cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 812 Documents
 76   77   78   79   80 
URGENSI KLAUSULA RAHASIA DAGANG DALAM KONTRAK KERJA ANTARA KARYAWAN DENGAN PERUSAHAAN (Studi Pada Kentucky Fried Chicken Kota Pekanbaru) AHMAD IRFAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (343.675 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Saidin, SH, MHum2. Dr. Jelly Leviza, SH, MHum3. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum A trade secret owner has to keep important information confidential from other parties that can harm his importance. The Law on Trade Secrets explains that the owners of trade secrets have managed to keep their trade secrets if they have taken decent and proper steps, as such a company that has standard procedures based on general practices applicable in other places and or written in internal provisions of the company. The research discusses about the contract of Kentucky Fried Chicken and their employee named Mr. X written in form of an employment contract dated August 18, 2018, stating that “Employees are obliged to keep the confidentiality of the managerial system and restaurant managerial methods obtained during their years of service in the company and after their contract is terminated”. In practice, Mr. X, as a former employee of Kentucky Fried Chicken, has now established his own business named RG Fried Chicken on Jalan Diponegoro in Pekanbaru.Keywords: Trade Secrets, Settlement of Dispute over Trade Secrets.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PENITIPAN SERTIPIKAT KEPADA NOTARIS/PPAT TERKAIT PROSES PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR 53/PID.B/2017/PN.BKT) DARA TRIANI PUTRI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (256.631 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Dr. Suprayitno, SH, MKn2. Dr. Henry Sinaga, SH, MKn3. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum The procedures of depositing land title certificates to a Notary/Land Title Registrar (hereinafter is referred to as PPAT) have not yet been explicitly and obviously regulated in term of the authority/obligations and prohibition for the Notary/PPAT to accept the deposit related to land title transfer. However practically, the certificate deposit is frequently performed by Notary/PPAT for the land title transfer process. Consequently, Notary/PPAT can be accused for embezzlement, for example, the district court ruling No. 53/Pid.B/2017/PN.BKT. The results of the research conclude that it is actually compulsory to deposit certificates to Notary/PPAT related to land title transfer process because PPAT shall firstly verify the land title to the National Land Office by matching the land title certificate in the lists of certified land in the local Land Office, and PPAT needs to show the original certificate as stipulated in the Regulations of Ministry of Agrarian/Head of National Land Office. Notary/PPAT cannot be held criminal accountable because there are buyer’s rights that have to be protected in the sale and purchase contract deed that he makes. When the certificate is deposited, Notary/PPAT makes a receipt acknowledgement letter for all parties. however, the Notary/PPAT have to be truthful in transferring the land title, because they can be held accountable administratively or civilly and there are sellers that feel being financially harmed by the legal action of Notary/PPAT.Keywords: Certificate Deposit, Notary/PPAT, Embezzlement
KEDUDUKAN DAN HAK MEWARIS ANAK YANG BERSTATUS WARGA NEGARA ASING (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATAUSAHA NEGARA DI JAKARTA NOMOR141/G/2010/PTUN-JKT) ERMILIA DEVRITA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.233 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Muhd Yamin, SH, MS, CN2. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3. Notaris Dr. Syahril Sofyan, Sh, MKn A child who is born from an international mix marriage will have a problem with his status of citizenship and with his inheritance rights. Jakarta Probate Court issued a Letter of Notifications on Inheritance Rights for a child who had foreign citizen status and stated that he was the heir of his late mother’s property. However, his mother’s siblings filed a complaint. A child who has status the status of foreign citizen has the right to inherit from his parents who are Indonesian citizens. However, if he inherits an ownership property, according article 21, paragraph 3 of Agrarian Law, he has to relinquish his rights within 1 (one) year after he inherits it. It is recommended that every Indonesian citizen should pay attention and be aware of any rules and regulations on civil registry in Indonesia so that there will be law of order.Keywords: Inheritance Rights, Foreign Citizen
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGAJUAN GUGATAN PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) HAK ATAS TANAH OLEH PIIHAK CALON PENJUAL KARENA ADANYA GUGATAN DARI PIHAK KETIGA (STUDI PUTUSAN MA NO. 3703.K/PDT/2016) FRANCO SENTANU
