cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnaldisiplin@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaldisiplin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2746394X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/disiplin
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda (STIHPADA) Berisikan tulisan ilmiah, hasil pembahasan penelitian, pembahasan buku dan pendapat yang mendukung. Redaksi mengundang para dosen, pakar, mahasiswa, membahas dan masyarakat yang tertarik untuk menuangkan hasil yang diharapkan ke dalam tulisan ilmiah. Jadwal penerbitan setahun 4 (empat) kali pada bulan Maret, Juni, September dan Desember. Tulisan yang dikirim harus berpedoman pada metode penulisan ilmiah dan petunjuk penulisan sebagaimana terlampir. Isi konten tulisan tanggung jawab sepenuhnya penulis. Redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap isi konten tulisan.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 94 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Penipuan dalam Transaksi Online Shop: Telaah Normatif atas Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional, dan Perlindungan Konsumen Sandy Vallentino; Anton Wahyudi; Firhat Arjuna; M. Tri Rizki Putra
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 32 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The growth of internet-based commerce has expanded the practice of online shopping in Indonesia, but at the same time has increased the risk of fraud that harms consumers. This article aims to analyze the legal framework and criminal liability for perpetrators of fraud in online shopping transactions based on Indonesian positive law. This study is a normative legal research employing a legislative, conceptual, and analytical approach. Primary legal sources include Law No. 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions, Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, Law -Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, and Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019 on Electronic Commerce. The findings indicate that online shop fraud cannot be analyzed merely as general fraud, as under certain conditions it also fulfills the specific elements under Article 28(1) in conjunction with Article 45A(1) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. Therefore, law enforcement against online shop fraud must be integrated across the general criminal regime, the electronic transactions regime, and the consumer protection regime to ensure legal certainty, victim protection, and the effectiveness of enforcement.
Analisis Kritis Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Listrik dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Ketenaga Listrikan di Indonesia Nabila Peggy Arfah Peyanda; Dikky Febriansyah; Siti Waryunah; Muyasar
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 32 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Electricity theft is an unlawful use of electrical power that not only causes financial losses to PT PLN (Persero) but also disrupts supply reliability, poses safety risks, and weakens national electricity governance. This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to electricity theft and examine the legal sanctions imposed on perpetrators under Indonesian positive law. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches, using primary legal materials such as Law No. 30 of 2009 on Electricity, Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, and Law No. 1 of 2026 on Penal Adjustments. Findings indicate that electricity theft is more appropriately categorized as a specific criminal offense in the electricity sector, particularly under Article 51 paragraph (3) of the Electricity Law. The main contributing factors include economic pressure, environmental influence, weak supervision, and low legal awareness. Effective mitigation requires a combination of criminal law enforcement, technical supervision, legal socialization, and coordinated efforts between PLN and law enforcement authorities.
Proporsionalitas Pembelaan Terpaksa Terhadap Serangan Mematikan Dalam Kejahatan Jalanan: Telaah Normatif Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Fiqh Jinayah Enni Merita
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 32 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v32i3.2077

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation and parameters of the proportionality of forced defense against deadly attacks in Indonesian criminal law and compare it with the concept of daf' al-shā'il in fiqh jinayah. The research uses normative legal methods with legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are analyzed through literature studies, systematization, interpretation, conceptual analysis, and prescriptive comparison. The results of the study show that Article 34 and Article 35 of the National Criminal Code have distinguished between forced defense as a justification and exceedance of the defense limit as a excuse for forgiveness, but have not provided operational proportionality parameters. These conditions contribute to differences in assessment in self-defense cases. Comparison with fiqh jinayah shows similarities in the rejection of defense that turns into retaliation, but differs in the mechanism of limitation and accountability for exceeding the limit. This study formulates seven proportionality indicators, namely the proximity of the threat, the level of seriousness of the danger, the real need for action, the defensive objective, the suitability of the response, the termination of the action after the threat ends, and the assessment of the concrete situation.
Rekonstruksi Hukum Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia Warmiyana Zairi Absi
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 32 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v32i3.2083

Abstract

This study raises the problem of disharmonization of norms in the recognition and protection of customary rights of customary law communities, due to constitutional recognition through Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution which is conditional as Article 3 of the UUPA, while the subsequent arrangements are scattered fragmentarily in unintegrated sectoral regulations. This condition triggers repeated agrarian conflicts, recorded in 217 cases throughout 2024 with an affected area of 630 hectares. This study aims to analyze the legal construction of the recognition and protection of customary rights in the national legal system and formulate an ideal legal reconstruction. The method used is a prescriptive normative legal research, with a legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative approach to the Philippines and Ethiopia. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively-normatively using grammatical, systematic, telelogical, and deductive logic interpretations. The results of the study show that the existing legal construction is still fragmentary, because conditional recognition in the UUPA is not followed by the harmonization of sectoral regulations, so customary rights are often subordinate to investment interests, even though the Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-X/2012 has corrected some of the inequality through the restoration of customary forest status. This research develops a legal construction that operationalizes the paradigm shift from conditional recognition to existence and history-based recognition, through the expansion of tiered recognition mechanisms, the determination of customary territories, preventive-repressive protection, regulatory harmonization, cross-agency institutional models, and tiered dispute resolution. These findings affirm the declarative nature of state recognition of customary rights and offer a framework for improving the Customary Law Communities Bill. Further research is recommended to test this reconstruction empirically in various regions.

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 94

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 32 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 31 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 31 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 30 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 30 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 30 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 29 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 29 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 29 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 29 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 28 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021) More Issue