cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Viskasari P. Kalanjati
Contact Email
fmi@journal.unair.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
fmi@journal.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
Folia Medica Indonesiana The Unit of Journal Consortium and Folia Medica Indonesiana Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga Jl. Prof. Dr. Moestopo No.47, Pacar Kembang, Kec. Tambaksari, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60132, Indonesia
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Folia Medica Indonesiana
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : 23558398     EISSN : 2599056X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.65346/2958-4515.2401
Core Subject : Health, Science,
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience
Folia Medica Indonesiana, as indicated by its name, focuses on publishing good quality articles about research and education on health science and medicine in Indonesia. However, due to the fast growth of science and knowledge in these fields, we also welcome submitted articles from around the world, especially the ones that contain related matters from lower-middle income countries. Folia Medica Indonesiana is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that is published online at least four times a year. The scope covers various aspects of basic medical sciences includes anatomy, physiology, pathology, microbiology, pharmacology, and molecular medicine) and clinical medicine (covers specialties like internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics, oncology, psychiatry, etc). We highlight the pathology and potential treatment of metabolic syndromes and infectious diseases. Folia Medica Indonesiana also encourages the publication of articles about health education. The scope includes, but is not limited to, articles that emphasize on preventive education on certain diseases in a community, also research report of various materials and/or methods to develop medical education. We recognize the importance of this type of articles to be published alongside the assigned topic in each of our yearly issues, to provide our readers with updated information in medical sciences’ research and education simultaneously.
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Kedokteran (Lain-Lain)
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 52, No. 2" : 13 Documents clear
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy is more benefecial than open appendectomy in early acute appendicitis Budipramana, Vicky S
Folia Medica Indonesiana Vol. 52, No. 2
Publisher : Folia Medica Indonesiana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Open appendectomy has already commonly been performed to treat acute appendicitis, but the relatively more painful and longer incision scar becomes a cosmetical problem. Two port laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed safely, less painful and leaving only two small incision scars. The aim of the study was to evaluate the benefit of two-port laparoscopic appendectomy and that of with open appendectomy in the case of early acute appendicitis. An observational study was conducted from 2012 to 2014; to compare the operating time, post operative pain and wound infection in early acute appendicitis, performed with two-port laparoscopic appendectomy and with open appendectomy. The statistical analysis in this study uses t-test. There were 114 patients (73 men and 41 women) divided into two groups based on the choice made by the patients themselves. The number of samples performed with two-port laparoscopic appendectomy was 64 and that with open appendectomy was 46. Four patients were excluded from this study. In analysis using t-test, we found that the two-port laparoscopic appendectomy was more beneficial than open appendectomy. There was a significant difference between the two groups, the length of operation time was 37.22 minute in two-port laparoscopic appendectomy and 43.83 minute in open appendectomy (p=0.00), VAS pain score was 1.58 in two-port laparoscopic appendectomy and 2.30 in open appendectomy (p=0.00) and no post operative wound infection in both two groups. The conclusion is two-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique is faster and less painful and the same risk of wound infection than open appendectomy in early acute appendicitis.
Ampicillin sulbactam and cefotaxime are similarly effective in pediatric pneumonia Puspitasari, Diny; Hasmono, Didik; Rahman, Taufiqur
Folia Medica Indonesiana Vol. 52, No. 2
Publisher : Folia Medica Indonesiana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pneumonia is an infection of the lungs that occurs and still cause high mortality in young children today. The main cause is bacterial or viral. Antibiotics still recommended though it is difficult to know the cause is bacterial or viral. Ampicillin be the first option some guideline. Increased resistance worldwide become one of them concerns the effectiveness of antibiotics. The main treatment of toddler pneumonia in Muhammadiyah Hospital Lamongan are ampicillin sulbactam and cefotaxime. The study was conducted to analyze the effectiveness of both antibiotics. This study aims to analyze comparison in the use of ampicillin sulbactam and cefotaxime pneumonia patients aged 3-59 months from November 2013 to March 2014. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively observed for clinical data, laboratory data, the data microbiology. After it is analyzed to know the difference between the effectiveness of antibiotics. In this study of 29 patients included in the inclusion criteria, 17 patients who received antibiotics ampicillin sulbactam and 12 patients receiving cefotaxime. In the comparison of the mean pulse pulse is known there is a significant reduction in both groups of patients on the second day and was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.084). Likewise, the average ratio of temperature (p = 0.117), breath rate (p = 0.839), leukocytes of patients (p = 0.429). Length of stay for ampicillin sulbactam group was 4.77 days and 5.17 days for cefotaxime group. Analysis showed no differences between the two groups for lenght (p = 0.275). Of the 22 patients who were sampled for blood culture examination only 1 patient with positive results. Based on these results we can conclude that ampicillin sulbactam and cefotaxime effective in cases of children pneumonia, and there is no distinction based on the parameters in body temperature, breath rate, pulse, leukocytes and long hospitalization of patients. Regimentation dosage is appropriate based on guidelines, and length of stay less than 10 days. Found no side effects of both drugs.
Fertilization of bovine oocytes vitrified pre- and post in vitro maturation Faizah, Zakiyatul; Darsini, Ninik; Hinting, Aucky
Folia Medica Indonesiana Vol. 52, No. 2
Publisher : Folia Medica Indonesiana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The success rate of fertilization post save frozen oocytes is still very low, because the oocyte has distinctive features, namely the volume ratio and a lower surface to the limited penetration of water and cryoprotectants penetrate cells. Beside mature oocytes have a thread spindles are particularly vulnerable to the drop in temperature. Keep frozen oocytes is needed, especially in women who needed rescue fertility so their oosit can be fertilized. Maturation is done in TC 100 mL medium covered with mineral oil in a petri dish with a diameter of 36 mm. Oocyte vitrification begins with washing in PBS supplemented medium serum 20% for 1-2 minutes, followed by serum in the medium PBS + 20% + 10% ethylene glycol for 10-14 minutes. Then oocyte vitrification medium is transported in PBS + serum 20% + sucrose 0.5M ethylene glycol + 15% + 15% PROH for 25-30 seconds. Thawing oocytes is done by successive immersed in the media: 1). PBS + 20% serum + 0.5M sucrose, 2). PBS + 20% serum + 0.25M sucrose, and 3). PBS + 20% serum + 0.1 M sucrose. Insemination is done in rosset, and the number of fertilization was observed after 48 hours. Fertilization in the control group amounted to 42.97%, while the K1 and K2 there are no fertilization at all. The analysis showed that fertilization in the control and treatment groups significantly different at p <0.05 in both treatment groups K1 or K2 there are no fertilization at all. The conclusions of this study is there is no difference between the amount of fertilization of bovine oocytes were vitrified pre and post-maturation in vitro.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 61, No. 2 Vol. 61, No. 1 Vol. 60, No. 4 Vol. 60, No. 3 Vol. 60, No. 2 Vol. 60, No. 1 Vol. 59, No. 4 Vol. 59, No. 3 Vol. 59, No. 2 Vol. 59, No. 1 Vol. 58, No. 4 Vol. 58, No. 3 Vol. 58, No. 2 Vol. 58, No. 1 Vol. 57, No. 4 Vol. 57, No. 3 Vol. 57, No. 2 Vol. 57, No. 1 Vol. 56, No. 4 Vol. 56, No. 3 Vol. 56, No. 2 Vol. 56, No. 1 Vol. 55, No. 4 Vol. 55, No. 3 Vol. 55, No. 2 Vol. 55, No. 1 Vol. 54, No. 4 Vol. 54, No. 3 Vol. 54, No. 2 Vol. 54, No. 1 Vol. 53, No. 4 Vol. 53, No. 3 Vol. 53, No. 2 Vol. 53, No. 1 Vol. 52, No. 4 Vol. 52, No. 3 Vol. 52, No. 2 Vol. 52, No. 1 Vol. 51, No. 4 Vol. 51, No. 3 More Issue