cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dinda Keumala
Contact Email
amicus.curiae@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6287840093703
Journal Mail Official
ernameiliana@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekretariat Amicus Curiae Gedung H, Kampus A, Jalan Kyai Tapa No. 1 Grogol, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Amicus Curiae
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30472504     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/amicus.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Amicus Curiae menyediakan wadah bagi para akademisi, praktisi hukum, dan peneliti untuk berbagi pengetahuan, temuan, dan pemikiran terbaru di bidang hukum. Dengan mempublikasikan artikel-artikel yang berkualitas dan terkini, Amicus Curiae membantu menyebarkan pengetahuan hukum yang relevan dan penting bagi pembangunan hukum dan kebijakan di Indonesia. Hal ini memungkinkan para pemangku kepentingan, seperti pemerintah, pengadilan, praktisi hukum, dan masyarakat umum, untuk mengakses dan memanfaatkan pengetahuan tersebut dalam proses pengambilan keputusan dan implementasi kebijakan. Dengan mendorong pemikiran hukum yang berkualitas dan progresif, Amicus Curiae membantu mengembangkan pandangan baru, solusi hukum yang lebih baik, dan pendekatan yang lebih efektif dalam menangani masalah-masalah hukum yang kompleks di Indonesia. Dengan demikian, Amicus Curiae dapat membantu menciptakan lingkungan hukum yang lebih stabil, adil, dan berkelanjutan yang mendorong pertumbuhan dan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Amicus Curiae terbit online secara berkala 4 kali dalam satu tahun.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 376 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
PEMBERHENTIAN DIREKSI SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN UU NO.40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS: Unlawful Dismissal Of Directors Based On Law No.40 Of 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Companies Apriyanto, Zaeriko Rizky; Kerti, N.G.N Renti Maharaini
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/51y7q037

Abstract

The board of directors is a key component of a company responsible for overseeing its operations andrepresenting it both in and out of court. The board can be removed at any time through a GeneralMeeting of Shareholders (RUPS) resolution, citing specific reasons for their removal. This study delvesinto the validity of PT. Multi Daya Wonua's RUPS regarding director dismissal. It also examineswhether the decisions in Case Number 16/pdt.G/2019/PN Kka, 82/PDT/2019/PT KDI, and 1888K/pdt/2020 on director dismissal at PT. Multi Daya Wonua align with the guidelines set out in LawNumber 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. The research follows a normative legalapproach, utilizing descriptive-analytical methods to review existing materials and offer insights throughcollected data. The study primarily employs qualitative analysis of secondary data. Findings highlight that removing directors without specifying reasons through RUPS and without allowing a defensecontradicts Article
PENERTIBAN RENCANA TATA RUANG WILAYAH SEMPADAN SUNGAI CILIWUNG BERDASARKAN PERDA KABUPATEN BOGOR: Controlling Of Spatial Plans For The Ciliwung River Burier Area Based On Regional Regulation Of Bogor Regency Ainina, Lia Qurrotu; Hasni, H
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/4cjvgv28

Abstract

Spatial planning is an effort to mitigate floods. The Regional Spatial Planning (RTRW) Plan of each district/city is stated in the Regional Regulations of each respective region. However, in its implementation, there are still violations committed by certain individuals, such as constructing buildings in river buffer zones. The issue raised is how the implementation of Regional Regulation No. 11 of 2016 concerning the Regional Spatial Planning of Bogor District 2016-2036 affects violations in the Upper Ciliwung River Buffer Zone, and the consequences of spatial violations in the said area. Thus, the first analysis reveals three samples of hotels/villas that have violated Article 71 letter a of the Bogor District Regional Regulation and have also violated zoning regulations and do not possess administrative permits. The second analysis involves the legal consequences for buildings in the Ciliwung
PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN DAN PENERAPAN MENGENAI TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DAN LINGKUNGAN DI INDONESIA DAN DI INGGRIS: Comparison of Regulations and Implementation of Social and Environmental Responsibility in Indonesia and in the UK Sudharmawan, M Naufal; Yunari, Sri Bakti
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/d0y6c642

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to the efforts of companies to assume social andenvironmental responsibility in their operations. CSR has been widely regulated and applied in variouscountries, including Indonesia and the UK. In Indonesia, Corporate Social and EnvironmentalResponsibility (CSER) is governed by a number of regulations, and PT Bank Central Asia Tbk (BCA) is acompany in Indonesia that has implemented various CSER initiatives in accordance with these regulations.In the UK, CSR is regulated under corporate law, and HSBC UK Bank plc (HSBC) is a company in theUK that has implemented various CSR initiatives in accordance with the regulation. The formulation ofthe problem in this study are: 1) What are the similarities and differences between CSER in Indonesia andCSR in the UK? 2) How is BCA's CSER in Indonesia and HSBC's CSR in the UK implements theregulation? This study used a normative legal research approach using secondary data. This research isdescriptive and conclusions are drawn through deductive reasoning. Based on the results of the research obtained, it can be concluded that Indonesia and the UK have several similarities and differences in legalarrangements and the application of CSER and CSR, respectively.
PEMBERHENTIAN WALIKOTA YANG MELAKUKAN KASUS KORUPSI DAN WEWENANG PELAKSANA TUGAS WALIKOTA (STUDI DI KOTA BEKASI, JAWA BARAT): Dismissal of Mayors who Commit Corruption Cases and the Authority of the Acting Mayor (Study in Bekasi City, West Java) Fahtimah, Trisinta Nurul; Purnomowati, Reni Dwi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/2yv4m497

Abstract

The position of Mayor is a very risky position if there is a vacancy, so if there is an issue of offence thatcauses a vacancy, a temporary replacement must be made first. Similar to what happened in Bekasi City,when the mayor was fired for corruption. The subject matter is how the mechanism for dismissing themayor of Bekasi who committed a criminal offence according to Law No. 23 of 2014 concerningRegional Government and whether the Acting Mayor of Bekasi is in accordance with Law No.23 of 2014concerning Regional Government in Indonesia. This research approach is descriptive normative, basedon secondary data that is evaluated qualitatively using deductive inference. The conclusion of thisresearch is that the power of the acting mayor in carrying out regional government affairs is really notclear and firm because the authority based on the law is not clear and firm, and any Regional Head canbe dismissed due to death, own request, or dismissed.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN YANG DILAKUKAN DENGAN RENCANA (PUT.108/PID.B/2020/PN.RHL): Juridical Review of The Crime of Murder Commited with a Plan (Study of Decision Number 109/Pid.B/2020/PN.RHL) Akbar, Muhammad Fakhri Zaki; Tawang, Dian Adriawan Daeng
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ebmn1x98

Abstract

This research is entitled Juridical Review of the Crime of Murder Committed with a Plan (Put No.109/Pid.B/2020/PnRhl). There are 2 (two) main issues raised in this thesis, namely how the perpetrator'sactions comply with the elements of the offense in Article 340 of the Criminal Code and how the basis forjudges in deciding criminal cases of murder. This research is a juridical-normative research, the natureof the research is descriptive-analytical, data collection uses secondary data and primary materials, thisdata is carried out through library research methods. The actions carried out by the perpetrators are notappropriate if they are terminated by Article 338 of the Criminal Code concerning ordinary Murder,because the actions of the perpetrators were carried out with a prior plan in committing the Criminal Actof Murder, therefore the more appropriate Article to be used by the perpetrators is Article 340 of theCriminal Code concerning Murder which carried out with a plan in advance because the perpetrator'sactions have fulfilled the elements of the offense of Article 340 of the Criminal Code.
STUDI KOMPARASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERCERAIAN MELALUI PENGADILAN DI INDONESIA DENGAN BRITANIA RAYA (INGGRIS DAN WALES): Comparative Study Of Divorce Settlement Through The Courts In Indonesia With The United Kingdom Of Britain (England And Wales) Hasibuan, Winda Fitriani; Kirana, Gandes Candra
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/qtpfqh50

Abstract

Every marriage does not rule out the possibility of divorce, so divorce is not a new thing to be found in society. However, each region of the country has different laws for finalizing divorce, such as Indonesia and the UK. This research aims to describe the settlement of divorce according to the Indonesian legal system with the UK along with the advantages and disadvantages of the divorce settlement. This research was conducted normatively based on secondary data, and data analysis is done descriptively and conclusions were drawn using deductive methods. Based on the research conducted, what regulates the divorce process in Indonesia is carried out in accordance with the provisions of civil law that apply in public courts, namely HIR, RBg, Rv, the Marriage Law, and the Law on Religious Courts. Meanwhile, the divorce settlement process in the UK is carried out in accordance with The Family Procedure (Amendment) Rules Number 44 of 2022 and for Muslim couples it is regulated in The Muslim Law (Shariah) Council UK. England and Wales have not made peace and evidentiary efforts in examining and adjudicating divorce cases as Indonesia has done so far. So that this is a weakness of divorce settlements in the UK and advantages for divorce settlements in Indonesia.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERAN BANK TANAH BAGI REFORMA AGRARIA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA: Juridical Analysis of The Role of Land Banks For Agrarian Reform in Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation Novery, Aprilia Wulan; Pandamdari, Endang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/c90em767

