Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

CONSUMER PROTECTION FROM ILLEGAL COSMETIC PRODUCTS ACCORDING TO ISLAMIC LAW: A STUDY ON THE ACEH FOOD AND DRUG MONITORING AGENCY (BPOM), INDONESIA Kartika Dwi Novasari; Fithria, Nurul
Al-Mudharabah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Al-Mudharabah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/al-mudharabah.v5i1.4604

Abstract

This article aims to analyse a consumer protection in cosmetic products that are not registered with Food and Drug Administration (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan, BPOM). It uses the normative-juridical research methods with a statutory approach. The results shows that Indonesia has a legal relating to consumer protection, namely Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Customer Protection. Thus, any fraudulent businesses actors who still frequently violate statutory regulations can be subject to sanctions in the form of administrative or criminal sanctions. Additionally BPOM as a supervisory agency also actively monitors the circulation of this dangerous product and even withdraws the product if it is proven to contain dangerous ingredients. Similarly, in the context of Islamic law, this supervision is strengthened by the principles of justice, responsibility and protection of consumers. Islamic law‘s objective is to ensure that cosmetic products on the market meet the safety standards set by Islamic principles, as well as providing appropriate protection to consumers fro
Praktik Peradilan dan Kesetaraan Gender: Analisis Implementasi PERMA No. 3 Tahun 2017 di Pengadilan Syariah Banda Aceh, Indonesia Fitri, Sulis Mai; Melayu, Hasnul Arifin; Fithria, Nurul
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2024): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v11i2.10627

Abstract

Discriminatory treatment and gender stereotypes against women in the justice system are directly related to women's accessibility to justice. The more women experience discrimination and negative stereotypes, the more limited their access to justice becomes. The implementation of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Cases Involving Women in Conflict with the Law has not been effectively carried out. For instance, some judges in the trial process have not adhered to the guidelines set out in PERMA No. 3 of 2017. In reality, there are still judges who make belittling, blaming, intimidating statements, and use loud voices against women in conflict with the law, which can undermine women's mentality in court. In response to these conditions, the Supreme Court, as the highest judicial institution in Indonesia, has initiated steps to gradually eliminate discriminatory treatment against women in conflict with the law in judicial practices in Indonesia. This study aims to examine the efforts made by judges in implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 at the Banda Aceh Sharia Court and to explore the perspectives of Sharia Court judges regarding the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017. The research uses a qualitative method with a field research approach. This study indicates that there are still challenges in implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 at the Banda Aceh Sharia Court. However, efforts are being made to reduce discrimination and negative stereotypes against women in conflict with the law. This research contributes to providing insights into the importance of implementing guidelines to reduce discriminatory treatment and offering recommendations to improve the effectiveness of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in addressing gender discrimination issues in Indonesian courts.
Normative Legal Review on the Implementation of the Main Thoughts of the DPRA in 2023 Syahriga, Razik; Suganda, Delfi; Fithria, Nurul
Jurnal EL-QANUNIY: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 11, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-qanuniy.v11i1.15342

Abstract

Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 86 of 2017 was ratified in 2017. The researcher is particularly interested in Article 178 of this regulation, which discusses the review of main ideas. The study examines whether the established rules are appropriate and whether their implementation is effective and efficient. The first issue the researcher seeks to investigate is the mechanism for implementing the Pokir (Main Thoughts) of the DPRD Banda Aceh City, as well as the effectiveness of these rules in promoting regional development in the Syiah Kuala District, Banda Aceh City. In writing this article, the author employs the Normative Juridical approach. This methodology in legal research focuses on analyzing applicable laws and regulations about the legal issues being studied, ultimately leading to problem resolution. The findings of this research indicate that the rules formulated by the legislative institution are appropriate, as they provide clear guidelines for implementing policies based on community aspirations. Furthermore, their implementation has been efficient and well-executed, demonstrating harmony between regulation and field application. This synergy between local governments and legislative institutions ensures that the main ideas generated genuinely contribute to planning that is more responsive to community needs. Thus, this regulation plays a significant role in fostering a more participatory and welfare-oriented regional development process.
Penolakan Return Barang oleh Pelaku Usaha E-commerce (Analisis Undang Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999) Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Munawarah, Nizmi; Iqbal, Muhammad; Fithria, Nurul
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16840552

Abstract

This study identifies instances of breach of contract (wanprestasi), where goods received by consumers do not match the order or arrive in a damaged condition. Furthermore, the consumer complaint process often becomes difficult and does not receive an adequate response from business actors or the platform itself. Based on initial observations of consumer experiences in Banda Aceh, it was found that return rejections often occur even though consumers have fulfilled the required procedures, such as providing an unboxing video. This reflects a gap between existing regulations and their implementation in practice, which ultimately causes harm to consumers. This study applies a normative juridical method, using an analytical approach to various relevant laws and regulations, including Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 concerning Electronic Commerce, and the Indonesian Civil Code. Primary and secondary data, including interviews with consumers who have experienced return rejections, were collected to gain a comprehensive understanding of the legal position of return rejection by e-commerce business actors and the effectiveness of legal protection for consumers. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal standing of return rejection by e-commerce businesses and to assess the extent to which Law Number 8 of 1999 can provide effective legal protection for consumers in dealing with such practices. This research is expected to contribute to formulating concrete solutions to the issue of return rejection on the Shopee platform and to optimizing the protection of consumer rights in the digital era based on Law Number 8 of 1999.
Praktik Peradilan dan Kesetaraan Gender: Analisis Implementasi PERMA No. 3 Tahun 2017 di Pengadilan Syariah Banda Aceh, Indonesia Fitri, Sulis Mai; Melayu, Hasnul Arifin; Fithria, Nurul
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2024): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v11i2.10627

