cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Reza Muamar Zaki
Contact Email
info@polteksci.ac.id
Phone
+6287743788687
Journal Mail Official
support@jolastic.id
Editorial Address
Desa Penambangan, Sedong, Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Social Politics
Published by Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional
ISSN : 29886740     EISSN : 29886740     DOI : 10.59261
Core Subject : Humanities, Science, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences
The Journal Of Law and Social Politic provides a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal that can be examined empirically. The Journal Of Law and Social Politic will publish scientific articles in the fields of education, including education, economics, history education, geography education, Pancasila and citizenship education and other fields of social science education that have not been listed. Published articles are articles from critical and comprehensive research, scientific studies or studies on important and current issues, or reviews of scientific books.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (semua kategori) - Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 98 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Evaluasi Penerimaan Konsumen Kue Mentega dengan Substitusi Tepung Millet Mutiara (Pennisetum glaucum) Hakimah, Dalilah; Mahdiyah, Mahdiyah; Dahlia, Mutiara
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v2i1.44

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Pemanfaatan bahan pangan lokal sebagai pengganti tepung terigu semakin penting untuk mendukung diversifikasi pangan dan pengembangan produk pangan fungsional. Tepung millet mutiara (Pennisetum glaucum) memiliki potensi sebagai bahan alternatif dalam produk roti; namun, dampaknya terhadap penerimaan konsumen, terutama dalam kue mentega, belum dieksplorasi secara luas. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh substitusi tepung millet mutiara dalam kue mentega terhadap penerimaan konsumen berdasarkan atribut kualitas sensorik dan fisik. Metode: Studi eksperimental dilakukan di Laboratorium Pastry dan Bakery, Program Studi Pendidikan Kuliner, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, pada September 2021 hingga Februari 2024. Sampel kue mentega diformulasikan dengan tingkat substitusi tepung millet mutiara sebesar 20%, 30%, dan 40%. Evaluasi sensorik dilakukan oleh 30 panelis semi terlatih menggunakan tes organoleptik. Data dianalisis menggunakan tes Friedman untuk atribut sensorik dan ANOVA untuk kualitas fisik. Hasil: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa substitusi tepung millet mutiara tidak memiliki efek yang signifikan pada volume kue, warna remah, kelembutan, struktur pori-pori, aroma mentega, aroma millet mutiara, atau rasa manis. Perbedaan yang signifikan diamati hanya pada warna permukaan atas dan rasa millet mutiara. Analisis kualitas fisik menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam kemampuan pembengkakan kue di antara tingkat substitusi. Kesimpulan: Kue mentega dengan substitusi tepung millet mutiara hingga 40% dapat diterima oleh konsumen, dengan tingkat substitusi 30% direkomendasikan sebagai formulasi optimal. Tepung millet mutiara menunjukkan potensi yang kuat sebagai bahan lokal fungsional dalam kue mentega tanpa mengurangi penerimaan konsumen.
Tax Factors, Audit Quality, and Multinationality in Transfer Pricing Practices of Multinational Firms Ambarita, Dinar; Gibtiyyah, Riska Mariyatul; Ibrohim, Ibrohim
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v2i2.48

Abstract

Background: Transfer pricing practices are widely used by multinational companies as a mechanism for tax management and profit allocation among related entities. Several factors, including tax burden, audit quality, and multinationality, are believed to influence transfer pricing decisions; however, empirical findings remain inconclusive, particularly in the context of multinational firms in Indonesia. Objective: This study aims to examine the effect of tax, audit quality, and multinationality on transfer pricing practices in multinational companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Methods: This study employs a quantitative approach using panel data regression analysis. The sample consists of 19 multinational companies listed on the IDX during the 2018–2022 period, selected through purposive sampling. Secondary data were obtained from published corporate financial statements. Data analysis was conducted using EViews 10 Student Version Lite, and the most appropriate estimation model was determined prior to hypothesis testing. Results: The results indicate that the Fixed Effect Model (FEM) is the best model for this study. Partially, tax and audit quality have a significant effect on transfer pricing practices, while multinationality does not show a significant partial effect. Simultaneously, tax, audit quality, and multinationality jointly have a significant effect on transfer pricing. Conclusion: This study concludes that tax and audit quality are important determinants of transfer pricing practices among multinational companies in Indonesia. Although multinationality does not individually affect transfer pricing, the combined influence of all variables highlights the need for comprehensive monitoring of transfer pricing practices by companies and regulators.
The Concept of Rehabilitation Law for Military Personnel Who Commit Narcotics Crimes in the Perspective of Legal Certainty Salam, Abdul
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i1.50

