cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhamad Zaenal Muttaqin
Contact Email
mz.muttaqin@uinssc.com
Phone
+6282210831252
Journal Mail Official
diyaalafkar@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi, Cirebon, West Java 45132, Indonesia
Location
Kota cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Diya al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
ISSN : 23030453     EISSN : 24429872     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v13i2
Core Subject :
Diya al-Afkar is a scholarly journal focusing on the study of the Qur’an and Hadith. This journal publishes scholarly articles in the form of studies on the sciences of the Qur’an and Hadith, interpretations and understandings of the Qur’an and Hadith, research findings-including both literature reviews and field research-related to the Qur’an or Hadith, and/or book reviews. The journal is published twice a year.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 201 Documents
 17   18   19   20   21 
DARI ATRIBUSI STRUKTURAL KE VERIFIKASI KORELATIF: Reinterpretasi Harald Motzki atas Common Link dalam Rekonstruksi Historis Hadis Amin Iskandar
Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/nge5aa56

Abstract

The historicity of hadith in modern scholarship partly depends on the extent to which isnād structures can be used to reconstruct the origins and transmission of a report. This article examines Harald Motzki’s reinterpretation of G. H. A. Juynboll’s common link theory and its implications for the epistemic status of isnād, particularly the common link, single strand, and diving strand. The study employs a qualitative literature review using content and comparative analysis of Juynboll’s and Motzki’s works together with relevant secondary studies. The analysis proceeds through identification, categorization, comparison, and interpretive synthesis of isnād structures and isnād-matn relationships. The findings show that Motzki does not discard the evidentiary value of the common link, but separates a transmitter’s structural position from his historical function. A common link is not automatically an originator or fabricator; it may function as a transmitter-collector whose historical role must be tested through correlations among isnād routes, matn variants, sources, and transmission patterns. Consequently, single strands and diving strands cannot be treated as automatic evidence of authenticity or fabrication, but as investigative indicators requiring further verification. This article conceptualizes the shift as a movement from a structural attribution model to a correlative verification model: from structure directly producing attribution to structure generating a hypothesis that must be tested through correlated evidence. The study concludes that isnād remains relevant as historical evidence, but its conclusions are probabilistic, critical, and open to revision. Historisitas hadis dalam studi modern salah satunya ditentukan oleh sejauh mana struktur isnād dapat digunakan untuk merekonstruksi asal-usul dan proses transmisi suatu riwayat. Artikel ini mengkaji reinterpretasi Harald Motzki terhadap teori common link G. H. A. Juynboll dan implikasinya terhadap status epistemologis isnād, khususnya common link, single strand, dan diving strand. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis tinjauan pustaka dengan analisis isi dan analisis komparatif terhadap karya Juynboll, Motzki, serta studi terkait. Analisis dilakukan melalui identifikasi, kategorisasi, perbandingan, dan sintesis interpretatif terhadap struktur isnād dan relasi isnād-matan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Motzki tidak meniadakan nilai common link, tetapi memisahkan posisi struktural periwayat dari fungsi historisnya. Common link tidak otomatis merupakan originator atau fabricator, melainkan dapat berfungsi sebagai transmitter-collector yang statusnya harus diuji melalui korelasi antara jalur isnād, varian matan, sumber, dan pola transmisi. Konsekuensinya, single strand dan diving strand tidak dapat diperlakukan sebagai bukti otomatis autentisitas ataupun fabrikasi, tetapi sebagai indikator investigasi yang memerlukan verifikasi lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini merumuskan pergeseran dari model atribusi struktural menuju model verifikasi korelatif, yaitu dari struktur yang langsung menghasilkan atribusi menuju struktur yang membentuk hipotesis untuk diuji secara korelatif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa isnād tetap relevan sebagai bukti sejarah, tetapi kesimpulannya bersifat probabilistik, kritis, dan terbuka terhadap revisi.  

Page 21 of 21 | Total Record : 201

 17   18   19   20   21 

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): June Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): December Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): December Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): December Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): June Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): December Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): June Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): December Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): June Vol. 7 No. 02 (2019): December Vol. 7 No. 01 (2019): June Vol. 6 No. 02 (2018): December Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): June Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): December Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): June Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): December Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): June Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014): June More Issue