cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
NOVZEL RIDHO ABEDNEGO HASUGIAN
Contact Email
ejournalkebijakan@gmail.com
Phone
+6281232140041
Journal Mail Official
jikh@kemenkum.go.id
Editorial Address
Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum Jalan Raya Gandul No.04, Cinere, Depok 16512
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Published by Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum, Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 19782292     EISSN : 25797425     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2026.V20.2
Core Subject :
Focus and Scope The focus of this journal is legal policy (in Indonesia) which can be derived from the results of research, studies and legal reviews. The scope of this journal includes but is not limited to: Correctional policy; Immigration policy; Legislative policies; Intellectual property policy: copyrights, industrial designs, patents, layout designs of integrated circuits, trade secrets, marks and geographical indications; General law administration policies: civil (legal entity, fiduciary, inheritance, state curator, and notary); crime (criminal law services and pardons, civil servant investigators, and dactyloscopy); state administration (citizenship and political parties); central authorities and international law (mutual assistance in criminal matters, extradition, transfer of trains, and international law); Policies for fostering national law: legal planning, legal counselling, and legal aid; Policies on administration, supervision and development of human resources in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 253 Documents
 22   23   24   25   26 
Under-Enforcement of Corporate Criminal Liability: Indonesia’s Normative Commitment and Systemic Impunity Tumian Lian Daya Purba; Silvester Magnus Loogman Palit; Ali Rahman; Yassine Chami
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 20 No 2 (2026): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2026.V20.161-176

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability has been progressively recognised in Indonesia through sectoral legislation, procedural regulations, and the new Criminal Code, indicating a strong formal commitment to hold corporations accountable for corruption and other economic crimes. In practice, however, corporations are still rarely prosecuted, and enforcement remains heavily focused on individual offenders. This article examines the gap between “law in the books” and “law in action” and argues that the persistent under-enforcement of corporate criminal liability has produced a pattern of systemic impunity for corporate actors. Using a normative juridical method combined with case-law analysis and secondary empirical materials, the study reconstructs the legal framework, maps enforcement patterns in corruption, banking, environmental, tax and labour sectors, and identifies doctrinal, procedural, institutional, and political–economic factors that discourage prosecutors and judges from pursuing corporate defendants. The novelty of this article lies in treating under-enforcement itself as the central analytical problem and offering an integrated explanatory framework that connects legal design, institutional capacity, and political–economic incentives. The article concludes by proposing reforms to clarify liability standards, strengthen evidentiary and procedural tools, enhance institutional capacity and coordination, and insulate enforcement from undue corporate influence so that corporate criminal liability can function as an effective mechanism of accountability rather than merely a symbolic commitment
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Distorsi Orisinalitas Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Kesenian Jaran Kencak Lumajang Rizki Hidayat; Rhama Wisnu Wardhana; Nuzulia Kumala Sari
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 20 No 2 (2026): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2026.V20.105-126

Abstract

In the dynamics of contemporary societal development, Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) frequently experience distortion in the form of shifts in cultural values and identities resulting from modifications that incorporate elements of modern culture. The Jaran Kencak performance art in Lumajang is one of the Traditional Cultural Expressions that has undergone distortion due to modifications in its musical accompaniment, accompanying dances, and performers’ costumes. This study aims to analyze the legal protection framework for preserving the originality of Jaran Kencak as a Traditional Cultural Expression and to examine the legal consequences of modifications that have caused distortion to Jaran Kencak as a Traditional Cultural Expression. This research employs a normative juridical method with conceptual and statutory approaches. The findings reveal that the legal protection framework for Jaran Kencak as a Traditional Cultural Expression and intangible cultural heritage encompasses preventive and negative protection, which positions the state as the primary guardian; defensive protection through inventory mechanisms as both a Traditional Cultural Expression and intangible cultural heritage; and repressive protection through dispute resolution and the imposition of administrative sanctions against its misuse. Furthermore, modifications to the music, dances, and costumes in Jaran Kencak performances have distorted its cultural identity as well as its aesthetic and social values. Such modifications are inconsistent with Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, Law Number 5 of 2017 on Cultural Advancement, and Government Regulation Number 56 of 2022 on Communal Intellectual Property.
Orientasi Fiskal dalam Penegakan Hukum Keimigrasian: Antara PNBP, Tindakan Administratif Keimigrasian, dan Proses Peradilan Pidana Masdar Bakhtiar; Awaluddin Kadriah; Muhammad Yusuf
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 20 No 2 (2026): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2026.V20.127-144

Abstract

This study examines the shift in Indonesia's immigration law enforcement from a sovereignty-based approach toward fiscal orientation, reflected in revenue-oriented enforcement whereby legal instruments increasingly optimize Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP). This study aims to identify the interrelation between State Budget Allocation (DIPA) design and PNBP targets with enforcement instrument selection, particularly between Immigration Administrative Actions (TAK) and criminal proceedings, and their implications for immigration's selective function and national security. Using a normative-empirical approach, this study analyzes immigration regulations comparatively alongside empirical data from the Directorate General of Immigration's Performance Reports, Ministry Annual Reports, DIPA documents, and in-depth interviews with Technical Implementation Unit officials, applying the economic analysis of law framework. Findings reveal that TAK escalation correlates with PNBP increases while criminal proceedings simultaneously decline, indicating fiscal orientation dominance. Budget analysis uncovers a structural disincentive toward criminal proceedings stemming from DIPA asymmetry between service and enforcement functions, reinforced by PNBP codification as an institutional performance indicator, rationally driving officials toward TAK. This condition weakens immigration's selective function and elevates national security risks. This study recommends revising the immigration DIPA to proportionally increase enforcement budgets and issuing technical guidelines tightening TAK discretionary criteria to rebalance revenue and sovereignty functions.

Page 26 of 26 | Total Record : 253

 22   23   24   25   26 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 20 No 2 (2026): Edisi Juli Vol 20 No 1 (2026): Edisi Maret Vol 19 No 3 (2025): Edisi November Vol 19 No 2 (2025): Edisi Juli Vol 19 No 1 (2025): Edisi Maret Vol 18 No 3 (2024): Edisi November Vol 18 No 2 (2024): Edisi Juli Vol 18 No 1 (2024): Edisi Maret Vol 17 No 3 (2023): Edisi November Vol 17 No 2 (2023): Edisi Juli Vol 17 No 1 (2023): Edisi Maret Vol 16 No 3 (2022): Edisi November Vol 16 No 2 (2022): Edisi Juli Vol 16 No 1 (2022): Edisi Maret Vol 15 No 3 (2021): Edisi November Vol 15 No 2 (2021): Edisi Juli Vol 15 No 1 (2021): Edisi Maret Vol 14 No 3 (2020): Edisi November Vol 14 No 2 (2020): Edisi Juli Vol 14 No 1 (2020): Edisi Maret Vol 13 No 3 (2019): Edisi November Vol 13 No 2 (2019): Edisi Juli Vol 13 No 1 (2019): Edisi Maret Vol 12 No 3 (2018): Edisi November Vol 12 No 2 (2018): Edisi Juli Vol 12 No 1 (2018): Edisi Maret Vol 11 No 3 (2017): Edisi November Vol 11 No 2 (2017): Edisi Juli Vol 11 No 1 (2017): Edisi Maret Vol 10 No 3 (2016): Edisi November Vol 10 No 2 (2016): Edisi Juli Vol 10 No 1 (2016): Edisi Maret Vol 7 No 1 (2013): Edisi Maret More Issue