cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Achmad Fawaid
Contact Email
achmad_fawaid.linguistik@upnjatim.ac.id
Phone
+6282318007953
Journal Mail Official
khatulistiwanarasi@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Dusun Krajan, RT 015 / RW 007 Desa Karanganyar, Kecamatan Paiton, Kabupaten Probolinggo, Provinsi Jawa Timur, Kodepos 67291
Location
Kab. probolinggo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Applied Community Research
Published by CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31633285     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Indonesian Journal of Applied Community Research is a double-blind peer-reviewed scholarly journal in the field of Social Science, with a specific focus on Community Development. This journal publishes original research articles, critical studies, and applied research that examine community processes, community participation, community capacity, collective action, local institutions, social relations, and community-based change.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Turning waste into collective value: circular economy, informal labour, and community governance in Indonesian urban settlements Fuad Rahman
Indonesian Journal of Applied Community Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Co-creation, community resilience, and just transitions in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijac.v1i2.941

Abstract

Background: Surabaya generated 660,946.82 tons of waste in 2024, with households contributing 85.2% of the waste stream, making neighbourhood-based circular waste governance a pressing community development issue. Objective: This community engagement program aimed to strengthen circular economy literacy, household sorting practice, waste-bank documentation, and participatory governance among 40 eligible residents, waste-bank actors, and local partners in Kelurahan Rangkah, Kecamatan Tambaksari. Method: The method combined planning, implementation, and monitoring-evaluation through coordination meetings, needs assessment, training, mentoring, pre-post questionnaires, observation checklists, practice-output rubrics, waste-bank transaction logs, FGD guides, and follow-up indicators. Results: Planning produced three coordination meetings, 40 targeted needs-assessment responses, six mapped stakeholder groups, five evaluation instruments, and an eight-week mentoring schedule. Implementation consisted of one orientation, four training sessions, eight weeks of mentoring, two peer discussion forums, 85% attendance, 26 active mentoring participants, and 28 documented practice outputs. Implication: Monitoring-evaluation recorded 70% acceptable outputs, a mean capacity score movement from 52.0 to 73.2, two validation forums, one institutional follow-up plan, and a 3–6 month sustainability monitoring design. Novelty: The novelty of this program lies in integrating practical waste intervention, informal labour recognition, participatory data, simple quantitative evaluation, and institutional follow-up into one evidence-based community engagement model.
Can local data change public policy? participatory mapping and evidence-based advocacy in disaster-prone Indonesian communities Siti Mahmudah Noorhayati
Indonesian Journal of Applied Community Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Co-creation, community resilience, and just transitions in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijac.v1i2.942

Abstract

Background: Disaster-prone Supiturang Village in Pronojiwo, home to 4,050 residents within the Mount Semeru hazard context, required a mechanism for translating local risk experience into evidence usable in disaster governance. Objective: This community engagement program engaged 40 intended residents, village actors, volunteers, youth, women’s-group representatives, and neighbourhood representatives to develop participatory risk maps and advocacy-oriented recommendations. Method: Using a planning-implementation-monitoring/evaluation design, this program combined baseline surveys, short interviews, attendance sheets, observation checklists, mapping products, product rubrics, FGD notes, and partner-commitment forms to document quantitative and qualitative evidence. Results: Planning documentation specified three coordination meetings, five stakeholder groups, 40 baseline responses, five instruments, and two reflection-forum agendas. The implementation framework comprised one orientation session, three workshops, two mentoring clinics across six weeks, four group maps, one consolidated map, and one recommendation matrix. Implication: Monitoring and evaluation targeted 75% attendance, 70% acceptable outputs, a capacity benchmark from index 100 to at least 120, two validation forums, and one follow-up plan. Novelty: Its novelty lies in integrating participatory spatial evidence, measurable engagement thresholds, mentoring, collective validation, and institutional follow-up without presenting planned indicators as demonstrated policy effects.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Co-creation, community resilience, and just transitions in Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Local innovation and community-based development in Indonesia