cover
Contact Name
Habib Sulthon Asnawi
Contact Email
journalislamicmubadalah@gmail.com
Phone
+6281312427807
Journal Mail Official
journalislamicmubadalah@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Cemara, No. 27 Ganjar Asri, Metro Barat, Kota Metro, Provinsi Lampung, Indonesia
Location
Kota metro,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Journal of Islamic Mubādalah
ISSN : -     EISSN : 3063587X     DOI : 10.70992
Journal of Islamic Mubadalah merupakan jurnal kajian interdisipliner yang bersifat akses terbuka dan terbit dua kali setahun (Juni dan Desember). Artikel kajian interdisipliner yang terbit dalam Journal of Islamic Mubadalah menekankan analisis Mubadalah (saling menguntungkan), hubungan manusia yang setara, dan menegakkan keadilan gender. Isu kajian Mubādalah tidak terbatas pada kajian hubungan suami istri dalam rumah tangga saja, tetapi juga seluruh anggota keluarga seperti hubungan orang tua dan anak atau kajian hubungan keluarga dan masyarakat (domestik dan publik). Journal of Islamic Mubadalah menyediakan sarana untuk diskusi berkelanjutan tentang isu-isu relevan yang menjadi fokus dan cakupan jurnal ini yang dapat dikaji secara empiris. Jurnal ini menerbitkan artikel penelitian yang mencakup seluruh aspek kajian (kajian interdisipliner) tentang Mubādalah (saling menguntungkan), hubungan manusia yang setara, dan menegakkan keadilan gender. Isu-isu kajian Mubadalah tidak terbatas pada kajian tentang hubungan suami istri dalam rumah tangga, tetapi juga seluruh anggota keluarga seperti hubungan orang tua dan anak atau kajian tentang hubungan keluarga dan masyarakat (domestik dan publik). Beberapa isu kajian yang dapat dipublikasikan antara lain: Politik Mubadalah; Ekonomi Mubadalah; Peran Perempuan dalam Pendidikan; Peran Perempuan dalam Tradisi Adat Lokal; Kepemimpinan (Qiwamah) dalam Perspektif Mubadalah; Gerakan Ulama Perempuan; Reformasi Hukum dalam Perspektif Mubadalah; Mubadalah dalam Pola Pengasuhan Anak; Mubadalah dalam Konteks Seksual; Mubadalah dalam Rumah Tangga.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 24 Documents
Dynamics of Regulatory and Policy Changes in Child Custody in Indonesia and Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis in Responding to Modern Family Issues Muhammad Azhad Al-Bohari
Journal of Islamic Mubādalah Vol. 2 No. 2 December (2025)
Publisher : Brajamusti Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70992/743j3e88

Abstract

This study discusses the dynamics of child custody policies in Indonesia and Malaysia in the face of modern family challenges, such as divorce, mixed marriages, single-parent families, and the increasingly dominant role of women. Both countries have legal system that combine civil law and religious law, which often create tensions in the implementation of child custody rights. The study analyzez the influence of globalization and international human rights standars, particularly the UN Convention on the rights of the child, on these policies, as well as the challenges in integrating international principles with domestic law. Tha research method used is a literature study with a comparative analisys, gathering data form journal, books, policy document, and relevant online sources regarding child custody regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia. The result show that although both countries have ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, its implementation still faces obstacles due to differences in legal system and social norms. In Indonesia, religious law is more dominant in determining child custody, while in Malaysia, there is a dual legal system between civil and sharia law. However, there are opportunities to strengthen child custody policies that are more inclusive and responsive to modern families by involving courts, social institutions, and the government. The study concludes that to unsere optimal child protection, both countries need to align their policies with international standars and be more sensitive to the social changes occurring within modern families.
A Mubādalah Based Legal–Cultural Model of Mak Dijuk Siang in the Lampung Pepadun Megou Pak Community for Strengthening Family Resilience in Indonesia M. Anwar Nawawi; Chalawah Ummy Sa’diyah
Journal of Islamic Mubādalah Vol. 2 No. 2 December (2025)
Publisher : Brajamusti Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70992/xqrw3986

