cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Yayan Sudrajat
Contact Email
kang.iyan76@gmail.com
Phone
+628122772475
Journal Mail Official
jidiejournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Pitara Raya No. 83/1D Pancoran Mas , Depok, Jawa Barat 16436
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Instructional Development, Innovation, and Evaluation (JIDIE)
Published by PT. Lancar Media Komunikasi
ISSN : 29647428     EISSN : 29647428     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other
Journal of Instructional Development, Innovation, and Evaluation is a scientific communication medium for lecturers, teachers, widyaiswara, mentors, students, and other education practitioners as well as educational observers. This journal is intended as a forum for disseminating the results of studies, thoughts, research, and evaluations relevant to the area of ​​education, namely design, development, management, utilization, evaluation and research in the fields of education, learning and evaluation. Articles received and processed by the editor are articles substantially related to the area of ​​education Publish : March-June-September-December
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Reguler Issue (2022)" : 5 Documents clear
User satisfaction analysis of graduates in the Pedagogic competence of alumni Indonesian language education development Indraprasta PGRI University Adi permana; Bambang Sumadyo; Eko Yulianto
Journal of Instructional Development, Innovation, and Evaluation Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Reguler Issue (2022)
Publisher : PT. Lancar Media Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the satisfaction of graduate users with the pedagogic competence of the alumni of the Indonesian Language Education study program, Indraprasta University, PGRI. This research is a quantitative survey research with a correlation approach. Respondents in this study were stake holders (graduate users) who were alumni of Indonesian language education study programs in Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang and Bekasi (Jabodetabek). Data obtained by giving questionnaires to graduate users about alumni job satisfaction and pedagogical competence. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that there is a significant effect of graduate user satisfaction on the pedagogic competence of graduates. This is evidenced by the value of Sig = 0.000 <0.05 and t count = 4.561. The magnitude of the correlation number is 0.484 with a determination of 0.234. This means that the magnitude of the relationship between X and Y variables is 0.484 in the medium category. The magnitude of the influence of X on Y is 23.4% where the variable user satisfaction of the graduates affects the pedagogical competence variable of graduates by 23.4% while the rest is influenced by other variables. Keywords: graduate user satisfaction, pedagogical competence, analysis
Test standard, test artificial teacher, and condition test Atikah Sri Wahyuni; Arinah Sabilulhaq; Syafina Nur isnaini; Ferlinda Nur Milayniawati; Yayan Sudrajat
Journal of Instructional Development, Innovation, and Evaluation Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Reguler Issue (2022)
Publisher : PT. Lancar Media Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article aims to determine the differences between standardized tests, artificial teacher tests, and condition tests. Standardized tests are usually carried out by schools when schools carry out tests simultaneously at the sub-district level and at the national level. Meanwhile, teacher-made tests are carried out when teachers want to know the competencies possessed by students after learning. Keywords: standardized test, teacher-made test, and condition test
The evaluation of face-to-face learning is limited to the Indonesian language learning outcomes of class VII MTS Nur Al Zahrah Depok Muhammad Syauqi Ghozi; Irham Ramdani; Yayan Sudrajat
Journal of Instructional Development, Innovation, and Evaluation Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Reguler Issue (2022)
Publisher : PT. Lancar Media Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the results of the evaluation of seventh grade students of MTs Nur Al Zahrah in learning Indonesian using CIPP. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the evaluation of the context of students' Indonesian learning outcomes in face-to-face learning is limited to the good category and is considered to have fulfilled all the stipulated provisions and regulations. Regarding the input in this study, it is included in the fairly good category, because the use of teacher learning resources only relies on books. The process in this research, learning Indonesian is going well. In product evaluation, student learning outcomes were reviewed based on report cards with an average of 82.6 in the cognitive domain, 81.3 in the psychomotor domain and in the affective domain as a whole quite good. Based on the results of the study, the authors conclude that it can be concluded that the limited face-to-face learning program at MTs Nur Al Zahrah during this pandemic is appropriate to continue with the procedures and rules that have been set because the learning outcomes of Indonesian class VII students are still in the good category. Keywords: Evaluation, Learning Outcomes, Limited Face-to-face Learning
Ranking Techniques in Indonesian Language Instructional Sinta Bella; Ike Nur Sapitri; Lia Nuraeni; Rika Amelia; Yayan Sudrajat
Journal of Instructional Development, Innovation, and Evaluation Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Reguler Issue (2022)
Publisher : PT. Lancar Media Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The results of the assessment of a lesson will provide motivation for students to perform better, known as rankings or rankings. The higher the ranking, the better the learning achievement, the lower the ranking, the worse the learning achievement. This applies from elementary school, junior high school to high school. Each student will compete with each other to be the highest rank in his school. The purpose of writing this article is to find out the ranking of students, the purpose of ranking in the learning aspect, the use of ranking, and ranking techniques. Keywords: Student Rankings, Ranking Purposes, Ranking Uses, and Ranking Techniques
Item Analysis Sasmita Sasmita; Pungky Dyantieni; Yulia Dini Astuti; Yayan Sudrajat
Journal of Instructional Development, Innovation, and Evaluation Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Reguler Issue (2022)
Publisher : PT. Lancar Media Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to describe the items, explain the purpose of making item analysis,find out the level of difficulty of the items, know the techniques for compiling item analysis, and knowthe advantages and disadvantages of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The task of a teacher besides teaching and guiding, is to assess the learning outcomes of their students. Assessing activities in the learning process is also known as learning evaluation. Evaluation is needed to see the level of success in the implementation of learning which will be used as the basis for making the final decision. Keywords: Item analysis, item difficulty level, technique of compiling item analysis, advantages anddisadvantages of qualitative and quantitative techniques.  

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 01 (2023): Reguler Issue Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Reguler Issue Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Reguler Issue (2022) Vol. 1 No. 01 (2022): Reguler ISSUE | 2022