cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Cecep Aminudin
Contact Email
office@kaka.co.id
Phone
+622220453602
Journal Mail Official
office@kaka.co.id
Editorial Address
Cigadung Green Land No. A9 Bandung 40191 INDONESIA
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas
Published by PT. Kaka Media Visi Sistematis
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30900220     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56607/jhe
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas (JHE) adalah inisiatif penerbitan PT. Kaka Media Visi Sistematis bekerjasama dengan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia untuk diseminasi artikel ilmiah bidang hukum secara elektronik. Jurnal diharapkan dapat menjadi sarana penyebarluasan pengetahuan, gagasan, pemikiran dan hasil penelitian dari peneliti maupun praktisi mengenai berbagai hal yang berkaitan dengan ilmu hukum. Fokus dan skop JHE mencakup namun tidak terbatas pada hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum acara, hukum bisnis, hukum tata negara, hukum administrasi negara, hukum internasional, hukum lingkungan, hukum ekonomi syariah, hukum kesehatan dan bidang hukum lainnya.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 21 Documents
 1   2   3 
Keadilan Substantif dan Transformasi Hukum Pidana: Pendekatan Filsafat Hukum Alam Ibnu Asa, Agam; Mukhtasar Syamsuddin , Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Jan-Jun 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/2jkbkp50

Abstract

This study explores the application of substantive justice principles in Indonesia’s criminal justice system through the lens of natural law philosophy. Natural law demands a paradigm shift from rigid legal formalism toward an approach that emphasizes moral, humanitarian, and contextual justice values. Within this framework, law is not merely seen as a set of written rules, but as an expression of universal moral principles derived from human reason. The thoughts of philosophers such as John Rawls, Aristotle, and Jeremy Bentham reinforce the urgency of substantive justice, particularly in protecting vulnerable groups, restoring social balance, and achieving public benefit. This research employs a qualitative method with juridical and philosophical approaches, focusing on analyzing the role of law enforcement officials in implementing substantive justice through criminal sentencing. The findings reveal that the prevailing legalistic approach hinders the realization of substantive justice. Major obstacles include unequal access to justice, low integrity among law enforcers, and the dominance of retributive punishment. Although restorative justice practices are beginning to emerge, their implementation remains limited and inconsistent. The study recommends strengthening legal aid for vulnerable groups, internalizing ethical values in legal education and training, and developing policies aligned with substantive justice principles. Collaboration between the state, civil society, and academia is essential to building a criminal justice system that is not only repressive but also transformative and capable of serving as a means of social restoration that upholds human dignity.
Penilaian Ahli dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Muhana, Ahmad Fauzi Muhana
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Jan-Jun 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/dfkawk59

Abstract

Disputes are inevitable in today's complex legal world, and effective and efficient resolution is crucial to maintain legal certainty. In addition to litigation in the Courts, Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS) is becoming increasingly popular. This is because it offers faster, cheaper and more flexible solutions. One of the most popular methods in APS is expert judgment. Therefore, this research will comprehensively examine the definition, function, process, and advantages of expert judgment in the context of dispute resolution. Expert judgment generally involves one or more experts in a particular field to provide an objective evaluation and comprehensive analysis of the technical or complex issues at the heart of the dispute. In contrast to expert testimony in Court, expert assessment in APS serves more as an instrument to help the parties understand the specific aspects of the problem, facilitate negotiations, and reach a mutually beneficial consensus. In addition, this research aims to provide a clear and comprehensive insight into the strategic role of expert judgment in realizing effective and equitable dispute resolution in Indonesia.
Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Eksekusi Penghitungan Suara Ulang Pemilihan Kepala Desa Bode Lor Oleh PTUN Bandung Firdausiyah, Salsabila; Arfan, Am’mar Abdullah; Hafizd, Jefik Zulfikar
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Jan-Jun 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/8cq7eh98

Abstract

The State Administrative Court is one of the executors of judicial power for people seeking justice regarding State Administrative disputes. Settlement of disputes in the general election of village heads through a State Administrative Court lawsuit is the appropriate legal action because the PTUN has the authority to decide and adjudicate disputes at the election stages. This research aims to review the execution process of decision Number 57/G/2020/PTUN.BDG. The method used in this research is qualitative with a normative juridical approach. The data collection used is literature. The results of this research show that the decision letter in question has been decided to be valid and declared to remain in effect since the PTUN decision has permanent legal force and the Regent of Cirebon did not make a new decision because the person who received the most votes in the process of recounting the votes at the Court regarding the elected Kuwu did not change. even though there were additional votes for all candidates from votes that were previously considered invalid.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Label Produk Kosmetik Antara BPOM Indonesia dan FDA Amerika Serikat Muryati, Afri; Cholil, Mochamad
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Jan-Jun 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/sebk3n71

Abstract

The rapid growth of the cosmetics industry demands effective product labeling regulations to protect consumers and ensure information transparency. Labels serve to convey essential details such as ingredients, benefits, usage instructions, and warnings. This study analyzes and compares the cosmetic labeling regulations of Indonesia’s BPOM and the United States FDA using a normative juridical method and a comparative approach. BPOM regulates labeling in detail through BPOM Regulation No. 18 of 2024, while the FDA refers to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (1938) and the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (1967). The differences lie in the substance of regulations, institutional structure, and notification systems, although both aim to provide accurate and non-misleading information to consumers. In conclusion, the labeling systems of both countries are complementary, and FDA practices may serve as a reference for Indonesia in enhancing digitalization and transparency in cosmetic labeling oversight.
Legalitas Cryptocurrency sebagai Alat Pembayaran Metaverse menurut Regulasi Perbankan Indonesia Yosep
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Jan-Jun 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/0rfhe743

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the dualism of cryptocurrency status in Indonesian regulations and its implications for metaverse transactions. Using normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds that cryptocurrency is recognized as a legal commodity (Bappebti Regulation No. 8/2021) but prohibited as a payment instrument (BI Regulation No. 18/40/PBI/2016 jo. Law No. 7/2011). This dualism creates legal uncertainty in metaverse transactions that are virtual and cross-border. The research recommends a three-zone approach: red zone (physical transactions prohibited), yellow zone (virtual transactions permitted with strict supervision), and green zone (trading as investment commodity). This approach balances protection of Rupiah's monetary sovereignty with national digital economy development, creating legal certainty for metaverse business actors without sacrificing Indonesia's payment system stability.
Penilaian Ahli dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ahmad Fauzi Muhana Muhana
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Jan-Jun 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/dfkawk59

Abstract

Sengketa merupakan hal yang tak terelakkan dalam kompleksitasdunia hukum dewasa ini, dan penyelesaian yang efektif serta efisienmenjadi krusial guna menjaga kepastian hukum. Selain jalur litigasi di Pengadilan, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) kini semakinpopuler. Karena, ia menawarkan solusi yang lebih cepat, murah, dan fleksibel. Salah satu metode yang banyak diminati dalam APS adalahpenilaian ahli. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bakal mengkaji definisi, fungsi, proses, dan keunggulan penilaian ahli secara komprehensifdalam konteks penyelesaian sengketa. Penilaian ahli ini umumnyamelibatkan seorang atau beberapa ahli di bidang tertentu gunamenyajikan evaluasi objektif dan analisis komprehensif terhadap isu-isu teknis atau kompleks yang menjadi pokok sengketa. Ini berbedadengan keterangan ahli di sidang Pengadilan, penilaian ahli dalamAPS lebih berfungsi sebagai instrumen bantu bagi para pihak gunamemahami aspek spesifik problematika, memfasilitasi negosiasi, dan mencapai konsensus yang saling menguntungkan. Selain itu, penelitian ini bermuara guna menyajikan wawasan yang jelas dan komprehensif ihwal peran strategis penilaian ahli dalammengejawantahkan penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dan berkeadilan di Indonesia.
Jalur Penyelesaian Sengketa Perikatan: Kajian Komparatif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam di Indonesia Ahmad Fauzi Muhana; Iga Dwi Febrianti
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Jul-Des 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/w94g5j07

Abstract

Azis, Pahrudin, Et.al. “Perbandingan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa: Litigasi dan Non-Litigasi.” Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2024): 16.“Bernadetha Aurelia Oktavira | Perbedaan antara Perikatan dan Perjanjian”, diakses 17 Juli 2025, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-perikatan-dan-perjanjian-lt4e3b8693275c3/.Caniago, Arivani Vero. Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pengadilan, Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, Vol. 8, No. 20 (2022): 310-311.Efendi, Sumardi. Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Islam, Constituo: Jurnal Riset Hukum Kenegaraan & Politik, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2022): 88.“F. Peter Phillips | Sulh: Penyelesaian Sengketa Tradisional Arab”, diakses 18 Juli 2025, https://www-businessconflictmanagement-com.translate.goog/blog/2011/04/sulha-traditional-arab-dispute-resolution/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc.Faesal, Moh. Konsep Ukhuwah Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur'an dan Relevansinya Dalam Kehidupan Ber masyarakat, Journal Al-Irfani: Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2022): 11-12.Halim, Abdul. Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Islam Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus dan Evaluasi, SCHOLASTICA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaa, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2024): 65.Ilyas, Musyfikah. Tinjauan Hukum Islam terhadap Musyawarah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2018): 230-231.“Irham Fatur Rizki | Harmonisasi Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam”, diakses 19 Juli 2025, https://www.kompasiana.com/amp/irhamfaturrizki7526/673d68aa34777c3e760d9073/harmonisasi-hukum-positif-dan-hukum-islam.Ishak, Sufriadi. Kemudharatan Tidak Dihilangkan Dengan Kemudharatan, Jurnal Al-Mizan: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2020): 119.Ivanda, Christa Alda., dan Syaputri, Dini Martika. Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia, Jurnal Yustitia, (yustitia.unwir.ac.id): 209.Jaidun dan Jaang, Syaharie. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan, Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2024): 205.Khikmah, Nurul. Metode Ijtihad Dalam Konstruksi Hukum Tahkim Indonesia, Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. 8, No. 2 (2022): 225-228.Mahir. Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama dalam Sengketa Perbankan Syariah, Al-Qanun, Vol. 17, No. 1 (2014): 23-24.Mulyani, Sri., et.al. Peran Hukum Perikatan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Studi Kasus PN Kuningan Putusan Nomor: 3/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kng, Letterlijk: Jurnal Hukum Perdata, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2024): 3-4.Noviyansah, Aditya. Hukum Perdata Islam sebagai Landasan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkawinan, Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara (JINU), Vol. 2, No. 2 (2025): 372.Oktavia, Lia. Pengenalan Proses Gugatan Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata, Media Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2024): 803.Pakpahan, Abidin Zainal. Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Di Luar Pengadilan, Jurnal Ilmiah “Advokasi”, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2014): 102-103.Paulus, et.al. Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Jalur Litigasi dan Non-Litigasi: Analisis Perbandingan, JIHAK: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Aktualita, Vol. 1 (2024): 187.“Pengadilan Negeri Cirebon| Prosedur Beracara Perdata”, diakses 17 Juli 2025,https://www.pn-kotacirebon.go.id/hal-prosedur-beracara-perdata.html.Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.Rahma, Aulia., et.al. Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Jalur Litigasi Perbandingan Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Jalur Litigasi Dengan Penyelesaian Melalui Jalur Non Litigasi, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2025): 48-49.Rahman, Abd., et.al. Pendekatan Sulh dan Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Terbaik Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, JIEI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2021): 963.Ridwan, Muannif., et.al. Sumber-Sumber Hukum Islam dan Implementasinya (Kajian Deskriptif Kualitatif Tentang Al-Qur'an, Sunnah, dan Ijma'), Borneo: Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2021): 30.Rokhmad, Abu. Paradigma Hukum Islam Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa, International Journal Ihya''Ulum Al-Din, Vol. 18, No. 1 (2016): 55.Rosita. Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi dan Non Litigasi), Al-Bayyinah: Journal of Islamic Law, Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017): 100.Rum, Birra Nurul., dan Wahid, Hadijah St. Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah, Al-Fikru: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2025): 6.Saidah. Konsep Ishlah Dalam Hukum Islam (Perspektif Tafsir Maudhu'iy), Jurnal Hukum Diktum, Vol. 10, No. 2 (2012): 121.Sharky, Nur Yoliandri., et.al. Akibat Hukum Terjadinya Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Tanpa Adanya Jaminan, UNES Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 4 (2024): 9826.Soemarto, Richo Leonardo. Mediasi dan Konsiliasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITS) yang Melibatkan Indonesia, Jurnal Darma Agung, Vol. 31, No. 6 (2023): 179.Subekti, R., dan Tjitrosudibio, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.Syafrida dan Hartati, Ralang. Keunggulan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Melalui Negosiasi, Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2020): 253.Syofyan, Ahmad dan Nurfani, Anggun. Prinsip Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Perjanjian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Islam, Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual, (Journal.uii.ac.id): 157.Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.Vinanda, Rizka Olivia., et.al. Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Perdata: Perspektif Non-Litigasi, JIIC: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendekia, Vol. 1, No. 10 (2024): 7825-7826.Widjaja, Gunawan., et.al. Wanprestasi, Kegagalan Transaksi dan Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Transaksi Elektronik, Journal IAI Sambas, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2019): 196.“Willa Wahyuni | Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Umum di Pengadilan Negeri”, diakses 17 Juli 2025, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/cara-penyelesaian-sengketa-perdata-umum-di-pengadilan-negeri-lt6453a30d8a9f9/.Wirhanuddin. Mediasi Perspektif Hukum Islam: Studi Kasus di Wilayah Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Makassar, Jurnal Diskursus Islam, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2013): 240-241.
Hakekat Beban Pembuktian Terbalik Terhadap  Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia Widhy Andrian Pratama; Halimah Endang Widyaningsih
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Jul-Des 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/0tnqgs83

Abstract

Money laundering is categorized as an extraordinary crime, so its prevention requires an unconventional approach in the form of extraordinary measures. The provisions of Article 69 of Law No. 8 of 2010, are a manifestation of this approach, by allowing the process of investigation, prosecution, and examination of cases in court to be carried out without having to first prove the original crime. The author conducted this research with a data-based approach through a literature study method. Data were collected through a review of various relevant sources, such as journals, books, articles, and similar references. Information from print and digital media related to the topic was also used as part of the research data. The approach in normative law focuses on efforts to understand the basics and scope of law as a system that reflects social reality. This study consists of two main elements, namely the analytical and normative dimensions, which together describe the fundamental nature of law. From this research, the author concludes that in money laundering cases, although the burden of proof generally rests with the defendant, this does not relieve the public prosecutor of the responsibility to prove that the assets charged are indeed derived from a criminal act. Therefore, the evidentiary process is a shared responsibility, with the defendant, investigator, public prosecutor, and judge each having a role commensurate with their respective responsibilities. The system of reversal of the burden of proof applied is limited or balanced, meaning that both parties, the public prosecutor and the defendant, bear a proportionate burden of proof. However, in practice, this principle is often not applied consistently, so the burden of proof remains based on the conventional system stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code.
Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dari Klaim Berlebih Dan Kandungan Berbahaya Pada Produk Perawatan Kulit Mutafiqoh Khasanah; Niken Wahyuning Retno Mumpuni
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Jul-Des 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/9h06yc32

Abstract

Pesatnya perkembangan zaman menjadikan penampilan sebagai aspek penting bagi pria maupun wanita. Namun, sebagian produk skincare yang beredar mengandung bahan berbahaya yang tidak dijelaskan secara jelas, sehingga berpotensi merugikan kesehatan kulit. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan sumber utama peraturan perundang-undangan terkait perlindungan konsumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum menjamin keadilan, kepastian, dan akses yang setara terhadap proses hukum. Dalam hukum perdata, tanggung jawab produk mewajibkan pelaku usaha bertanggung jawab atas kerugian konsumen, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 19 Undang- Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Oleh karena itu, konsumen perlu berhati-hati dalam memilih skincare dan tidak mudah tergiur harga murah maupun hasil instan.
Desentralisasi dalam Negara Kesatuan : Implikasi terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia Deang Simanjuntak; Az Zahra Widjanarka; Darrell Fajriyatdinansyah; Khalista Nurra Permana; Riana Susmayanti
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Jul-Des 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/rj1eq734

Abstract

Abstrak Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 memberikan dasar normatif bagi pelaksanaan desentralisasi di Indonesia melalui Pasal 18 yang menegaskan kewenangan daerah dalam mengatur dan mengurus urusan pemerintahan. Regulasi pelaksanaan desentralisasi terus mengalami perubahan, mulai dari UU No. 22 Tahun 1999, UU No. 32 Tahun 2004, hingga UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 beserta perubahannya. Dinamika regulasi ini mencerminkan adanya tantangan dalam menjaga keseimbangan antara kewenangan pemerintah pusat dan daerah. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan statute approach dan conceptual approach dengan metode kualitatif, serta memanfaatkan sinkronisasi vertikal dan horizontal untuk menganalisis implementasi desentralisasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa desentralisasi membawa dampak positif berupa peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat, percepatan pelayanan publik, dan penguatan akuntabilitas politik lokal. Namun, di sisi lain juga muncul dampak negatif berupa maraknya praktik korupsi di tingkat lokal, ketimpangan pembangunan antarwilayah, serta lemahnya kapasitas kelembagaan daerah. Kasus korupsi Dana Desa di Nunukan menjadi salah satu contoh konkret dampak negatif dari lemahnya pengawasan dalam pelaksanaan otonomi fiskal. Dengan demikian, implementasi desentralisasi di Indonesia bersifat ambivalen, sehingga diperlukan konsistensi regulasi, penguatan kapasitas birokrasi daerah, serta mekanisme pengawasan yang lebih efektif agar tujuan utama desentralisasi, yakni peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat dan pemerataan pembangunan, dapat tercapai.

Page 2 of 3 | Total Record : 21

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2025 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Jul-Des 2026 Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Jan-Jun 2026 Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Jul-Des 2025 Vol 1 No 1 (2025): Jan-Jun 2025