cover
Contact Name
Triwiyanto
Contact Email
triwiyanto123@gmail.com
Phone
+628155126883
Journal Mail Official
triwiyanto123@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Pucang Jajar Timur No. 10, Surabaya, Indonesia
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26568624     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35882/ijeeemi
Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics (IJEEEMI) publishes peer-reviewed, original research and review articles in an open-access format. Accepted articles span the full extent of the Electronics, Biomedical, and Medical Informatics. IJEEEMI seeks to be the world’s premier open-access outlet for academic research. As such, unlike traditional journals, IJEEEMI does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Rather, IJEEEMI evaluates the scientific and research methods of each article for validity and accepts articles solely on the basis of the research. Likewise, by not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, IJEEEMI facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers, whether within or between disciplines. The scope of the IJEEEMI, covers: Electronics: Intelligent Systems, Neural Networks, Machine Learning, Fuzzy Systems, Digital Signal Processing, Image Processing, Electromedical: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Artificial intelligence in biomedical imaging, Machine learning and Pattern Recognition in a biomedical signal, Medical Diagnostic Instrumentation, Laboratorium Instrumentation, Medical Calibrator Design. Medical Informatics: Intelligent Biomedical Informatics, Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, Educational computer-based programs pertaining to medical informatics
Articles 221 Documents
Data Splitting Strategies for Down Syndrome Facial Classification: A Comparative Study Using EfficientNet-B0 and MobileNetV2 Dzaki Dhiya Ul-Haq; Yunidar Yunidar; Melinda Melinda; Nurlida Basir; Rosmawinda Rosmawinda
Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): August
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Elektromedik, Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v8i3.338

Abstract

Early identification of Down Syndrome (DS) is essential for timely intervention; however, conventional diagnostic approaches often require specialized clinical expertise and significant resources. Recent advances in deep learning-based facial image analysis offer a promising alternative, yet the impact of data partitioning strategies on model performance and stability remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates the effects of different data-splitting strategies on DS facial image classification using EfficientNet-B0. A total of 3,030 facial images were collected from Roboflow and curated through preprocessing techniques, including Gaussian noise reduction, image sharpening, and contrast enhancement. Two data partitioning configurations, 70:20:10 and 80:10:10, were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, while statistical significance was examined using the Friedman test. The results show that the 70:20:10 configuration achieved an average accuracy of 87.88% ± 3.03%, while the 80:10:10 configuration achieved a slightly higher accuracy of 89.09% ± 2.53%. The Friedman test indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). However, the improvement is relatively marginal, with a small-to-moderate effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.43) and no significant difference in variance (p > 0.05), indicating limited practical significance. A trade-off between accuracy and evaluation stability was observed. While the 80:10:10 configuration benefits from a larger training set, the 70:20:10 configuration provides more stable and balanced performance, particularly in minimizing false negatives. These findings highlight that higher accuracy does not necessarily imply more reliable or clinically meaningful performance, emphasizing the importance of appropriate data partitioning in medical image classification.