cover
Contact Name
Danang
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
+6281269402117
Journal Mail Official
indexsasi@apji.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Batursari, Mranggen Kab. Demak Jawa Tengah 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science
ISSN : 30901812     EISSN : 30901804     DOI : 10.70062
Core Subject : Education,
ICCMS (International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science) is an open access Journal published by the IFREL ( International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers). ICCMS accepts manuscripts based on empirical research results, new scientific literature review, and comments/ criticism of scientific papers published by ICCMS. This journal is a means of publication and a place to share research and development work in the field of Multidisciplinary Science. Articles published in ICCMS are processed fully online. Submitted articles will go through peer review by a qualified international Reviewers. Complete information for article submission and other instructions are available in each issue. ICCMS publishes 2 (two) issues a year in June, and December ,however articles that have been declared accepted will be queued in the In-Press issue before published in the determined time.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 183 Documents
Urban Mobility and the Production of Space: Everyday Politics and Infrastructural Power in Makassar, Indonesia
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.187

Abstract

Urban mobility in Southeast Asia is often framed in policy discourse as a matter of infrastructure provision, modernization, and efficiency. Yet, the everyday experiences of city residents reveal that mobility is deeply shaped by power relations, cultural practices, and contested rights to urban space. This paper examines the politics of mobility in Makassar, Indonesia, drawing on Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space and James C. Scott’s notion of infrapolitics to analyze how infrastructures both structure inequality and generate everyday forms of resistance. The study employed an urban ethnographic approach, combining participant observation, in-depth interviews with drivers, commuters, and fisher households, shadowing and time–space diaries, and document analysis of urban planning policies. Fieldwork was conducted in Makassar between January and August 2024, focusing on neighborhoods, terminals, and transport hubs affected by infrastructural change. Findings reveal four interrelated dynamics. First, infrastructural development produces new exclusions, privileging elites and commercial interests while marginalizing informal transport systems and low-income residents. Second, residents engage in everyday tactics and infrapolitics from flexible pete-pete routes to informal market spaces that resist displacement and reclaim access. Third, infrastructures carry symbolic meanings, celebrated by elites as markers of modernity but interpreted by residents as signs of exclusion or resilience. Finally, infrastructure embodies material politics, embedding inequalities and capital priorities into the spatial fabric of the city. The study concludes that mobility in Makassar is not simply about circulation but about contested rights to the city, where infrastructures function simultaneously as instruments of domination and arenas of everyday negotiation. Recognizing these dynamics calls for inclusive urban planning that integrates informal systems, values cultural practices, and prioritizes social equity alongside technical efficiency
Contesting Corporate Social Responsibility: Community Agency, Hegemony, and Ecological Justice in Berau’s Coal Mining Region
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.188

Abstract

This study examines the practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by PT Berau Coal in Berau Regency, East Kalimantan, focusing on dynamics of hegemony, meaning-making, and ecological justice. Berau, as one of Indonesia’s major coal-producing regions, reflects a development paradox: while the company has gained recognition for its economic contributions and CSR programs, local communities continue to experience environmental degradation, land dispossession, and limited participation. The research employs a qualitative case study approach using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, observations, and document analysis in four mining-affected villages. The analysis is guided by Gramscian hegemony, Berger and Luckmann’s social constructivism, and critical political ecology. Findings indicate that CSR primarily functions as a hegemonic strategy that normalizes extractivism through tokenistic participation, corporate-led development narratives, and community dependence on company resources. Yet, local actors are not passive. Youth groups, women’s cooperatives, and traditional leaders emerge as critical voices who negotiate CSR agendas, reinterpret corporate narratives, and, in some cases, reject projects that fail to meet community needs—such as the case of the Jalan Usaha Tani project in Gunung Tabur. From a political ecology perspective, CSR practices remain confined to administrative compliance and symbolic environmental gestures, while structural ecological injustices persist. The study recommends transforming CSR into a participatory, transparent, and community-centered governance model by strengthening multi-stakeholder platforms, institutionalizing co-design processes, and recognizing local ecological knowledge.
Reflective Village Leadership and Everyday Politics: An Autoethnographic Study from Labanan Makmur, Indonesia
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.189

Abstract

Village leadership in Indonesia is often portrayed in technocratic and administrative terms, focusing on budget allocation, program delivery, and regulatory compliance. Such perspectives overlook the relational, cultural, and political dimensions of governance as lived in everyday community life. This paper explores reflective village leadership in Labanan Makmur, East Kalimantan, through an autoethnographic approach, drawing on the author’s six-year experience as village head (2017–2023). Data were derived from field diaries, village documents, participant observation, and informal dialogues with community members. Analysis was conducted thematically, guided by Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge, Scott’s concept of everyday politics, Freire’s idea of emancipatory participation, Parsons’ AGIL framework, and theories of social capital (Putnam, Bourdieu). Findings reveal four interrelated dynamics. First, power in village governance is a circulating practice, negotiated across formal institutions and informal arenas such as coffee stalls and WhatsApp groups. Second, reflective leadership engages with everyday politics, treating gossip, rumors, and community debates as integral feedback loops. Third, participation emerges as an emancipatory practice, where villagers co-create decisions through dialogue, collective agency, and symbolic action. Finally, innovation grows from social capital, with women’s savings groups, youth initiatives, and collective labor networks becoming institutionalized as grassroots innovations. The study argues that reflective leadership transforms governance from bureaucratic routine into a participatory and emancipatory practice, grounded in trust, reciprocity, and cultural legitimacy. It contributes to broader debates on rural governance by showing how leaders who embrace reflexivity and everyday politics can build more inclusive and resilient community institutions.
Cultural Values and Social Capital in Empowering Migrant Fishers: A Case Study of the Butonese in Derawan, Indonesia
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.190

Abstract

Migrant fishers are among the most vulnerable groups in Indonesia’s coastal economy, facing ecological uncertainty, market volatility, and limited institutional recognition. Yet, their survival and empowerment often depend not only on economic resources but also on cultural values and social capital that regulate cooperation, solidarity, and adaptation. This paper examines how Butonese migrant fishers in Derawan, Berau Regency, East Kalimantan construct empowerment through everyday practices and community-based institutions. The study employs a qualitative case study approach, combining in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, and document analysis. Data were analyzed thematically with guidance from Kabeer’s empowerment framework, Putnam’s social capital theory, and Parsons’ AGIL model. Findings reveal four interrelated dynamics. First, cultural values such as mosinte (mutual help) and spiritual practices serve as adaptive mechanisms and informal safety nets. Second, social capital enables collective empowerment through rotating savings groups, cooperative labor arrangements, and trust-based conflict resolution. Third, integration is reinforced by solidarity practices like gotong royong, rituals, and cultural events, which sustain legitimacy and cohesion. Finally, cultural values undergo transformation (latency) as kinship ties and rituals are reinterpreted into collective enterprises and hybrid institutions that secure recognition from external actors. The study concludes that empowerment among migrant fishers is not only economic but also cultural and relational. Strengthening cultural institutions and social capital is essential for building resilience, fostering inclusivity, and ensuring sustainable fisheries governance in Indonesia.
Women’s Agency and Institutional Change in Small-Scale Fisheries: Evidence from Talisayan, Indonesia
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.191

Abstract

Women play crucial yet often invisible roles in small-scale fisheries, particularly in post-harvest processing, marketing, and household financial management. Despite their contributions, women remain marginalized in fisheries governance and institutional decision-making. This paper examines how women in Talisayan, Berau Regency, East Kalimantan, Indonesia move from the margins to the center of fisheries governance by mobilizing everyday practices and collective enterprises to drive institutional change. The study adopts a qualitative case study approach, drawing on in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, and document analysis involving 35 informants, including women fish processors, leaders of Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUB), and village officials. Data were analyzed thematically using Parsons’ AGIL framework, Berger and Luckmann’s social constructivism, and social capital theory. Findings highlight four dynamics. First, women adapt to economic and ecological pressures by diversifying livelihoods and creating informal saving schemes. Second, they achieve collective goals through KUB, enhancing bargaining power, leadership opportunities, and market access. Third, women foster social integration by building solidarity, trust, and institutional legitimacy within their communities. Finally, through cultural reproduction and innovation, they transform gender norms and gain recognition as institutional actors, embedding inclusivity into local fisheries governance. This study contributes to debates on gender and development by demonstrating how women’s agency in small-scale fisheries generates both livelihood resilience and institutional transformation. It argues that empowering women through collective enterprises is essential for achieving equitable and sustainable fisheries governance in Indonesia and beyond.
The Influence of International or Local Student Status on Generation Z's Decision to Move Abroad
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.192

Abstract

Globalization and the internationalization of higher education have significantly increased student mobility. Generation Z, growing up in the digital era, exhibits unique characteristics and career aspirations. This study aims to analyze how the status as an international student compared to a local student influences the intention of Generation Z students to move abroad after graduation. Using a qualitative case study approach, this research collected data through a questionnaire distributed at two universities, focusing on two representative respondents: one international student and one local student. Thematic analysis was used to explore the motivations, barriers, and career aspirations shaping their mobility decisions. Preliminary results indicate that international students tend to have higher transnational capital and stronger global career aspirations, while local students give more consideration to family ties and stability, although they remain open to international opportunities if the incentives are strong. These findings provide insights for educational institutions and policymakers in designing strategies to support and manage the mobility of young talent in the future.
Designing an Inclusive Digital Ecosystem for Public Services: A Framework for Accessibility Integration in Local Government Information Systems
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.193

Abstract

The digital transformation of public services has expanded rapidly across local governments, yet accessibility for people with disabilities remains insufficiently addressed. Many government websites fail to comply with international standards such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, limiting equitable participation in e-government. This study aims to develop a conceptual model that integrates accessibility principles into the architecture of local government information systems. Using a framework construction approach, the research synthesizes findings from prior mixed-method evaluations involving accessibility audits and user perception surveys conducted in Kudus Regency, Indonesia. The resulting model, known as the Inclusive Digital Ecosystem Framework (IDEF), embeds the four WCAG 2.1 principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust (POUR), into a multi-layered system architecture that spans interface design, application functionality, data management, and governance mechanisms. The study reveals that accessibility must evolve from a corrective process to a proactive design and governance culture. The IDEF framework demonstrates that technical compliance, user-centered design, and institutional policy can be systematically aligned to build sustainable, inclusive, and citizen-oriented digital ecosystems. This research contributes both theoretically and practically to the advancement of inclusive e-government by establishing a scalable model that links technological accessibility with policy accountability, supporting the realization of Sustainable Development Goals on equality and strong institutions.
Smart Governance in Health: Linking Strategic Human Resource Management, Technology Integration, and Public Health Performance in Central Java
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.194

Abstract

This study explores the interconnection between Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM), technology integration, and public health performance within the framework of smart governance at the Provincial Health Office of Central Java, Indonesia. Using a qualitative method with a strategic approach, this research aims to identify how strategic alignment between human resource capabilities and technological advancement contributes to the enhancement of health service delivery in the public sector. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including policymakers, HR managers, IT personnel, and public health experts, supported by document analysis and field observation.Findings reveal that the implementation of SHRM practicessuch as strategic talent development, performance-based systems, and leadership empowermentplays a critical role in enabling the adoption of digital health technologies. Moreover, technology integration is not merely a technical adaptation but requires organizational readiness, digital culture, and continuous policy innovation. The synergy between SHRM and technology contributes to improved public health outcomes, faster response to health crises, and better data-driven decision-making. However, institutional barriers, fragmented coordination, and limited digital infrastructure remain significant challenges.This study offers strategic insights for provincial health governance, emphasizing the importance of long-term planning, interdepartmental collaboration, and capacity building. It recommends developing an integrated smart health governance roadmap that aligns HR policies with technological innovations to support sustainable public health performance. The findings contribute to the growing discourse on digital transformation in the health sector, particularly within emerging economies facing complex governance structures.
Strengthening Digital Trade Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Indonesia: A Responsive and Equitable Regulatory Framework
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.195

Abstract

Digital transformation has revolutionized global trade, creating significant economic opportunities while simultaneously generating unprecedented dispute complexity. This article analyzes the urgency of strengthening digital trade dispute resolution mechanisms in Indonesia, a country with a rapidly growing digital economy but facing challenges of regulatory fragmentation and limited access to justice. Using a normative legal research approach and a multi-theoretical analytical framework encompassing the theory of legal certainty (Gustav Radbruch), the theory of justice (John Rawls), the theory of legal system effectiveness (Lawrence M. Friedman), and the theory of responsive law (Philippe Nonet & Philip Selznick), this study examines the weaknesses of existing conventional and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. The analysis shows that the effectiveness of dispute resolution is hampered by three main factors: fragmentation of legal substance, inefficient institutional structures, and a legal culture that is not yet fully adaptive to digital transactions. As a novelty, this article proposes an integrated and multi-stakeholder model for strengthening Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). This model is designed to create a harmonized regulatory framework, increase accessibility for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), and ensure efficient and equitable dispute resolution. Policy recommendations focus on establishing a National ODR Center, harmonizing cross-sectoral regulations, and strengthening digital infrastructure to support a fair and competitive trade ecosystem.
Judicial Effectiveness in Corruption Sentencing: An Analysis of Proportionality and Deterrent Impact in Indonesia's Anti-Corruption Court System
Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December : ICCMS (Proceeding International Collaborative Conference on Multidis
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/iccms.v2i2.196

Abstract

Corruption remains one of Indonesia's most pressing legal challenges, causing substantial state financial losses and impeding national development. This study analyzes the effectiveness of court decisions in imposing sentences on corruption perpetrators from both proportionality and deterrence perspectives. Using socio-legal research methodology with descriptive analysis, this research examines (1) the extent to which judicial decisions reflect principles of proportional justice in corruption sentencing, and (2) the deterrent impact of such sentences on both individual offenders and potential perpetrators. Data were collected through comprehensive documentation study of corruption court decisions, statutory analysis, and review of relevant legal literature. Findings reveal significant sentencing disparity across similar corruption cases, with most sentences imposed near minimum statutory thresholds despite massive state losses. The average imprisonment duration for corruption offenses is only 2 years and 8 months, substantially below maximum allowable sentences. This study identifies both juridical factors (wide sentencing ranges, evidentiary weaknesses) and non-juridical factors (political intervention, defendant's social status) as primary obstacles to effective sentencing. The research concludes that current judicial practices fail to achieve optimal deterrent effects, as evidenced by high recidivism rates and continued corruption prevalence. Comprehensive reforms in sentencing guidelines, judicial capacity building, and monitoring mechanisms are essential to enhance the effectiveness of anti-corruption judicial processes in Indonesia.