cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya Gedung Graha Medika Lt. 1, Ruang 104
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : 02169347     EISSN : 23380772     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jkb
Core Subject : Health,
Medicine & Pharmacology
JKB contains articles from research that focus on basic medicine, clinical medicine, epidemiology, and preventive medicine (social medicine).
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Kedokteran (Lain-Lain)
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 33 No. 3 (2025)" : 13 Documents clear
Hormonal vs. Non-Hormonal Contraceptives for Women in Relation to Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review Rusfandi, Annisa Adhania; Agung Indrawan, I Wayan
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya Vol. 33 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jkb.2025.033.03.7

Abstract

Recent global statistics indicate approximately 527,624 new cases of cervical cancer and 265,672 deaths annually. Additionally, recent research has identified a correlation between cervical cancer incidence and the use of hormonal or non-hormonal contraceptives. This systematic review aims to investigate this correlation. Articles meeting inclusion criteria from Google Scholar and PubMed within the last five years were searched. Eight eligible studies were included: six on hormonal contraceptives and two on non-hormonal contraceptives. The review findings suggest that the use of both non-hormonal and hormonal contraceptives increases the risk of cervical cancer. Non-hormonal contraception was associated with a slightly elevated risk, while hormonal contraceptives, especially oral contraceptive tablets used over an extended period, showed a clear link to increased cervical cancer risk.
Association between Clinical Pathway for Cesarean Section and Length of Stay in Dr. Saiful Anwar Regional Hospital Malang Rusfandi, Annisa Adhania; Agung Indrawan, I Wayan
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya Vol. 33 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jkb.2025.033.03.4

Abstract

Cesarean section (C-section) is one of the main medical procedures performed at Dr. Saiful Anwar Regional Hospital in Malang. Implementing a clinical pathway (CP) as a standard of evidence-based care can influence the length of hospital stay for patients. This study aims to analyze the relationship between CP implementation and the length of hospital stay for C-section patients at Dr. Saiful Anwar Regional Hospital. The analysis was based on data from CP forms and patient medical records. The lowest CP implementation score in this study was 89.86%. A correlation test across all samples (n=97) revealed a significant relationship between CP implementation and length of stay (correlation coefficient: 0.246, p=0.008). Dividing the samples into four groups based on the most frequent diagnosis categories (placenta previa, PROM (Premature Rupture of Membranes), preeclampsia, and placenta accreta) showed significant differences in the length of stay between patients with PROM and those with preeclampsia (p=0.0001) and placenta accreta (p=0.002). The CP implementation rate for all C-section patients was above 80% and was significantly correlated with the length of hospital stay. In the future, CPs specifically designed for different C-section indications may be developed to accommodate various patient conditions.
Optimizing Burn Injury Care: A Comparative Network Meta-Analysis of Skin Grafts' Efficacy Del Rosario Puling, Imke Maria; Pramana Giri, Nyoman Deva; Almadita, Teresa; Limantara, Jane; Arviansyah, Arviansyah
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya Vol. 33 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jkb.2025.033.03.8

Abstract

Burn injuries, causing approximately 180,000 deaths. Skin grafting serves as a cornerstone intervention in burn injury management. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different types of skin grafts in promoting the healing process of burn injuries. The outcomes of the study were the reepithelialization time and repigmentation rate of skin graft. Quality appraisal was done using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, while network and single arm meta-analysis were conducted using R-Studio. A literature search across 6 databases resulted in the selection of 7 articles. Quality assessment categorized 6 studies as low- and 1 as moderate-risk of bias studies. The device facilitated autologous skin cell increase in reepithelialization rate (OR=5.21; 95% CI=0.24-114.41), followed by autologous skin cell and synthetic graft (OR=0.47; 95% CI=0.04-5.98), topical agent (OR=0.30; 95% CI=0.06-1.47), and Xenograft (OR=0.09; 95% CI=0.00-4.89). Furthermore, the single-arm meta-analysis showed an overall repigmentation rate of 61.49%, with xenograft displaying the highest repigmentation rate (87.50%), followed by synthetic graft (70.32%), and autologous skin cell (37.54%). Xenografts have proven effective in promoting burn wound healing. Nevertheless, the outstanding efficacy and minimal repigmentation of device-facilitated autologous skin cell transplantation highlight its potential in clinical practice.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 33 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 33 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 33 Supplement 1 (2024) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 32 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 32 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 32 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 32 Supplement 1 (2022) Vol. 32 Supplement 1 (2021) Vol 31, No 4 (2021) Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2021) Vol 31, No 3 (2021) Vol. 31 Supplement 2 (2021) Vol 31, No 2 (2020) Vol 31, No 1 (2020) Vol 30, No 4 (2019) Vol 30, No 3 (2019) Vol 30, No 2 (2018) Vol 30, No. 1 (2018) Vol 29, No. 4 (2017) Vol 29, No. 3 (2017) Vol 29, No 3 (2016) Vol 29, No. 2 (2016) Vol 29, No 1 (2016) Vol 28, No 4 (2015) Vol 28, No 3 (2015) Vol 28, No 2 (2015) Vol 28, No 2 (2014) Vol 28, No 1 (2014) Vol 27, No 4 (2013) Vol 27, No 3 (2013) Vol 27, No 2 (2012) Vol 27, No 1 (2012) Vol 26, No 4 (2011) Vol 26, No 3 (2011) Vol 26, No 2 (2010) Vol 26, No 1 (2010) Vol 25, No 3 (2009) Vol 25, No 2 (2009) Vol 25, No 1 (2009) Vol 24, No 3 (2008) Vol 24, No 2 (2008) Vol 24, No 1 (2008) Vol 23, No 3 (2007) Vol 23, No 2 (2007) Vol 23, No 1 (2007) Vol 22, No 3 (2006) Vol 22, No 2 (2006) Vol 22, No 1 (2006) Vol 21, No 3 (2005) Vol 21, No 2 (2005) Vol 21, No 1 (2005) Vol 20, No 3 (2004) Vol 20, No 2 (2004) Vol 20, No 1 (2004) Vol 19, No 3 (2003) Vol 19, No 2 (2003) Vol 19, No 1 (2003) Vol 18, No 3 (2002) Vol 18, No 2 (2002) Vol 18, No 1 (2002) Article in Press 2 Article in Press More Issue