Articles
<![CDATA[Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Akademik Berbasis Website Pada SMP Negeri 4 Bangkalan ]]>
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>;
<![CDATA[Dr. M.J. Dewiyani Sunarto]]>;
<![CDATA[Norma Ningsih]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Komputerisasi Akuntansi (JSIKA) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Jurnal Sistem Informasi Universitas Dinamika ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Bangkalan Middle School 4 is an educational institution that was established in 1979 and is one of the public schools. During this time, Bangkalan 4 Public Middle School recorded and carried out the assessment process using paper, where the recording of values and presence carried out on paper sometimes suffered loss or damage to the paper and in the process of calculating the value is still done manually which results in miscalculation or typing in the delivery of information about the school's academic activities is not good enough, delivered at the end of the semester. To overcome this problem, 4 Bangkalan Middle School requires the School Academic Information System to be related to student attendance, student assessment and attendance information, grades and student ranking. So that the school can provide academic information to students and parents of students. Based on the results of the analysis, system design, and making that has been done, it can be concluded that the design of academic information systems can record the presence of students by homeroom and can be seen directly by students without having to wait at the end of the semester. a matter of minutes without having to count the grades of students one by one. The system will calculate the value automatically and can be directly seen by homerooms and students without having to wait 1 week to 1 month. Students can also find out student grade ranking information.]]>
<![CDATA[KEKUATAN HUKUM SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK YANG TERBIT DI DALAM KAWASAN HUTAN SEBELUM KELUARNYA KEPUTUSAN MENTERI KEHUTANAN NOMOR SK.453/KPTS-II/1999 ]]>
<![CDATA[Bambang Puji Mulyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>;
<![CDATA[Suprapto]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i1.917
<![CDATA[This land tenure right has been linked to certain land as the object and a certain person or legal entity as the subject or holder of the rights. Mastery or control can be juridical and or can also be physical. Juridical control is based on rights, protected by law and generally gives authority to the right holder to physically control the land being claimed. The relationship between the Indonesian nation and the land is eternal, which means that as long as the Indonesian people are united with the Indonesian nation, the relationship will continue uninterrupted forever. Since the issuance of a certificate of ownership indicating that the area is an area for other uses or outside the forest area and has guaranteed legal certainty. However, the government unilaterally designated their settlements or areas as forest areas since the issuance of Law no. 41/1999 concerning Forestry through the Decree of the Minister of Forestry Number SK.435/KPTS-II/1999. So that the land in the area is designated and determined as a forest area which was previously included in another area of use and in the end the status of the land becomes land attached to a forest area. This means that if land that already has a certificate of ownership is then designated and determined as a forest area, the characteristics of the certificate of ownership will not be fulfilled in the case that the certificate of ownership has the fullest character because the certificate of ownership cannot be the parent for other land rights. and in terms of use it is only limited to physical control but other legal actions cannot be taken against the certificate of ownership. In order to provide legal certainty to holders of land title certificates in this Government Regulation number 24 of 1997, confirmation is given regarding the extent of the strength of certificates, which are stated as a strong means of proof by the Basic Agrarian Law.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS/PPAT ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KARYAWAN NOTARIS/PPAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Ridho Rifani]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>;
<![CDATA[Saprudin]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i1.932
<![CDATA[The purpose of conducting this research is to analyze the legal protection of a Notary/PPAT whose responsibility is as a recipient of a client's document entrusted with the purpose of making a Deed to be disabled or negligent for acts against the law committed by Notary/PPAT employees, as well as to analyze the legal consequences for the Notary/PPAT for the delivery of client's documents to parties other than the client carried out by employees without the knowledge of the Notary/PPAT. According to the results of the study, one of the obligations of a notary based on the Notary Office Act is to safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. One of them is in terms of keeping an item entrusted to a Notary/PPAT for the process of making a deed. This obligation also applies to the employee of the Notary concerned, and the obligation to maintain the client's documents applies until the position of the Notary ends (retirement). However, in this case the Notary/PPAT employee does not carry out these obligations properly, the Notary employee submits the client's documents to a party other than the client without the Notary/PPAT's knowledge. carried out by employees. Even though in practice employees are trusted by the Notary/PPAT to assist in keeping the client's documents, however, in the case of an unlawful act committed by the employee, the Notary is responsible for the unlawful act committed by the employee as the employer. This shows the need for legal protection for Notaries/PPATs which is very detrimental to the Notary and is closely related to the good name of his profession as a Notary and his colleagues.]]>
<![CDATA[KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DALAM MENGATASI PERMASALAHAN PERTANAHAN DI ERA DIGITALISASI DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA TERHADAP TUGAS DAN FUNGSI NOTARIS ]]>
<![CDATA[Ricardo, Erick]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL HUKUM DAS SOLLEN Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.32520/das-sollen.v10i1.3409
<![CDATA[Sertifikat tanah merupakan dokumen bukti hak kepemilikan atas tanah yang menjadi produk akhir dari proses pendaftaran tanah. Lembaga pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia lahir pada tahun 1960 dengan diberlakukannya Peraturan Pemerintah No. 10 Tahun 1961 yang mengatur tentang Pendaftaran Tanah." Dalam era digitalisasi, pemerintah telah menerapkan kebijakan untuk mengubah proses pendaftaran tanah menjadi berbasis elektronik, termasuk penerbitan sertifikat tanah elektronik. Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan pemerintah dalam mengatasi permasalahan pertanahan di era digitalisasi dan implikasinya terhadap tugas dan fungsi notaris. "Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah yuridis sosiologis dengan melakukan penelitian terhadap keadaan nyata masyarakat atau lingkungan masyarakat untuk menemukan fakta, mengidentifikasi masalah, dan menuju penyelesaian masalah. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi teoritis dalam pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan Hukum agrarian, khususnya mengenai pendaftaran tanah di era digital. Secara praktis, hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan masukan bagi pemerintah, notaris, PPAT, dan masyarakat terkait pendaftaran tanah di era digital."]]>
<![CDATA[Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Adat Dayak Meratus Di Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Tengah Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan: Recognition and Protection of the Indigenous Dayak Meratus Community in Hulu Sungai Tengah Regency, South Kalimantan Province: A Legal and Socio-Cultural Perspective ]]>
<![CDATA[Rubi]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 6: Juni 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i6.7734
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji eksistensi serta kendala dalam proses pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap Masyarakat Adat Dayak Meratus di Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Tengah, Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Meskipun keberadaan masyarakat adat tersebut telah teridentifikasi secara sosiologis dan antropologis, namun hingga saat ini belum terdapat produk hukum berupa Peraturan Daerah yang secara resmi mengakui dan melindungi hak-hak mereka. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitik serta studi lapangan dan kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kendala utama dalam pengakuan dan perlindungan tersebut berasal dari aspek hukum, sosial, dan budaya. Secara hukum, keterlambatan ini disebabkan oleh ketidaksinambungan kepemimpinan daerah dan lemahnya implementasi regulasi yang ada. Secara sosial dan budaya, masyarakat adat mengalami tekanan modernisasi dan mulai kehilangan ketertarikan generasi muda terhadap nilai-nilai adat. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan percepatan legislasi daerah serta penguatan kelembagaan adat untuk mendukung perlindungan hak-hak masyarakat adat secara berkelanjutan]]>
<![CDATA[Penunjukan Notaris Pengganti Sebagai Penerima Protokol Dari Notaris Yang Bermasalah Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Anggri Yana]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 4 (2025): 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i4.1811
<![CDATA[Notaris memiliki peran vital dalam menjamin kepastian, ketertiban, dan perlindungan hukum melalui pembuatan akta autentik yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna. Ketika notaris menghadapi permasalahan hukum hingga berhalangan menjalankan tugas, penunjukan notaris pengganti atau penerima protokol menjadi krusial untuk menjamin kelanjutan pengelolaan arsip kenotariatan secara sah dan tertib. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dasar hukum, prosedur, dan tanggung jawab notaris pengganti sebagai penerima protokol dari notaris yang bermasalah hukum, serta mengidentifikasi kendala implementasi dan solusinya. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan literatur ilmiah terkait, dianalisis melalui interpretasi sistematis dan gramatikal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun pengaturan penyerahan protokol telah tegas diatur dalam UU Jabatan Notaris dan diawasi oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris, pelaksanaannya sering terkendala lemahnya penegakan sanksi terhadap penolakan tanpa alasan sah. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah perlunya penguatan regulasi, konsistensi penegakan hukum, dan optimalisasi fungsi pengawasan untuk menjaga wibawa jabatan notaris dan kepercayaan publik.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Dalam Pembuatan Akta Hak Pakai Atas Tanah Oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA): The Role of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) in Drafting Deeds of Land Use Rights for Foreign Nationals ]]>
<![CDATA[Imam Cahaya Saputera]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 8: Agustus 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i8.8090
<![CDATA[Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang membuat akta terkait pemindahan, penyerahan, dan pemberian hak atas tanah sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis: (1) Kepemilikan hak atas tanah bagi Warga Negara Asing (WNA) menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria; dan (2) Peran PPAT dalam pembuatan akta hak pakai atas tanah oleh WNA. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis. Data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa WNA tidak dapat memiliki tanah dengan hak milik, tetapi dapat diberikan hak pakai. Berdasarkan Pasal 52 PP No. 18 Tahun 2021, hak pakai diberikan untuk jangka waktu paling lama 30 tahun, dapat diperpanjang 20 tahun, dan diperbaharui maksimal 30 tahun. Selanjutnya, peran PPAT sangat penting dalam pembuatan akta hak pakai atas tanah oleh WNA. PPAT wajib memastikan seluruh persyaratan formal dan material terpenuhi sebelum membuat akta, sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Kewenangan PPAT dalam hal ini bersifat atribusi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 2 PP No. 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas PP No. 37 Tahun 1998 tentang Jabatan PPAT.]]>
<![CDATA[KEKUATAN HUKUM SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK YANG TERBIT DI DALAM KAWASAN HUTAN SEBELUM KELUARNYA KEPUTUSAN MENTERI KEHUTANAN NOMOR SK.453/KPTS-II/1999 ]]>
<![CDATA[Bambang Puji Mulyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>;
<![CDATA[Suprapto]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i1.917
<![CDATA[This land tenure right has been linked to certain land as the object and a certain person or legal entity as the subject or holder of the rights. Mastery or control can be juridical and or can also be physical. Juridical control is based on rights, protected by law and generally gives authority to the right holder to physically control the land being claimed. The relationship between the Indonesian nation and the land is eternal, which means that as long as the Indonesian people are united with the Indonesian nation, the relationship will continue uninterrupted forever. Since the issuance of a certificate of ownership indicating that the area is an area for other uses or outside the forest area and has guaranteed legal certainty. However, the government unilaterally designated their settlements or areas as forest areas since the issuance of Law no. 41/1999 concerning Forestry through the Decree of the Minister of Forestry Number SK.435/KPTS-II/1999. So that the land in the area is designated and determined as a forest area which was previously included in another area of use and in the end the status of the land becomes land attached to a forest area. This means that if land that already has a certificate of ownership is then designated and determined as a forest area, the characteristics of the certificate of ownership will not be fulfilled in the case that the certificate of ownership has the fullest character because the certificate of ownership cannot be the parent for other land rights. and in terms of use it is only limited to physical control but other legal actions cannot be taken against the certificate of ownership. In order to provide legal certainty to holders of land title certificates in this Government Regulation number 24 of 1997, confirmation is given regarding the extent of the strength of certificates, which are stated as a strong means of proof by the Basic Agrarian Law.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS/PPAT ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KARYAWAN NOTARIS/PPAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Ridho Rifani]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>;
<![CDATA[Saprudin]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i1.932
<![CDATA[The purpose of conducting this research is to analyze the legal protection of a Notary/PPAT whose responsibility is as a recipient of a client's document entrusted with the purpose of making a Deed to be disabled or negligent for acts against the law committed by Notary/PPAT employees, as well as to analyze the legal consequences for the Notary/PPAT for the delivery of client's documents to parties other than the client carried out by employees without the knowledge of the Notary/PPAT. According to the results of the study, one of the obligations of a notary based on the Notary Office Act is to safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. One of them is in terms of keeping an item entrusted to a Notary/PPAT for the process of making a deed. This obligation also applies to the employee of the Notary concerned, and the obligation to maintain the client's documents applies until the position of the Notary ends (retirement). However, in this case the Notary/PPAT employee does not carry out these obligations properly, the Notary employee submits the client's documents to a party other than the client without the Notary/PPAT's knowledge. carried out by employees. Even though in practice employees are trusted by the Notary/PPAT to assist in keeping the client's documents, however, in the case of an unlawful act committed by the employee, the Notary is responsible for the unlawful act committed by the employee as the employer. This shows the need for legal protection for Notaries/PPATs which is very detrimental to the Notary and is closely related to the good name of his profession as a Notary and his colleagues.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan Pemberian Nomor Registrasi Rancangan Peraturan Daerah oleh Pemerintah Provinsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Bintari Widyaputri Utami]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Faishal]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6512
<![CDATA[Abstrak Tahapan pemberian nomor registrasi rancangan peraturan daerah, gubernur bertanggung jawab untuk memberi nomor registrasi tersebut. Di mana ini diatur dalam pasal 242 ayat (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Mengenai mekanisme diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 120 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 80 Tahun 2015 tentang Pembentukan Produk Hukum Daerah. Gubernur memiliki kewenangan untuk melakukan pembatalan perda sebagai bentuk pengawasan pembentukan produk hukum daerah Namun, yang menjadi masalah disini terkait Pasal 251 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah yang sudah dicabut dengan Putusan MK Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016, pasal tersebut memang telah dicabut, nama pasal 242 ayat (5) ada maksud pembatalan rancangan perda secara implisit, yang mana dalam pasal tersebut hanya menyebutkan batas waktu paling lama 7 hari untuk pemberian nomor registrasi. Menjadi masalah, bagaimana jika rancangan perda tersebut tidak diberikan nomor registrasi lebih dari 7 hari. Walaupun di dalam peraturan menteri mengatur bahwa rancangan perda itu belum dapat diundangkan, namun sampai kapan, jika tidak ada batasan maka rancangan perda tersebut akan sia-sia. Di mana rancangan perda ini sudah melalui berbagai tahapan, banyak biaya yang sudah dikeluarkan, maka ini akan membuat negara dan daerah mengalami kerugian akibat rancangan peraturan daerah yang ditunda sampai batas waktu yang tidak diketahui. Kata Kunci: Gubernur, Registrasi Rancangan Perda, Pembatalan Perda]]>
