cover
Contact Name
Gokma Toni Parlindungan
Contact Email
gokmatoniparlindungan@gmail.com
Phone
+6281266660333
Journal Mail Official
journallegalreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Kolonel Anas Malik By Pass Kota Pariaman, Provinsi Sumatera Barat
Location
Kota pariaman,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Global Legal Review
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30316081     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59963/jglegar
Core Subject : Social,
Journal of Global Legal Review merupakan jurnal yang mempublikasikan artikel ilmiah dengan bidang keilmuan hukum. Jurnal ini dengan singkatan J-GLegar yang sebagai publisher adalah Universitas Sumatera Barat. Jurnal merupakan untuk menunjang keilmuan pada penulis, peneliti maupun dosen dalam bidang hukum, terkhususnya pada program studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Barat. Fokus jurnal ini adalah semua hasil penelitian terkait dengan ilmu hukum dan hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 34 Documents
Moralitas Humanis dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Analisis Pasal 463 KUHP Baru tentang Aborsi Korban Peekosaan Berbasis Formula Radbruch Mohamad Deden Mutakin
Journal of Global Legal Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Global Legal Review
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59963/jglegar.v3i2.538

Abstract

The policy of criminalizing abortion often causes moral tension between protecting the right to life of the fetus and protecting the humanity of rape victims. Therefore, the presence of Article 463 paragraph (2) of the New Criminal Code (KUHP), which exempts rape victims from criminal punishment, is crucial to examine, in order to observe the shift in Indonesia's criminal law paradigm from rigid positivism toward a more humanistic and just approach. This study analyzes Indonesia's criminal law response to the moral dilemma of protecting victims (humanity) and protecting life (the fetus), to the moral dilemma of protecting victims (humanity) and protecting life (the fetus), focusing on the extent to which this exemption from criminal abortion reflects a fundamental shift towards a more humanistic and just legal morality (Substantive Justice). This study uses a literature review method, which uses credible books and journals as references. This study aims to explore the article in responding to and accommodating the protection of fetuses and victims, as well as how the reciprocal relationship between law and morality is implemented in Indonesia's new criminal justice system. The results of the study show that: 1) Article 463 paragraph (2) of the New Criminal Code accommodates the demands of human morality by explicitly excluding criminal liability for female victims of rape or other sexual violence that results in pregnancy, provided that the pregnancy is no more than 14 (fourteen) weeks old or there are indications of a medical emergency; 2) This exemption is a progressive response that explicitly recognizes the physical and psychological trauma experienced by victims, placing the protection of victims' human rights and dignity as a primary consideration in the enforcement of criminal law; 3) This exception reflects a fundamental shift from rigid and positivistic legal morality (which previously punished all forms of abortion) towards a more humanistic and fair legal morality (Substantive Justice); 4) This shift is evident in the recognition of the status of the victim as a factor that negates the material unlawfulness of the act of abortion, and in a context-based approach that prioritizes substantive justice for the most vulnerable individuals; and 5) Thus, the New Criminal Code moves beyond formal procedural justice towards justice that takes into account the existential conditions and trauma of the victim.
Efektifitas Proses Mediasi Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Padang Miasiratni Miasiratni; Widya Yoseva; Suci Nurjannah Yuansyah; Nofrisca Patma Witri
Journal of Global Legal Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Global Legal Review
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59963/jglegar.v3i2.573

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the mediation process in resolving divorce cases at the Padang Religious Court and identify factors influencing the success and failure of mediation. The research method used is empirical legal research with a qualitative approach. Data were obtained through interviews with the mediator judge and the parties, as well as a study of divorce case documents that have undergone mediation at the Padang Religious Court. The collected data were analyzed descriptively qualitatively by linking applicable legal provisions with their implementation in practice. The results indicate that the mediation process in divorce cases at the Padang Religious Court has not been fully effective in reducing the divorce rate. This is due to the parties' low good faith in reconciliation, long-standing domestic conflicts, and limited time for mediation. Nevertheless, mediation remains an important means of communication and clarification between husband and wife before the case is decided by the judge. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the role of the mediator and increase the awareness of the parties so that the objectives of mediation can be optimally achieved.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pengguna Jasa Pinjaman Online dalam Perspketif Hukum Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Sistri Wahyuni; Yofiza Media; Harniwati Harniwati; Amanda Bherlyana Putri
Journal of Global Legal Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Global Legal Review
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59963/jglegar.v3i2.578

Abstract

This study aims to determine the Legal Protection for Online Loan Service Users in the Legal Perspective of Lending Agreements. This study uses a normative juridical analysis method by reviewing related laws and regulations and relevant legal literature. The results of the study indicate that in the (P2P) Lending scheme, the legal relationship occurs between the Lender and the Organizer, and between the Lender and the Borrower. The Lender authorizes the Organizer to distribute funds, while the main relationship is a loan agreement between the Lender and the Borrower. The legal relationship between the lender and the borrower is a loan agreement (debt) as regulated in Article 1754 of the Civil Code. The Lender acts as a creditor, and the Borrower acts as a debtor. Legal protection is needed to provide legal certainty for the Lender, especially in cases of default. Legal protection can be carried out preventively (before a dispute) by implementing basic principles of the organizer such as transparency, fair treatment, reliability, data confidentiality, and simple, fast, and affordable dispute resolution. Legal protection can also be provided repressively (after a dispute) through complaints and compensation if there is evidence of error or negligence by the provider. The Financial Services Authority (OJK) plays a crucial role in regulating and overseeing fintech P2P lending activities to protect the interests of lenders.
Relevansi Hukum Administrasi Negara Sebagai Instrumen Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Responsif Fauzan Zakir
Journal of Global Legal Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Global Legal Review
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59963/jglegar.v3i2.583

Abstract

State Administrative Law plays a strategic role in guiding government administration to respond appropriately and responsibly to the needs and dynamics of society. Responsive governance requires not only swift action but also adherence to the principles of legality, accountability, and protection of citizens' rights. This study aims to analyze the relevance of State Administrative Law as an instrument for realizing responsive governance within a democratic constitutional state. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results indicate that the general principles of good governance, regulations regarding discretion, and mechanisms for oversight of state administrative administration and judicial administration are important instruments in ensuring the responsiveness of government actions and decisions. However, in practice, challenges remain, such as tensions between demands for responsiveness and legal certainty, limited capacity of the apparatus, and a suboptimal understanding of the principles of State Administrative Law. Therefore, strengthening norms, improving the quality of the apparatus, and consistent application of the principles of good governance are key prerequisites for realizing responsive and just governance.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 34