cover
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnallexstricta@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnallexstricta@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29636639     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda (STIHPADA), contains scientific writings, results of research discussions, book discussions and supporting opinions. The legal articles published in this journal are scientific works of students and lecturers who have met the Author Guidelines determined by Lex Stricta: Journal of Legal Studies. All articles submitted by authors and published in this journal are reviewed through a peer review process. Publishing schedule 3 (three) times a year in April, August, December. Submissions must be guided by the Scientific Writing Method and writing instructions as attached. The contents of the article are the sole responsibility of the author. The editor is not responsible for the content of the article.
Articles 132 Documents
Implementasi Good Governance Dalam Menciptakan Efisiensi Pelayanan Pertanahan Di Indonesia Rahmad Nauli Siregar; Raihan Daffi Nauli Siregar
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Efficiency in the delivery of land administration services is one of the priorities of bureaucratic reform, aimed at improving the quality of public services, ensuring legal certainty, and achieving good governance. The complexity of land administration procedures has often led to delays in service delivery, high transaction costs, land disputes, and opportunities for corruption, collusion and nepotism. This study employs a normative legal research method using a legislative approach, a conceptual approach and a comparative approach. The research findings indicate that the digitalisation of land services through electronic certificates, online service applications and the streamlining of administrative procedures has contributed to improved transparency, efficiency, accountability and legal certainty. However, its implementation still faces various obstacles, including limitations in technological infrastructure, the quality of human resources, disparities in the public’s digital literacy, and sub-optimal data integration between agencies. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen regulations, enhance the capacity of civil servants, and integrate service systems to support the realisation of good governance.
Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati: Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Alifsyah Hilman; Zulkarnain Zulkarnain
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v5i1.2071

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal certainty in the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. It examines the concept of legal certainty, the mechanisms for implementing the death penalty, and factors supporting and hindering its realization within the national legal system. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data were obtained through a literature review of legislation, the Qur’an, Hadith, fiqh, Islamic criminal law literature, and relevant scholarly journals. The findings indicate that legal certainty in the implementation of the death penalty has not been fully realized due to prolonged waiting periods, complex clemency and judicial review mechanisms, procedural inconsistencies, and limited coordination among law enforcement agencies. Islamic criminal law provides a comprehensive framework through the principles of la jarimata wa la ‘uqubata illa bi nash (no crime or punishment without a legal textual basis) and dar’ al-hudud bi al-syubhat (avoiding hudud punishment in cases of doubt), supported by strict evidentiary standards, protection of defendants’ rights, and al-‘afwu (forgiveness) in qisas cases. Supporting factors include a clear legal basis, sentencing parameters, evidentiary standards, division of authority, and protection of victims and convicted persons. Inhibiting factors include uncertainty over execution timing, divergent interpretations, limited public awareness, and weak inter-agency coordination. The study concludes that criminal law reform should strengthen procedural certainty while integrating justice, humanity, and public interest as core values of Islamic criminal law.