Abstract

Background: Narcotics abuse among Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) members raises legal and human rights concerns. Although Law No. 35 of 2009 recognizes rehabilitation as a right for narcotics addicts, in practice TNI personnel are often directly subjected to dismissal without rehabilitation, creating legal injustice and human rights issues Objective: This study aims to analyze the regulatory framework, implementation, and ideal concept of rehabilitation for TNI members involved in narcotics crimes from legal, criminological, rehabilitation, and human rights perspectives Methods: This research employs a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach by examining laws, military regulations, and legal doctrines relevant to rehabilitation and military discipline Results: The findings show that rehabilitation for TNI members is not optimally implemented due to disharmony between civil and military law, the absence of special rehabilitation facilities for soldiers, and weak internal TNI regulations. As a result, punitive measures are often prioritized over rehabilitative efforts, despite rehabilitation’s purpose of restoring health, rights, and dignity Conclusion: The study concludes that effective rehabilitation for TNI personnel requires harmonization of civil and military legal frameworks, the establishment of specialized military rehabilitation centers, and stronger internal regulations. A holistic, rights-based rehabilitation approach is essential to address narcotics abuse fairly while maintaining discipline and strengthening the integrity of the TNI.
Legal Challenges in Protecting Minority Rights in a Plural Society Nur Abdurakhman, Raden
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i1.53

Abstract

Background: Protecting minority rights in plural societies presents complex legal challenges arising from sociopolitical, cultural, and institutional factors. Although international human rights frameworks promote equality and inclusivity, minority groups frequently experience discrimination, marginalization, and limited access to justice due to weak legal implementation and majoritarian dominance Objective: This study aims to analyze the legal obstacles that hinder the effective protection of minority rights in plural societies and to identify legal and institutional mechanisms that can strengthen minority rights within constitutional and human rights frameworks Methods: The study employs a qualitative legal research method using a doctrinal approach. Data are obtained through the analysis of international human rights instruments, national legislation, judicial decisions, and relevant academic literature. A comparative legal analysis is also conducted to examine best practices from different jurisdictions in safeguarding minority rights Results: The findings reveal that the main challenges in protecting minority rights include inconsistencies in national legal frameworks, weak enforcement mechanisms, and the influence of majoritarian politics that often undermine minority protections. In addition, gaps between international human rights standards and their domestic implementation further exacerbate legal vulnerabilities faced by minority groups. Conclusion: The study concludes that effective protection of minority rights requires stronger constitutional safeguards, proactive judicial interpretation, and active engagement of civil society. Legal reforms, institutional capacity-building, and enhanced international cooperation are essential to ensuring non-discriminatory and equitable treatment of minorities in plural societies.
Human Rights Violations and International Legal Responses Ribut Harwanto, Edi
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i1.54

Abstract

Background: Human rights violations remain a persistent global challenge, particularly in contexts of armed conflict, authoritarian rule, and socio-political instability. Although international legal frameworks exist to prevent and punish such abuses, accountability and effective enforcement remain problematic. Objective: This study aims to analyze contemporary human rights violations and evaluate the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms in addressing accountability and justice. Methods: A qualitative approach is employed through doctrinal legal analysis and case studies. The research examines key international legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute, supported by reports from the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and regional human rights bodies. Case studies from Ukraine, Myanmar, Ethiopia, and Venezuela are analyzed. Results: The findings show that international legal frameworks provide important normative and institutional mechanisms to address war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. However, enforcement remains inconsistent due to political interests, limited jurisdiction, and lack of state cooperation. Case studies reveal both the potential and limitations of international legal interventions. Conclusion: The study concludes that strengthening international legal responses requires enhanced international cooperation, greater judicial independence, and more effective enforcement and sanction mechanisms to ensure global accountability in human rights protection.
Political Ideology and Judicial Decision-Making in Contemporary Legal Systems Hermawan, Asep
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i2.56

Abstract

Background: Judicial decision-making has long been regarded as a neutral and objective process grounded in legal reasoning and precedent. Nevertheless, a growing body of empirical and socio-legal scholarship suggests that political ideology may shape judicial behavior, particularly in cases involving constitutional interpretation, civil rights, and public policy. This debate raises important questions regarding judicial impartiality and the integrity of the rule of law. Objective: This study aims to examine the extent to which political ideology influences judicial reasoning and decision-making processes, as well as to identify how institutional structures and external political pressures mediate such ideological effects. Methods: The research employs a qualitative approach through doctrinal and comparative legal analysis. Judicial opinions, constitutional case law, and scholarly commentaries from high courts across multiple jurisdictions are systematically analyzed. The study focuses on decisions related to constitutional rights, administrative law, and social justice issues to identify recurring ideological patterns in judicial interpretation. Results: The findings reveal discernible ideological tendencies in judicial rulings. Judges with conservative orientations tend to adopt more restrictive interpretations of statutes and constitutional provisions, while judges with liberal orientations are more inclined toward expansive interpretations, particularly in cases involving civil liberties and regulatory governance. Additionally, institutional arrangements and political environments influence the extent to which ideological preferences are reflected in judicial outcomes. Conclusion: This study concludes that although judicial decisions are formally grounded in legal doctrine, political ideology remains an underlying factor shaping legal interpretation. Recognizing these dynamics is essential for promoting transparency, judicial accountability, and public trust in the judiciary. The findings contribute to broader discussions on judicial behavior and underscore the importance of safeguarding impartiality within democratic legal systems.
The Role of Courts in Addressing Social Inequality Dikrurahman, Diki
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i1.57