Abstract

Land banks are specialized institutions with the responsibility of planning, acquiring, buying, maintaining,utilizing, and distributing land. In light of the Agrarian Reform Act of 2020 (Law No. 11 of 2020), thisarticle brings up the question of land banks as a means to further the goal of the law. The papers publishedhere meet the norms of professional legal study. This study intends to analyze land banks from a legal andphilosophical standpoint. This study's results clarify how Government Regulation 64 of 2021 andPresidential Regulation 113 of 2021 define land banks as providers for agricultural reform, as mandatedby Job Creation Law No. 11 of 2020. The Land Bank is obligated to actively participate in supplying landfor agrarian reform and allocate at least 30% of the land area under its control to this purpose. Inconclusion, the Job Creation Law requires the Land Bank to be governed in a way that allows it to fulfillits role as a land-providing agency, gather land for future development, and manage that property in away that upholds the ideals of equity, legal certainty, and legal benefits. Bank.
PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 3 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG IBU KOTA NEGARA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG- UNDANGAN: Establisment Of Law No. 3 Year 2022 On The National Capital Ased On Law No. 12 Year 2011 On The Establisment Of Laws And Regulations B Daffa, Muhammad; Edwar, Ferry
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/z2y6k236

Abstract

Enactment Law No. 3 of 2022 the National Capital City has both positive-negative responses,primarily stemming from IKN Law formulation process, considered to relatively fast, notoptimizing principles openness and public participation. There are different arrangements in IKNLaw which included realm special regional government regulated Constitution 1945 and Law no.23 year 2014 concerning Regional Government. Research problem 1) Is process of establishingLaw No. 3 year 2022 in accordance with provisions of Law no. 12 year 2011?; and 2) Is contentof Law No. 3 year 2022 concerning State Capital in accordance with Law no. 12 year 2011?. Thiswriting uses normative research with statutory approach that’s descriptive analytical withsecondary data that’s analyzed qualitatively from results literature studies and conclusions usingdeductive method. Study found IKN Law formation process wasn’t optimal with principlesopenness and public participation regulated in Article 5 letter g and Article 96 of Law no. 12/2011at drafting and discussion stage as well as IKN Law didn’t fulfill content material as consequenceof hierarchy of laws and regulations Article 7 Law no. 12/2011. IKN Law need revisions inaccordance with hierarchy laws and regulations with pay attention to provisions Law no.12/2011.
IMPLEMENTASI PENEGAKAN DISIPLIN TERHADAP APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA YANG MELANGGAR KODE ETIK: Enforcement of Discipline for Civil Servants Who Violate the Code of Ethics Ramadhani, Bella Mirtha; Wiratno
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/tvstt133

Abstract

Civil servants are obligated to adhere to the prevailing legal regulations. However, there are still manyinstances where civil servants exhibit a lack of discipline and fail to comply with the applicable code ofethics. For instance, as illustrated in this case, there are instances where civil servants engage in sexualharassment towards students. The central issue revolves around the enforcement of disciplinarysanctions against civil servants who violate the code of ethics, as exemplified by Case Number4/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.MTR. This research also identifies the obstacles and challenges in implementingdisciplinary sanctions against civil servants who breach the code of ethics. The research methodology isnormative research of a descriptive, utilizing secondary data as the primary source of information. Thisdata is qualitatively analyzed, and conclusions are drawn through deductive reasoning. The findings ofthis study indicate that the actions taken by Lalu Mustajab, an ASN and the perpetrator in this case, haveviolated his obligations by sexual harassment behavior towards a students. Consequently, he could besubject to severe disciplinary penalties due to the abuse of authority.
PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN MENGENAI DOKTRI BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE DI NEGARA INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA: Comparison Of Business Judgement Rule Doctrine Regulation in Indonesia and Australia Maulina, Arabella Kezia Putri; Yunari, Sri Bakti
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/042bgd75

Abstract

The Business Judgment Rule Doctrine is a doctrine that is widely applied in common law countries, suchas in Australia which adopted the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine into its positive law since theCorporate Law Economic Reform Program (Corporate Law Economic Reform Program) in 1998.Indonesia itself who are Civil law also apply the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine which is in theDefault case committed by PT Ciremai Prima Mandiri in Decision Number 156/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Tim.Based on this, the issues raised are how are the similarities and differences regarding the BusinessJudgment Rule Doctrine between Indonesia and Australia, and how is the Application of the BusinessJudgment Rule Doctrine between Indonesia and Australia between the Default case by PT CiremaiPrima Mandiri in Decision Number 156/ Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Tim with Mariner Corporations Ltd case.The research was conducted normatively, using secondary data. The results of this study indicatesimilarities in the concepts and objectives of the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine and differences in theelements of the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine between the two countries, as well as showing the form of application of the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine in the default case by PT Ciremai Prima Mandiriin Decision Number 156/Pdt .G/2013/PN.Jkt.Team with Mariner Corporations Ltd case

Page 18 of 38 | Total Record : 376

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2024 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae