cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Adam Mudinillah
Contact Email
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Phone
+6285379388533
Journal Mail Official
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jorong Kubang Kaciak Dusun Kubang Kaciak, Kelurahan Balai Tangah, Kecamatan Lintau Buo Utara, Kabupaten Tanah Datar, Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Kodepos 27293.
Location
Kab. tanah datar,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean
Published by Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi
ISSN : 30482461     EISSN : 30481708     DOI : 10.70177/multidisciplinary
Core Subject : Science, Education,
Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Other
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to facilitating the exchange of results of high-quality research in all aspects of all areas of knowledge. The scope of the Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean is not only in the form of study, research, or development but also book review. This journal publishes articles from all areas, including agricultural sciences, health sciences, biological sciences, engineering, and other exact sciences, as well as social and human sciences, which should contribute to scientific knowledge. Types of papers accepted: Review Articles, Mini-Reviews, and Research Articles with Questionnaires Application. As our commitment to advancing science and technology, the Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean follows an open-access policy that allows published articles to be freely available online without any subscription. Submitted papers must be written in English for the initial review stage by editors and further review by at least two international reviewers.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024)" : 13 Documents clear
Problems of Legal Efforts to Resist Execution in District Courts and High Courts up to Cassation and Judicial Review Haikal, Ahmad; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i6.1831

Abstract

Background. The execution challenge process in Indonesia faces numerous obstacles, including procedural ambiguity, administrative inefficiencies, and case backlogs. These challenges lead to prolonged case resolution and undermine public trust in the legal system, especially among individuals with limited legal knowledge or financial resources. Purpose. This study aims to identify the main obstacles in the execution challenge process and assess their impact on legal certainty and access to justice. It also seeks to propose solutions to enhance the effectiveness and fairness of the legal system. Method. A qualitative approach was used, involving case studies, interviews with legal practitioners, and a review of legal documents to analyze procedural gaps and their effects on stakeholders. Findings. The study found that procedural complexity and administrative delays are significant obstacles, causing legal uncertainty and harming public trust. Furthermore, limited access to legal aid for disadvantaged individuals exacerbates inequality in the justice system. Conclusion. Simplifying procedures, incorporating technology in court administration, and enhancing public legal education are essential reforms to improve efficiency and accessibility. These measures will promote legal certainty and ensure equal justice for all.
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Immigration Law Enforcement: Balancing Efficiency, Transparency, and Ethical Accountability Hamdi, Muhammad Arief; Briando, Bobby; Santiago, Faisal
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i6.1835

Abstract

Background. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in immigration law enforcement has significantly improved efficiency in areas such as fraud detection, border security, and visa application assessments. However, the implementation of AI raises critical concerns related to transparency, fairness, and ethical accountability. The "black box" nature of AI systems often obscures the reasoning behind decisions, posing risks to the rights of migrants, especially refugees and asylum seekers. Furthermore, the increased use of biometric data for security purposes heightens privacy concerns and potential misuse. Purpose. This study aims to analyze the role of AI in immigration law enforcement, focusing on its benefits, limitations, and ethical challenges. It seeks to provide recommendations for regulatory frameworks that ensure a balance between operational efficiency and the protection of human rights. Method. The research adopts a qualitative approach, combining a review of scholarly articles and case studies from journals such as Comparative Migration Studies and AI & Society. Key themes include transparency, fairness, privacy, and accountability. Results. AI significantly enhances operational efficiency but remains vulnerable to biases and errors that can disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Human oversight is critical to ensuring ethical decision-making and maintaining accountability. Conclusion. The integration of AI in immigration law must be guided by transparent, fair, and ethical regulatory frameworks. Emphasizing human oversight ensures that moral responsibility remains with human actors rather than AI systems.
The Position of Agreements and Arbitration Awards as A Legal Protection in Out-Of-Court Dispute Resolution Simanjuntak, Adolf Theodore B.; Hoesein, Zainal Arifin
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i6.1836

Abstract

Background. In the era of globalization, the speed of economic activities fosters free markets and intense competition. Agreements play a crucial role in facilitating transactions, but disputes often arise due to differing interpretations or alleged breaches. Resolving these disputes efficiently and justly is essential to maintain trust and economic stability. Purpose. This research aims to determine the legal certainty and position of arbitration awards as a means of legal protection in out-of-court dispute resolution. Method. The study employs normative legal research with a focus on statutory and conceptual approaches. It analyzes laws and regulations related to arbitration, particularly Article 60 and Article 70 of the Arbitration Law. Results. Arbitration awards, as regulated in Article 60, are considered final, binding, and have permanent legal force. However, Article 70 allows parties to challenge arbitration awards by filing annulment requests, which undermines their finality. This duality creates ambiguity in the enforcement of arbitration awards. Conclusion. Although arbitration awards are designed to be final and binding, the provision for annulment in Article 70 diminishes their definitive status. Legal reforms are needed to enhance the finality of arbitration awards to strengthen their role in dispute resolution.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024) More Issue