cover
Contact Name
Muhammad Ridwan
Contact Email
biarpublisherr@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
biarpublisherr@gmail.com
Editorial Address
MAIN OFFICE Linglit - Journal Indonesia Komplek Jasari Muslim Jl. Perjuangan, Bandar Klippa, Percut Sei Tuan, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Sumatera Utara 20371, Indonesia
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
LingLit Journal
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27744523     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33258
Core Subject :
LingLit Journal: Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature is an international journal using a peer-reviewed process published in December, March, June and September by Britain International for Academic Research Publisher (BIAR-Publisher). LingLit welcomes research papers in linguistics, literature, and other researches relating to linguistics and literature. It is published in both online and printed version.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 103 Documents
Lexical and Semantic Variations in Digital Communication among Adolescents: A Case Study of TikTok Comments Belay Sitotaw Goshu; Muhammad Ridwan
LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature Vol 6 No 3 (2025): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Social media platforms, particularly TikTok, have become primary arenas for linguistic experimentation among adolescents, yet systematic analyses of how platform-specific affordances shape lexical and semantic innovation remains limited. This study investigated lexical and semantic variations in adolescent digital communication on TikTok, addressing three research questions concerning the types of lexical innovations, processes of semantic change, and the role of platform affordances in shaping language evolution. Methods: A mixed-methods design integrated quantitative corpus linguistics with qualitative discourse analysis. A corpus of 2,848 TikTok comments was compiled across four major trends (September–December 2024). Lexical analysis identified neologisms, graphical variations, and acronyms; semantic analysis documented broadening, narrowing, metaphoric extension, and pejoration/amelioration; platform affordances analysis examined meme-driven language and intertextual policing. Analysis revealed 15 lexical innovations with 63 occurrences across semantic categories. Neologisms (fr, bestie, delulu) and graphical variations (tryna, cuz, ion) served dual functions of efficiency and identity performance. Semantic shifts included ameliorative broadening (slay, fire), pejoration (basic, cringe), metaphoric extension (era, main character), and reclamatory usage (ghetto). Platform analysis identified 11 meme-driven phrases generating 2,848 occurrences with near-neutral sentiment, and 347 policing instances (12.2%) concentrated during rising and peak trend phases, demonstrating active semantic negotiation through definition, debate, and correction. TikTok functions as an accelerated laboratory for language change where adolescents deploy multiple mechanisms of linguistic innovation simultaneously. Platform affordances fundamentally reshape traditional sociolinguistic processes, with intertextual policing serving as the mechanism by which communities enforce emerging semantic norms. The findings extend communities of practice frameworks to algorithmically-mediated digital environments. Educators should recognize digital language as systematic innovation; lexicographers should develop protocols for documenting ephemeral platform-specific terms; platform designers should account for in-group reclamation practices; and researchers should prioritize cross-platform longitudinal studies to track whether observed innovations represent enduring change or age-graded phenomena.
Face, Power, and Digital Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Politeness in Asynchronous Student-Lecturer Exchanges Belay Sitotaw Goshu; Muhammad Ridwan
LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature Vol 6 No 3 (2025): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid digitization of higher education has transformed student-lecturer communication, with asynchronous platforms becoming primary sites of academic interaction. However, the pragmatic dimensions of these exchanges, particularly how face and power are negotiated through politeness strategies, remain underexplored in digital contexts. This study investigates how students and lecturers manage face and negotiate power through politeness strategies in asynchronous digital exchanges, examining strategy selection across participant roles and communicative purposes. Employing a qualitative interpretive paradigm with computer-mediated discourse analysis (Herring, 2004), we analyzed 1,847 asynchronous exchanges from Blackboard Learn at Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia. Participants included 16 lecturers and 275 students across Business, Engineering, and Social Sciences. Data were coded deductively using Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness framework and inductively for emergent digital-specific patterns. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests and odds ratios. Significant asymmetries characterized strategy selection: students predominantly employed deferential strategies (negative politeness: 36.8%; off-record: 19.1%), while lecturers favored bald on-record strategies (41.2%). Request sequences showed extensive student mitigation (hedging: 82.3%; apologetic framing: 58.7%) versus lecturer directness (bald on-record: 52.8%). Feedback followed a "sandwich structure" (opening positive: 78.5%; closing positive: 72.8%). Time-sensitive contexts reduced mitigation by 58%, temporarily overriding power norms. Resistance patterns revealed student agency through polite pushback (26.3%) and justified disagreement (19.8%), with lecturers responding accommodatively (explanation: 25.1%; compromise: 22.0%). Repair sequences showed role-dependent preferences: student-initiated apology (92.5% success) and lecturer-initiated explanation (87.3% success). Asynchronous digital discourse both reproduces institutional power asymmetries and enables novel forms of negotiation through platform-specific affordances. Effective face-work requires strategy-role alignment, with digital mediation transforming traditional politeness practices. Universities should develop communication guidelines acknowledging power asymmetries, provide faculty training on feedback structures and accommodative responses, and offer student orientation on pragmatic norms. Platform designers should incorporate features supporting face-work in asynchronous academic discourse.
The Harp of the Soul: Neuroacoustic and Psycho-spiritual Mechanisms of the Ethiopian Begena as a Therapeutic Modality for Grief, Anxiety, and Spiritual Dryness Kassahun Desealegn Asfaw; Nigussie Mamushet Degeif; Belay Sitotaw Goshu; Arifulhak Aceh
LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature Vol 6 No 3 (2025): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Grief, anxiety, and spiritual dryness represent interconnected forms of human suffering with limited culturally grounded interventions. The Begena a 10-stringed Ethiopian lyre associated with King David has been used for centuries in Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church meditation as "food for the soul." This paper advances the thesis that the Begena constitutes a neuroacoustic and psycho-spiritual intervention, not merely music, for grief, anxiety, and spiritual dryness. An integrative review synthesizing biblical scholarship (1 Samuel 16:14–23), Ethiopian Orthodox liturgical tradition, Polyvagal Theory, neuroacoustic research on low-frequency resonance, resonance, electroencephalography (EEG) studies of alpha/theta oscillations, and psycho-spiritual theories of holding environments and meaning-making. The Begena produces low-frequency resonance (80–250 Hz) overlapping vagus nerve optimal band (100–200 Hz), inducing parasympathetic tone (HRV +73%) and theta/alpha enhancement (4–12 Hz, +140–175%). Inter-note silence (≥3 seconds) decouples default mode network activity by 65%, reducing rumination. Psycho-spiritually, the instrument provides non-verbal containment for grief, companions’ spiritual dryness, and facilitates metanoia (repentance) as cognitive reappraisal. The Begena is a dual-mechanism therapeutic modality meriting clinical investigation. Pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Begena listening to white noise and silence for prolonged grief disorder.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 103


Filter by Year

2020 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6 No 3 (2025): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, June Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, March Vol 5 No 4 (2024): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, December Vol 5 No 3 (2024): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, June Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, March Vol 4 No 4 (2023): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, December Vol 4 No 3 (2023): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September Vol 4 No 2 (2023): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, June Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, March Vol 3 No 4 (2022): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, December Vol 3 No 3 (2022): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, June Vol 3 No 1 (2022): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, March Vol 2 No 4 (2021): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, December Vol 2 No 3 (2021): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, September Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, June Vol 2 No 1 (2021): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, March Vol 1 No 1 (2020): Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, December More Issue