cover
Contact Name
Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti
Contact Email
cendekiagagayunanindonesia@gmail.com
Phone
+6281324943904
Journal Mail Official
admin@journal.yayasancgi.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Raya Banjar - Pangandaran No.427, Kertahayu, Kec. Pamarican, Kabupaten Ciamis, Jawa Barat 46361
Location
Kab. ciamis,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
An-nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30640520     DOI : https://doi.org/10.63142/an-nisa.v1i4.46
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law is a peer-reviewed academic journal that focuses on the study and analysis of Islamic family law and related issues. The journal aims to provide a platform for scholars, researchers, and practitioners to explore the dynamic and evolving nature of Islamic family law in various cultural, social, and legal contexts. An-Nisa welcomes submissions from various disciplines, including Islamic studies, law, sociology, anthropology, gender studies, and related fields. The journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and fostering a deeper understanding of how Islamic family law operates both in theory and practice, as well as its implications for contemporary Muslim societies. By engaging with diverse perspectives and research methodologies, An-Nisa contributes to the ongoing discourse on Islamic family law and offers insights into the legal, social, and ethical dimensions of family life in Muslim communities. This journal is published 1 year 4 times (March, June, September and December).
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 8 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni" : 8 Documents clear
Tindak Pidana Kelalaian Lalu Lintas Yang Menyebabkan Kematian Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam Banalfa Izdihaar, Balqiz Rafi'
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.175

Abstract

Law enforcement against criminal acts of traffic negligence (culpa) that result in death often raises debates about the proportionality of the sanctions imposed. This article aims to analyze the application of law in traffic negligence cases based on Indonesian positive law and Islamic criminal law. The study focuses on Court Decision Number 49/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Kdl, in which the defendant was sentenced to one year of city detention, even though Article 310 paragraph (4) of Law Number 22 Year 2009 stipulates a prison sentence of up to six years. This research uses a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, through analysis of legal documents and in-depth interviews with judges who handle cases. The results showed that the judge considered the special conditions of the defendant, such as pregnancy, dependents of children under five, sincere remorse, and good faith in providing compensation to the victim's family. In the perspective of Islamic criminal law, the act is classified as jarimah qatlu al-khata', which is subject to sanctions in the form of diyat and expiation if unable to pay. This finding shows that there is a difference in approach between positive law and Islamic law, and raises discourse about the gap between legal norms and people's sense of justice. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the punishment policy in traffic negligence cases to better reflect substantive justice.
Nafkah Pasca Talak bagi Istri Nusyuz: Telaah Yuridis atas Putusan Mahkamah Syar'iyah Banda Aceh Nomor 215/Pdt.G/2020/Ms.Bna Ulkhuluq, Nisa; Amri, Aulil; Fithria, Nurul
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.179

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of judges in determining post-divorce alimony to wives who are declared nusyuz in the practice of religious justice. In classical Islamic law, nusyuz wives are generally not entitled to alimony, but the reality in Indonesian religious courts shows that there is flexibility in its interpretation and application. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a qualitative descriptive method, based on a study of the Decision of the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court Number 215/Pdt.G/2020/MS. Bna. The data was analyzed through a review of laws and regulations, a Compilation of Islamic Law, and fiqh books as the main source of law. The results of the study show that even though the wife is proven to be nusyuz, the judge still determines the maintenance of iddah and mut'ah by considering social factors, such as the economic condition of the wife and the existence of young children. This consideration shows that there is a contextual approach by judges that prioritizes the principles of justice and protection for vulnerable parties. This study concludes that the practice of providing alimony to nusyuz wives can be legally justified if it is based on the principle of benefit. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the law that is adaptive to social dynamics and strengthen regulations that are in line with the sharia maqashid in realizing substantive justice in Indonesian religious courts.
The Principle of Guardianship in Marriage: A Philosophical Analysis of the Harmonization of Islamic Law and Indonesian Positive Law Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti; Aden Rosadi; Usep Saepullah; Husain
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.188

Abstract

Guardianship in marriage law has an important position as one of the conditions for the validity of marriage in the perspective of Islamic law and also received recognition in the Indonesian national legal system. However, the application of guardianship principles in the context of positive law often raises debates, especially regarding the authority of the guardian, the position of women, and the limits of state intervention. This study aims to examine the principles of guardianship in the Indonesian marriage law system and its relevance to the values of justice and legal protection. This research uses a normative juridical approach with a literature study method. Sources of data are obtained from legislation, legal doctrine, and relevant court decisions. The analysis is done descriptively-qualitatively by tracing the concepts of guardianship in Islamic law, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage. The results show that the principle of guardianship in the Indonesian marriage legal system is based on the strong influence of Islamic law, especially in KHI. The marriage guardian is considered as a representation of honor and protection of women. However, there is also ambiguity in guardianship arrangements between the national legal system and social religious practices, which can lead to legal uncertainty. There is a need for harmonization between religious principles and human rights principles in marriage law, especially regarding women's autonomy in choosing a life partner. Revisions to regulations relating to guardianship are also needed to emphasize the position of women as independent and protected legal subjects.
Penyelesaian Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Luar Pengadilan: (Studi Kasus Dayah Mon Ara Kecamatan Kembang Tanjong Kabupaten Pidie) Muniruddin, Amesya Amani Fatiha; Fakhrurrazi M. Yunus; Boihaqi Bin Adnan
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.198

Abstract

This research examines the settlement of child custody after divorce outside the court with a focus on child custody disputes in Gampong Dayah Mon Ara, Kembang Tanjong District, Pidie Regency, the purpose of the research is to find out how the practice of resolving custody rights is carried out and how it is in accordance with Islamic law and laws and regulations. This research uses field research methods and empirical normative approaches, observation and interviews become primary data sources while articles, theses, theses and dissertations that have been researched by previous authors become secondary data sources. The results of this study indicate that the local community prefers to resolve disputes through deliberation with local traditional leaders, without going through the court process because the community believes that customary institutions are able to resolve their cases rather than having to go to court at a relatively more expensive and long time, in the case studied by the author the custody of minors falls to the father because it is considered more feasible in terms of emotional, economic, and social support, this customary settlement reflects the synergy between customary norms, Islamic law and the principle of the best interests of the child.
Pembatalan Perkawinan dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Regulasi, Faktor Penyebab, dan Dampaknya Andro Foza, Yerry; Suyatna , Enang; suhibbullah, suhibbullah; Tahsin , Rizal; Hanas, Azwar
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.207

Abstract

Marriage annulment is a legal measure taken to declare a marriage invalid and considered never to have occurred. In Indonesia, marriage annulment is regulated under Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). This study aims to analyze the factors leading to marriage annulment, the applicable legal procedures, and its impact on the parties involved, including the husband, wife, children, and shared assets. Based on legal analysis and case studies, the main causes of marriage annulment include improper marriage guardianship, violations of marriage procedures, and polygamous marriages conducted without the consent of the first wife and without court approval. Court rulings on marriage annulments have far-reaching legal implications, including the nullification of marital status, legal protection for children, and the division of shared assets. This study concludes that although regulations regarding marriage annulment are clearly defined, challenges remain in their implementation, particularly in law enforcement and public awareness of legal marriage requirements. Therefore, strengthening regulations, enhancing judicial oversight, and increasing legal education for the public are necessary to ensure that all marriages comply with the prevailing legal provisions.
Comparison of Islamic Family Law in Malaysia and Indonesia Ade Khoirunnisa; Retno Arimbi Dewi; Fatya Zahra Siahaan; Siti Samra; Aulil Amri
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.226

Abstract

Islamic family law in Malaysia and Indonesia has the same sharia basis but differs in its application due to the influence of the legal system, culture, and state policies. This comparison is important to understand the variation of regulations and their implications for Muslim communities in both countries. This study aims to analyze the similarities and differences of Islamic family law in Malaysia and Indonesia, especially in the aspects of marriage, polygamy, and inheritance, and to examine the effectiveness of its implementation. This study uses a normative juridical method with a comparative approach. Primary data sources include the Enakmen of the Melaka State Law Number 12 of 2002, the Selangor State Law Draft, the Islamic Family Law Enakmen Number 17 of 2003 (Malaysia), and Law Number 1 of 1974, Law Number 16 of 2019, and the Compilation of Islamic Law (Indonesia). Data collection techniques were carried out through library research, with data analysis using descriptive analysis and content analysis of applicable legal provisions. Research shows that although Malaysia and Indonesia are both based on sharia, Malaysia tends to be more structured in regulating polygamy and inheritance, while Indonesia is more flexible by considering customary law. Differences are also seen in the authority of the judicial institution, where Malaysia has autonomous Sharia Courts per state, while Indonesia implements a centralized system through the Religious Courts.
Eksplorasi Komprehensif Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia: Sejarah, Prinsip, dan Praktik Kontemporer Aulil Amri; Fariqan Malhusna; Maryam Thahira; Nissa Azra Nabila; Nabila Miswar; Saniah Amatillah; Ibrahim Adeyemi Adewumi
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.227

Abstract

This paper aims to comprehensively examine Islamic Family Law in Indonesia, focusing on its historical development, legal sources, and core components such as marriage, inheritance, divorce, wills, adoption, and gifts. The method used is a literature review of Islamic legal texts and national regulations, particularly the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and the Marriage Law. The results show that Islamic Family Law in Indonesia has significantly evolved, especially since the enactment of Law No. 1 of 1974 and the implementation of KHI through Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 1991. Nevertheless, challenges remain in terms of implementation, public understanding, and criticism of certain provisions perceived as gender- biased. Ongoing reform and contextualization are needed to ensure Islamic family law delivers more equitable justice in Indonesia’s pluralistic society.
Early Marriage in the Islamic Legal System, the Continental and Anglo Saxon European Legal Systems Ikbal, Muchamad; Ah. Fathonih; Fauzan Ali Rasyid
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.292

Abstract

Child marriage is a violation of human rights that has a systemic impact on aspects of reproductive health, education, economy, and social participation. This article conducts a comparative-critical analysis of the construction of child marriage law in three dominant legal systems: Islamic Law (based on maslahah mursalah), Continental European Law (codification-based), and Anglo-Saxon Law (precedent-based), using the theoretical framework of legal pluralism Santos (1987) and the concept of best interest of the child (CRC 1989). The research method combines a normative-doctrinal approach with a critical discourse analysis of primary legal texts and court decisions in 15 representative countries. The findings reveal three paradigms: (1) Contemporary Islamic law has undergone a transformation from classical fiqh through the reinterpretation of maqashid shari'ah with an age limit of 18 years (Law No. 16/2019 in Indonesia and the Child's Rights Act 2003 in Nigeria); (2) The Continental European System implements legal paternalism through the harmonization of EU Directive 2019/51 with the minimum age standard of 18 years without dispensation; (3) The Anglo-Saxon system developed judicial activism through progressive precedents (the Re Marriage Act 2015 in the UK and Obergefell v. Hodges in the US). This study contributes to the theory of global legal convergence by recommending an integrated legal reform model that synthesizes the legal certainty of the European system, Anglo-Saxon flexibility, and Islamic maslahah values.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8