cover
Contact Name
Indra Hadi
Contact Email
profesionaljournalmedicine@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
pt.internationalmedicaljournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Equity Tower. 49th Floor. Sudirman Street. Special Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
ISSN : 30481376     EISSN : 30481368     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research, published by International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd. is dedicated to providing physicians with the best research and important information in the world of medical research and science and to present the information in a format that is understandable and clinically useful. Committed to publishing multidisciplinary research that spans the entire spectrum of healthcare and medicine access, The American Journal of Medical Science and Health Research aims at an international audience of pharmacists, clinicians, medical ethicists, regulators, and researchers, providing an online forum for the rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area.
Articles 516 Documents
The Role of Emergency Evacuation Plans in Pro Texting Workers : A Comprehensive Systematic Review Kevin Chaniago Tanudirjo; Egin Cipta Wiguna; Dendi Handriansyah
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/3s1pts84

Abstract

Introduction: Workplace emergencies pose significant risks to worker safety globally. Emergency evacuation plans are critical components of occupational safety, yet their effectiveness in protecting workers varies substantially across settings. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the role, components, effectiveness, and implementation factors of emergency evacuation plans for worker protection. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eight screening criteria were applied, including worker population focus, emergency evacuation intervention, worker safety outcomes, empirical data, workplace setting, workplace context, evacuation procedures, and worker population focus. Data extraction covered worker populations, evacuation plan types, protective mechanisms, plan components, effectiveness evidence, implementation factors, challenges, and key findings from 80 included studies across diverse industries. Results: Studies spanned healthcare, construction, mining, manufacturing, oil and gas, and other sectors globally. Eight primary plan components were identified: detection/alarm systems, evacuation route design, assembly points, communication protocols, role assignments, training/drills, equipment provision, and emergency services coordination. Integrated multi-component interventions reduced evacuation times by 64% (581 to 212 seconds) and achieved 100% worker survival in severe events. Training improved knowledge by 57-76%, while smart technologies enhanced evacuation efficiency by 35-37%. Critical success factors included regular drills, clear communication, management commitment, and technology integration. Major barriers comprised worker non-compliance (51-70% ignoring instructions), physical obstacles, communication failures, and insufficient training (83.3% demonstrating poor knowledge). Conclusion: Emergency evacuation plans significantly improve worker protection when implemented as integrated systems rather than standalone documents. Effectiveness depends on context-specific tailoring, regular practical training, management commitment, and systematic maintenance. Future efforts should address vulnerable worker populations, technology optimization, and cross-cultural effectiveness. Keywords: Emergency evacuation, worker safety, occupational health, disaster preparedness, systematic review
Association Between Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index and Early Detection of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis Pramuliansyah Haq; Andi Muhammad Ariansyah N
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/vg1x7670

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a growing clinical challenge with limited diagnostic tools for early detection. The Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) is a novel non-invasive measure of arterial stiffness that may facilitate early identification of HFpEF. Methods: This meta-analysis systematically reviewed 48 sources examining the association between CAVI and HFpEF. Studies were included if they assessed adult populations, measured CAVI, and reported quantitative associations with HFpEF or its surrogates. Data extraction focused on study design, CAVI measurement protocols, HFpEF definitions, and association measures. Results: Cross-sectional analyses demonstrated significant correlations between CAVI and diastolic function parameters: E/A ratio (r = -0.405, 95% CI -0.324 to -0.481) and e' velocity (r = -0.449, 95% CI -0.340 to -0.630) (1). CAVI ≥10 was associated with HFpEF hospitalization (OR 9.76) (6). Meta-analyses showed CAVI predicted cardiovascular events (HR 1.20-1.46 per SD/category increase) (8-10). Longitudinal data demonstrated CAVI progression correlated with left ventricular global longitudinal strain deterioration over 26.8 months (5). Sex-specific analysis revealed stronger associations in women (OR 1.67, P=0.007) (3). Discussion: CAVI demonstrates consistent associations with subclinical diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF outcomes. The evidence supports mechanistic plausibility through ventricular-vascular coupling, with distinct patterns in hypertensive and female subpopulations. However, significant limitations include predominance of Asian populations, absence of prospective screening studies, and lack of validated early detection thresholds. Conclusion: CAVI shows promise as a screening tool for early HFpEF detection, particularly in high-risk populations. Future research requires prospective studies with standardized protocols, population-specific thresholds, and evaluation of CAVI-guided intervention strategies.
Interplay of Maternal Nutrition, Sanitation, and Socioeconomic Factors in Childhood Stunting across Resource-Limited Rural Communities : A Systematic Review Mutawaffika Mahir; Asrita Suri; Andi Muh. Ariansyah Nazaruddin
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/gbysvf70

Abstract

Introduction: Childhood stunting remains a critical public health challenge in resource-limited rural communities, affecting nearly 150 million children under five globally. The interplay between maternal nutrition, sanitation, and socioeconomic factors is complex and context-dependent, with previous studies showing inconsistent results regarding the effectiveness of isolated interventions. Methods: This systematic review synthesized findings from 80 studies examining the interplay of maternal nutrition, sanitation, and socioeconomic factors on childhood stunting in resource-limited rural settings across Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Included studies comprised cluster-randomized controlled trials, and country-level decomposition analyses. Results: Maternal nutrition interventions demonstrated consistent positive effects on linear growth across diverse settings, with effect sizes ranging from 0.13 to 0.38 increases in length-for-age Z-scores (1-3,14). In contrast, household-level WASH interventions showed minimal effectiveness on stunting despite high adherence, with three major trials reporting null effects (1-3). Socioeconomic factors, particularly maternal education and household wealth, emerged as dominant determinants, explaining 24.7% of stunting reduction in Nepal and 19.5% in Peru (5,7). Country-level decomposition analyses revealed context-specific drivers: malaria control dominated in Uganda (35%) and Senegal (35%) (4,13), while agricultural productivity accounted for 32% of improvements in Ethiopia (6). Combined WASH and nutrition interventions provided no additive benefit over nutrition alone in major trials (1-3), though integrated programs in Ethiopia showed significant effects (OR: 0.50) (11). Discussion: The discrepancy between strong observational associations and null trial results for WASH interventions suggests substantial confounding by socioeconomic status. Nutrition interventions operate through direct biological pathways addressing micronutrient deficiencies, showing consistent but modest effects. Socioeconomic factors represent long-term structural determinants operating through multiple mechanisms including improved feeding practices, healthcare utilization, and intergenerational transmission. Context-specific determinants—including malaria control, agricultural productivity, and education—must guide intervention priorities. Conclusion: Effective stunting reduction in resource-limited rural settings requires context-specific strategies prioritizing proven nutrition interventions alongside long-term investments in socioeconomic development. WASH interventions should not be abandoned but require more comprehensive community-level approaches rather than household-level infrastructure provision alone. Multisectoral coordination addressing context-specific dominant drivers is essential for sustainable progress.
The Relationship Between Testosterone Levels and the Severity of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms : A Comprehensive Systematic Review Muhammad Zul Fahmi; Cut Dessia Zulda Muthia
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/8kgbfx75

Abstract

Introduction: The relationship between testosterone levels and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men remains controversial, with conflicting evidence from observational studies and interventional trials. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the association between testosterone levels and LUTS severity, and to assess the effects of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) on urinary symptoms. Methods: We systematically screened studies involving adult male participants with LUTS assessment using validated instruments (IPSS, AUA-SI) and testosterone measurement via validated laboratory methods. Eighty studies comprising randomized controlled trials, observational registry studies, and cross-sectional analyses were included. Results: Cross-sectional studies showed inconsistent baseline associations between testosterone levels and LUTS severity, with some demonstrating significant negative correlations (r=-0.334, p=0.031) (21) while large-scale trials found no relationship (1,3,4). However, interventional studies consistently demonstrated that long-term TRT significantly improved LUTS. In registry studies of up to 16 years, mean IPSS decreased from 7.0±3.5 to 1.5±2.0 in treated men versus worsening from 4.9±2.0 to 14.3±5.3 in controls (p<0.0001) (5). Improvements were observed independent of prostate size (6,9) and were particularly pronounced in men with metabolic comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes (7) and obesity (59). Mechanistic studies identified effects on bladder function (44), inflammation reduction (17,32), and sleep improvement (27) as potential mediators. Effect modifiers included baseline testosterone levels, prostate size, metabolic status, and treatment duration exceeding 6 months. Discussion: The heterogeneous findings can be reconciled by recognizing that severe testosterone deficiency (<300 ng/dL) contributes to LUTS through multiple mechanisms, and restoration to normal levels with adequate treatment duration produces clinically meaningful benefits. The saturation model (75) explains why variations within normal range show no association. Benefits are maximized in men with documented hypogonadism, metabolic comorbidities, and moderate-to-severe baseline symptoms. Conclusion: Testosterone replacement therapy significantly improves LUTS in hypogonadal men, particularly those with metabolic comorbidities, with benefits requiring sustained treatment beyond 6 months. Patient selection based on documented testosterone deficiency and symptom severity optimizes therapeutic outcomes.
The Relationship Between Hot-Cold Compression Therapy and Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) : A Comprehensive Systematic Review Dendy Edyana; Wianne Carima
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 38 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/r4raqf18

Abstract

Introduction: Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) represents a common consequence of unaccustomed or intense exercise, characterized by pain, reduced function, and inflammation. Despite widespread use of thermal and compression therapies in sports recovery, the optimal application parameters and comparative effectiveness remain unclear. This systematic review evaluated the relationship between hot-cold compression therapy and DOMS outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted across multiple databases, screening studies based on predefined criteria including population (healthy individuals or athletes), intervention (thermal and/or compression therapies), outcomes (DOMS-related measures), and study design (RCTs, controlled trials, systematic reviews). Data extraction focused on intervention parameters, population characteristics, DOMS assessment methods, and primary findings. Results: Eighty studies were included, encompassing diverse interventions including contrast water therapy (CWT), cold water immersion (CWI), compression therapy, and combined approaches. CWI at 10-15°C for 10-15 minutes demonstrated consistent benefits for pain reduction (SMD -0.48 to -0.75) and functional recovery. Compression therapy, particularly pneumatic devices, improved muscle soreness (SMD -0.33) and performance measures. Combined thermal-compression approaches showed synergistic effects in some contexts (d = 0.67-1.12 for strength recovery), though not universally superior. Discussion: Intervention effectiveness demonstrated systematic variation based on temperature (optimal CWI: 10-15°C), duration (CWT optimal at 6 minutes), timing (immediate post-exercise application critical), and population (trained males show robust responses; females may respond differently). Methodological quality varied substantially, with placebo effects potentially contributing to reported benefits. Conclusion: Cold water immersion at 10-15°C for 10-15 minutes immediately post-exercise represents the most consistently beneficial single modality for DOMS, particularly in trained male athletes. Compression therapies offer viable alternatives with distinct mechanisms. Personalized approaches considering individual response patterns and resource availability are recommended over universal protocols.
The Relationship Between Fasting Blood Glucose and the Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy : A Comprehensive Systematic Review Ramadhani Ferrial Nugraha; Djonny Djuarsa; Gaby Syafira Siti Halimatussa'diah
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 38 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/pqypab80

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. While glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the standard glycemic metric, the role of fasting blood glucose (FBG) as an independent predictor of DR severity remains debated. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the relationship between FBG and DR severity. Methods: A systematic review of 80 studies (cross-sectional, cohort, RCTs, et al) was conducted. Data were extracted on FBG measurement, DR severity classification, study populations, confounding variables, and the direct association between FBG and DR. Results: A positive association between elevated FBG and DR presence/severity was found across diverse populations. Meta-analyses reported pooled odds ratios (OR) for DR per unit FBG increase ranging from 1.19 (95% CI: 1.13-1.26) to 2.41 (95% CI: 1.63-3.57) when combined with HbA1c. Longitudinal studies identified FBG thresholds (e.g., 6.9-7.4 mmol/L) for predicting DR risk. Large RCTs (ACCORD, DCCT) confirmed that intensive glycemic control, which reduces FBG, significantly slows DR progression. Fasting glucose variability emerged as an independent risk factor for DR in type 2 diabetes, even after adjusting for HbA1c. However, several studies found FBG lost independent significance when HbA1c was included in multivariable models. Key confounders included diabetes duration, hypertension, and renal function. Discussion: The relationship between FBG and DR is significant but complex. The evidence supports FBG as a robust risk marker, particularly in type 2 diabetes, with a dose-response relationship and the added risk of glycemic variability. However, HbA1c remains a superior predictor of cumulative glycemic exposure. Discrepancies across studies may be explained by differences in diabetes type, study design (cross-sectional vs. longitudinal), and whether analyses adjusted for HbA1c. The effect of FBG is most pronounced in settings where HbA1c is unavailable or as a component of overall glycemic control. Conclusion: Elevated FBG and its variability are significant, independent risk factors for DR presence and severity, especially in type 2 diabetes. While HbA1c remains a crucial metric, FBG provides valuable prognostic information. Clinical management should focus on achieving recommended FBG targets and minimizing glycemic variability to reduce DR risk.

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 38 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 36 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 36 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 35 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 35 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 34 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 34 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 33 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 33 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 32 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 32 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 31 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 31 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 30 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 30 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 29 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 29 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 28 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 28 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 26 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 12 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 11 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 10 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 23 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 22 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 22 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 21 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 20 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 9 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 8 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 7 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 8 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 7 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 8 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 7 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 7 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 14 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 14 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 14 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 13 No. 7 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 13 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 13 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 13 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 7 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 10 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 8 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 7 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 6 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 8 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 7 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 5 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research More Issue