cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dinda Keumala
Contact Email
amicus.curiae@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6287840093703
Journal Mail Official
ernameiliana@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekretariat Amicus Curiae Gedung H, Kampus A, Jalan Kyai Tapa No. 1 Grogol, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Amicus Curiae
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30472504     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/amicus.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Amicus Curiae menyediakan wadah bagi para akademisi, praktisi hukum, dan peneliti untuk berbagi pengetahuan, temuan, dan pemikiran terbaru di bidang hukum. Dengan mempublikasikan artikel-artikel yang berkualitas dan terkini, Amicus Curiae membantu menyebarkan pengetahuan hukum yang relevan dan penting bagi pembangunan hukum dan kebijakan di Indonesia. Hal ini memungkinkan para pemangku kepentingan, seperti pemerintah, pengadilan, praktisi hukum, dan masyarakat umum, untuk mengakses dan memanfaatkan pengetahuan tersebut dalam proses pengambilan keputusan dan implementasi kebijakan. Dengan mendorong pemikiran hukum yang berkualitas dan progresif, Amicus Curiae membantu mengembangkan pandangan baru, solusi hukum yang lebih baik, dan pendekatan yang lebih efektif dalam menangani masalah-masalah hukum yang kompleks di Indonesia. Dengan demikian, Amicus Curiae dapat membantu menciptakan lingkungan hukum yang lebih stabil, adil, dan berkelanjutan yang mendorong pertumbuhan dan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Amicus Curiae terbit online secara berkala 4 kali dalam satu tahun.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 398 Documents
 36   37   38   39   40 
PENOLAKAN PENERBITAN KEPUTUSAN OLEH LURAH KEPUTIH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANGADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PTUN SURABAYA NO.19/P/FP/2019/PTUN.SBY.): The Refusal to Issue a Decision by The Head of Keputih Village Based on Law Number 30 of 2014 Concerning Government Administration (Case Study of The Surabaya Administrative Court Decision NO.19/P/FP/2019/PTUN.SBY.) Axel Matthew Lambert Setyoadi; Yogo Pamungkas
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24695

Abstract

This study reviews the refusal to issue a decision by the Lurah Keputih based on Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (Case Study of Surabaya Administrative Court Decision No. 19/P/FP/2019/PTUN.SBY). The main issue discussed in this study is whether the actions of Lurah Keputih in not issuing the requested certificate contradict Law No. 30 concerning Government Administration. To answer this issue, the research employs a juridical-normative method with a descriptive nature, using secondary data as the primary data processed qualitatively. Conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. This study concludes that the actions of the Government Official in not issuing the requested certificate without a reason that meets the requirements are contrary to Law No. 30 concerning Government Administration. The legal consequence of this act is that it constitutes a positive fictitious action due to the neglect in issuing a decision, and the concerned Government Official is subject to administrative sanctions such as paying court costs and issuing what was requested by the Applicant.
ANALISIS KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PERKARA PERCERAIAN PERALIHAN AGAMA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2/PDT.G/2015/PN SNT): Absolute Competency Analysis Of The Case Divorce Transfer Of Religion (Study Decision Number 2/Pdt.G/2015/Pn Snt) Karin Marcheni; Gandes Candra Kirana
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24738

Abstract

Over time, not all marriages remain harmonious, and the bond of marriage can encounter various issues that may lead to its dissolution through divorce. One such issue is the conversion of religion by one of the spouses. Identification problem of this research the regulations regarding the absolute competence in divorce cases due to religious conversion in Indonesia and to assess whether the judge's decision in case Number 2/Pdt.G/2015/PN Snt aligns with the applicable laws and regulations. The research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing secondary data. This descriptive study outlines the regulations related to the resolution of divorce cases due to religious conversion and analyzes the judge's decision in case Number 02/Pdt.G/2015/PN Snt to ensure its compliance with existing laws. The research result and conclusion; based on Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision Number 726 K/Sip/1976, the District Court has the authority to adjudicate this case, as the applicable law in resolving divorce disputes due to religious conversion is based on the law in effect at the time of marriage. The District Court retains the authority to examine, adjudicate, and decide divorce cases involving religious conversion, even if the plaintiff is a Muslim.
SANKSI PIDANA TERKAIT DENGAN PUTUSAN NO.890/PID.SUS/2022/PN.JKT.BRT.: Juridical Review of Criminal Sanctions related to Decisions Number 890/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn. Jkt. Brt. Silawati Dayang Ganjar; Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24739

Abstract

Cyber law is regulated in the ITE Law. Still, the criminal sanctions it regulates are often imposed much lighter than the maximum penalty threatened, such as the Borobudur Temple Stupa meme case in Decision No. 890/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. Identification of the problems that will be researched, namely: what caused the judge to impose a lighter criminal sanction than the ITE Law regulation in Decision Number 890/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt.? And, is the criminal sanction in Decision Number 890/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. in accordance with the purpose of punishment? The research method used is normative research, descriptive in nature, using secondary data through literature study, and qualitative data analysis. The research result and conclusion of the research shows that the judge imposed a lighter criminal sanction because the defendant did not have the intention to commit an act that caused hatred or hostility as regulated in Article 28 paragraph (2) jo. Article 45 of the ITE Law. This lighter criminal sanction is not in accordance with the 3R+1H punishment objectives, namely: Reformation, Restraint, Retribution, and Deterrence. The panel of judges should impose a heavier punishment based on the principles of justice, legal certainty, and expediency to achieve the objectives of punishment.
PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN YANG MELEBIHI BATAS WAKTU MENURUT UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN DAN KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM(STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 790/PDT.G/2021/PA.MKD): Juridical Analysis Of The Annulment Of A Marriage That Exceeds The Time Limit According To Law Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage And The Compilation Of Islamic Law (Study Decision Number 790/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Mkd) Nabila Kamilia Luthfiyyah; Muriani
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24740

Abstract

Marriages can be annulled for a number of reasons, including failure to meet the necessary conditions or being carried out in an unqualified manner – a marriage condition, such as being done with an invalid marriage guardian. The identification problem in this study is whether marriages of spouses who have lived together as spouses that do not meet the conditions can be annulled and whether the reason for the judge to accept the application for annulment of marriage in judgment No. 790/pdt.G/2021/PA.Mkd in accordance with the Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and Compilation of Islamic Law. The descriptive aspect of the Normative Law research technique is the nature of the research in this writing and using secondary data. Based on the results and conclusion of the analysis that a legally entered marriage can be annulled, the right to seek annulment will cease after six months if the husband and wife continue to live together as spouses after learning that the preconditions for marriage are not met. The judge's decision to annul a marriage in this case would be contrary to the provisions of Article 27 para. 3 of Act No. 1 of 1974 jo. Article 72 para. (3) KHI.
INKONSISTENSI PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN JAKSA DALAM MELAKUKAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PADA UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2021 TENTANG KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA (STUDI PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 20/PUU-XXI/2023): Juridicial Review of Inconsistencies in The Regulation of The Prosecutor’s  Authority to Conduct Judicial Review in Law No. 11 of 2021 Concerning The Prosecutor’s Office of The Republic of Indonesia (Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 20 / PUU-XXI / 2023) Revydo Daniel Pranoto; Reni Dwi Purnomowati
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24741

Abstract

Prosecutors have the legal authority to request a judicial review under Article 30C letter h of Law Number 11 of 2021, which pertains to the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The prosecutor's submission of a judicial review has the capacity to create discord and uncertainty. The author will employ normative juridical research methodology for conducting this thesis research. The data utilized in this research consists of secondary data derived from primary, secondary, or tertiary legal materials. The result research and conclusion, according to Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XXI/2023, the authority of the Prosecutor to perform a Judicial Review has been deemed unconstitutional. The decision affirms that the convicted individual or their successors possess the right to judicial review, whereas the prosecution lacks the power to initiate such a review. Under Law No. 11/2021 on the Prosecutor's Office, prosecutors are granted the authority to carry out judicial reviews.
PENYALAHGUNAAN IZIN TINGGAL OLEH WARGA NEGARA INDIA DI INDONESIA: Misuse of Residence Permit by Indian Nationals in Indonesia Devika Cetirzania; Radian Syam
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24742

Abstract

Restrictions on the activities of foreigners in Indonesia are intended to prevent immigration violations, such as misusing visas or residence permits. The misuse of residence permits of two foreign nationals (WNA) from India named Mohammad Zaffer Syed and Syed Naveed violated Law No. 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration by carrying out activities contrary to their limited stay permits. The identification problems of this research are: how the immigration action against the abuse of residence permits by the Indian foreigner is, and whether the immigration action against the two WNAs is in accordance with Law No. 6 of 2011 concerning immigration. The article is a normative legal research, descriptive in nature, using secondary data, then analyzed qualitatively, and the conclusion is drawn deductively. The research and conclusion of this research shows that foreigners from India named Mohammad Zaffer Syed and Syed Naveed Abbas are proven to have misused their residence permit and violated Article 122 letter a of Law No. 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration, and were sentenced to five months imprisonment and a fine of IDR 500,000,000.  with the provision that if the fine is not paid, it will be changed to one-month imprisonment.
KEDUDUKAN KURATOR KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM INTIDANA YANG BATAL DIPAILITKAN (PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 43 PK/PDT.SUS- PAILIT/2022): Position of the Intidana Savings and Loans Cooperative which was canceled and bankrupted (Supreme Court decision Number 43 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022) Yurico Berthan Sagawa; Heru Pringgodani Sanusi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.23010