Abstract

This article examines the application of customary law regarding the prohibition of divorce (Mak Dijuk Siang) within the Lampung Pepadun customary community, where this norm functions as a mechanism for resolving household conflict. The central issue arises from indications that the prohibition generates marital disharmony by limiting the range of conflict-resolution options available to couples. The purpose of this article is to analyze (1) how Mak Dijuk Siang is implemented as a binding customary norm, (2) its social and emotional implications for family stability, and (3) the formulation of a culture law integration model grounded in the principle of reciprocity. Employing a qualitative, socio-legal approach informed by the mubādalah framework, the study finds that Mak Dijuk Siang is enforced through nuwo adat, family deliberation, and formal customary mediation, reflecting the moral values of pi’il pesenggiri. While this rule reinforces social cohesion, it may simultaneously intensify domestic tensions. The integration of mubādalah ethics offers a more equitable reinterpretive model that strengthens family resilience. The recommendations call for improving customary institutional policies and enhancing the role of traditional leaders so that dispute-resolution mechanisms become more protective, reciprocal, and oriented toward sustaining family wellbeing. 
Reformulating the Concept of Nusyuz in Malaysian Islamic Family Law: A Mubadalah-Based Gender Justice Analysis in Malaysian Islamic Family Law Wan Abdul Rahim Bin Wan Abd Aziz; Achmad Faishal
Journal of Islamic Mubādalah Vol. 2 No. 2 December (2025)
Publisher : Brajamusti Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70992/5wj72143

Abstract

This article reexamines the legal construction of nusyuz within Malaysian Islamic Family Law. The formulation that positions obedience as a unilateral obligation of the wife generates serious concerns related to gender hierarchy and directly affects women’s rights to maintenance, protection, dignity, and access to justice. The study aims to evaluate gender bias in both the legal definition and judicial application of nusyuz, while proposing an alternative framework based on the Mubadalah hermeneutical theory, which emphasizes reciprocity, shared responsibility, and egalitarian family relations. This study employs a qualitative normative legal method with a comparative approach to examine Islamic family law enactments across several states in Malaysia, analyzed through the framework of the theory of mubādalah. The novelty of this research lies in the application of the mubādalah perspective as an analytical framework to articulate principles of reciprocity and justice in Islamic family law. The research results found that reduction of nusyuz into a one-sided duty imposed on women not only reinforces unequal power relations but also undermines legal protection for women in situations of domestic conflict. Through the Mubadalah perspective, this article proposes the reformulation of nusyuz as a bilateral legal category grounded in moral and legal reciprocity. Recommendations include legislative revision, the development of more equitable judicial guidelines, and the integration of reciprocal principles into future reforms of Malaysian Islamic family law.
Human–Nature Imbalance in Sumatera Ecological Disasters: Mubādalah as a Framework for a Just and Sustainable Ecological Model Iskandar; Abu Yazid Abu Bakar; Hakis
Journal of Islamic Mubādalah Vol. 2 No. 2 December (2025)
Publisher : Brajamusti Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70992/1sf7vm73

Abstract

Ecological disasters in Sumatra, including flash floods and landslides, demonstrate a profound imbalance in human–nature relations resulting from upstream watershed degradation and development practices that disregard ecological carrying capacity. This article aims to identify the forms of this imbalance, analyze them through the framework of mubādalah, and propose an applied ecological model that is both just and sustainable for national environmental governance. The novelty of this study lies in extending mubādalah as an ethic of reciprocity beyond interpersonal relations to encompass the human–nature nexus, positioning nature as a relational subject rather than a passive object. Employing a qualitative–analytical approach, the study draws on literature reviews, disaster reports, and Islamic ecological scholarship. The analysis integrates reciprocity-based ecological theory and ecological spatial-planning frameworks. The findings indicate that the failure to cultivate reciprocal relations with nature exacerbates disaster risks and weakens community resilience. Consequently, the study argues for the importance of a reciprocity-oriented ecological paradigm that recognizes nature as a partner in development. Recommendations include strengthening reciprocity-based mitigation policies, advancing upstream landscape rehabilitation, and integrating the ethical principles of mubādalah into environmental governance and education as a response to the increasing frequency of ecological disasters at the national level.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 24