Abstract

Background: Human rights violations remain a persistent global challenge, particularly in contexts of armed conflict, authoritarian rule, and socio-political instability. Although international legal frameworks exist to prevent and punish such abuses, accountability and effective enforcement remain problematic Objective: This study aims to analyze contemporary human rights violations and evaluate the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms in addressing accountability and justice Methods: A qualitative approach is employed through doctrinal legal analysis and case studies. The research examines key international legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute, supported by reports from the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and regional human rights bodies. Case studies from Ukraine, Myanmar, Ethiopia, and Venezuela are analyzed. Results: The findings show that international legal frameworks provide important normative and institutional mechanisms to address war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. However, enforcement remains inconsistent due to political interests, limited jurisdiction, and lack of state cooperation. Case studies reveal both the potential and limitations of international legal interventions Conclusion: The study concludes that strengthening international legal responses requires enhanced international cooperation, greater judicial independence, and more effective enforcement and sanction mechanisms to ensure global accountability in human rights protection.
The Relationship Between Law and Public Policy in Social Development Sutrisno, Endang
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i1.58

Abstract

Background: Law and public policy play a central role in social development by providing legal and institutional frameworks that regulate economic, political, and social interactions. In democratic systems, misalignment between legal frameworks and public policies often weakens governance and limits social progress. Objective: This study aims to analyze the influence of law on public policy formulation and implementation in supporting social development, identify key challenges arising from legal–policy misalignment, and propose strategies to enhance their coherence. Methods: A qualitative research approach was employed using comparative analysis of legal frameworks, policy-making processes, and selected case studies from various jurisdictions. Data were collected from legal documents, government policies, academic literature, and expert opinion. Results: The findings show that effective social development requires strong alignment between legal frameworks and public policy goals. Legal rigidity, political interference, and inconsistent enforcement are major obstacles to policy effectiveness. In contrast, integrated legal and policy mechanisms contribute to better governance, economic stability, and social welfare. Conclusion: Strengthening synergy between law and public policy through transparent legal processes, institutional reform, and inclusive policy-making can enhance social development outcomes. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and legal scholars in improving governance and social progress.
Social Justice and Human Rights: A Legal Perspective Setiawan , Andri Herman; Sunandar, Firman Nurdiansyah; Fajar, Ahmad
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i1.59

Abstract

Background: Social justice and human rights are fundamental principles shaping contemporary legal systems. Nevertheless, their implementation often faces obstacles arising from structural inequality, economic disparity, and the exclusion of marginalized groups. Legal frameworks play a crucial role in operationalizing these principles within society Objective: This study seeks to examine the legal dimensions of social justice and human rights by analyzing their conceptual foundations, international legal instruments, and application in national legal systems, with a focus on equality, non-discrimination, and access to justice Methods: The research employs a doctrinal legal method through the analysis of international human rights treaties, national legislation, judicial decisions, and relevant academic literature. A normative and conceptual approach is used to explore the relationship between social justice theories and human rights law Results: The findings indicate that international human rights law provides a comprehensive normative framework to support social justice. However, inconsistencies in national implementation, limited institutional capacity, and socio-economic conditions continue to hinder effective legal protection for vulnerable and marginalized groups Conclusion: The study concludes that a rights-based legal approach is essential for addressing structural inequalities. Strengthening legal institutions and ensuring alignment between national laws and international human rights standards are key to advancing social justice
Judicial Independence and Political Influence in Modern Democracies Fathya, Adinda Zahra; Santika, Rani
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v3i2.60

Abstract

Background: Human rights violations and political interference in judicial systems remain persistent global challenges that undermine accountability, democratic governance, and the rule of law. Armed conflicts, authoritarian governance, and socio-political crises have intensified systematic abuses by both state and non-state actors, while weakening the independence of judicial institutions responsible for upholding justice. Objective: This study aims to examine contemporary human rights violations and assess the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms in addressing these violations, while also analyzing the extent to which political influence affects judicial independence in modern democratic systems. Methods: The research employs a qualitative approach using doctrinal legal analysis and comparative case studies. Data are derived from international legal instruments, judicial decisions, United Nations reports, International Criminal Court (ICC) documents, regional human rights bodies, and scholarly literature published within the last five years. Results: The findings indicate that international legal frameworks provide essential mechanisms for addressing human rights violations; however, enforcement remains inconsistent due to political constraints, jurisdictional limitations, and state non-cooperation. Case studies from Ukraine, Myanmar, Ethiopia, and Venezuela reveal both successes and structural limitations of international legal interventions. Additionally, political interference in judicial appointments, budgetary control, and legislative restrictions significantly undermines judicial independence, contributing to democratic backsliding. Conclusion: The study concludes that strengthening international human rights protection and safeguarding judicial independence require enhanced international cooperation, robust legal frameworks, judicial autonomy, and active civil society engagement. These measures are crucial for ensuring accountability, protecting civil liberties, and promoting democratic resilience in contemporary governance systems.

Page 9 of 10 | Total Record : 98

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics