cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Akbar Narum
Contact Email
akbar.nasrum@gmail.com
Phone
+6282293685122
Journal Mail Official
pengelolajme@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Pemuda No. 339, Kab. Kolaka, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
Location
Kab. kolaka,
Sulawesi tenggara
INDONESIA
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)
Published by Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
ISSN : 25282468     EISSN : 25282026     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31327/jomedu
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
The Journal of Mathematics Education (JME) aims to serve as a scientific platform for researchers, practitioners, and educators in the field of mathematics education to publish their original research. JME welcomes contributions that advance theory, practice, and policy in mathematics education across all educational levels. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: Teaching and learning of mathematics Mathematics curriculum development Technology in mathematics education Mathematics teacher education Assessment and evaluation in mathematics education Systematic literature reviews Bibliometric analyses related to mathematics education The journal accepts quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches relevant to these topics.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME" : 9 Documents clear
Promoting Self-Reflection Over Re-Teaching: Addressing Students’ Misconceptions With ‘My Favorite No’ Joanne Caniglia
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1230

Abstract

Misconceptions are an important aspect of learning and teaching mathematics. What are effective ways for teachers to confront misconceptions and prevent their reoccurrence? This mixed-methods study examined instrumental and conceptual understandings of students’ errors, mistakes, and misconceptions in a 7th grade mathematics classroom utilizing the ‘My Favorite No’ strategy. Fifty-five students from a Midwest middle school were divided into two groups with similar abilities, with one group confronting misconceptions using the ‘My Favorite No” strategy while the other group received information about a potential error directly from a teacher. A brief survey of questions followed for students in the “My Favorite No’ class. One group was concerned with conceptual understanding and making connections, and able to solve similar problems. In the second group, students improved from pretests, yet did not improve as much as students using ‘My Favorite No.’ Thus, teachers are encouraged to consider using “My Favorite No” a strategy where students are in an environment in which they discover their errors and believe in the value of making a mistake.
Validation of A Critical Thinking Test in Mathematics for Senior High School Ma. Rachel Kim L. Aure; Enriqueta D. Reston
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1232

Abstract

Critical thinking equips a person with the competencies needed and develops the power of the mind extensively. The development of critical thinking is known as an essential goal in educational systems. However, the assessment of critical thinking is not an easy feat. This study validated the critical thinking skills test in mathematics for senior high school students based on a model of critical thinking skills and learning areas of the K to 12 Mathematics Curriculum. The instrument validation process to 902 respondents through cluster sampling from different senior high schools. With an initial 45 items on three dimensions of critical thinking, the test's final form consisted of only 30 items after the items were screened based on the validation process. The content validation was carried out through an expert examination of the items and a comparison of the test results developed with Cornell's critical thinking for criterion-related validity evidence (r = 0.299, p < 0.01). Construct validation by factor analysis, and results generated 13 factors accounting for 58.51% of the variance. These results indicated that the developed mathematics critical thinking test measured other than the specified critical thinking skills model used. The developed test may try to assess students' critical thinking in the context of mathematics. Furthermore, this may contribute to promoting teaching and assessment strategies gears towards the development of students' mathematical critical thinking.
Card Game Method to Improve the Number of Counting Operations of Elementary School Students in Buru District M. Yusran Zakaria; Irma Magfirah; Nur Fadhilah Amir; Taufik Taufik
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1298

Abstract

This research aims to describe the counting operation capabilities of grade II elementary school students with card game methods. This type of research is classroom action research with Kemmis and Mc Taggart models. The research was conducted at public elementary school (Sekolah Dasar Negeri or “SDN”) 1 Teluk Kaiely, SDN 1 Lilialy, and SDN 3 Namlea. Data is collected with tests and observations. Furthermore, the data is analyzed with qualitative and quantitative techniques. The results showed that by using the card game method, the ability to calculate the grade II elementary school students improved from the beginning of the pre-cycle to cycle II. The average value in pre-cycle is 65 with the percentage of 42%. The average value increases to 66, with a percentage of 58%. The average score increased to 78 with the percentage of 81% reach the cut of score in cycle II
Supporting the Emergence of Mathematical Knowledge through Problem Posing Simone Passarella
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1259

Abstract

Problem posing represents a valuable strategy to create a bridge between mathematics classroom activities and everyday-life experiences. Despite the value of problem posing activities as opportunities for measuring students’ mathematical learning outcomes, more research is needed in investigating if and how problem posing could support the introduction of new mathematical knowledge promoting the development of mathematical concepts. The aim of this paper is to start investigating how problem posing can extend students’ mathematical knowledge. After having introduced the notion of emergent problem posing, some results from a teaching experiment conducted in a primary school class are reported. The design of the teaching experiment was explicated through the development of the three components of a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory: learning goal; hypothetical learning process; learning activities. Results from the study indicate that semi-structured problem posing activities that start from a suitable artifact could support the emergence of new mathematical knowledge, supporting students’ in re-inventing mathematical strategies to solve problems posed by themselves. However, further research is necessary, especially in: supporting the notion of emergent problem posing with more teaching experiments; investigating the role of different artifacts in supporting the process of emergent problem-posing; evaluating which characteristics an artifact should have in order to support the process of emergent problem posing; examining possible relations between students’ abilities and emergent problem posing performances
The Effect of Direct Instruction and Interactive Instructional Videos on Learning Effectiveness and Efficiency in Mathematics Education Andreas M. Zendler
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1137

Abstract

This study focuses on the empirical examination of learning effectiveness and efficiency concerning two instructional methods: Direct instruction and interactive instructional videos. An SPF-2×2•2 design is used to control the instructional method, lessons, and class context. Learning outcome on probability calculation is assessed about effectiveness (grade) and efficiency (time required). The empirical findings show that learning with interactive instructional videos performs well regarding direct instruction. This is a sig nificant result in the digitization of instructional methods.
Analogical Reasoning Ability of Mathematics Education Students at Six State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia Maifalinda Fatra; Lilis Marina Angraini
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1243

Abstract

Mathematical abilities that students must possess at the level of primary and secondary education must also be possessed by a student of teacher candidates who will teach mathematics. One of the abilities is an analogical reasoning ability. The main objectives of this research are: 1) To describe and analyze analogical reasoning ability of students of mathematics education at the State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia, 2) To know the differences of analogical reasoning abilities of students of mathematics education at several State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia. The study was conducted at 6 UINs in Indonesia with a sample of 203 5th semester students using a survey method. This study's results indicate: 1) Analogical reasoning ability in Mathematics Education students consisting of 6 UINs in Indonesia can be seen from the average value in each sample. The acquisition of the average value of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta students' analogical reasoning ability is the highest compared to the other 5 UINs with an average mathematical reasoning ability value of 65. 2. There is a difference in mathematics education students' analogical reasoning ability at the State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia.
Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning Ability Viewed from Student Learning Motivation Hesti Marianah; Fitriyani Hali
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1758

Abstract

This study aims to describe mathematical reasoning abilities in terms of student motivation in class VIII SMP Negeri Satap 1 Lambandia. This type of research is qualitative. The subjects of this study consisted of 20 students of class VIII SMP Negeri Satap 1 Lambandia. The instrument used is a mathematical reasoning ability test consisting of 4 questions, a learning motivation questionnaire consisting of 16 statements, and interview guidelines. The results showed that; 1) The average mathematical reasoning ability of students is 40.78 which is in the fairly low category. Many students who have a high level of ability score is 1 (5%), students with a moderately low ability score of 10 (50%), and many students who have a low ability score are 9 (45%); 2) The number of students with high levels of learning motivation is 7 students (35%), moderate learning motivation is 5 students (25%), and low learning motivation is 8 (40%); 3) Students with high learning motivation have the highest average ability with an average score of 48.66 with quite low criteria, followed by students with moderate and low learning motivation with scores of 40 and 35.15, both of which are in the criteria low. Subjects with high learning motivation are generally able to understand 3 indicators of mathematical reasoning, namely using patterns and relationships to analyze mathematically, estimate the completion process and develop valid arguments using systematic steps. Subjects with moderate and low learning motivation were only able to understand 3 indicators, namely using patterns and relationships to analyze mathematically, estimate the completion process and develop valid arguments using systematic steps. So it can be said that high, medium and low learning motivation has the same level of reasoning ability, namely in the low category.
Improving Pedagogic Competence through Learning Videos Herlina Herlina
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1759

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to improve learning outcomes in the subjects of Basics and Mathematics Learning Process. This study uses a pre-experimental one group pre post design. The research subjects are prospective student teachers who take the Basics and Mathematics Learning Process course consisting of 41 students in 2020. The instrument used is a test instrument that is given before and after treatment in the form of pretest and posttest. Data analysis used two mean differences, namely paired two sample t-test, but previously tested for normal distribution using Kolmogorof Sminov. To see the improvement in learning outcomes, both data were analyzed by N-Gain. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that the average pretest and posttest were different where the posttest average was 77.44 higher than the pretest average was 62.68. The results of the two-average difference test show a significance value (2 tailed) (0,000) < ? (0.05), which means that the average pretest and posttest are significantly different. The results of the N-Gain calculation show that the increase in learning outcomes is included in the medium category, so that an increase in learning outcomes is obtained Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the use of instructional video media can improve learning outcomes for the Basic Learning Process and Mathematics courses. This is possible because videos about learning can represent teaching simulations more than just lectures or discussions.
Improving Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes with the Geogebra Assisted Active Index Card Match Method at the Third Grade SMP Negeri 3 Kolaka Evi Safitri; Andi Mariani Ramlan; Arbain Arbain; Fitriyani Hali
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v5i2.1752

Abstract

The aim of the study was to improve the learning outcomes of Mathematics through the Geogebra-assisted Active Index Card Match method for students in class VIIIC of SMP Negeri 3 Kolaka. This type of research is classroom-based action research that is conducted collaboratively between teachers, observers, and researchers with research procedures that include planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The type of data obtained are quantitative data from the results of learning tests and qualitative data through observation sheets. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 3 Kolaka from 2 to 28 May 2019 in class VIIIC with a total of 26 students. The results of the study refer to the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM), that is, 80% of the students obtained a score of 68. The average score of the initial test results is 49.67. After the evaluation of the first cycle of action, the classic completeness reaches 50.00% (mean value 67.12%). This means that the first cycle of action increased from the daily test results of students. According to the results of the second cycle of action tests, the classic completeness was 80.77% (the average value was 76.30). It can therefore be concluded that the Geogebra Active Index Card Match assisted learning method can improve the learning outcomes of Mathematics for the students of class VIIIC of SMP Negeri 3 Kolaka.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JME Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JME Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JME Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): JME Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): JME Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JME Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JME Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): JME Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): JME Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JME Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JME Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): JME More Issue