cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Noorika Retno Widuri
Contact Email
noorika.rw@gmail.com
Phone
+6285642543857
Journal Mail Official
sek.jurnalbaca@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Gedung BJ Habibie, Jl. M.H. Thamrin No.8, RW.1, Kb. Sirih, Kec. Menteng, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10340
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi
Published by Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
ISSN : 01259008     EISSN : 23018593     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55981/baca
Core Subject : Science,
Library & Information Science
BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI (Jurnal BACA) is a scientific journal in the documentation, information, and library subject that is published consistently by The National Research and Innovation Agency (Previously this Journal was managed by Center for Scientific Data and Documentation - Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PDDI LIPI). The publishing purpose is to provide up-to-date and quality information to readers who have an interest in science and technology development in these topics. Every article published in Jurnal BACA is the result of research activities, literature review, and best practices. Jurnal BACA is published twice a year, precisely in June and December. The number of articles for each issue is at least five articles. As a reference for submitting manuscripts, the author can refer to ODLIS to determine the list of terms related to the scope and focus of the journal. Based on "Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 21/E/KPT/2018" and "Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknlogi Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 105/E/KPT/2022", BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi was recognized as a nationally accredited scientific journal (SINTA 2). This accreditation is valid until Vol. 46, No. 1, 2025.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Perpustakan dan Informasi
Articles 302 Documents
 14   15   16   17   18 
ANALISIS BIBLIOGRAFI NASIONAL INDONESIA PERIODE 2009-2010 Nani Rahayu, Rochani; Tupan, Tupan
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 34 No. 2 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v34i2.177

Abstract

This study aims to determine: 1) The composition of the fields which listed in Indonesian National Bibliography; 2) The types of publications; 3) The cities where the publications issued; 4) The comparison of the books which have an ISBN or not. The method of this study was descriptive. The source of data was Indonesian National Bibliography vol.57 and 58 no. 1,2,3,4 year 2009 and 2010. The data presented in the form of tables and pictures. The study concluded that 1) The most appeared field in Indonesian National Bibliography was social science, i.e. 1,057 titles (22.93%), the second was technology, i.e. 723 titles (15.68%) and the third was religion, i.e. 716 titles (15.53%). 2) The first rank of publications’ type was books, i.e. 3,992 titles (86.59%), the second was compact dics, i.e. 198 titles (4.30%) and the third was cassettes, i.e. 102 titles (2.21%). 3) The highest number of publications was in 2007, i.e. 2,703 titles (58.63%), the second was in 2008, i.e. 1,205 titles and the third was in 2006, i.e. 650 titles (14.10%). 4) The first rank city where the publications issued was Jakarta, i.e. 3,436 titles (81.75%), the second was Yogyakarta, i.e. 553 (13.16%) and the third was Bandung, i.e. 147 titles (3.50%). 5) It found that a total number of 3,223 titles of books have ISBN and 958 books have no ISBN.
PERENCANAAN STRATEGIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI Sri Handayani, Diah
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 34 No. 2 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v34i2.178

Abstract

The very fast development of information technology has brought many changes to university libraries. Libraries should be able to deal with those changes by implementing appropriate strategy, otherwise it would be neglected by its users. Using SWOT and IT Balanced Scorecard qualitative approach, this study aims to result in information technology strategic planning implemented in Usakti Library. This study showed that the internal condition of Usakti Library is within average category. Meanwhile the external condition is in a medium category. The SWOT analysis resulted in ten strategies. For each strategy, measurement, target and its initiative strategy was set. The user orientation perspective is in the highest priority by 30.6% score and its main strategy is to improve the usage and quality of information technology-based services for user satisfaction scored 38.9%.
SISTEM PEMANTAU KINERJA BERBASIS BALANCED SCORECARD: STUDI KASUS UKSW DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY Tanone, Radius; Manongga, Danny; Tambotoh, Johan
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 34 No. 2 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v34i2.179

Abstract

Balanced scorecard is a concept that can be used as a performance monitoring system in an organization. Results of monitoring the performance of the organization by implementing a balanced scorecard to perform and produce measurement and monitoring from time to time. Satya Wacana Christian University wants to develop the concept of education in the direction of research in a Research University (RU). It is important for universities to create a strategy and carry out the action that RU can be realized. Application of the balanced scorecard use to see the vision and mission of the university to reach the next target should be done. As a leading university RU application of balanced scorecard need to be viewed from four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, growth and learning. Based on the perspective that there is then established Key Performance Indicators (KPI) are selected according to the needs of SWCU realize RU. Performance monitoring system is used based Ms.excel. The implementation of the balanced scorecard and KPI development plans SWCU create RU in the resulting system performance monitor that can measure and monitor from time to time.
TESAURUS BIOTEKNOLOGI: SEBAGAI ALAT BANTU PENGINDEKSAN DOKUMEN Tambunan, Kamariah
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v33i2.99

Abstract

Thesauri contain words or terms that are used as a tool to identify a concept or an idea precisely and correctly. The advantage of thesauri is because they are considered as better tools to find out information or document with a high degree of invention and precision. Thesauri are invaluable tools for analysts in deciding descriptors as keywords of a document. In accordance with its structure or composition, thesaurus of biotechnology consists of three parts: a hierarchy, an alphabetic, and an index. The relationships of terms from specific (narrow terms) to general (broad terms) are shown in the structure of the hierarchy. The next structure is an alphabetic, which is a form-changed from hierarchical thesaurus that is re-arranged alphabetically. The relationship between one term and other terms is shown, based on specificity level of a term meaning. The last structure is index. It is made by a team to help users browse terms in thesaurus quickly. Each of the terms will appear in alphabetical sequence with different frequencies.
PEMETAAN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH LPNK: STUDI KASUS LIPI DAN BPPT (2004-2008) Royani, Yupi; A. Bachtar, Mulni; Tambunan, Kamariah; Tupan, Tupan; Sugiharto, Sugiharto
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v34i1.171

Abstract

This research aims to determine: the rank of authors of LIPI and BPPT whose articles are mostly cited by other authors, the type of publications, the level of collaboration, the productivity level of authors, the coverage areas, and the topics contained in the scientific work through the subject analysis. The data were obtained from Google Scholar from 2004 to 2008. The collected data were then analyzed by using ‘co-word’ analysis. The ‘co-word’ structure was known after the mapping using bibliometric method. A total of 593 analyzed scientific papers consist of 472 from LIPI and 121 from BPPT. The results show that the highest citation number (100 citations) comes from LIPI scientific papers, while BPPT scientific papers are 36 citations. Most types of publication produced by LIPI and BPPT are from journal articles and papers, each of 235 documents (49.79%) and 101 documents (21.40%) by LIPI and 71 documents (58.68%) and 42 documents (34.71%) by BPPT. LIPI researcher collaboration level was 0.82 and BPPT was 0.89. The most productive LIPI researcher in writing paper is Danny Hilman Natawidjaya (Geotechnology Research Center) with 31 scientific papers, while BPPT is Yusuf Surachman Djajadihardja with 34 scientific papers. The most dominant topic written by LIPI researcher is basic science or pure science i.e. 63.56%, with details: biology 131 documents (27.75%) followed by geology 121 documents (25.64%), chemistry 47 documents (9.96%) and mathematics 1 document (0.21%). The topic most widely written by BPPT researchers is the field of applied research i.e. 56.19% with the details: environment 33 (27.27%), engineering 27 (22.31%), biotechnology 5 (4.13%), food technology 2 (1.65%) and fisheries 1 document (0.83%). The relationship among the topics is shown in the line among the descriptors on each field. More relation lines among descriptors, the closer the relationships among documents.
ANALISIS KETERPAKAIAN REFERENSI: STUDI KASUS LAPORAN AKHIR RISET KOMPETITIF LIPI 2003 – 2007 BIDANG KALIMANTAN TIMUR & BANGKA BELITUNG, PRODUK KOMODITAS & TEKNOLOGI, DAN WILAYAH PERBATASAN NTT Nani Rahayu, Rochani; Tupan, Tupan; Mardiana, Mardiana
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v33i2.100

Abstract

Study of reference usage analysis on final report of LIPI‘s Competitive Research (2003 -2007) has some goals, i.e to find out: kinds and sources of document which were cited, also median half life of document used by researchers as references. This research focused on 3 fields of research areas, i.e: East Kalimantan and Bangka Belitung (EKBB), Product, Comodities, and Technology (PCT), and Border Region of East Nusa Tenggara (BRENT). Data was obtained by recording the research titles and all of the references used by researchers on the final research reports. All recorded data including information resources, such as books, journals, proceedings, thesis, etc, then tabulated, grouped, and presented on tables. The results show that total citation in the area of: EKBB, PCT, and BRENT are 580, 260, and 147 respectively. The most citation is coming from foreign literatures. The author also found that many researchers still did not write down their references carefully, for examples no publication date and no access date (for internet sources). Median half life for all the research fields is ≥ 10 years.
KAJIAN PERPUSTAKAAN KHUSUS DAN SUMBER INFORMASI DI INDONESIA Tambunan, Kamariah
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v34i1.172

Abstract

This study tries to know the map of special libraries and information sources in Indonesia. Publication which examined are Directory of Special Libraries and Information Sources in Indonesia which published in 1981, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005. Data was collected by rewrite of each title of the library, address or city also province, field or subject, and established year. Total of the special libraries base on city (libraries address), field or subject, and established year then calculated and presented in form of tables and hystograms. The result shows that total of special libraries and information sources in Indonesia increase year by year. The last publication in 2005 registered as many as 994 of libraries which reside in 32 provinces (136 cities) in Indonesia. Base on the total that registered, 668 libraries are in Jawa Island (62 cities), and others 326 libraries are in outside Jawa Island (74 cities). The most of special libraries with subject of religion (143 libraries) and economics (140 libraries), then social, agriculture, education, law, and medicine. The author also found that there are 3 oldest special libraries which were established in 1842, 1886, and 1887, while the youngest library was established in 2004.
MEWUJUDKAN PERPUSTAKAAN PERGURUAN TINGGI YANG RAMAH DIFABEL Isrowiyanti, Isrowiyanti
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v34i1.173

Abstract

This study aims to: 1) raise the institutions awareness about disabilities, especially the awareness in the university library that disability is a part of the academic society. The disabled people have the same rights for facilities and learning support services, therefore every university library should be inclusive and can serve user with disabilities; 2) university library should become disabilities-friendly. This study used literature study and also observation and interviews. The result of this study showed the elements which support university library to be disabilities-friendly namely facilities and infrastructure, human resource, and program socialization.
SUMBER INFORMASI "STANDAR" DALAM CYBERSPACE Rahartri
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v33i2.101

Abstract

A library has a principal role as a place to obtain the necessary information and data needed by users. Most users need the latest information. The increasing demand of the recent information needed by user is not balanced with the availability of collections owned by the library. The limitation of collections in the library requires the librarians to dig up more necessary information from various sources in the worldwide. This makes librarians work harder to access the various sources of the information online. Many users need information about standards, while most librarians do not understand how and where they can access the information. This paper discusses the sources of the latest information standards accessible by librarians easily.
MENERAPKAN KONSEP PERPUSTAKAAN 2.0 Sudarsono, Blasius
BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 31 No. 1 (2010): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Agustus)
Publisher : Direktorat Repositori, Multimedia, dan Penerbitan Ilmiah - Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN Publishing)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/j.baca.v31i1.95

Abstract

The Library 2.0 terminology was coined in 2005 by Michael E Casey in his blog entitled Library Crunch. This article discusses the implementation of Library 2.0 concept, as a continuation of the previous article by the same author which had introduced the concept. Basically, Library 2.0 is an application of Web 2.0 for library purposes. It based on two fundament¬als that are: the strength of participation and the sophisticated of information technology. For library, theses forces based on three basic transformations i.e.: from book centered to human centered, from users oriented to users centered, and from information management to knowledge management. To discuss the implementation of the concept, the author did not start from the scratch, but looking other libraries that already had undertaken the effort. Examples are taken from USA, Australia, and China. Finally, the author discusses the possibility of Indonesian Librarians to implement the Library 2.0 concept. In addition the author also gives some suggestions.

Page 16 of 31 | Total Record : 302

 14   15   16   17   18 

Filter by Year

1995 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 46 No. 2 (2025): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi : (Desember) Vol. 46 No. 1 (2025): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 45 No. 2 (2024): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 45 No. 1 (2024): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) 2024: SPECIAL ISSUE - DATA IN BRIEF FOR REPOSITORI ILMIAH NASIONAL Vol. 44 No. 2 (2023): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 44 No. 1 (2023): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) 2023: SPECIAL ISSUE - FESTSCHRIFT FOR BLASIUS SUDARSONO Vol. 43 No. 2 (2022): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 43 No. 1 (2022): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 42 No. 2 (2021): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 42 No. 1 (2021): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 41 No. 2 (2020): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 41 No. 1 (2020): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2019): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 40 No. 1 (2019): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 39 No. 2 (2018): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 39 No. 1 (2018): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 38 No. 2 (2017): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 38 No. 1 (2017): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 37 No. 2 (2016): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 37 No. 1 (2016): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 36 No. 2 (2015): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 35 No. 2 (2014): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 35 No. 1 (2014): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 34 No. 2 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2012): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2010): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Agustus) Vol. 30 No. 2 (2009): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2009): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Agustus) Vol. 29 No. 1 (2005): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 28 No. 2 (2004): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 28 No. 1 (2004): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 27 No. 2 (2003): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Agustus) Vol. 27 No. 1 (2003): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (April) Vol. 26 No. 1-2 (2001): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Maret-Juni) Vol. 25 No. 3-4 (2000): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (September-Desember) Vol. 25 No. 1-2 (2000): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Maret-Juni) Vol. 24 No. 3-4 (1999): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (September-Desember) Vol. 24 No. 1-2 (1999): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Maret-Juni) Vol. 23 No. 1-3 (1998): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Maret-September) Vol. 22 No. 5-6 (1998): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Maret) Vol. 23 No. 4 (1998): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 22 No. 3-4 (1997): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (September) Vol. 21 No. 6 (1997): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Maret) Vol. 21 No. 3-4 (1996): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (September) Vol. 21 No. 1-2 (1996): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Juni) Vol. 21 No. 5 (1996): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) Vol. 20 No. 6 (1996): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 20 No. 3-4 (1995): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi Vol. 20 No. 5 (1995): BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi (Desember) More Issue