cover
Contact Name
Reza Muamar Zaki
Contact Email
info@polteksci.ac.id
Phone
+6287743788687
Journal Mail Official
support@jolastic.id
Editorial Address
Desa Penambangan, Sedong, Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Social Politics
ISSN : 29886740     EISSN : 29886740     DOI : 10.59261
The Journal Of Law and Social Politic provides a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal that can be examined empirically. The Journal Of Law and Social Politic will publish scientific articles in the fields of education, including education, economics, history education, geography education, Pancasila and citizenship education and other fields of social science education that have not been listed. Published articles are articles from critical and comprehensive research, scientific studies or studies on important and current issues, or reviews of scientific books.
Articles 128 Documents
Structural Realism and Institutional Barriers in the UN Security Council's Failure: Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Agussalim Agussalim; Ariesani Hermawanto; Sucahyo Heriningsih
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.90

Abstract

Background: … Objective: This study examines the failure of the United Nations Security Council (UN) in intervening in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict using a structural realism approach and an analysis of institutional barriers. The focus of the research lies in the role of the geopolitical interests of permanent members of the Security Council who use veto power to block peace resolutions, as well as the weak UN institutional mechanisms in international law enforcement. Methods: A qualitative method with a single case study was used to analyse official documents, Security Council resolutions, and related literature. Results: The study results show that the dominance of national interests and undemocratic institutional structures are the main factors for the failure of interventions. These findings provide important recommendations for UN institutional reform to improve the effectiveness of international peace governance. Conclusion: …
Reconstruction of Human Rights Protection in the Criminal Justice Process Based on the Modern Criminal Law Paradigm in Indonesia Marsudin Nainggolan
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.98

Abstract

Background: Human Rights (HAM) protection in the criminal justice system is a primary indicator of the legitimacy of a modern rule-of-law state. Indonesia has normatively adopted the principle of due process of law through the 1945 Constitution, the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and international human rights instruments such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). However, in practice, various human rights violations are still found, particularly during the investigation and evidentiary stages. Objective: This research aims to reconstruct a model of human rights protection based on the modern criminal law paradigm. Methods: The method used is normative juridical research employing statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Results: The results show that human rights protection in Indonesia remains procedural rather than substantive. Therefore, an integrative model is needed that combines the legal theories of Hart and Dworkin, as well as the restorative justice approach. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that an integrative model combining the exclusionary rule, pretrial reform, and restorative justice grounded in the legal theories of Hart and Dworkin   constitutes the most viable framework for achieving substantive human rights protection in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Parliamentary Opposition and Legislative Proposals: A Study of Institutional Constraints on The Role of The Moroccan Opposition Hicham Nassar
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.74

Abstract

Aligned with more advanced constitutional democracies, the Moroccan Constitution of 2011 expanded the powers of Parliament, particularly the House of Representatives. It also reinforced the rights of the opposition by granting it multiple legal powers and privileges that extend beyond the typical limits of representative democracy based on proportional representation. This framework allows the opposition to hold constitutional powers that position it between the majority and minority groups, granting it a distinct status that enables meaningful participation in parliamentary decision-making. The opposition plays a vital role in the legislative process, as emphasized in the Constitution, notably through the inclusion of its proposed laws on the agendas of both parliamentary chambers. At least one day each month is dedicated to reviewing draft laws, including those submitted by the opposition. A particularly prominent role of the parliamentary opposition in the House of Representatives is its chairmanship of the Justice, Legislation, and Human Rights Committee, alongside its leadership of another permanent committee not specified in the House’s internal regulations. This arrangement is based on the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 10 and the third paragraph of Article 69 of the Constitution. Despite the significance of these provisions, some researchers argue that they do not necessarily ensure the opposition an influential position in the legislative process.
Digitalization of Parliament: Implementation of E-Parliament in the Central Java Provincial DPRD Dafana Khairunnisa; Fitriyah Fitriyah
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.95

