cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Khobirul Amru
Contact Email
juit@uinsa.ac.id
Phone
+6285736375937
Journal Mail Official
juit@uinsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. St. Ahmad Yani 117 Surabaya, East Java 60237, Indonesia.
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29887917     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15642/JUIT
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Art, Social,
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought (JUIT) is an international peer-reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. This journal serves as a global academic platform for research in Islamic Thought, Islamic Politics, Religious Studies, Sufism, and Islamic Psychotherapy. Adopting a broad and inclusive approach to these fields, the journal brings together diverse disciplinary perspectives. JUIT publishes peer-reviewed articles that explore the historical, cultural, social, philosophical, political, anthropological, literary, artistic, and other dimensions of these subjects across all periods and regions. The journal aspires to become one of the world’s leading platforms for new findings and scholarly discourse in the aforementioned areas. Scholars from all countries with an interest in these topics are warmly invited to submit their articles and contribute to this open-access journal.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Kesehatan (Ilmu Sosial)
Articles 25 Documents
 1   2   3 
Constructing Digital Patriarchy: Framing the Hadith of Dayyūth and Gendered Morality in Online Islamic Discourse Rohmah, Nur Maulidya Wardatur; Mukhammad Zamzami; Ida Rochmawati
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/juit.2025.3.1.1-36

Abstract

This article analyzes the construction of digital patriarchy in Islamic moral discourse through the use of hadith about dayyūth on the Instagram account @mahasiswa.salaf using Robert N. Entman's Framing Analysis framework. In the context of social media as a space for contesting religious authority, this hadith not only functions as a source of family ethics but also as an ideological instrument that shapes moral boundaries and gender relations. Through Entman's four dimensions, such as problem definition, diagnosis of causes, moral judgment, and treatment recommendation, this article shows that the account defines moral threats as the result of men's negligence in protecting family honor, judges such behavior as a sin that blocks the path to heaven, and recommends male control over women as a solution. These findings reveal that religious narratives in digital spaces reinforce patriarchal hegemony through textual legitimation, but also open up space for resistance through audience interactions that challenge conservative interpretations with arguments for gender equality. This article contributes to the study of digital religion and Islamic gender studies by emphasizing the need for a reinterpretation of hadith based on social ethics that emphasize collective moral responsibility, the value of raḥmah, and justice in an increasingly ideological and fragmented digital religious ecosystem.
Digital Tafsir and the Construction of Religious Authority: A Critical Analysis of Gus Nur’s Quranic Interpretation Nopriani Hasibuan; Eka Mulyo Yunus; Thohar Ahmad Hsb
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/juit.2025.3.1.65-97

Abstract

The phenomenon of digital tafsir presents a significant challenge to the accuracy and credibility of Quranic interpretation. A controversial case emerged from Gus Nur’s digital sermon, in which he claimed that “scholars can originate from animals,” referring to surah Fāṭir [35]: 28. This claim generated theological confusion and illustrated the potential for interpretive distortion in digital da‘wah. This study investigates the forms and mechanisms of distortion in Gus Nur’s interpretation and critically verifies his claims using authoritative exegetical methods. A qualitative content-analysis approach is employed, drawing on primary data from the GusNur 13 Official YouTube channel and the Quranic text, as well as secondary data from classical and contemporary tafsir literature. The analysis integrates the framework of al-Aṣīl wa al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr (The authentic and the intrusive in Quranic Exegesis) with Pierre Bourdieu’s sociological theory, specifically the concepts of field, habitus, capital, and doxa. The findings reveal that the distortions in Gus Nur’s interpretation function as a symbolic attempt to assert religious authority in the digital sphere, utilizing rhetorical strategies and visual religious symbols to construct legitimacy outside established scholarly structures. The study highlights the urgent need for critical verification of digital religious content and underscores the importance of tafsir literacy grounded in rigorous scientific methodology to preserve the accuracy and integrity of Quranic interpretation
Between Revelation and Revolution: H.O.S. Tjokroaminoto’s Quranic Hermeneutics and the Formation of Islamic Socialism Rosalnia, Rika Leli Dewi Khusaila
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/juit.2025.3.1.37-64

Abstract

This article examines the ontological and epistemological foundations of H.O.S. Tjokroaminoto’s interpretation of sacred texts, as well as his hermeneutical commitment to the Quran as a project of knowledge and structural decolonization. As a prominent figure in the Indonesian Islamic political movement in the early twentieth century, Tjokro synthesized nationalism, socialism, and religiosity into an anti-colonial framework of thought. Living under the shadow of Western colonialism and capitalism, he sought to construct an antithesis to colonial hegemony through the Sarekat Islam (SI) movement and intellectual discourse based on Quranic values. Employing qualitative research with a hermeneutical approach to a range of Tjokroaminoto’s intellectual artifacts, this study finds that Tjokroaminoto interpreted the Quran from two interrelated perspectives: theologically, as a form of obedience and submission to divine revelation, and sociologically, as a moral and political imperative to free humans from oppression. His interpretation reflects a praxis-oriented epistemology rooted in the basic values of Islamic socialism, namely unity of the people, with four hermeneutic keys structured around four hermeneutical principles: equality, brotherhood, independence, and the cultivation of democratic ideals. Tjokroaminoto’s hermeneutics presents a reading that transcends dogmatic and textual boundaries, transforming the Quran into both a theological foundation and a political manifesto for liberation. Through this perspective, the Quran emerges as a living and dynamic text that inspires social change and national awakening.
The Conservative Turn in Qur’anic Legal Hermeneutics: Discourse and Authority in Tafsīr Āyāt Al-Aḥkām Yahya, Ahmad; Zidna Zuhdana Mushthoza
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/juit.2025.3.1.98-129

Abstract

The article examines Mannā‘ al-Qaṭṭān’s Tafsīr Āyat al-Aḥkām as a central articulation of a conservative turn in Qur’anic legal hermeneutics, formulated to reinforce Islamic orthodoxy amid the growing influence of contextualist approaches in twentieth-century Qur’anic interpretation. Employing Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis framework, this study investigates three levels of discourse practice—text, discourse production, and socio-cultural context—to demonstrate how al-Qaṭṭān’s interpretive strategies construct, sustain, and reproduce religious authority. The textual analysis reveals that al-Qaṭṭān articulates his legal hermeneutics through tarbawī (pedagogical) and taysīrī (facilitative or ease-oriented) orientations, supported by argumentative patterns that reaffirm the boundaries of Islamic orthodoxy. The analysis of discourse production reveals that his critiques of theological groups—such as the Mu‘tazilah, Qadariyyah, Mujassimah-Mushabbihah, and Mu‘aṭṭilah—as well as his positions on contemporary issues, including dhikr jahrī (audible remembrance), population control, and liberal thought, function as mechanisms for delegitimizing alternative interpretive discourses. At the socio-cultural level, the study demonstrates that al-Qaṭṭān’s legal interpretive construction is inseparable from Saudi Arabia’s ideological configuration and the institutional role of the Islamic University of Imam Muḥammad ibn Sa‘ūd in shaping the kingdom’s global da‘wah agenda since the 1960s. The study concludes that his tafsīr serves as a crucial locus for reinforcing orthodoxy and sustaining the authority of conservative discourse in contemporary Islamic legal thought.
Decolonizing Gendered Readings: Post-Colonial Indonesian Qur’anic Exegesis and the Reframing of Women in Islamic Discourse Mala, Fiki Khoirul; Dany Buyung Yudha Prasetya; Muhamad Irfan Maulana; Faris Maulana Akbar
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/juit.2025.3.1.130-165

Abstract

This article examines how post-colonial Indonesian Qur’anic exegesis contributed to the reconstruction of women’s roles during the nation’s epistemic transition from colonial domination to decolonial self-definition. Drawing on Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis and hegemonic masculinity theory, the study analyzes Hamka’s Tafsīr al-Azhar and Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy’s Tafsīr an-Nūr as two pivotal interpretive trajectories that shaped mid-20th-century Islamic thought in Indonesia. The findings reveal complementary discursive strategies: Hamka advances a moral-spiritual discourse that situates male-female relations within a balanced social fiṭrah and employs tafsir as a medium for national moral reconstruction, while Hasbi articulates a rational-reformist approach emphasizing justice, mutuality, and the historical functionality of gender roles. Both exegetes resist colonial and classical patriarchal hierarchies by reframing women not as passive subjects but as moral and civic agents in nation-building. The study’s primary contribution lies in demonstrating that post-colonial Indonesian tafsīr constitutes a distinct decolonial hermeneutic that recongures gender through three analytical dimensions: women’s morality, rationalization of roles, and epistemic repositioning within Islamic discourse.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 25

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): December Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Desember Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): June