cover
Contact Name
Suwari Akhmaddhian
Contact Email
suwari_akhmad@uniku.ac.id
Phone
+6285328677090
Journal Mail Official
ulr@uniku.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Cut Nyak Dhien No.36A
Location
Kab. kuningan,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Uniku Law Review
Published by Universitas Kuningan
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30217350     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25134/ulr.v2i02.275
Core Subject : Social,
UNIKU LAW REVIEW adalah Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum merupakan sarana desiminasi ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kuningan. E-ISSN jurnal yaitu 3021-7350. Jurnal ini memuat kajian-kajian di bidang ilmu hukum baik secara teoritik maupun empiris. Fokus jurnal ini tentang kajian-kajian hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, hukum acara maupun hukum adat. UNIKU LAW REVIEW ini diterbitkan 2 (dua) kali dalam setahun, yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): UNIKU LAW REVIEW" : 5 Documents clear
Regulasi Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembalakan Liar dan Penyelundupan Ekspor Kayu Bakau Ramadhani, Deaf Wahyuni
Uniku Law Review Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): UNIKU LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/ulr.v2i02.8

Abstract

Mangrove forests in Indonesia constitute 23% of the world's mangrove ecosystem. This study aims to analyze the Regulation of Legal Responsibility of Criminal Acts of Illegal Logging and Smuggling of Mangrove Wood Exports in Indonesia. This research method is a doctrinal legal research with a case approach; secondary data sources are obtained from library materials; data collection techniques are carried out by literature studies; all data collected will be analyzed deductively. The results of the study are the Regulation of Legal Responsibility of Criminal Acts of Illegal Logging and Smuggling of Mangrove Wood Exports in Indonesia in Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs. Law No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry. Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction. The conclusion is that the regulations regarding illegal logging and smuggling of mangrove wood exports are complete. The judge's suggestion has considered the sustainability of Natural Resources but has not been oriented towards the preservation of the mangrove ecosystem and the criminal penalties applied must be maximal.
Pertimbangan Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pencalonan Peserta Pemilihan Umum di Pengadilan Pratiwi, Chika Nadia
Uniku Law Review Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): UNIKU LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/ulr.v2i02.10

Abstract

Elections are a pillar of democracy that not only guarantees the political rights of citizens, but also demands consistent and fair implementation of the law. The purpose of this article is to find out about the regulations governing the Election Participant Nomination Process including its resolution in the event of a dispute and its implementation in the PTUN Decision Number 583/G/SPPU/2023/PTUN.JKT. The research method used in this preparation uses the normative legal method, which is carried out by examining literature or secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study are that Law No. 7 of 2017 has regulated the general election process and MA Regulation No. 5 of 2017 concerning the settlement of election process disputes. In its application in 583/G/SPPU/2023/PTUN.JKT, the plaintiff Aditya has fulfilled the requirements as stipulated in Law No. 7 of 2017, but in the dispute resolution process that occurred was not in accordance with MA Regulation No. 5 of 2017. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's lawsuit was rejected because it contradicted the provisions as stipulated in MA Regulation No. 5 of 2017.
Analisis Pemutusan Kontrak Kerjasama Pengadaan Barang Atau Jasa Pemerintah Secara Sepihak Kurniawati, Imelda
Uniku Law Review Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): UNIKU LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/ulr.v2i02.14

Abstract

Termination of Cooperation Contract for Procurement of Goods or Services" refers to the termination or cancellation of an agreement between parties involved in the procurement process of goods or services. The purpose of this article is to find out about the unilateral termination of the contract carried out by the Public Works and Spatial Planning Service of the Meranti Islands Regency against PT. Merbau Indah Abadi in the contract agreement in accordance with the regulations in force in Indonesia and also to analyze the basis for the judge's considerations that granted the plaintiff's lawsuit in the decision of the Pekanbaru State Administrative Court Number 21 / G / 2023 / PTUN.PBR. The research method used is the normative research method, the reason for using normative research in this study is because of the problems being studied. The results of this study are that in the decision, the Public Works and Spatial Planning Service of the Meranti Islands Regency was proven to have missed the unilateral termination mechanism explained in Presidential Regulation No. 4/2015 and Minister of Finance Regulation 243 / PMK.05 / 2015, so that the act of terminating the contract cannot be justified because it is not in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations. The conclusion is that there are legal consequences of unilateral termination of the contract in the procurement of goods/services contract, namely the imposition of administrative sanctions, sanctions in the form of inclusion in the blacklist, civil lawsuits and criminal reporting to the authorities.
Korelasi Hukum Hak Asuh Lansia dalam Tradisi Sunda dan Islam Sarip, Sarip; Azis Husnarijal, Muhammad; Nurkhaeriyah, Nurkhaeriyah
Uniku Law Review Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): UNIKU LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/ulr.v2i02.275

Abstract

This study aims to provide input related to the plan to change Law no. 13 of 1998. The number of elderly people is increasing day by day, it is necessary to make revisions in order to realize prosperity. Lanisa with her limitations is a human being who has the same position and degree and must be protected and given welfare. Through the discussion method to provide input on the revised plan, it focuses more on the approach of local wisdom and religious teachings. The value of local wisdom chosen is the Sundanese tradition in the custody of the elderly, the religion chosen is Islam. However, he does not deny other traditions and teachings to study them as an effort to provide input for the welfare of the elderly. In the Sundanese tradition and Islamic teachings there are indeed differences in parental custody, the location of these differences is not substantial. However, to get an understanding of custody of the elderly, a solution must be found first in order to avoid the perception of custody which is always identified with custody of children. The essence of both lies in the race to take care of and respect parents regardless of whether it is a boy or a girl.
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sertifikat Hak Milik antara Pengadilan PTUN Pontianak dan PTTUN Jakarta Gayatrie, Rinda Robyatul
Uniku Law Review Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): UNIKU LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/ulr.v2i02.501

Abstract

This study aims to explore variations in legal considerations taken by judges when handling the same case in the Pontianak PTUN Decision Number 25/G/2020/PTUN.PTK and Jakarta PTTUN Number 106/B/2021/PT.TUN.JKT. The method used in this study is normative, focusing on assessing the quality of legal norms based on the principles of justice, benefit, and legal certainty. The findings of the study indicate that differences in the resolution of this case were triggered by variations in the judges' interpretation of legal facts, especially regarding the deadline for filing a lawsuit in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. Pontianak PTUN rejected the lawsuit because it considered the deadline had passed, while Jakarta PTTUN overturned the decision by stating that there was an error in calculating the time. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of consistency in the application of the law, in order to prevent uncertainty and provide justice for the parties involved in the case.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5