cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dinda Keumala
Contact Email
amicus.curiae@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6287840093703
Journal Mail Official
ernameiliana@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekretariat Amicus Curiae Gedung H, Kampus A, Jalan Kyai Tapa No. 1 Grogol, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Amicus Curiae
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30472504     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/amicus.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Amicus Curiae menyediakan wadah bagi para akademisi, praktisi hukum, dan peneliti untuk berbagi pengetahuan, temuan, dan pemikiran terbaru di bidang hukum. Dengan mempublikasikan artikel-artikel yang berkualitas dan terkini, Amicus Curiae membantu menyebarkan pengetahuan hukum yang relevan dan penting bagi pembangunan hukum dan kebijakan di Indonesia. Hal ini memungkinkan para pemangku kepentingan, seperti pemerintah, pengadilan, praktisi hukum, dan masyarakat umum, untuk mengakses dan memanfaatkan pengetahuan tersebut dalam proses pengambilan keputusan dan implementasi kebijakan. Dengan mendorong pemikiran hukum yang berkualitas dan progresif, Amicus Curiae membantu mengembangkan pandangan baru, solusi hukum yang lebih baik, dan pendekatan yang lebih efektif dalam menangani masalah-masalah hukum yang kompleks di Indonesia. Dengan demikian, Amicus Curiae dapat membantu menciptakan lingkungan hukum yang lebih stabil, adil, dan berkelanjutan yang mendorong pertumbuhan dan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Amicus Curiae terbit online secara berkala 4 kali dalam satu tahun.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 376 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERCOBAAN PEMBUNUHAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 45/PID.B/2021/PNSIM : Accountability For The Persons of The Criminal Action of Attempted Murder Decision Number 45/PID.B/2021/PN.Sim Ridwan, Sabila; Multiwijaya, Vientje Ratna
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19604

Abstract

Criminal responsibility for attempted murder is the ability legally to be accountable for their actions and to be aware that what they did was a violation. The perpetrator swung the machete, kicked and choked the victim but the execution was not completed because the perpetrator's mother came and pulled the perpetrator's hand from the victim's neck. The problems in this research are 1). Is the responsibility of the perpetrators of the attempted murder appropriate according to Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code? and 2). Is the Judge's Decision Number 45/Pid.B/2021/PNSim which imposes a 2-year sentence on the perpetrator in accordance with the purpose of sentencing? This research was conducted using a normative legal research type that is descriptive in nature, using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials by collecting data from literature studies which were analyzed qualitatively and drawing conclusions using deductive logic. The conclusions from this study are (1). The criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of the attempted murder is not appropriate according to Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (2). The decision of the Panel of Judges Number 45/Pid.B/2021/PNSim for the perpetrators is not yet 2 years in prison according to the theory of sentencing purposes. The results of the research are related to the theory of sentencing purposes, so it should be subject to Article 338 in conjunction with Article 53 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with a sentence of 10 years in prison.
PEMBERHENTIAN WALIKOTA YANG MELAKUKAN KASUS KORUPSI DAN WEWENANG PELAKSANA TUGAS WALIKOTA (STUDI DI KOTA BEKASI, JAWA BARAT): Discharge of the Mayor Who Commits Corruption Cases and the Authority of the Acting Mayor (Study in Bekasi City, West Java) Fatimah, Trisinta Nurul; Purnomowati, Reni Dwi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19605

Abstract

The Mayor's position is a highly risky position in the event of a vacancy, so if there are violation issues that lead to a vacancy, temporary replacement must be carried out first. As happened in the city of Bekasi where the Mayor was involved in corruption and dismissed. The main issue is the mechanism for dismissing the Mayor of Bekasi who committed criminal acts according to Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, and whether the Acting Mayor of Bekasi is in accordance with Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government in Indonesia. The research method used is normative descriptive research, based on secondary data, analyzed qualitatively, with deductive conclusions. The conclusion of this research is that every Regional Head can be terminated due to death, personal request, or dismissal, and the authority of the acting mayor in the implementation of regional government affairs is not yet clear and definitive, due to the authority in the law. Jabatan Walikota adalah posisi yang sangat beresiko apabila terjadi kekosongan, maka apabila terdapat permasalahan pelanggaran yang menyebabkan terjadinya kekosongan maka harus dilakukan penggantian sementara terlebih dahulu. Seperti yang terjadi di kota Bekasi dimana walikota melakukan korupsi dan diberhentikan. Pokok permasalahannya adalah bagaimana mekanisme pemberhentian walikota Bekasi yang melakukan tindak pidana menurut Undang-Undang No. 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah dan apakah Pelaksana Tugas Walikota Bekasi telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif, dengan bersumber pada data sekunder, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif, dengan penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah setiap Kepala Daerah dapat diberhentikan karena alasan meninggal dunia, permintaan sendiri, atau diberhentikan serta peraturan keԝenangan pelaksana tugas walikota dalam penyelenggaraan urusan pemerintah daerah faktanya belum jelas dan tegas, karena keԝenangan dalam undang-undang
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PIDANA NOMOR: 96/PID.B/PN.CJR): Juridical Review of The Verdict In The Case Of Persecution (Case Study Of Criminal Decision Number: 96/Pid.B/Pn.Cjr) Tanjung, Rofaeda Arisia Salsabila; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19606

