cover
Contact Name
Ardian Asyhari
Contact Email
foundae.aidie@gmail.com
Phone
+628127884800
Journal Mail Official
foundae.aidie@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Pramuka street, Bandar Lampung city, Lampung, Indonesia.
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
AI and Developmental Insights in Education (AIDIE)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31235220     DOI : https://doi.org/10.58524/aidie
Core Subject :
Focus and Scope of AI and Developmental Insights in Education AIDIE AI and Developmental Insights in Education AIDIE is an international peer reviewed journal that focuses on the integration of Artificial Intelligence AI in educational settings with a particular emphasis on its implications for developmental psychology and learning sciences The journal aims to bridge the gap between cutting edge AI technologies and their practical applications in enhancing cognitive social and emotional development within educational environments AIDIE provides a platform for researchers educators policymakers and technology developers to share theoretical and empirical research that contributes to the evolving landscape of AI enhanced education The journal welcomes interdisciplinary research that intersects AI psychology and education emphasizing innovation and evidence based practices Focus Areas AI Driven Personalized and Adaptive Learning Development of AI algorithms for personalized learning experiences Adaptive learning systems that cater to individual learning styles and paces Machine learning models for predicting student performance and providing tailored interventions Intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive feedback mechanisms Cognitive and Emotional Development Through AI The role of AI in supporting cognitive skill acquisition in various educational contexts AI assisted emotional intelligence development and socio emotional learning SEL AI based interventions for students with special educational needs AI driven analytics to assess cognitive load and mental well being AI Based Assessment and Feedback Systems Automated grading systems and their effectiveness in formative and summative assessments Natural Language Processing NLP for assessing written responses and personalized feedback The role of AI in formative assessment and continuous feedback mechanisms Ethical and bias considerations in AI based assessments Developmental Psychology Insights in AI Education The integration of developmental theories into AI driven educational tools The influence of AI on cognitive social and emotional growth in learners Developmental perspectives on student engagement and motivation in AI driven classrooms Longitudinal studies on the impact of AI on learning development Gamification and AI in Education The use of AI in developing educational games that enhance motivation and engagement AI driven analytics in gamified learning environments The role of reinforcement learning in educational gamification Impact of AI enhanced gamification on student achievement and retention Ethical and Psychological Implications of AI in Education Privacy and data security concerns in AI driven educational tools Ethical considerations related to AI bias fairness and transparency Psychological effects of AI reliance in the learning process Policy implications of AI adoption in educational institutions Collaborative AI Frameworks for Teaching and Learning Integration of AI with traditional pedagogical methods AI driven collaboration tools for peer learning and group projects Social robotics in educational environments to facilitate teamwork and social learning Enhancing teacher effectiveness through AI supported instructional strategies AI and Teacher Professional Development AI driven teacher training programs and competency building Utilizing AI to analyze teaching effectiveness and classroom dynamics Personalized recommendations for professional growth using AI analytics Ethical considerations in AI supported teacher evaluations AI in Online and Distance Learning Environments Intelligent virtual learning environments VLEs and their impact on learning outcomes AI driven chatbots and virtual assistants for online student support Remote assessment techniques using AI tools Strategies for increasing engagement in online learning with AI Big Data and Learning Analytics in Education Leveraging AI for educational data mining and pattern recognition Predictive analytics for student success and dropout prevention AI enhanced dashboards for educators to track student progress The role of AI in data driven decision making for institutional improvements Scope of the Journal AIDIE welcomes submissions of original research articles theoretical papers systematic reviews case studies and short communications that address but are not limited to the following topics Artificial Intelligence in Education Applications and innovations in AI technology to enhance learning processes Developmental and Educational Psychology The impact of AI on cognitive emotional and social development in learners of all ages Technology Enhanced Learning AI assisted tools and platforms that support teaching and learning Data Driven Education Utilizing AI to analyze and optimize learning outcomes through big data analytics Human AI Interaction in Education Understanding how students and educators interact with AI tools and their effectiveness Ethical Considerations in AI Integration Exploring the challenges and frameworks for ethical AI implementation in educational settings Pedagogical Strategies for AI Adoption Developing frameworks to integrate AI into teaching methodologies Cross Cultural Studies in AI and Education Investigating the role of AI in diverse educational contexts and cultural settings Types of Manuscripts Accepted Original Research Articles Empirical studies that present new findings related to AI applications in educational psychology and learning sciences Review Articles Comprehensive reviews that summarize and critically analyze existing research in the field Case Studies Practical implementations of AI driven educational solutions with in depth analysis and reflections Short Communications Brief reports on emerging trends innovative tools and ongoing research projects in AI and education Theoretical and Conceptual Papers Papers that propose new models frameworks or theoretical perspectives on AI and developmental education Target Audience AIDIE is intended for a diverse readership that includes but is not limited to Academics and researchers in AI psychology and education Educators and instructional designers interested in AI driven teaching methodologies Policymakers and administrators exploring the role of AI in shaping education systems EdTech developers focused on designing AI based educational tools and solutions Publication Frequency and Open Access Policy AIDIE is published two times a year in May and November and follows an open access policy ensuring that all published articles are freely available to the global community without subscription fees thereby promoting widespread dissemination of knowledge
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 15 Documents
Educational-Stage Profiles of Learners’ Trust in Artificial Intelligence Across Secondary and Higher Education Contexts Fredi Ganda Putra; Khoirunnisa Imama
AI and Developmental Insights in Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): AI and Developmental Insights in Education
Publisher : CV. FoundAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/aidie.v2i1.155

Abstract

Trust in artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly relevant to educational technology adoption, yet evidence remains limited on how learners at different educational stages evaluate AI systems. This cross-sectional survey examined AI trust among 412 students from secondary schools and universities in Lampung Province, Indonesia. The study assessed AI trust, AI literacy, prior AI experience, perceived AI transparency, and perceived institutional AI integration policy. Descriptive analyses, independent-samples t-tests, hierarchical multiple regression, bootstrapped mediation, and moderated mediation were used to estimate educational-stage differences and conditional indirect associations. Higher education students reported higher composite AI trust than secondary school students (M = 70.63 vs. M = 57.04, p < .001, d = 1.21). AI literacy and perceived transparency were positively associated with AI trust after controlling for gender, educational stage, and prior AI experience. Perceived transparency partially accounted for the association between AI literacy and trust (indirect effect = 0.17, 95% CI [0.11, 0.24]), and institutional AI integration policy strengthened the AI literacy-transparency pathway. Because the design was cross-sectional and based on self-report data, the findings should be interpreted as associational rather than causal or developmental evidence. The study suggests that AI literacy curricula should explicitly develop learners’ ability to evaluate transparency, uncertainty, and appropriate reliance when using AI-supported educational tools.
Examining the Association Between AI-Supported Cognitive Scaffolding and Conceptual Understanding in Secondary Science Learning Anggi Widiarni; Yuli Yanti
AI and Developmental Insights in Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): AI and Developmental Insights in Education
Publisher : CV. FoundAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/aidie.v2i1.156

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support adaptive feedback, prompts, and learning analytics in science education, yet the mechanisms linking AI-supported scaffolding to conceptual understanding remain underexplored. This study examined whether metacognitive awareness mediated the association between AI-supported cognitive scaffolding and conceptual understanding, and whether prior knowledge moderated the scaffolding–metacognition pathway. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control-group design was conducted with 214 Grade 9–10 students from four intact science classes in Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. Students were assigned to either an AI-scaffolding condition (n = 108) or a conventional instruction condition (n = 106) over a 12-week intervention. Conceptual understanding was assessed using a 40-item curriculum-aligned test (α = .87), while metacognitive awareness was measured using a 30-item adapted inventory (α = .82). Results showed that students in the AI-scaffolding condition achievedhigher post-test scores and greater learning gains. Metacognitive awareness partially mediated this association, and the indirect effect was stronger among students with lower prior knowledge.
Enhancing Vocational Students’ Socio-Emotional Adjustment through Artificial Intelligence Supported Learning Sari Indrayani; Rita Nur Anjani
AI and Developmental Insights in Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): AI and Developmental Insights in Education
Publisher : CV. FoundAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/aidie.v2i1.157

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in school learning environments, yet evidence remains limited on its developmental value in vocational secondary education. This quasi-experimental study examined whether an eight-week AI-supported socio-emotional learning and AI literacy intervention was associated with improved socio-emotional adjustment, AI literacy, and perceived AI support among vocational students. A non-equivalent pretest-posttest control-group design was implemented with 168 Grade 10–11 students from four intact classes in two public vocational schools in Way Kanan, Indonesia. The AI-supported condition (n = 84) received activities integrating AI literacy, reflective prompting, feedback evaluation, peer dialogue, and teacher-mediated socio-emotional reflection, while the comparison condition (n = 84) received regular technology-enriched instruction. ANCOVA controlling for pretest scores showed higher adjusted posttest scores in the AI-supported condition for socio-emotional adjustment, F(1,165) = 18.72, p < .001, partial η² = .102; AI literacy, F(1,165) = 44.96, p < .001, partial η² = .214; and perceived AI support, F(1,165) = 16.84, p < .001, partial η² = .093. Findings suggest that structured, teacher-guided AI learning may support vocational students’ socio-emotional and AI-related development, although intact-class assignment and self-report outcomes require cautious interpretation.
Predicting Early Signs of Learning Disengagement Through AI-Based Behavioral Analytics in Blended Education M. Vithor Al Faqih; Ratu Dwi Gustia
AI and Developmental Insights in Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): AI and Developmental Insights in Education
Publisher : CV. FoundAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/aidie.v2i1.158

Abstract

This study examined whether behavioral analytics derived from a Moodle-based learning management system could help identify early signs of learning disengagement in blended higher education. A quantitative predictive correlational design was used with 305 undergraduate students at Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia. Five behavioral indicators, login frequency, assignment submission timeliness, discussion participation, video completion rate, and LMS interaction breadth, were analyzed alongside scores from a 24-item Learning Disengagement Index (LDI). Multiple linear regression and four machine learning classifiers were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. The composite behavioral model was significantly associated with LDI scores (R² = .671, p < .001), with login frequency (β = −.42) and assignment submission timeliness (β = −.38) showing the strongest standardized associations. At the Week 4 checkpoint, Random Forest showed the highest classification performance among the tested algorithms (Accuracy = .832; AUC = .912), followed by Gradient Boosting. These findings suggest that early LMS behavioral traces can provide useful decision-support signals for student support in blended courses. The results should be interpreted as context-specific predictive evidence rather than causal evidence, and local validation is recommended before institutional deployment.
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Student Vulnerability to Academic Stress in AI-Integrated Learning Environments Alvina Desya Ramadhani; David Naista
AI and Developmental Insights in Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): AI and Developmental Insights in Education
Publisher : CV. FoundAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/aidie.v2i1.159

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly embedded in higher education, yet their relationship with students’ academic stress remains insufficiently established. This study developed and internally evaluated machine learning (ML) models for classifying academic stress vulnerability among 441 undergraduate students enrolled in AI-integrated courses at three Indonesian public universities. Using a quantitative cross-sectional predictive design, data were collected through psychometric scales, institutional GPA records, and LMS behavioral indicators. Four supervised classifiers, Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine with radial basis kernel (SVM-RBF), and Logistic Regression (LR), were compared using stratified train-test evaluation and five-fold cross-validation within the training data. GB achieved the strongest held-out performance (accuracy = .846, macro-F1 = .840, AUC-ROC = .930). Permutation importance indicated that cognitive load, AI literacy, and digital fatigue contributed most to classification performance. Subgroup AUC comparisons showed no significant differences across gender and discipline, although this should be interpreted cautiously. External validation and ethical governance are required before operational deployment.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 15