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (344.006 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Budiman Ginting, SH, MHum2. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3. Notaris Dr. Henry Sinaga, SH, MKn Case of unilateral cancellation of PPJB on Land Rights in the Supreme Court's Ruling No. 3703.K / PDT / 2016 is done by returning the down payment that has been deposited to the Jayapura District Court but the defendant does not want to receive the deposited money because it does not want to cancel the PPJB and because of that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, the prospective buyer because he did not the existence of good faith. The research used normative judicial method which used a library research. The main stressing on this research is the legal standing of PPJB that is made by notary, the regulation of the cancellation of contract agreement and doing a juridical analysis on the supreme court’s ruling No. 3703.K/PDT/2016. The making of the PPJB should be accompanied by sanctions clauses regarding defaults in the implementation of the PPJB and the Notary is expected to be the mediator between the disputed prospective seller and buyer.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP WARGA NEGARA INDONESIADARI AKIBAT PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN PADA PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN(STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI RI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015) DANIEL JEFFREY LUMBAN BATU
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (280.862 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Hasim Purba, SH, MHum2. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3. Dr. Yefrizawati, SH, MHum The research results demonstrate that before the enactment of the Verdict of the Constitutional Court No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015, the law is considered incapable of insuring the constitutional rights of Indonesian citizens who are married to foreign citizens without a marital agreement. The Verdict of the Constitutional Court has widened the significance of a marital agreement so that it is not only interpreted as an agreement made before or by the time of the marriage, but it can also be made during the marriage. A marital marriage is highly needed by Indonesian citizens who are married to foreign citizens in order to provide protection, insurance, and legal benefits for all parties unexceptionally the third party outside the marriage. The verdict is not only beneficial for those in a mixed marriage, but also for all married couples.Keywords: Legal Protection, Indonesian Citizens, Marriage, Marital Agreement, Mixed Marriage, Foreign Citizens.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS ON THE VALIDITY OF PROPERTY SALE ERTIFICATE BY PPAT (OFFICIAL EMPOWERED TO DRAW UP LAND DEEDS) FOR FOREIGNERS IN INDONESIA NINDYA CAESY AIDITA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (415.674 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Budiman Ginting, SH, MHum2. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3. Notaris Dr. Suprayitno, SH, MKn PPAT is liable for the deeds he has drawn up so that when there s a dispute, a civil sanction will be imposed upon him. A PPAT’s deed is evidence with a complete legal force, but when later on they are considered as underhanded deeds or they are null and void according to a Court’s Verdict which is final and conclusive (inkracht) so that it is considered illegal and harms other parties, the PPAT is liable and is required to pay compensation. The regulation on making property sale certificate for foreigners in Indonesia is that by making a request for right of use for foreigners, the original certificate is changed to right of use, and transaction can be done. Foreigners can buy or build their own houses on the right of use land of the State land or the right of use on ownership land, or buy units of apartment built on a right of use land or on the State land. Legal protection for foreigners who make property sale certificate is found in Article 4 of UUPA which states that foreigners who live in Indonesia are allowed to have the right of use so that as buyers, they can have legal protection, but when they want to buy ownership land, it has to be changed to the right of use.Keywords: Validity of Property Sale Certificate, PPAT, Foreigners
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERBEDAAN HARGA TRANSAKSI DENGAN HARGA YANG TERCANTUM DI DALAM AKTA PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI NOTARIS SUNDARIA TAMBUNAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (349.391 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Syafruddin Kalo, SH, MHum2. Dr. Maria Kaban, SH, MHum3. Notaris Dr. Henry Sinaga, SH, MKn Buy and sell on land is the transfer of land right from a person to another one. It is common in a society since land is highly needed and has economic value. In the sale contract, object and price should be listed clearly. Price is very prominent in a sale contract so that if it is not listed it will change the meaning of the contract. Land is an object of sale-purchase contract which has economic value; therefore, every land right transfer will be subject to tax for the State. The seller is subject to PPh (Income Tax) and the buyer will be subject to BPHTB (Duty on Land and Building Right Acquisition). In calculating the tax of the land and building transfer, price has significant influence on the amount of its payment so that to increase the income of the State the tax is determined from the highest price. This makes land speculators not mention the real price in the deed to avoid a great number of taxes so that it is necessary to analyze the legal consequence of the price in a sale contract at taxation sector.
KONVERSI HAK ATAS TANAH YANG BERASAL DARI TANAH ULAYAT KAUM MENJADI HAK MILIK PRIVAT (STUDI PADA KANTOR PERTANAHAN KABUPATEN PESISIR SELATAN) AISYAH AULIA HASAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (433.115 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yamin, SH, MS, CN2. Prof. Dr. Syafruddin Kalo, SH, MHum3. Dr. Edy Ikhsan, SH, MA Tanah ulayat kaum sering menjadi konflik di tengah masyarakat yang berujung pada gugatan sengketa kepemilikan tanah di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. penggunaan tanah yang lama kelamaan tanah yang pada awalnya milik kebersamaan akan beralih dan berproses melalui individualisasi hak secara legal dimata hukum maupun tidak legal.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris yang bersifat deskriptif analitif, sumber data yang digunakan yaitu data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Tekhnik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu library research, dan alat pengumpulan data menggunakan studi dokumen yang didukung data wawancara. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan secara kualitatif sehingga dapat ditarik kesimpulan secara deduktif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa alasan anggota kaum ingin mengkonversi menjadi hak milik privat karena anggota kaum ingin mendapatkan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum dan memperkuat bukti pemindahtanganan hak (dijual) kepada pihak lain. Secara prosedur syarat konversi hak atas tanah menjadi hak milik privat di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan sudah sesuai dengan Peraturan Daerah Propinsi Sumatera Barat nomor 16 tahun 2008 tentang tanah ulayat dan pemanfaatannya dan berdasarkan Surat Edaran Kakanwil Badan Pertanahan Nasional Sumatera BaratHambatan yang dihadapi dalam konversi hak atas tanah menjadi hak milik privat di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan masih kuatnya adat, sehingga UUPA belum mengakomodasikan dengan jelas bentuk dan format pendaftaran dan penerbitan tanah ulayat kaum yang sesuai dengan kearifan lokal Sumatera BaratKata Kunci : Hak milik privat ; Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan ; Konversi ; Sumatera Barat ; Tanah ulayat kaum
PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HAK CIPTA ATAS PENGGUNAAN MATERI CERAMAH, LAGU DAN/ATAU MUSIK DALAM PEMBUATAN VIDEO DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN APLIKASI DUBSMASH MENURUT PRINSIP FAIR USE MUHAMMAD FADHLI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (107.805 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Dr. Saidin, SH, MHum2. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3. Dr. Jelly Leviza, SH, MHum Internet is an information technology development as new media. Dubsmashappears as mobile application to make selfie dubbing video, using popular audio;the result is distributed through social media. A problem occurs when the soundrecording is citation of a popular song or film protecting by copyright, but thereis an exception of using the work of a composer which is called, fair use principle.The research used descriptive analytic method with juridical normativeapproach. The data were analyzed qualitatively, and the conclusion was drawndeductively through normative framework.Videos result dubsmash applications has violated the moral values ofcomposers and/or copyright holders in which the users have mutilated the workart such as popular audio of other people’s music or films of other people’s sound(Article 5, paragraph 1 of UUHC). However, in the fair use principle, since it isnot commercial and for personal use and/or does not give any profit to Dubsmashusers and there is no objection from the composers (Article 43, letter d of UUHC).The video and Dubsmash distributed to social network is not protected by lawaccording to Article 7, paragraph 1, letter (a) of UUHC since there is nooriginality element in it; it is only common work which belongs tocinematography. The legal protection for composers and/or copyright holders ispreventive and repressive (Article 55 and Article 95, paragraph 1 of UUHC).It is recommended that the Government intensively inform internet users notto violate other people’s copyright. Executive and/or Legislative Institutions should explain clearly the requirements of a work of art which protected bycopyright. Those who feel harmed should report to the Dubsmash or theauthorities or bring the case to the Commercial Court for the process of litigation.Keywords: Copyright, Video, Dubsmash, Fair Use
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS PALA ACEH SELATAN SEBAGAI PRODUK INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS NANDA MAULINA SAFIRA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (689.384 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Saidin, SH, MHum2. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3. Dr. Jelly Leviza, SH, MHum Geographical indication is defined as an indication symbolizing the place or good and/or products by which geographical environmental factor including the factors of nature, human and the combination of both contribute a particular reputation, quality and characteristics. The agricultural products in Aceh Province that have been registered as the product of geographical indications are gayo coffee, gayo oranges and Aceh patchouli, while the nutmegs of South Aceh has not yet been registered as the geographical indications product and is not yet legally protected. The good reputation and quality of the nutmeg of South Aceh is well-known in national and international because it has special characteristic. Considering that the nutmeg had ever been rejected by foreign countries because it was contaminated by kerosene by irresponsible pary that wanted to take profits from its reputation. It is necessary to register the nutmeg to be protected, in geographical indications. Keyword: Registration, Legal Protection, Geographical Indications

Page 78 of 82 | Total Record : 812

 76   77   78   79   80 

Filter by Year

2013 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue