cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Siti Fatimah Abd. Rahman
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
info@ifrel.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Batursari, Mranggen, Kab. Demak, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Published by International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers
ISSN : 30630576     EISSN : 30637244     DOI : 10.70062
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
(Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs) [e-ISSN : 3063-7244, p-ISSN : 3063-0576] is an open access Journal published by the IFREL (International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers). GreenSocial accepts manuscripts based on empirical research results, new scientific literature review, and comments/ criticism of scientific papers published by GreenSocial. This journal is a means of publication and a place to share research and development work in the field of Law and Civil Affairs. Articles published in GreenSocial are processed fully online. Submitted articles will go through peer review by a qualified international Reviewers. Complete information for article submission and other instructions are available in each issue. GreenSocial publishes 4 (four) issues a year in March, June, September, December, however articles that have been declared accepted will be queued in the In-Press issue before published in the determined time.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 57 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
The Potential Economic Impact of the India-Pakistan Conflict on Indonesia: A Growing Threat to Stability and Growth A. Junaedi Karso
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i3.224

Abstract

The potential war between India and Pakistan poses significant risks to the Indonesian economy, as it is expected to exacerbate uncertainty in the global financial market. Such geopolitical tensions often trigger a ‘flight to safety,’ where capital flows shift to countries considered stable, leading to reduced foreign direct investment (FDI) in emerging markets like Indonesia. This scenario is likely to place additional pressure on Indonesia’s exchange rate, further destabilizing its financial position. One of the key impacts of the looming India-Pakistan war on Indonesia is its effect on monetary and fiscal management. The Indonesian government is already facing significant challenges, including managing a large amount of maturing debt and grappling with a growing budget deficit. The war would complicate these efforts, making it more difficult for the government to stabilize the economy and implement effective policies. Indonesia’s export sector will also be affected, as India and Pakistan are two of the country’s main trading partners, especially for key commodities like crude palm oil (CPO) and coal. India is Indonesia’s 4th largest export destination, accounting for approximately 9% of total exports, while Pakistan represents around 1.9%. Any disruption in trade with these countries, due to the war or political instability, could significantly hurt Indonesia’s export revenues and negatively affect industries reliant on these markets. Moreover, Indonesia is already facing challenges from the United States, which has imposed reciprocal tariffs worth 32% on Indonesian products. This trade tension, combined with the geopolitical instability from the India-Pakistan conflict, will add further strain to Indonesia’s trade balance. The combination of these factors could lead to slower economic growth, reduced investor confidence, and potentially higher inflation, as the country faces multiple external and internal economic pressures.
When Punishment Becomes Political Currency : The Penological Theater of the Tom Lembong Case Zul Khaidir Kadir; Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i3.225

Abstract

In its ideal form, punishment is conceived as a rational and proportionate response to moral wrongdoing, grounded in demonstrable harm and clear culpability. Classical penological theories emphasize the principles of retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation, all of which presume the presence of intent and injury. However, in the case of Tom Lembong, punishment was imposed absent any proven crime, malicious intent, or measurable harm. Instead, it became a symbolic act, reconfigured as a performance of political theater to assert and preserve a sovereign narrative. This article advances two interrelated aims. First, it analyzes how the penalization of Tom Lembong reflects a wider pattern wherein legal institutions are repurposed to perform sovereignty and construct legitimacy through public spectacle. Second, it critiques the inadequacy of classical penological frameworks when punishment operates without moral fault or corrective intent. Using a qualitative research method and conceptual approach, this study draws upon library-based data sources, critically engaging with theoretical literature on penology, sovereignty, and post-truth politics. Data analysis was conducted descriptively, allowing conceptual mapping between legal practices and political narratives. The findings indicate that the punishment in this case functioned less as an instrument of legal redress than as political choreography. It transformed into symbolic currency designed to enforce narrative conformity and signal power consolidation. In such contexts, punishment serves not as a corrective measure but as a performative mechanism, signaling the dominance of a political order over competing interpretations of truth. This rupture in classical penological logic calls for a post-penological framework—one that accounts for punishment as a tool of narrative enforcement and symbolic governance within post-truth legal orders. Such a framework recognizes the transformation of legal acts into staged political performances, where the appearance of justice supersedes substantive fairness.
Community-Driven Environmental Governance Transformation to Strengthen Legal Protection of Public Resource Management in Rural and Vulnerable Regions Dedy Stansyah; Agatha Jumiatie; Patria B. Boneo
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i3.255