Abstract

This study discusses the importance of clarity regarding the legal standing and fee determination of bankruptcy receivers (curators) in the event of a bankruptcy status revocation, as seen in the Supreme Court Decision No. 43 PK/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2022. In bankruptcy proceedings, the curator is responsible for managing and settling the debtor’s assets. The issue identified in this research is the curator’s legal position toward KSP Intidana after its bankruptcy was annulled, and whether the curator’s fee complies with the applicable regulations. This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive analytical approach. Legally, the curator loses the formal standing to continue asset settlement following the revocation of the bankruptcy status, yet remains obligated to prepare an accountability report and return the managed assets to the debtor. Based on the research findings and conclusion, it can be concluded that the curator’s actions during the bankruptcy period remain valid as long as they are based on a prevailing court decision. Nevertheless, there is a need to evaluate the fee determination to align with the principles of justice and proportional burden-sharing among the involved parties.
AKTIVITAS WHALING OLEH JEPANG DI KAWASANANTARTIKA BERDASARKAN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE REGULATION OF WHALING (ICRW) 1946: Whaling Activities by Japan in the Antartic Region based on theInternational Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) 1946 Dwinanda Audrey; Amalia Zuhra
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24959

Abstract

The International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) 1946 was established to protect whale populations. Although Japan is a party to the convention, its whaling—originally a cultural practice—has developed into a commercial activity supported by modern technology, with operations expanding into the Antarctic region. This study examines whether Japan’s activities in the Antarctic comply with the ICRW 1946 and how state responsibility should be applied. Using normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach and deductive reasoning, the study finds that Japan’s whaling programs, particularly JARPA and JARPA II, violate the provisions of the ICRW because they do not meet the criteria for legitimate scientific research. Consequently, Japan bears responsibility in the form of strict liability, requiring proof of negligence in natural resource management and compensation through restitution.
PERAN BADAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAN BADAN PERADILAN DALAM PEMBERHENTIAN PRESIDEN DAN/ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN (STUDI PERBANDINGAN DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT): The Role of the People's Representative Council and the Judiciary in the Impeachment of the President and/or Vice President (A Comparative Study between Indonesia and the United States) Chrystyan Nadin Cleviandra Hidayat; Ninuk Wijiningsih
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24961

Abstract

The manifestation of popular sovereignty in a country necessitates the role of a representative body in the impeachment of the president and/or vice president. However, it is also common for countries to involve judicial institutions in the impeachment process. The research questions in this research are: How do the roles of representative bodies in Indonesia and the United States compare in the impeachment of the president and/or vice president? And how does the involvement of judicial institutions in the impeachment of the president and/or vice president differ between Indonesia and the United States? The research method used is normative legal research, with a descriptive writing approach. Data types include secondary data with primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The findings reveal that the representative bodies in Indonesia and the United States have similarities in initiating the impeachment of the president and/or vice president, and that the decision to impeach is only a removal from office. However, in Indonesia, one chamber, the Regional Representative Council, does not play a role in the impeachment of the president and/or vice president. In contrast, both the House of Representatives and the Senate in the United States have roles in the impeachment process. The comparison of judicial roles shows a clear difference. The Supreme Court of the United States does not play a role in the impeachment process, whereas the Constitutional Court of Indonesia does.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGENAAN BEA MASUK ANTI-DUMPING UNI EROPA KEPADA PRODUK STAINLESS STEEL COLD-ROLLED FLAT ASAL INDONESIA: Judicial Analysis of the Imposition of the European Union Anti-Dumping Duties on Cold-Rolled Stainless Steel Flat Products from Indonesia Tatyana A S A W Notodipuro; Rosdiana Saleh
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24962

Abstract

The European Union issued Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2012, later amended by Regulation (EU) 2022/433, imposing anti-dumping duties for three years starting November 18, 2021 on cold-rolled flat stainless steel products from Indonesia. This study examines whether the EU’s anti-dumping measures comply with the GATT/WTO framework and assesses their impact. The analysis shows that several elements of the EU’s anti-dumping investigation and the resulting duties are inconsistent with the Anti-Dumping Agreement and GATT 1994. The duties have reduced the competitiveness of Indonesian stainless steel products and led to a significant decline in exports to the EU market. In response to these inconsistencies and their economic consequences, Indonesia brought the dispute to the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) to seek resolution.

Page 38 of 40 | Total Record : 398

 36   37   38   39   40 

Filter by Year

2024 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae