AGRONES: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, AGRIBUSINESS WELFARE, TECHNOLOGI, HUMANITY, ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND ECONOMY
FOKUS AND SCOPE AGRONES: Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy is a multidisciplinary scientific journal that publishes high-quality research and studies across the interconnected fields of agriculture, agribusiness, community welfare, technology, human development, environmental sustainability, social sciences, and economic growth. This journal aims to serve as a platform for disseminating innovative research findings, critical analyses, and practical applications that contribute to building a sustainable, inclusive, and technology-driven agricultural and rural development sector. The scope of AGRONES includes, but is not limited to, the following areas: Agriculture and Agricultural Technology Precision agriculture, smart farming, and digital agriculture Mechanization and automation in farming systems Biotechnology and genetic innovation in crop production Post-harvest technology and agricultural product processing Innovations in sustainable farming practices Agribusiness, Economics, and Welfare Agribusiness management, entrepreneurship, and rural enterprise development Supply chain and value chain analysis in agricultural systems Agricultural policies, rural development, and community empowerment Marketing strategies, consumer behavior, and trade in agricultural products Socio-economic strategies for improving farmer welfare Humanity, Social, and Environmental Issues in Agriculture Climate change and its socio-economic impacts on agriculture Agroecology, environmental conservation, and biodiversity protection Soil and water management for sustainable production Waste reduction, recycling, and circular economy in agriculture Renewable energy applications in agricultural and rural communities Livelihoods, Social Development, and Inclusive Growth Community-based agricultural development Education and capacity building for farmers and rural youth Human welfare and equality in agricultural systems Social innovation and participatory development approaches AGRONES accepts original research articles, literature reviews, case studies, and technical reports that make significant contributions to the advancement of knowledge in these fields. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure their scientific quality, originality, and relevance. The journal adopts an open-access policy to enable global accessibility and the wide dissemination of research for sustainable agricultural and rural transformation.
Articles
6 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Edition"
:
6 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Smart Farming and Consumer Awareness; Measuring the Uptake of Agri-Tech in the Digital Landscape ]]>
<![CDATA[Koswara, Asep]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v1i1.50
<![CDATA[This research analyzes global search trends for "Smart Farming" and "Smart Agriculture" over the last five years, aiming to uncover how public interest in these digital agricultural terms has evolved. This research employed a quantitative research design by examining Google Trends data from last 5 years. The study identifies long-term growth, seasonal fluctuations, and surges in interest due to global events and technological advancements. The key findings reveal that "Smart Agriculture" has consistently outpaced "Smart Farming" in global popularity, with peak interest for Smart Agriculture reaching a score of 100 in March 2025, compared to 83 for Smart Farming in November 2024. From 2020 to 2025, the average interest for Smart Agriculture was 65, while Smart Farming averaged 50. Additionally, seasonal patterns indicated higher interest in Q1 (January–March), peaking in February 2025 for Smart Agriculture with a score of 96–100. The study also observed significant surges in interest in 2022, particularly around May, when interest in Smart Agriculture spiked to 91, likely driven by the Ukraine conflict and food security concerns. The research further highlights global geographical variations, with countries like Afghanistan, Armenia, and Belize showing strong interest in Smart Agriculture (scoring 100), while countries such as Haiti and Venezuela led the Smart Farming interest rankings. Overall, the study concludes that Smart Agriculture is becoming a global priority, significantly driven by technological and geopolitical factors, with broad implications for policy, research, and industry innovation.]]>
<![CDATA[Postharvest Physiological Studies on the Quality and Shelf Life of Tropical Fruits: A Literature Review ]]>
<![CDATA[La Oge]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v1i1.270
<![CDATA[Tropical fruits possess high economic value but are highly susceptible to quality deterioration after harvest due to ongoing physiological processes. This study aims to review postharvest physiological factors that affect the quality and shelf life of tropical fruits by synthesizing findings from recent literature. Key physiological processes such as respiration, transpiration, ripening, and enzymatic activity are critical in maintaining fruit quality. The findings indicate that effective management of temperature, humidity, controlled atmosphere, and the application of ethylene inhibitors can significantly delay senescence and extend the shelf life of tropical fruits. The novelty of this review lies in its synthesis of recent literature (2020–2024), emphasizing the integration of biological approaches (e.g., plant hormone treatments) and innovative technologies (e.g., edible coatings and smart packaging) to regulate postharvest physiological processes. This review also proposes a synergistic approach combining physiological understanding with technological interventions to optimize the tropical fruit supply chain in developing countries.]]>
<![CDATA[Technical and Economic Efficiency in Farming: A Literature Study Using the DEA and Frontier Production Approaches ]]>
<![CDATA[La Harudin]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v1i1.271
<![CDATA[Technical and economic efficiency are key indicators in evaluating farm performance, particularly in the context of limited land resources, input constraints, and the challenges posed by climate change. This study aims to systematically review existing literature that employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Frontier Production Function approaches particularly Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) to measure farm efficiency in Indonesia and other developing countries. DEA provides a non-parametric means of assessing technical efficiency without assuming a specific production function, whereas frontier approaches offer parametric analysis by incorporating random disturbances in the production process. Based on a review of 20 selected articles, the findings reveal that farmers' technical efficiency generally ranges from 60% to 85%, while economic efficiency tends to be lower due to input-output price imbalances and limited access to market information. Key factors influencing efficiency include farmers’ education level, farm size, technology adoption, and participation in farmer groups. This study highlights the strengths of these quantitative approaches as data-driven tools for agricultural policy formulation at both micro (farm) and macro (national policy) levels. The findings underscore the importance of integrating DEA and SFA methods to provide a more comprehensive picture of farm performance. Enhancing efficiency thus requires a combination of technical training, agricultural digitalization, and the development of inclusive policies that support smallholder farmers in a sustainable manner.]]>
<![CDATA[Post Harvest Practices among the Muna Ethnic Group: A Literature Review on Local Wisdom in Sustainable Agriculture ]]>
<![CDATA[La Panga]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v1i1.273
<![CDATA[Post-harvest practices are a critical phase in the agricultural production system, directly affecting the quality, quantity, and market value of harvested crops. In Indonesia, particularly among indigenous communities such as the Muna ethnic group in Southeast Sulawesi, post-harvest activities are still conducted using traditional methods passed down through generations. This literature review aims to identify, analyze, and evaluate the traditional post-harvest practices of the Muna people and assess their relevance within the framework of sustainable agriculture. The study draws upon scientific publications, ethnographic records, and research reports related to traditional farming systems and local wisdom in the Muna region. The findings reveal that practices such as bamboo granary storage (tambu), sun-drying methods, and crop bartering systems carry ecological, social, and economic values that align with the principles of sustainable agriculture. Despite the advancement of modern technologies, these indigenous practices remain relevant as they contribute to environmental conservation, strengthen local food security, and preserve cultural heritage. This study recommends integrating these traditional practices into sustainable agricultural development programs grounded in local wisdom.]]>
<![CDATA[Nutritional Transformation of Ruminant Feed: A Literature Review on the Role of Fermentation in Enhancing Productivity ]]>
<![CDATA[Hajar Hajar]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v1i1.274
<![CDATA[Feed is a fundamental component in ruminant livestock production systems, directly influencing productivity and overall efficiency. Given the limited availability of high-quality feed resources, feed fermentation emerges as a promising strategy to enhance the nutritional value of abundant and low-cost local feed materials. The fermentation process involves the activity of microorganisms capable of hydrolyzing anti-nutritional compounds, improving fiber digestibility, enriching protein content, and generating beneficial secondary metabolites that support digestive health. This literature review aims to examine existing research on feed fermentation mechanisms, types of microorganisms employed, changes in nutrient composition, and the effects on ruminant performance, including feed intake, feed conversion efficiency, weight gain, and milk production. The findings indicate that fermentation using lactic acid bacteria, fungi, or yeast significantly improves the quality of fibrous feeds such as rice straw, cassava leaves, and agro-industrial by-products. Consequently, animal performance improves, accompanied by enhanced feed efficiency. Therefore, feed fermentation technology holds substantial potential in supporting sustainable livestock systems, particularly in areas with limited access to high-quality feed. This review highlights the need for standardization of fermentation techniques and comprehensive economic evaluations to facilitate large-scale adoption.]]>
<![CDATA[Strategies to Improve Livestock Productivity through Probiotic Supplementation: A Literature Review ]]>
<![CDATA[Inal Inal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v1i1.275
<![CDATA[Improving livestock productivity is a key objective in the development of the animal husbandry sector. One innovative approach that has gained widespread attention is the use of probiotics as dietary supplements. Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer health benefits to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This literature review aims to examine the role and effectiveness of probiotic supplementation in enhancing the productivity of various livestock species, including ruminants, poultry, and swine. Data were collected from relevant national and international journal publications from 2015 to 2024. The findings indicate that probiotic supplementation can improve feed digestibility, stabilize gut microflora, enhance feed conversion efficiency, and strengthen immune response and reproductive performance in livestock. Moreover, the use of probiotics may reduce the reliance on antibiotics, making it a more environmentally friendly and sustainable strategy. However, its effectiveness is highly influenced by factors such as the type of probiotic, dosage, method of administration, and the physiological condition of the animals. Therefore, properly designed probiotic supplementation strategies can serve as a promising solution to sustainably improve livestock productivity. This review highlights the need for further locally based research and field trials to optimize the application of probiotics in the context of the Indonesian livestock system.]]>