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of community-driven governance in managing natural resources in post-conflict rural areas. The object of research focuses on governance models in the departments of Caquetá and Cesar, Colombia, where community-based initiatives have been implemented to address socio-environmental challenges. The main problem identified is the limited success of top-down regulatory approaches in promoting sustainability and legal compliance in these regions. The primary objective of the research is to assess the role of local participation in improving governance outcomes. To achieve this, the study employs a qualitative approach, using case studies and interviews to gather data from local stakeholders involved in natural resource management. The main findings suggest that community-driven governance models significantly enhance legal protection for public resources, fostering stronger compliance with environmental regulations and promoting sustainable practices. These models empower local communities, increase their engagement in decision-making, and improve the long-term management of resources. The research concludes that integrating community-driven approaches into national and regional legal frameworks is essential for achieving more effective and sustainable environmental governance. These findings contribute to the understanding of how governance can be adapted to better address the needs of vulnerable communities in post-conflict settings.
Evaluating Hybrid Citizen-AI Legal Monitoring Systems for Strengthening Public Oversight in Urban Environmental Governance Rezki Akbar Norrahman; Aan Puji Kistanto; Aya Hamdi Ramadan
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i4.256

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a hybrid citizen–AI legal monitoring system in enhancing urban environmental governance. The hybrid system integrates citizen-driven reporting platforms with AI-powered legal monitoring tools to address the challenges of weak public oversight in urban environmental management. By implementing the system in three metropolitan areas, the study explores how real-time data collection through citizen reports, combined with AI-driven analysis, can improve the accuracy, speed, and responsiveness of identifying environmental violations. The results showed a 45% improvement in oversight effectiveness, demonstrating the potential of hybrid systems to enhance monitoring capabilities beyond traditional methods. The AI system, capable of analyzing large datasets and providing timely insights, enabled quicker identification and categorization of violations such as pollution and waste management issues. The integration of citizen involvement through digital platforms allowed for more inclusive data collection, enhancing the quality and volume of information available for decision-making. This synergy between human participation and AI-driven analysis improved the speed of response to urban environmental challenges, making the system more adaptive and efficient. However, challenges such as data reliability and variable citizen participation rates were identified, suggesting the need for strategies to encourage consistent engagement and ensure the accuracy of reported data. The study concludes that hybrid citizen–AI systems can significantly improve urban governance by enhancing transparency, accountability, and responsiveness, offering a promising solution for cities seeking to address environmental issues more effectively.
Regulatory Capacity of Local Governments in Resolving Contemporary Environmental Disputes through Integrated Restorative Approaches and Civil Governance Mechanisms Moh. Mujibur Rohman; Patria Adiguna; Arvy N. Osma
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i3.257

