cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Siti Fatimah Abd. Rahman
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
info@ifrel.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Batursari, Mranggen, Kab. Demak, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Published by International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers
ISSN : 30630576     EISSN : 30637244     DOI : 10.70062
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
(Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs) [e-ISSN : 3063-7244, p-ISSN : 3063-0576] is an open access Journal published by the IFREL (International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers). GreenSocial accepts manuscripts based on empirical research results, new scientific literature review, and comments/ criticism of scientific papers published by GreenSocial. This journal is a means of publication and a place to share research and development work in the field of Law and Civil Affairs. Articles published in GreenSocial are processed fully online. Submitted articles will go through peer review by a qualified international Reviewers. Complete information for article submission and other instructions are available in each issue. GreenSocial publishes 4 (four) issues a year in March, June, September, December, however articles that have been declared accepted will be queued in the In-Press issue before published in the determined time.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 42 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
The Potential Economic Impact of the India-Pakistan Conflict on Indonesia: A Growing Threat to Stability and Growth A. Junaedi Karso
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i3.224

Abstract

The potential war between India and Pakistan poses significant risks to the Indonesian economy, as it is expected to exacerbate uncertainty in the global financial market. Such geopolitical tensions often trigger a ‘flight to safety,’ where capital flows shift to countries considered stable, leading to reduced foreign direct investment (FDI) in emerging markets like Indonesia. This scenario is likely to place additional pressure on Indonesia’s exchange rate, further destabilizing its financial position. One of the key impacts of the looming India-Pakistan war on Indonesia is its effect on monetary and fiscal management. The Indonesian government is already facing significant challenges, including managing a large amount of maturing debt and grappling with a growing budget deficit. The war would complicate these efforts, making it more difficult for the government to stabilize the economy and implement effective policies. Indonesia’s export sector will also be affected, as India and Pakistan are two of the country’s main trading partners, especially for key commodities like crude palm oil (CPO) and coal. India is Indonesia’s 4th largest export destination, accounting for approximately 9% of total exports, while Pakistan represents around 1.9%. Any disruption in trade with these countries, due to the war or political instability, could significantly hurt Indonesia’s export revenues and negatively affect industries reliant on these markets. Moreover, Indonesia is already facing challenges from the United States, which has imposed reciprocal tariffs worth 32% on Indonesian products. This trade tension, combined with the geopolitical instability from the India-Pakistan conflict, will add further strain to Indonesia’s trade balance. The combination of these factors could lead to slower economic growth, reduced investor confidence, and potentially higher inflation, as the country faces multiple external and internal economic pressures.
When Punishment Becomes Political Currency : The Penological Theater of the Tom Lembong Case Zul Khaidir Kadir; Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i3.225

Abstract

In its ideal form, punishment is conceived as a rational and proportionate response to moral wrongdoing, grounded in demonstrable harm and clear culpability. Classical penological theories emphasize the principles of retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation, all of which presume the presence of intent and injury. However, in the case of Tom Lembong, punishment was imposed absent any proven crime, malicious intent, or measurable harm. Instead, it became a symbolic act, reconfigured as a performance of political theater to assert and preserve a sovereign narrative. This article advances two interrelated aims. First, it analyzes how the penalization of Tom Lembong reflects a wider pattern wherein legal institutions are repurposed to perform sovereignty and construct legitimacy through public spectacle. Second, it critiques the inadequacy of classical penological frameworks when punishment operates without moral fault or corrective intent. Using a qualitative research method and conceptual approach, this study draws upon library-based data sources, critically engaging with theoretical literature on penology, sovereignty, and post-truth politics. Data analysis was conducted descriptively, allowing conceptual mapping between legal practices and political narratives. The findings indicate that the punishment in this case functioned less as an instrument of legal redress than as political choreography. It transformed into symbolic currency designed to enforce narrative conformity and signal power consolidation. In such contexts, punishment serves not as a corrective measure but as a performative mechanism, signaling the dominance of a political order over competing interpretations of truth. This rupture in classical penological logic calls for a post-penological framework—one that accounts for punishment as a tool of narrative enforcement and symbolic governance within post-truth legal orders. Such a framework recognizes the transformation of legal acts into staged political performances, where the appearance of justice supersedes substantive fairness.

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 42

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2024 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs