cover
Contact Name
Harun Joko Prayitno
Contact Email
ijolae@ums.ac.id
Phone
+6282242301929
Journal Mail Official
ijolae@ums.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Jl. Ahmad Yani, Pabelan, Kartasura, Sukoharjo, 57169
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)
ISSN : 2655920X     EISSN : 26562804     DOI : 10.23917
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE) aims to promote creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship in education in order to face global challenges such as education in the disruption era, internet of things in education, child-friendly education, HOTS-based education, STEAM Education, blended learning, humanity literation education, life-skill learning, digital class, and other educational innovations.
Articles 152 Documents
Enhancing Students' Critical Reading Skills through the Integration of Critical Literacy Pedagogy and Teacher-Parent Collaboration Program Gian Fitria Anggraini; Dadang Sunendar; Vismaia S Damayanti; Bachrudin Musthafa
Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE) Vol. 8, No. 1, January 2026 (In Process)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/ijolae.v8i1.13366

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of an innovative instructional model that integrates critical literacy pedagogy with structured teacher–parent collaboration to enhance elementary students’ advanced critical reading skills. Grounded in the principles of critical literacy, the model extends literacy learning beyond the classroom by aligning school-based instruction with guided home literacy practices. The study responds to the urgent need to strengthen Indonesian students’ higher-order reading abilities in the context of information overload and persistent low literacy achievement. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test control group design was employed involving 37 fourth-grade students from a public elementary school in West Bandung Regency. The experimental group (n = 21) participated in the innovative collaborative literacy model, while the control group (n = 16) received conventional language instruction. The intervention was implemented through three stages problematization, cultural discussion, and social action—using thematic texts on bullying and environmental issues. Students’ critical reading was measured across six dimensions: interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation. Data were analyzed using independent sample t-tests. Results showed no significant pre-test differences between groups. However, post-test findings revealed a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group (p < 0.05) with medium normalized gain scores. Teachers demonstrated high pedagogical understanding, and parents showed adequate readiness, supporting effective implementation. These findings indicate that innovative family–school literacy integration can effectively advance critical reading development and offers a scalable approach to strengthening advanced literacy in primary education.
Students' Perceptions of Scientific Writing Teaching: Implications for Improving Learning Effectiveness Eko Purnomo; Markhamah Markhamah; Harun Joko Prayitno; Muhammad Syahriandi Adhantoro; Muhammad Rohmadi; Norazmie Yusof; Yabit Alas
Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE) Vol. 8, No. 1, January 2026 (In Process)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/ijolae.v8i1.15023

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ perceptions of scientific writing learning within an advanced and innovative learning framework. The research employed a descriptive quantitative approach using a Likert-scale questionnaire completed by 202 students. The data were analyzed descriptively to obtain the mean, standard deviation, and percentage distribution across five main aspects: participation and interaction, clarity of materials and use of examples, feedback and collaborative guidance, development of academic skills, and time management and variation in innovative learning methods. The results indicate that all aspects achieved mean scores above 3.00 (on a 1–4 scale), which are categorized as high. The highest scores were obtained for teaching method variation (3.14) and material implementation support (3.14), while the lowest score was found in learning time allocation (3.06). Although the majority of students selected the “Agree” category, the proportion of “Strongly Agree” responses remained relatively low (13–17%), suggesting the need for improvement in time allocation, feedback quality, and diversity of examples provided. This study underscores the importance of interactive learning design, consistent use of formative feedback, and the implementation of innovative learning methods to enhance the quality of students’ learning experiences. These findings can serve as a reference for teachers and schools in designing more effective and sustainable scientific writing instruction strategies.