cover
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29622395     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/consensus
Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda (STIHPADA) Palembang berisikan tulisan ilmiah, hasil pembahasan penelitian, pembahasan buku dan pendapat yang mendukung. Artikel Hukum yang dipublikasikan pada jurnal ini merupakan hasil karya ilmiah mahasiswa dan dosen yang telah memenuhi Pedoman Penulisan bagi Penulis (Author Guidelines) yang telah ditentukan oleh Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Semua artikel yang dikirimkan oleh penulis dan dipublikasikan dalam jurnal ini ditelaah melalui peer revie process. Jadwal penerbitan setahun 4 (empat) kali pada bulan Februari, Mei, Agustus, dan November. Tulisan yang dikirim harus berpedoman pada metode penulisan ilmiah dan petunjuk penulisan sebagai terlampir. Isi konten tulisan tanggung jawab sepenuhnya penulis. Redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap isi konten tulisan.
Articles 91 Documents
Tugas Dan Tanggung Jawab Dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Ringan Di Wilayah Hukum Polres Musi Rawas Hasta Ageng Kinarya Gunawan; M. Ridho; Wahyu Ningsih; M. Adhi Prasetya Ahrly
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/consensus.v5i1.2076

Abstract

This study raises the issue of the limit of investigators' discretionary authority in stopping cases of minor crimes (tipiring) based on the peaceful agreement of the parties, considering that Article 205 of the Criminal Code only regulates the mechanism of rapid investigation and does not provide an explicit legal basis for the termination of cases outside the court. The practice at the Musi Rawas Police Station actually shows the termination of a number of tipiring cases through restorative justice based on Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021 and the Circular Letter of the National Police Chief Number SE/7/VII/2018, two regulations at the same level under the law. This research uses an empirical legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach, supported by interviews with investigators and studies of related regulatory documents. The results of the study show that investigators play the role of mediators as well as determinants of the continuation of cases by considering juridical and non-juridical aspects, but the practice that takes place is actually a combination of penal mediation as a process and peace as a result, not the full application of the restorative justice paradigm. Data on the handling of tipiring for the 2021–2023 period shows a downward trend in the number of cases but accompanied by fluctuations in unresolved cases, influenced by the adequacy of evidence, willingness to reconcile, involvement of community leaders, and grudges that have not subsided. This study concludes the need to strengthen the hierarchy of norms and standards for supervision of investigators' discretion so that the implementation of restorative justice does not cause disparities in handling similar cases.

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 91