Abstract

Background: An increasing trend in digital governance reforms is the influence on democratic processes, including in legislative institutions. Like e-parliament initiatives, that have changed the local legislatures (DPRD) in Indonesia to be more participatory, and more responsive to society. Yet their impact as platforms on substantive representation has not been sufficiently studied. Objective: This research aimed to examine the installation of E-Parliament in Central Java Provincial DPRD to broaden publication participation in it, in addition, as a medium for community representation. Methods: A qualitative case study/data were collected through semi-structured interviews with DPRD members, administrative stakeholders, and the public, as well as surveys and document review. A multi-actor methodology was utilised to obtain views from political actors, administrative actors, and citizens through digital platforms. Results: These results demonstrate that digital platforms add procedural transparency and responsiveness by strengthening the record-keeping and tracking of public hopes and desires. But since cultures tend to prefer local channels where direct interaction is frequent, it reinforces the role of relational legitimacy, although on informal grounds, leading to widespread use of informal channels. Digital inclusion is also shaped by how literacy and access differ. Conclusion: The article argues that while E-Parliament does improve procedural responsiveness, it does not ensure substantive responsiveness. Increasing digital literacy, ameliorating outreach capacities, and interfacing digital platforms with culturally embedded participatory practices are imperative for realizing equitable democratic engagement.
Reconstruction of a Normative Regulatory Model for Juvenile Cybercrime within the Indonesian Criminal Justice System: A Restorative and Procedural Approach Yuni Priskila Ginting; Franciscus Xaverius Wartoyo; Anissa Furqanina
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.96

Abstract

Background: The rapid development of digital technology has generated new forms of cybercrime involving children as perpetrators. In Indonesia, existing legal frameworks, particularly the Criminal Code and Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, have not fully accommodated the dual position of children as offenders and subjects entitled to special protection. Objective: This study aims to reconstruct a regulatory model for cybercrimes committed by children based on restorative justice and the best interests of the child. Methods: This study applies a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. It examines Indonesian regulations, relevant doctrines, international child protection standards, and comparative legal frameworks from the United Kingdom, Australia, and Malaysia. Results: The findings show that Indonesian law remains largely retributive and lacks specific procedural guidelines for digital offenses involving minors. The proposed model emphasizes child-sensitive digital forensic procedures, diversion mechanisms, digital rehabilitation programs, and harmonization between the ITE Law and the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. Conclusion: The proposed framework integrates criminal liability, child protection, restorative justice, and digital literacy. Future research should empirically test this model through field studies involving legal practitioners and juvenile court data.
Doctrinal Reconstruction of Pacta sunt servanda: Contractual Binding Force, Legal Certainty, and Corrective Justice Aris Yulia; Fatma Ayu Jati Putri
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.99

Abstract

Background: … Objective: This study examines the reconstruction of the philosophical foundation of the binding force of contracts from the perspectives of legal certainty and justice. It addresses two central issues: first, how the paradigm of freedom of contract influences the existence of the principle of pacta sunt servanda; and second, what philosophical foundations underpin the validity of this principle within legal systems. Methods: This research employs a normative juridical method, characterized as qualitative and comparative. It is based on library research, utilizing primary and secondary legal materials analyzed qualitatively through normative and comparative legal approaches. Results: The findings reveal that, first, within the paradigm of freedom of contract or autonomy of will, there exists an operational foundation that legitimizes the binding force and enforcement of contracts as a manifestation of respect for the parties’ agreement. Second, in classical contract law theory, the doctrine of the sanctity of contract serves as a fundamental principle arising from freedom of contract and underpins the application of pacta sunt servanda. Meanwhile, in Islamic law, the philosophical foundation of the binding force of contracts is directly rooted in the normative values derived from the Qur’an, emphasizing the obligation to fulfill agreements as both a moral and legal duty. Accordingly, the reconstruction of the philosophical foundation of the binding force of contracts should not solely rely on principles of freedom and legal certainty but must also incorporate the dimension of justice as a corrective to the absolutism of freedom of contract in modern legal practice. Conclusion: …
Poverty, Cultural Practices, and Human Trafficking in Sumba: Unraveling Injustice and the Quest for Legal Protection Christine Susanti; Cokorde Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi; I Wayan Putu Sucana Aryana; Ester Damaris W. Wunga; Agus Budianto
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.101

