syuhudi Ismail's perspectives on the scientific method and critical discussion of hadith. The integration of this approach is analyzed through Kristeva's intertextual approach. The results showed a difference between Carnap's approach that focused on empirical verification and rigorous logic and Syuhudi Ismail's contextual approach that emphasized understanding hadith in historical and cultural contexts. The integration of these two perspectives through Kristeva's intertextual analysis allows for a deeper and scientifically strong understanding of understanding in hadith studies.
Gelar Habib dan Konflik Nasab: Menimbang Kembali Ukuran Kemuliaan Menurut Al-Qur’an Masyhadi, Ahmad Aziz; Tasmuji, Tasmuji
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jitp.2023.2.2.259-268

Abstract

Artikel ini mengakaji polemik mengenai nasab (garis keturunan) habib yang belakangan meluas dan memicu polarisasi di tengah masyarakat Muslim. Penelitian ini bertujuan mencari jalan tengah agar perdebatan tentang keturunan tidak berkembang menjadi permusuhan, serta merumuskan kembali posisi nasab dalam kehidupan keberagamaan dengan merujuk pada prinsip-prinsip Al-Qur’an. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis tematik ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an mengenai akhlak, ukhuwah, dan konsep kemuliaan manusia, khususnya penegasan bahwa ketakwaan merupakan satu-satunya ukuran mulia di sisi Allah. Pendekatan ini memungkinkan penilaian kritis terhadap praktik kebanggaan genealogis yang sering menimbulkan konflik sosial. Kebaruan kajian terletak pada penawaran kerangka rekonsiliatif yang menggeser fokus dari klaim status keturunan menuju pembentukan ketakwaan sebagai kesadaran moral transendental. Dengan demikian, kajian ini menghadirkan perspektif Qur’ani yang lebih inklusif dan berorientasi pada persatuan umat.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 15