cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Reza Muamar Zaki
Contact Email
info@polteksci.ac.id
Phone
+6287743788687
Journal Mail Official
support@jolastic.id
Editorial Address
Desa Penambangan, Sedong, Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Social Politics
Published by Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional
ISSN : 29886740     EISSN : 29886740     DOI : 10.59261
Core Subject : Humanities, Science, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences
The Journal Of Law and Social Politic provides a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal that can be examined empirically. The Journal Of Law and Social Politic will publish scientific articles in the fields of education, including education, economics, history education, geography education, Pancasila and citizenship education and other fields of social science education that have not been listed. Published articles are articles from critical and comprehensive research, scientific studies or studies on important and current issues, or reviews of scientific books.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (semua kategori) - Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 97 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Judicial Independence and Political Influence in Modern Democracies Adinda Zahra Fathya; Rani Santika
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.60

Abstract

This research examines contemporary human rights violations and evaluates the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms in addressing these issues. Using a qualitative approach, it employs doctrinal legal analysis and case studies to assess the role of international courts, tribunals, and human rights organizations. Key legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute, are analyzed to understand their impact on prosecuting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Reports from the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and regional human rights bodies highlight enforcement challenges, such as political constraints, jurisdictional limitations, and state non-cooperation. Case studies on Ukraine, Myanmar, Ethiopia, and Venezuela illustrate both the successes and shortcomings of international legal interventions. Strengthening global accountability requires enhanced cooperation, judicial independence, and more effective sanction mechanisms. The study also explores judicial independence as a fundamental pillar of democracy, assessing the extent of political influence on judicial autonomy. Through content analysis of judicial reforms and constitutional changes in democratic nations, the research identifies key patterns of political interference, including judicial appointments, budgetary control, and legislative restrictions on judicial review. While judicial independence upholds constitutional integrity and civil liberties, political interference can erode democratic institutions. The study concludes that safeguarding judicial autonomy necessitates strong legal frameworks, institutional transparency, and active civil society participation. These findings contribute to legal and political discourse, offering policy recommendations to enhance judicial resilience and democratic governance.
Constitutional Law and Social Change: A Global Perspective Ujang Suratno
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.61

Abstract

Constitutional law shapes social change, influencing governance, human rights, and democratic resilience across diverse political and cultural contexts. As societies evolve, constitutional frameworks must adapt to emerging challenges, including populism, digital transformation, and global crises such as pandemics and climate change. This study explores the dynamic relationship between constitutional law and social change from a global perspective, examining how legal frameworks respond to and shape societal transformations. The research aims to analyze key constitutional developments worldwide, focusing on constitutional amendments, judicial interpretations, and landmark decisions that reflect societal shifts. Using a qualitative approach, this study synthesizes legal analyses, case studies, and comparative constitutional research to identify patterns in constitutional adaptation across different legal systems. The findings reveal that constitutional law serves as both a catalyst for progressive change and a tool for maintaining stability. While some jurisdictions leverage constitutional mechanisms to advance human rights and democracy, others experience constitutional regression through legalistic autocracy. The study highlights the crucial role of judicial independence, civic engagement, and international legal frameworks in sustaining constitutional resilience amid shifting social dynamics. The research concludes that constitutional law is an evolving instrument that both reflects and influences societal change. By examining global case studies, this study contributes to the discourse on constitutional adaptability, offering insights for policymakers, legal scholars, and human rights advocates on fostering democratic resilience through legal frameworks.
The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i; Abdullah Abdullah
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.62

Abstract

Democratic governance is fundamentally upheld by the rule of law, which ensures transparency, accountability, and citizen participation. However, in many jurisdictions, weak legal frameworks, judicial inefficiencies, and political interference hinder the effectiveness of democratic institutions. Strengthening the legal framework is crucial for sustaining democracy and preventing authoritarian tendencies. This research analyzes the role of law in reinforcing democratic governance by examining legal principles, institutional mechanisms, and case studies from various democratic nations. It identifies key legal elements that contribute to a stable and effective democracy. This research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing doctrinal legal analysis and comparative case studies. Legal documents, judicial decisions, and governance reports are analyzed to assess the impact of legal frameworks on democratic governance. The findings indicate that robust legal systems, independent judiciaries, and strong constitutional safeguards are pivotal in promoting democratic governance. Countries with well-established legal protections for civil liberties and checks on executive power tend to exhibit greater political stability and public trust. Conversely, weak legal systems often correlate with corruption, electoral fraud, and democratic backsliding. Strengthening the rule of law is essential for sustaining democracy. A well-functioning legal system safeguards human rights, ensures governmental accountability, and enhances public participation in governance. This research contributes to legal and political scholarship by providing a framework for assessing the effectiveness of legal systems in democratic governance. It offers insights for policymakers and legal scholars on how legal reforms can strengthen democratic institutions globally.
The Impact of Legal Reforms on Social Equity Arip Rahman Sudrajat; Rexy Nakula Urbaningrum
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.63