Abstract

The crime of maltreatment often occurs due to a misunderstanding or a sense of resentment/offense against another person so that the perpetrator takes it out by committing maltreatment, as is the case in Criminal Decision Number: 96/Pid.B/2020/PN Cjr who committed maltreatment due to a sense of resentment/offense against the victim causing injury. The issues raised are 1) Whether the defendant's actions fulfill the formulation of Article 351 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code (Study of Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2020/PN Cjr) and 2) Is the punishment imposed on the defendant in accordance with the purpose of punishment? This research was conducted using normative juridical research type with descriptive analytical nature with secondary data which was analyzed qualitatively and a deductive logic conclusion was drawn. The results showed that the actions committed by the defendant had fulfilled the formulation of Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code but were not precise because the victim suffered serious injuries and the defendant's actions basically constituted serious maltreatment so that the Judge should have imposed Article 351 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code in accordance with the objectives of the theory of punishment, namely to provide protection of the public welfare and balance and harmony of life by taking into account the interests of the state, society, victims, and perpetrators
PELAKSANAAN REDISTRIBUSI TANAH DALAM RANGKA REFORMA AGRARIA DI KABUPATEN KUBU RAYA : Implementation of Land Redistribution in The Framework of Agrarian Reform in Kubu Raya District Putri, Deviana; Pandamdari, Endang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19608

Abstract

The agrarian reform program launched by the government basically aims to improve the welfare of the people, especially landless farmers. Through Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform, the government is trying to redistribute land for farmers, including those carried out in Kubu Raya Regency. However, in practice the land redistribution program carried out by the government isn’t in accordance with the procedures stipulated in Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018. Of the 10 access arrangement activities as stated in Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018, only 2 activities were carried out by Kubu Raya District Land Office. Before carrying out the implementation of land redistribution, the Land Office must first make a plan which is preceded by the preparation of operational instructions. Counseling on land redistribution activities should be carried out at the planning stage. In practice, the Kubu Raya Land Office doesn’t go through established mechanisms or procedures and directly conducts counseling at the implementation stage of activities that should have been carried out at the planning stage. In addition, the Land Office doesn’t control land whose area exceeds the maximum land ownership limit, which the government wants to control through the agrarian reform program.  
PRAPERADILAN JULIET ASRIL SEBAGAI TERSANGKA PIDANA KORUPSI (PUTUSAN NOMOR 3/PID.PRA/2021/PN.TPG): Juliet Asril Pretrial as a Criminal Suspect of Corruption (Decision Number 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg) Dinanti, Bernandia Hamsyah; Setiyono
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19609

Abstract

Pretrial Request Number 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg from the Tanjung Pinang District Court, citing expiration as the basis for the request. This study focuses on how Pre-trial object arrangements are governed by the Criminal Procedure Code in relation to the Constitutional Court's decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 and whether the legal considerations and dictum of the Pretrial decision No. 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg were in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Constitutional Court's decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014. The author conducted normative research in order to respond to this query. Data management is conducted qualitatively, with reference to secondary data or library materials, while analysis and conclusion-drawing are qualitatively descriptive and deductive, respectively. Conclusions drawn from the research and discussion are that the legal considerations and the judge's dictum in Tanjungpinang District Pre-Trial Case Number 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg are not appropriate because there are only two grounds for determining a suspect: the allegation that the suspect committed a crime and the existence of sufficient preliminary evidence.
TINDAKAN KANTOR IMIGRASI JAKARTA PUSAT TERHADAP UCHECHUKWU ALVAN OKAFOR YANG MELAKUKAN PENYALAHGUNAAN IZIN TINGGAL Rahadinata, Fahira Febryanti; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor menggunakan izin tinggal terbatas sebagai penanam modal untuk melakukan usaha perbedaan atas Pasal 75 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian mengakibatkan izin tinggal terbatas sebagai penanam modal menggunakan izin tinggal terbatas sebagai penanam modal untuk melakukan usaha. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor menangani kasus pelanggaran izin tinggalnya untuk menjalankan usaha, bagaimana Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Non TPI Jakarta Pusat mengambil tindakan hukum keimigrasian terhadap Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor, dan bagaimana Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Non TPI Jakarta Pusat menangani proses penuntutan terhadap Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian. Penelitian ini bersifat normatif dan mengandalkan bukti sekunder, analisis kualitatif, dan penalaran deduktif untuk sampai pada kesimpulannya. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor menyalahgunakan izin tinggal terbatas dengan mempekerjakannya sebagai investor bisnis. Perbuatan hukum yang dilakukan Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Non-TPI Jakarta Pusat terhadap Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor merupakan pengusiran berdasarkan Pasal 75 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian. UU Keimigrasian Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 diikuti dalam melakukan proses deportasi.
ANALISIS PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT (PUTUSAN NOMOR 67/PDT.SUS PHI/2020/PN.JKT.PST: Analysis of Termination Dispute Resolution at the Central Jakarta Districk Court ( Descision Number 67/Pdt. Sus.Phi/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst) Pertiwi, Ayu Widia; Pamungkas, Yogo
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19631

Abstract

When handling disputes between workers and employers in industrial relations, action is required in accordance with applicable labor law. The initial step that must be taken is to carry out bipartite negotiations between the two parties to find a solution to the dispute. If bipartite negotiations are unsuccessful, the next step is to file for mediation and sue the Industrial Relations Court. The problems that arise between the Plaintiff and the Defendant relate to the mechanism for resolving disputes in termination of employment (PHK) in industrial relations, as well as whether the procedures carried out are in accordance with the statutory regulations explained in decision Number 67/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/ PN. JKT. PST. From this decision, it is not considered that any negotiations took place, which is the debate in this case. To answer this problem, normative juridical research was carried out with a descriptive analytical approach. This research refers to primary and secondary data which was analyzed qualitatively, and conclusions were drawn using deductive methods. The process of resolving this industrial relations case involves mediation with a mediator from the East Jakarta Social and Employment Service, as well as filing a lawsuit with the Industrial Relations Court at the local District Court. However, statutory regulations are not in accordance with the steps taken in this case, because bipartite negotiations are thought to have never occurred.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL (PUTUSAN NOMOR 710/PID.SUS/2021/PN JKT.TIM: Juridical Analysis of Accountability Criminal Defamation Perperators Either Trough Social Media (Verdict Number 710/PID. SUS/2021/PN Jkt. Tim) Saputra, Dewas; Widiatno, Andi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19632

Abstract

Defamation is an event where social interaction in the community environment harms one party, both materially and immaterially. With the development of the digital world, which moves social interaction from the real world to the digital world, it causes a newtype of crime, namely defamation on social media, and this type of crime is included in the category of computer-related crime. The legal basis for enforcing this criminal act of pollution is regulated in the Criminal Code and Law Number 19 of 2016 concerningInformation and Electronic Transactions. With the existence of dif erent forms of accountability for perpetrators of criminal acts, this is the basis for the creation of this paper using the library research method. This type of research is normative, with the nature of analytical descriptive research, and draws conclusions using deductive logic. There are several similarities in the acquittal and guilty verdicts, namely the existence of acts that allegedly attacked the victim's honor by perpetrators based on slander and the application of errors in the judge's considerations that looked more at psychological errors than normative errors
SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA, GOL.1 DALAM BENTUK BUKAN TANAMAN UNTUK DIRI SENDIRI (PUT.NO.103/PID.SUS/2021/PN.JKT.SEL): Criminal Sanctions for The Abuse of Narcotics, Category 1 in The Form of Non-Plant For It Self Wibowo, Bimo Ilham; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19639

Abstract

According to the National Narcotics Agency, drug abuse increased from 1.80% to 1.95% in 2021-2022. This has resulted in overcrowding in prisons. The majority of inmates in correctional facilities are drug offenders, estimated at 145,413 out of 151,303 individuals. This study discusses the case of Rahmat Handoyo, also known as Doyok, who committed the crime of "Misuse of Narcotics Group I, Non-Plant-Based" and was sentenced to prison. In this case, the perpetrator should have received rehabilitation as an alternative form of punishment as stipulated by the laws and regulations. The main issue revolves around the judge's failure to impose rehabilitative measures on drug offenders. The findings of this study indicate that the judge erred in considering the decision based on applicable laws and wrongly assessed drug addicts as sick individuals, where punishment is not the appropriate answer morally and legally, taking into account the expert opinion assessment in accordance with Article 55. This research adopts a descriptive analytical approach, gathering both primary and secondary data. Primary data were obtained through interviews and were qualitatively analyzed using deductive logic, supported by secondary data from literature studies.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN NO.10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT.DKI.DIKAITKAN PENERAPAN PASAL 5 UU NOMOR.48 TAHUN 2009: Consideration Judges in Decision No.10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT.DKI.Related of Article 5 of Law No. 48 2009 Sinaga, Cindy Clarance; Tawang, Dian Adriawan Daeng
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The consideration of the DKI High Court judge in the Pinangki Malasari case which turned out to be not in accordance with the facts, and not in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 of Law No.48 of 2009. the formulation of the problem of how the judge's consideration in determining the verdict against the suspect in the crime of bribery in a corruption case in decision No. 10/PID.SUS.TPK/2021/PT and how the judge's consideration is related to the provisions in Article 5 of Law No. 48 of 2009. The rresearch method used is normative type, descriptive in nature, the main data is secondary data supported by interviews, how to collect data by literature study and interviews, qualitative analysis and how to draw conclusions using the deductive method. The results and discussion of this study are that judges have not been able to realize a sense of justice in their decisions. The conclusion of the research is that the considerations given by the panel of judges at the appellate level are not in accordance with the fact. Suggestion: The panel of judges in the future in providing consideration matters both mitigating and aggravating must always pay attention to legal principles.

Page 10 of 38 | Total Record : 376

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2024 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae