cover
Contact Name
Mochamad Nashrullah
Contact Email
Nashrul.id@gmail.com
Phone
+6285745063538
Journal Mail Official
admin@antispublisher.com
Editorial Address
Kavling Banar, Pilang, Sidoarjo, Jawa Timur
Location
Kab. sidoarjo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Journal of Social Science
Published by Antis Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30474647     DOI : https://doi.org/10.61796/ijss.v1i1
The Journal of Social Science is a monthly beacon of intellectual exploration and scholarly inquiry, offering a dynamic platform for academics, researchers, and social scientists worldwide. Rigorously curated through a meticulous peer-review process, each issue presents a rich tapestry of diverse perspectives and methodologies within the realm of social sciences. Encompassing disciplines such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, political science, and more, the journal strives to advance our understanding of complex societal dynamics, cultural phenomena, and human behavior. With a commitment to fostering interdisciplinary dialogues and embracing global perspectives, this journal serves as a vital nexus for the exchange of innovative ideas and empirical research findings. Its monthly publication schedule ensures a timely dissemination of cutting-edge scholarship, making the International Journal of Social Science an essential resource for academics, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to navigate and contribute to the evolving landscape of social sciences.
Articles 146 Documents
IRAN’S STRATEGIC NARRATIVE AND DEFENSIVE POSTURE IN THE U.S.–ISRAEL CONFLICT: PERCEPTIONS, JUSTIFICATIONS, AND REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS Victor, WOSU, Moses; Egwu, UROM, Charles
Journal of Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijss.v3i2.120

Abstract

Objective: This paper explored the Iranian strategic discourse and defensive stance in relation to the U.S.Israel war, and how perceptions, reasons and implications in the region influenced its actions. Method: Based on the Realist theory and the principle of a security dilemma, the study examined the hybrid military approach of Iran, integrating defensive, asymmetric, and proxy warfare to maintain sovereignty and prevent foreign aggression. The study employed a qualitative approach that relies on secondary sources; such as academic literature, policy statements, and regional accounts on the interplay between the ideological narrative of defense, legitimacy, and resistance of Iran and its behavioral patterns. Results: The research showed that there is a considerable gap in perceptions: in the United States and Israel, the same actions were interpreted as signs of expansionist intentions and destabilizing actions, which would strengthen the security dilemma, whereas Iran saw the same actions as defensive ones and the need to preserve the regime. The discussion has indicated that the strategic narrative of Iran has been the key to justification of its policy in the domestic context and persuasion of the international audience, but it has not been effective in all cases and circumstances. The paper came to the conclusion that the strategic discourse and defensive stance of Iran could not be separated, and ideology, perception, and operational behavior were all integrated in the Iranian security policy. Its compromise nature helped Iran to survive in a hostile region without being deterred, but at the same time, created more tension with its opponents because of conflicting interpretations. On the basis of these results, the study suggested creating a multilateral dialogue platform to clarify the intentions and enhance the communication process, creating defensive strategies to combat hybrid threats and asymmetric operations, and enhancing the strategic narrative through transparency, public diplomacy, and information campaigns based on research. Such steps would help to increase mutual understanding, decrease the number of misperceptions, and help to create a more stable regional security environment. Novelty: Based on the Realist theory and the principle of a security dilemma, the study examined the hybrid military approach of Iran, integrating defensive, asymmetric, and proxy warfare to maintain sovereignty and prevent foreign aggression.
NATIONAL-CULTURAL MARKEDNESS OF COLLOQUIAL VOCABULARY Vadimovna, Faleeva Anastasiya
Journal of Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijss.v3i2.121

Abstract

Objective : The given article deals with the problem of national-cultural markedness of colloquial vocabulary as a functional-semantic and culture-specific, linguistically conditioned phenomenon reflecting the collective experience, social norms and culturally specific modes of conceptualization. Method : The article inspired by theoretical ideas from linguoculturology, sociolinguistics and pragmatics explores the national-cultural determinants of semantics, pragmatics and employs colloquial expressions in modern English language. Results : Evidence illustrates the codification of value judgments, social relationships, and shared background knowledge in terms of cultural coding in colloquial units. The results show that informal lexis is a major site of cultural specificity and until recently has been fraught with translation, lexicographic and cross-cultural issues. Novelty : They explore colloquial units both as informal lexical items and as the carriers of cultural meanings inscribed in everyday interaction.
BRAIN DRAIN: THE BANE OF AFRICAN UNDERDEVELOPMENT Adejo Godwin; Adejor Idoga; Ebelogu Destiny Ubadinma; Iyorhe Ephraim Shagba; Onita Cyprian Chidebe
Journal of Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijss.v3i2.122

Abstract

Objective: Brain Drain is defined as the large scale emigration of highly skilled and educated individuals from developing nations, remains a critical factor contributing to Africa’s underdevelopment. The paper examines how the persistent loss of talent weakens key sectors including healthcare, education, and Public Administration, resulting in reduced productivity and poor service delivery in many African countries. Method: The paper adopts dependency theory as its theoretical framework as put forward by Andre Gunder Frank. Frank believed that the world is divided into core (developed countries) and periphery (developing countries), and that underdevelopment in poorer countries is the result of their historical and economic dependence on richer countries. Results: The shortage of qualified personnel exacerbates poverty, limits innovation, and hinders sustainable development. Furthermore, the financial investment made by government in educating these professionals yields little return, as the benefits are transferred to host countries. Despite some potentials advantages, such as remittance and knowledge transfer through diaspora networks, the negative impacts of brain drain outweigh its benefits. Novelty: The way forward/recommendation is that all hope for development in Africa is not lost, but deliberate efforts must be made by African state to define in clear terms their development objectives, improve local working conditions, increase investment in infrastructure, promote political stability, and create opportunities for professional growth within the continent.
AFRICAN VOICES AND DEMANDS ON THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY @80 Theresa Egwure Chima
Journal of Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijss.v3i2.123

Abstract

Objective: The article evaluates the voices and demands of African leaders on the United Nations General Assembly @80. The paper focuses on African leader’s unified, assertive demands for a fundamental restructuring of the global order. Method: The study selected the demands of some African leaders through the voices of four African Presidents: Algeria- President Abdelmajid Tebboune, Kenya- President William Ruto, Nigeria- President Bola Ahmed Adekunle Tinubu, highly represented by the Vice President Kashim Shettima Mustapha and Ghana- President John Dramani Mahama. Results: The paper concludes that African leaders made key demands which centered on ending historical marginalization, which includes: Reform and fair representations of African States in the UN Security Council, aid dependency to self-reliance and development, fair trade and resource value addition, peace, security and human rights, climate change and sustainable development, finally, data sovereignty, migration governance and African led solution. Novelty: The paper recommends equitable representation in global governance by fostering fair economic partnership and development.
FOREIGN AID AND THE STABILITY OF WEST AFRICAN GOVERNMENTS AND MILITARY COUPS: THE BURKINA FASO'S EXPERIENCE Ebimnamaonye, Herbert Chukwudi
Journal of Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijss.v3i2.127

Abstract

Objective: This paper explored how foreign aid influences the stability of the West African governments and military coups with specific reference to Burkina Faso. The research thus sought to explore the question of whether foreign aid had empowered the institutions of governance or led to political instability and unconstitutional governmental transitions. Method: The research was based on the Dependency Theory, which was developed by Andre Gunder Frank (1966; 1967). The research methodology used was qualitative. Secondary sources were used to get data, including textbooks, academic journal articles, government publications, newspapers, and international news sources. Content analysis was used to analyse the data in order to determine patterns and relationships between foreign aid, governance stability, and military coups in Burkina Faso. Results: The results indicated that foreign aid had helped in certain areas of governance by providing administrative support, development programmes, humanitarian aid, and security cooperation. These gains, however, failed to translate into long term political stability and popular legitimacy. The study discovered that aid was more successful in situations where institutions were already in place, but in Burkina Faso weak governance structures, insecurity and low levels of state legitimacy diminished the value of aid in stabilising situations. Novelty: The research found that foreign aid had reinforced the remnants of the state, but not the political legitimacy and institutional stability needed to achieve stable democratic governance in Burkina Faso. The study suggested more powerful domestic institutions, more people-oriented aid interventions, and less reliance on external assistance by mobilising domestic resources.
BETWEEN TWO WORLDS: ANALYSIZING THE CONVERGENCE OF SECULAR AND ISLAMIC LAW IN NIGERIA’S JUSTICE SYSTEM-A STUDY OF SUNDAY JACKSONS’ CASE (2015-2025) Aristotle Isaac Jacobs; Bubarayi G. Ibani
Journal of Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijss.v3i2.128

Abstract

Objective: This study explores the synthesis between secular and sharia law in Nigeria’s justice system: A study of Sunday Jackson’s trial of (2015-2025), it further explores how these legal traditions interact and sometimes conflict in practice. Using Jackson’s case as a focal point, it examines tensions between constitutional guarantees of human rights and religiously grounded principles, highlighting issues of jurisdictions, fairness, and legal certainty. Method: The theoretical framework for the study was discussed in an eclectic form namely: Demand-side Theory (DST), Supply-side Theory (SST) and, Legal pluralism Theory (LPT), but we adopted the later. This research employs a doctrinal and case study perspective to assess the historical development of legal pluralism, its constitutional basis, and its practical challenges. Results: It further evaluates how courts balance secular and Islamic law, especially in criminal matters, and the implications for justice delivery and human rights protection. Study findings also show that while pluralism promotes cultural and religious inclusivity, it also creates inconsistences and risks of right violations. Novelty: Nigeria’s legal system operates at the intersection of secular, customary and sharia law, creating a pluralistic framework that reflects its religious and cultural diversity. Therefore, the study recommends constitutional reforms, clearer jurisdictional boundaries, and judicial training to harmonize Nigeria’s legal systems with international human rights standards.