Abstract

Background: Poverty is a persistent problem that fuels human trafficking, particularly in Sumba. Poverty refers to the condition of lacking essential needs, relying on others socially, and being unable to engage in a life of dignity within society. Objective: This study aims to analyze the relationship among cultural factors, poverty, and low legal awareness in contributing to human trafficking. Methods: This study employs a qualitative approach using ethnographic methods, with primary data collected through observation, interviews, and focus group discussions in Lewa, East Sumba. Secondary data were obtained from academic journals, legislation, and documentation of relevant past cases. Results: The results reveal a strong interconnection among the belis cultural practice, economic pressures, and vulnerability to human trafficking. These interrelated elements expose deep injustice and human rights violations concealed beneath cultural legitimacy, forming a complex web that communities struggle to escape. Conclusion: The study concludes that addressing human trafficking in Sumba requires integrated countermeasures targeting poverty, belis-related economic burdens, and customary exploitation. The state must enforce TPPO regulations, strengthen victim protection mechanisms, and pursue distributive, corrective, and social justice through law reform, access to education, and community economic empowerment.
Integrasi Sanksi Pidana Perpajakan: Analisis Normatif Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Pajak, KUHP, dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 3 Tahun 2025 Liong Tai Fa; Wahyu Prawesthi; Sri Astutik; Siti Marwiyah
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.102

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Penelitian ini menelaah sinkronisasi sanksi administrasi dan pidana perpajakan di Indonesia, dengan fokus pada UU HPP No. 7/2021, KUHP Nasional No. 1/2023, dan Perma No. 3/2025, didukung oleh sistem administrasi pajak berbasis Coretax serta PMK No. 108 & 111 Tahun 2025 mengenai akses informasi keuangan dan pengawasan kepatuhan wajib pajak. Studi ini menyoroti pergeseran paradigma menuju keadilan restoratif dalam praktik yudisial. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) menganalisis sinkronisasi sanksi administrasi dan pidana; (2) menelaah penerapan prinsip ultimum remedium dalam pengadilan; (3) menilai peran Coretax dalam penegakan pajak digital; dan (4) merumuskan rekomendasi normatif untuk kerangka penegakan terpadu dan seimbang. Metode: Penelitian hukum normatif digunakan melalui pendekatan undang-undang, kasus, dan komparatif, menganalisis 13 putusan pengadilan terkait faktur fiktif, manipulasi omzet, dan kejahatan pajak korporasi. Sumber data mencakup primer (perundang-undangan dan putusan pengadilan), sekunder (literatur akademik), dan tersier (kamus hukum), dianalisis dengan silogisme deduktif kualitatif-normatif. Hasil: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Perma No. 3/2025 menjadi instrumen kunci dalam penerapan ultimum remedium, mengutamakan denda dan pelunasan tunggakan pajak dibandingkan penahanan, sesuai prinsip keadilan restoratif. Coretax memperkuat bukti digital, sementara doktrin pertanggungjawaban korporasi menjamin akuntabilitas proporsional. Konsistensi yudisial dalam penerapan sanksi finansial menjaga penerimaan negara dan efek jera. Kesimpulan: Integrasi UU HPP, KUHP Nasional, Perma No. 3/2025, dan Coretax memberikan kepastian hukum yang menyeimbangkan kepentingan fiskal negara dan hak konstitusional wajib pajak, membentuk kerangka modern untuk penegakan hukum pidana perpajakan. 
Analisis Yuridis Penyalahgunaan Dana Sumbangan dan Filantropi: Tinjauan Hukum Pidana dan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia Erviana Indriani; Noenik Soekorini; Fathul Hamdani; Fitri Ayuningtyas
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.104

Abstract

Latar belakang: Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara dengan tingkat partisipasi filantropi yang tinggi, namun fenomena penyalahgunaan dana sumbangan dan hibah masih menjadi permasalahan yang signifikan. Kondisi ini dipengaruhi oleh kelemahan regulasi, rendahnya efektivitas pengawasan, serta belum optimalnya penyesuaian kerangka hukum terhadap perkembangan filantropi berbasis digital. Tujuan: Penelitian ini mengupas berbagai bentuk penyalahgunaan dana sumbangan dan hibah dengan fokus pada keterkaitan hukum administrasi, perdata, dan pidana. Metode: Penelitian ini menerapkan pendekatan hukum normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, kasus-kasus hukum, serta doktrin dan teori hukum yang relevan untuk menganalisis permasalahan korupsi dana sumbangan dalam sektor filantropi. Data penelitian bersumber dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif-analitis dan penalaran deduktif.  Hasil: Laporan ini juga membahas peran PPATK dalam mendeteksi praktik shadow economy dalam sektor filantropi. Pada akhirnya, temuan mengarah pada kebutuhan reformasi regulasi secara menyeluruh, termasuk sinkronisasi dengan KUHP baru (UU No. 1 Tahun 2023) guna memperkuat akuntabilitas yayasan. Kesimpulan: Filantropi di Indonesia memiliki peran penting dalam mendukung kesejahteraan sosial, namun efektivitasnya terancam oleh praktik korupsi yang memanfaatkan kelemahan regulasi dan pengawasan, sebagaimana tercermin dalam kasus penyalahgunaan dana hibah dan penggunaan donasi sebagai kedok suap. Kondisi ini menunjukkan perlunya reformasi hukum melalui pembaruan regulasi filantropi, penguatan akuntabilitas yayasan, sinkronisasi dengan ketentuan pidana terbaru, serta optimalisasi pengawasan dan intelijen keuangan.  Kesimpulan: Filantropi di Indonesia memiliki peran penting dalam mendukung kesejahteraan sosial, namun efektivitasnya terancam oleh praktik korupsi yang memanfaatkan kelemahan regulasi dan pengawasan, sebagaimana tercermin dalam kasus penyalahgunaan dana hibah dan penggunaan donasi sebagai kedok suap. Kondisi ini menunjukkan perlunya reformasi hukum melalui pembaruan regulasi filantropi, penguatan akuntabilitas yayasan, sinkronisasi dengan ketentuan pidana terbaru, serta optimalisasi pengawasan dan intelijen keuangan.
Human Rights and Constitutional Supremacy in Indonesia: Normative Guarantees and Policy Disharmony in Natural Resource Management, Freedom of Expression, and Public Participation Moh. Sigit Gunawan; Siska Karina
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.106

Abstract

Background: The research is grounded in the post-amendment strengthening of human rights guarantees following the amendments to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1999–2002), which marked a paradigmatic shift from governmental supremacy toward constitutional supremacy. Objective: This study aims to analyze the constitutional status of human rights within the framework of Indonesian constitutional law and to examine the disharmony between constitutional supremacy and the practice of public policymaking. Methods: The research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches to constitutional provisions, legal doctrines, and constitutional court decisions. Results: The findings indicate that, at the normative level, human rights have attained a reinforced position as constitutional rights binding upon all branches of state power. Nevertheless, in the realm of public policy implementation, tensions persist between administrative legality and constitutional legitimacy, particularly in matters concerning development policies, freedom of expression, and public participation. Conclusion: The study concludes that the effective protection of human rights is contingent upon the integration of constitutional supremacy in its normative, institutional, and ethical dimensions, thereby ensuring that the Constitution operates as an instrument of substantive justice within a democratic rule-of-law state.

Page 11 of 13 | Total Record : 128