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of restorative and civil governance models in resolving environmental disputes at the local government level. As environmental conflicts become more complex and widespread, traditional legal approaches often fail to provide quick, sustainable solutions. Restorative governance models, which prioritize community involvement, collaboration, and the restoration of relationships, offer a promising alternative to adversarial legal proceedings. The research combines policy analysis and semi-structured interviews with local government officials, mediators, and community representatives to assess the implementation and outcomes of these models in real-world contexts. Findings indicate that restorative practices, when integrated with civil governance mechanisms, significantly reduce dispute resolution times (a 40% improvement) and enhance community satisfaction compared to traditional litigation processes. These models foster a more inclusive and cooperative environment, ensuring that all stakeholders, including local communities, are actively involved in decision-making processes. However, challenges such as legal framework rigidity, political pressures, and resource limitations still impede the widespread adoption of restorative practices. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating restorative approaches into local environmental policies, advocating for legal reforms and enhanced resource allocation to support these methods. Limitations of the study include its regional focus and the need for broader, longitudinal research to assess the scalability of restorative and civil governance models across different geographic contexts and environmental issues.
Dynamics of Access to Justice for Marginalized Communities in Urban Green-Space Utilization Conflicts During Ongoing Social and Environmental Transitions Andes Robensyah; Citra Nasir; Nicat Kamran Mammadov
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i3.258

Abstract

Urban green-space conflicts have emerged as a significant challenge for marginalized communities, exacerbating existing social and environmental inequalities in cities undergoing rapid urbanization and environmental transitions. This study explores the dynamics of access to justice for marginalized groups in the context of urban green-space conflicts, focusing on the barriers they face and the enabling factors that improve their ability to access legal remedies. Through a socio-legal research design, data was collected using surveys, case reviews, and stakeholder interviews, which were analyzed to identify key physical, socio-economic, and institutional barriers that hinder equitable access to green spaces. Findings revealed that marginalized communities often experience physical barriers such as limited proximity to green spaces, socio-economic disparities that prevent them from accessing legal resources, and institutional constraints, including discriminatory urban planning policies. Despite these challenges, enabling factors such as legal aid networks, participatory forums, and inclusive urban planning policies emerged as crucial elements in improving access to justice for these communities. Moreover, the study examined the impact of social and environmental transitions, such as urbanization and climate change, on justice outcomes, showing that these transitions can either exacerbate or alleviate barriers depending on how policies are implemented. The study emphasizes the need for policy reforms that promote equity in urban planning and legal aid systems, ensuring that marginalized communities are included in decision-making processes. Future research should explore the impact of environmental justice policies in global contexts and investigate new legal frameworks to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations.
Reconstructing Legal Accountability Mechanisms for Climate-Induced Migration Through Integrative Social-Environmental Justice Frameworks Dahlia Kusuma Dewi; Dio Prasetyo Budi; hafiza binti abdul samath
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i4.259

Abstract

Climate-induced migration is becoming an increasingly significant global issue, driven by environmental changes such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and resource scarcity. Despite its growing importance, current legal frameworks inadequately address the protection of climate migrants, leaving them vulnerable and without clear legal rights. This research aims to propose an integrated social-environmental justice framework to address the legal accountability for climate-induced migration, focusing on the recognition of migrant rights, state responsibilities, and environmental protection. The study uses a comparative legal analysis to examine legal systems across various countries and incorporates field data from climate-vulnerable coastal communities through interviews, surveys, and legal case reviews. The research finds that the proposed framework enhances migrant recognition and clarifies state responsibilities in 70% of reviewed legal cases, offering a more comprehensive solution compared to traditional environmental and human rights approaches. The framework's integration of legal, social, and environmental elements provides a holistic response to climate migration, emphasizing equity and sustainability. However, challenges such as political resistance, fragmented governance, and limited funding hinder full implementation. The study concludes by recommending that governments and international bodies adopt this framework and strengthen their commitment to legal protections and climate adaptation strategies for displaced populations. Further research should focus on refining legal frameworks, addressing implementation barriers, and expanding the scope of social-environmental justice to better support climate migrants.
Assessing the Role of Social-Legal Instruments in Mitigating Ecological Inequality Across Rapidly Industrializing Areas Experiencing Growing Environmental Pressures Ghufron Maksum; Hilda Adinta Wulandari; Trinkul Kalita
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i3.260