Abstract

Discriminatory treatment and gender stereotypes against women in the justice system are directly related to women's accessibility to justice. The more women experience discrimination and negative stereotypes, the more limited their access to justice becomes. The implementation of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Cases Involving Women in Conflict with the Law has not been effectively carried out. For instance, some judges in the trial process have not adhered to the guidelines set out in PERMA No. 3 of 2017. In reality, there are still judges who make belittling, blaming, intimidating statements, and use loud voices against women in conflict with the law, which can undermine women's mentality in court. In response to these conditions, the Supreme Court, as the highest judicial institution in Indonesia, has initiated steps to gradually eliminate discriminatory treatment against women in conflict with the law in judicial practices in Indonesia. This study aims to examine the efforts made by judges in implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 at the Banda Aceh Sharia Court and to explore the perspectives of Sharia Court judges regarding the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017. The research uses a qualitative method with a field research approach. This study indicates that there are still challenges in implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 at the Banda Aceh Sharia Court. However, efforts are being made to reduce discrimination and negative stereotypes against women in conflict with the law. This research contributes to providing insights into the importance of implementing guidelines to reduce discriminatory treatment and offering recommendations to improve the effectiveness of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in addressing gender discrimination issues in Indonesian courts.
Nafkah Pasca Talak bagi Istri Nusyuz: Telaah Yuridis atas Putusan Mahkamah Syar'iyah Banda Aceh Nomor 215/Pdt.G/2020/Ms.Bna Ulkhuluq, Nisa; Amri, Aulil; Fithria, Nurul
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.179

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of judges in determining post-divorce alimony to wives who are declared nusyuz in the practice of religious justice. In classical Islamic law, nusyuz wives are generally not entitled to alimony, but the reality in Indonesian religious courts shows that there is flexibility in its interpretation and application. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a qualitative descriptive method, based on a study of the Decision of the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court Number 215/Pdt.G/2020/MS. Bna. The data was analyzed through a review of laws and regulations, a Compilation of Islamic Law, and fiqh books as the main source of law. The results of the study show that even though the wife is proven to be nusyuz, the judge still determines the maintenance of iddah and mut'ah by considering social factors, such as the economic condition of the wife and the existence of young children. This consideration shows that there is a contextual approach by judges that prioritizes the principles of justice and protection for vulnerable parties. This study concludes that the practice of providing alimony to nusyuz wives can be legally justified if it is based on the principle of benefit. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the law that is adaptive to social dynamics and strengthen regulations that are in line with the sharia maqashid in realizing substantive justice in Indonesian religious courts.
Isbat Nikah Pasangan Mualaf Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia (Studi Analisis Penetapan Nomor 157/Pdt.P/2022/Ms.Bna) Athira, Asla; Amri, Aulil; Fithria, Nurul
Jurnal EL-QANUNIY: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-qanuniy.v11i2.17016

Abstract

Isbat nikah pasangan mualaf menimbulkan persoalan yuridis karena belum terdapat pengaturan hukum yang eksplisit mengenai pengesahan perkawinan non-Muslim setelah memeluk Islam. Perbedaan penafsiran terhadap kewenangan lembaga peradilan menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum. Penelitian ini menganalisis ketentuan isbat nikah dalam hukum positif Indonesia serta kewenangan hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah dalam mengisbatkan perkawinan pasangan mualaf dengan studi kasus Penetapan Nomor 157/Pdt.P/2022/MS.Bna. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan analisis putusan pengadilan. Bahan hukum terdiri atas bahan primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan penetapan pengadilan, bahan sekunder berupa literatur hukum, serta bahan tersier berupa kamus dan ensiklopedia hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa isbat nikah pasangan mualaf masih menghadapi kekosongan norma dan perbedaan praktik peradilan. Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh melalui Penetapan Nomor 157/Pdt.P/2022/MS.Bna menetapkan keabsahan perkawinan berdasarkan asas personalitas keislaman, kemaslahatan, serta berpedoman pada Pasal 7 ayat (3) Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Pasal 49 Undang-Undang Peradilan Agama. Putusan tersebut dinilai sah secara yuridis dan konstitusional karena pasangan mualaf telah menjadi subjek hukum Islam. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan, bahwa negara perlu membentuk regulasi yang lebih spesifik dan operasional agar prosedur isbat nikah bagi mualaf memiliki kepastian hukum dan perlindungan yang berkeadilan sesuai nilai-nilai syariat Islam.