Abstract

Legal reforms play a critical role in shaping social equity by influencing access to justice, economic opportunities, and human rights protections. Historically, legal systems have both reinforced and dismantled systemic inequalities, depending on the nature and implementation of reforms. This study aims to analyze the impact of legal reforms on social equity, specifically focusing on how legislative changes affect marginalized communities. The research adopts a qualitative approach, employing a systematic literature review and comparative case studies from various jurisdictions to examine the effectiveness of legal reforms in reducing social disparities. The findings reveal that legal reforms have contributed to greater social equity in areas such as anti-discrimination policies, labor rights, and criminal justice. However, disparities persist due to inconsistent enforcement, socio-political resistance, and economic barriers. The study highlights that successful legal reforms integrate participatory governance, public accountability, and equitable enforcement mechanisms. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, particularly in ensuring that reforms are effectively implemented and do not inadvertently exacerbate existing inequalities. In conclusion, legal reforms serve as a crucial mechanism for fostering social equity, but their success depends on robust institutional frameworks and active civic engagement. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on law and social justice by providing insights into best practices for designing and implementing legal reforms that promote equitable outcomes. Future research should explore the long-term socio-economic effects of legal reforms across different legal traditions.
Legal Responsibility of Digital Platform Companies for Protecting Shareholder Losses in The Era Boni Siregar; Lesson Sihotang; Roida Nababan
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i2.64

Abstract

The era of e-commerce has presented a great opportunity for digital platform companies to expand financial services, including stock investment. However, the complexity of technology and business models often poses risks for investors. This article aims to analyze the legal responsibilities of digital platform companies in protecting stock investors in the era of e-commerce. This research uses a normative method with a legislative approach and case studies. The results show that the protection of stock investors is highly dependent on adaptive regulation and the implementation of strict legal responsibilities by digital platforms. It is recommended that companies improve transparency, technology security, and user education to strengthen investor confidence. What is the legal responsibility of digital platform companies in protecting stock investors from legal and technological risks in the e-commerce era? And what are the regulatory efforts in Indonesia able to ensure legal protection for stock investors who use digital platforms, and what steps need to be taken to overcome the regulatory loophole?
Digital Sovereignty and The Right To Data: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, The European Union, and The United States Rahayudin, Rahayudin; Naseer, Muchammad; Agustina, Nova; Guterres, Antonio
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i2.71

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the principles of data sovereignty and the right to personal data in Indonesia, the European Union, and the United States, and assess their impact on national policies and their legal implications. The study uses a comparative juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach, utilizing the Statute Approach to examine relevant laws and regulations, the Comparative Approach to compare the implementation of digital sovereignty principles across jurisdictions, and the Conceptual Approach to examine the theoretical framework and concepts related to data rights and digital sovereignty. The research findings indicate that Indonesia emphasizes local data control and obligations of electronic system providers, the European Union implements data subject rights and strict oversight through the GDPR, while the United States is more flexible with sectoral regulations that emphasize private sector innovation. These differences in principles influence national policies, with Indonesia facing challenges in harmonization and implementation, the European Union demonstrating regulatory uniformity, and the United States offering flexibility but with varying data protection. The legal implications of this study emphasize the importance of improving oversight capacity, regulatory harmonization, and secure cross-border data transfer mechanisms, while providing a basis for policy recommendations for Indonesia in strengthening digital sovereignty and the right to personal data.
Political Ideology and Judicial Decision-Making in Contemporary Legal Systems Fahira, Siti Hafsah; Nendi, Ikhsan; Hidayat, Agus Rohmat; Nurjanah, Aisyah; Santika, Rani
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v2i2.73

Abstract

Background: Constitutional protection of minority rights remains a central concern in contemporary constitutional law, particularly amid rising political polarization, public health crises, and democratic backsliding. Although constitutions formally guarantee equality and non-discrimination, the effectiveness of protection mechanisms varies significantly across jurisdictions and minority groups. Objective: This study aims to examine how constitutional frameworks across different regions protect minority rights and to identify the most effective constitutional mechanisms, judicial practices, and implementation challenges affecting religious, ethnic, LGBTQ+, linguistic, and other minority groups. Methods: The research employs a comparative legal analysis based on a systematic review of 25 Scopus-indexed publications published between 2019 and 2024. Judicial decisions, constitutional provisions, and enforcement mechanisms from jurisdictions in Europe, the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Oceania were analyzed to identify regional patterns and institutional effectiveness. Results: The findings indicate that constitutional courts are the most effective protection mechanism, demonstrating an average effectiveness rate of 85%, significantly outperforming legislative and administrative mechanisms. European jurisdictions exhibit the highest level of minority rights protection (65%), while African jurisdictions show lower protection rates (30%). Religious minorities account for the largest share of constitutional cases (32%), followed by ethnic minorities (28%) and LGBTQ+ groups (18%). Non-discrimination principles show the strongest implementation (8.0/10), whereas political representation mechanisms remain the weakest (6.5/10). The COVID-19 pandemic correlated with a notable increase in minority rights cases. Conclusion: This study provides empirical evidence that strong constitutional courts and non-discrimination principles are central to effective minority rights protection. However, enforcement gaps, political resistance, and limited institutional capacity continue to undermine constitutional guarantees, highlighting the need for targeted policy and institutional reforms.

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 97

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics