cover
Contact Name
Ahmad Rayhan
Contact Email
ahmadrayhan30@gmail.com
Phone
+6285695133714
Journal Mail Official
equalityjlj@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Puri Cempaka, Azalea A9, Number 22, Panancangan, Cipocok Jaya, Serang, Banten
Location
Kota serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Justice
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30481252     DOI : https://doi.org/10.69836/equality-jlj
Equality : Journal of Law and Justice - e-ISSN: 3048-1252 (online) is a journal published by the Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia with the aim of developing research that focuses on Law and the Welfare of Indonesian Society. The journal is published in May and November Focus and Scope: Legal Science, Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, Islamic Law, International Law, State Finance Law, Business Law, Tax Law, Environmental Law and Spatial Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 43 Documents
Analisis Sembilan Langkah Pembangunan Pendidikan Jawa Barat Menuju Terwujudnya Gapura Panca Waluya Prespektif Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Fiqih Siyasah Nursetiawati Nursetiawati; Jefik Zulfikar Hafizd; Ilham Bustomi; Abdul Fatakh
Equality : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Dinamika Hukum, Tata Kelola, dan Kesadaran Hukum Kontemporer
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/equality-jlj.v3i1.756

Abstract

This study analyzes the Governor of West Java Circular Letter Number 43/PK.03.04/KESRA of 2025 concerning the Nine Steps of Educational Development toward Gapura Panca Waluya from the perspectives of State Administrative Law and fiqh siyasah. The study is based on issues related to educational costs, weak character formation, and the need for regional policies that are responsive to the practical needs of educational institutions. This research employed a qualitative method with a case study approach at SMAN 1 Sumber, Cirebon Regency. Primary data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, while secondary data were obtained from laws and regulations, the circular letter, books, and scholarly journals. The data were analyzed qualitatively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that the circular letter functions as an administrative policy instrument that is administratively valid but normatively limited. At the school level, the policy is fairly effective in directing character building, discipline, healthy habits, and controlling school activities that burden parents. From the perspective of fiqh siyasah, the policy is consistent with the principles of justice, public benefit, equality, proportional freedom, and deliberation at the implementation stage. This study concludes that the circular letter can serve as an effective administrative guideline, although stronger formal regulatory support is still needed to ensure more optimal and sustainable implementation.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Komersialisasi Potret Individu pada Car Free Day menurut Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Muhammad Alamsyah Jaya
Equality : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Equality Before the law
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/equality-jlj.v3i2.845

Abstract

The use of individual portraits taken during Car Free Day activities has raised legal issues when such images are distributed or commercialized through electronic media without the consent of the person photographed. This study aims to analyze the legal qualification of commercializing individual portraits in public spaces and the criminal liability of perpetrators under Indonesian law, particularly Article 26 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, and Article 12 of Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright. This research uses normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The novelty of this study lies in its effort to distinguish ordinary public documentation, journalistic use, and unauthorized commercial exploitation of individual portraits in public spaces. The findings show that taking photographs in public spaces does not automatically constitute a criminal offense. However, criminal liability may arise when the portrait is processed, distributed, manipulated, or used through electronic media without consent, for commercial purposes, and causes harm to the subject’s privacy, dignity, or economic interests. Civil liability may also arise under unlawful act principles, while administrative sanctions may be imposed when personal data protection obligations are violated. Therefore, clearer legal parameters are needed to determine the boundary between lawful documentation and unlawful commercialization of individual portraits in digital spaces.
Delegitimasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 114/PUU-XXIII/2025 Melalui Peraturan Kepolisian Nomor 10 Tahun 2025 dalam Prinsip Supremasi Konstitusi Baihaqi Samudera Sastra
Equality : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Equality Before the law
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The issuance of Police Regulation Number 10 of 2025 has generated considerable controversy due to its alleged inconsistency with Constitutional Court Decision Number 114/PUU-XXIII/2025, which removed the phrase “or not based on an assignment from the Chief of the Indonesian National Police” from the Elucidation of Article 28 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police. This inconsistency is manifested in Article 3 paragraph (2) of Police Regulation Number 10 of 2025, which explicitly designates seventeen ministries and government agencies that may be occupied by active police officers without requiring their resignation or retirement from police service. Such inconsistency not only constitutes a violation of the final and binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions but also potentially infringes upon citizens’ constitutional rights to legal certainty and equal treatment before the law, as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to constitutionally examine the conformity of Police Regulation Number 10 of 2025 with the aforementioned Constitutional Court decision, as well as to formulate an ideal model for drafting police regulations within the framework of constitutional supremacy. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that Police Regulation Number 10 of 2025 is not aligned with Constitutional Court Decision Number 114/PUU-XXIII/2025 and the principle of constitutional supremacy upheld in Indonesia. The issuance of this regulation is also considered inconsistent with the police reform agenda aimed at improving governance within the Indonesian National Police. This study emphasizes that the ideal practice of drafting implementing regulations requires strict compliance with and reference to Constitutional Court decisions, while positioning the Constitution as the primary normative foundation to strengthen the implementation of constitutional supremacy within Indonesia’s constitutional system.