Abstract

Industrialization, while often driving economic growth, has led to significant environmental degradation, particularly in marginalized communities. These populations, already vulnerable due to socio-economic and geographic factors, bear the brunt of the environmental harm caused by industrial activities. This study explores the role of social-legal instruments in mitigating ecological inequality, focusing on their ability to reduce environmental burdens and empower marginalized communities in industrializing regions. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining environmental data mapping and legal framework assessment. The study found that social-legal interventions, including rights-based advocacy, legal aid, and community participation, significantly reduced ecological disparities. By improving access to legal resources and fostering active community engagement in environmental governance, these interventions empowered vulnerable populations to advocate for their environmental rights. Positive correlations were found between the implementation of robust legal frameworks and reductions in pollution exposure, highlighting the effectiveness of integrating environmental and social protections. However, the study also identified several barriers to the effective implementation of these instruments, including political resistance, resource limitations, and unequal access to legal support. These challenges hinder the full realization of social-legal frameworks' potential. The study concludes with recommendations for policymakers to strengthen social-legal instruments by incorporating social equity into environmental regulations and improving the resources available to marginalized communities. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impacts of social-legal interventions and their scalability to other industrializing regions, with an emphasis on enhancing both ecological and social outcomes.
National Legislative Strategies for Strengthening Corporate Accountability for Environmental Damage and Social Justice in Industrial Pollution Satriya Nugraha; Retno Saraswasti; Nikmah Fitriah
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): December: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i4.272

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of national legislative strategies in promoting corporate accountability for industrial pollution and social justice violations. It analyzes a comparative legal framework, focusing on laws, enforcement mechanisms, and corporate liability regimes in countries such as France, Germany, Norway, China, and Australia. The research evaluates how mandatory due diligence laws, judicial measures, and transparency mechanisms help hold corporations accountable for environmental impacts. It compares voluntary compliance models with mandatory legal frameworks, noting the limitations of voluntary agreements in driving substantial environmental changes. Findings show that countries with strong legal frameworks, like the EU and Australia, achieve higher corporate compliance and environmental performance, while voluntary measures struggle to produce meaningful results. The study emphasizes the need for stronger enforcement, higher penalties for violations, and enhanced public transparency. Additionally, it explores integrating environmental justice considerations, such as community participation and fair compensation, into national strategies. The study offers policy recommendations for improving corporate responsibility through better legislation, harmonizing laws across jurisdictions, and fostering collaboration among governments, corporations, and civil society. It also suggests future research directions, including examining the long-term impacts of environmental justice policies in different global contexts.
Analyzing the Role of Spatial Planning Law in Promoting Social Justice and Environmental Protection for Vulnerable Urban Communities Retno Eko Mardani; Ani Purwanti; Bagus Hermanto
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): December: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i4.273

Abstract

Rapid urbanization, especially in developing countries, has worsened spatial inequality and environmental degradation, impacting vulnerable urban communities living in informal settlements with limited access to services and increased environmental risks. This study examines the role of spatial planning law in promoting social justice and environmental protection in urban areas, particularly for marginalized populations. While spatial planning laws have the potential to promote equity and sustainability, inconsistent enforcement and inadequate evaluation mechanisms reduce their effectiveness. Using a qualitative legal analysis approach, the research reviews statutory frameworks, urban planning documents, and case studies to assess the practical application of these laws. Findings show that integrating spatial planning laws with social justice and environmental sustainability principles can enhance the living conditions of vulnerable communities by ensuring equitable resource access and reducing exposure to environmental hazards. However, fragmented legal frameworks, weak enforcement, and a lack of participatory planning hinder their impact. Comparing with traditional urban planning, social justice-oriented spatial planning provides more sustainable outcomes by prioritizing equity and environmental protection. The study recommends policy reforms to strengthen law enforcement, encourage inclusive decision-making, and integrate social justice and sustainability into urban planning frameworks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impacts and role of these laws in achieving equitable urban development.

Page 5 of 6 | Total Record : 57

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): March: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): December: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs