cover
Contact Name
Ria Wulansarie
Contact Email
publications@perhaki.org
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
publications@perhaki.org
Editorial Address
COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA People’s Empowerment, Rights, Human Advocacy, and Legal Knowledge Initiative (PERHAKI) Division Editorial Office: Karanganyar 003/001, Pekutan, Mirit, Kab. Kebumen, Jawa Tengah
Location
Kab. kebumen,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31645836     DOI : https://doi.org/10.65815
Core Subject :
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies (e-ISSN: 3164-5836) is a peer-reviewed, open-access academic journal in the field of anti-corruption studies, published by COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA in online format (electronic journal). First published in 2024, the journal is issued quarterly in March, June, September, and December. The journal focuses specifically on corruption, anti-corruption, law enforcement, anti-corruption policy, and governance, particularly in relation to institutional integrity, transparency, accountability, and public trust. Its scope covers corruption prevention and detection, anti-corruption strategies and policies, corruption-related legal frameworks, law enforcement and judicial institutions, institutional reform, public sector integrity, good governance, transparency and accountability mechanisms, public financial management, civil society participation, and digital approaches to corruption prevention. The journal welcomes empirical, doctrinal, comparative, and interdisciplinary studies from law and related fields that contribute to understanding and addressing corruption. The journal applies a double-anonymous peer-review process and provides immediate open access to published articles under the CC BY 4.0 License, with copyright retained by the authors.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 50 Documents
Public Perception and Trust in Anti-Corruption Institutions in Post-Reformasi Indonesia Muhammad Catur Kurniawan
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/4esv9b23

Abstract

Public trust is a vital indicator of the legitimacy and effectiveness of anti-corruption institutions. This paper investigates the evolution of public perception and trust toward Indonesia’s key anti-corruption bodies, notably the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the judiciary, in the post-Reformasi era. Using survey data, media analysis, and focus group discussions conducted across urban and rural areas, the study explores factors influencing public confidence, including institutional performance, transparency, and political interference. Results show a fluctuating level of trust: initial optimism during the early Reformasi years has been tempered by recent controversies, legal reforms, and perceived politicization. While the KPK remains relatively trusted compared to other institutions, public skepticism is growing, especially among younger demographics and marginalized groups. The study argues that restoring and sustaining public trust requires greater institutional transparency, independence, and consistent enforcement of anti-corruption laws. This research contributes to the international discourse by emphasizing the critical role of public perception in sustaining anti-corruption regimes, especially in transitional democracies where institutional legitimacy is fragile.
Cultural Dimensions of Corruption in Indonesia: Between Tolerance and Resistance Nyoman Shanti
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/pr2van38

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is not only a legal and political challenge but also a deeply embedded cultural phenomenon. This paper explores the cultural dimensions of corruption, focusing on how social norms, values, and informal practices contribute to both tolerance and resistance toward corrupt behavior. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, interviews, and cultural theory, the study examines how concepts such as “patronage,” “gotong royong” (mutual cooperation), and hierarchical social relations shape perceptions and practices of corruption at community levels. Findings reveal a complex ambivalence where corruption is simultaneously normalized as a means of survival and rejected as a moral and civic violation. This duality creates significant challenges for anti-corruption initiatives, which often clash with entrenched cultural patterns. The paper contributes to global debates on the importance of culturally sensitive anti-corruption strategies by highlighting Indonesia’s unique social context. It calls for policies that balance legal enforcement with community engagement and cultural awareness to foster sustainable anti-corruption change.
Grassroots Anti-Corruption Movements: A Case Study of Community-Based Monitoring Initiatives Zulfikar Ahmad; Karina Dwi Cahyani
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/7xv47j90

Abstract

Grassroots movements have increasingly become important actors in the fight against corruption, particularly in contexts where formal institutions face limitations. This paper presents a case study of community-based monitoring initiatives in Indonesia, which empower local citizens to oversee public projects and service delivery. Through fieldwork in several districts, interviews with activists, and analysis of project outcomes, the study evaluates the effectiveness, challenges, and impact of these grassroots anti-corruption efforts. Results indicate that community monitoring fosters transparency and accountability by exposing irregularities and pressuring local officials, though it often encounters resistance from entrenched interests and lacks sufficient institutional support. The paper argues that while grassroots movements cannot substitute formal institutions, they are crucial complements that enhance civic participation and democratize anti-corruption efforts. This research adds to the international literature on participatory governance by demonstrating how localized activism can generate meaningful oversight in decentralized settings, offering practical lessons for similar initiatives globally.
Youth Engagement in Anti-Corruption Campaigns: A Sociological Perspective Septian Noor Ekaputra
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/fbqpn502

Abstract

Youth engagement is increasingly recognized as a vital factor in sustaining anti-corruption efforts and democratic renewal. This paper investigates how Indonesian youth participate in anti-corruption campaigns, exploring their motivations, methods, and perceived impacts from a sociological perspective. Using surveys, focus groups, and content analysis of social media activism, the study examines the role of education, social networks, and digital platforms in shaping youth involvement. Findings suggest that while many young people express strong anti-corruption values and utilize innovative advocacy tools, challenges such as political apathy, limited institutional channels, and socio-economic barriers constrain their full participation. The study highlights the potential of youth as agents of change but underscores the need for inclusive policies that support their engagement. This paper contributes to broader debates on youth and governance by offering empirical insights into how emerging generations in Indonesia negotiate civic responsibility and anti-corruption activism in a transitional democracy.
Corruption and Social Inequality: How the Poor Pay the Price Ridwan Arifin; Auliya Rochman; Fatima Nayla Husna; Indah Sri Utari
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/yvr01604

Abstract

Corruption disproportionately affects marginalized and economically vulnerable populations, exacerbating social inequalities. This paper examines the relationship between corruption and social inequality in Indonesia, focusing on how corrupt practices in public service delivery and resource allocation impact poor communities. Utilizing mixed methods—including household surveys, interviews with affected individuals, and policy analysis—the study investigates the mechanisms through which corruption deepens poverty and restricts access to essential services such as healthcare, education, and social assistance. Findings demonstrate that corruption creates significant barriers for the poor, including increased costs, reduced service quality, and exclusion from benefits. These outcomes perpetuate cycles of disadvantage and undermine social cohesion. The paper contributes to international scholarship by highlighting the intersection of corruption and inequality, emphasizing the need for anti-corruption policies that explicitly address social justice concerns. It calls for integrated approaches that combine governance reform with poverty alleviation strategies to ensure equitable development and strengthen democratic accountability.
The Economic Cost of Corruption in Indonesia’s Infrastructure Projects Malik Sabrang Panuntun
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/wtyw2f40

Abstract

Corruption poses significant economic challenges in Indonesia’s infrastructure sector, undermining project efficiency, increasing costs, and delaying development. This paper investigates the economic cost of corruption in infrastructure projects by analyzing case studies, budget overruns, and procurement irregularities. Using quantitative data from government reports and interviews with key stakeholders, the study estimates the direct and indirect financial losses attributable to corrupt practices such as bribery, kickbacks, and collusion among contractors and officials. Findings reveal that corruption inflates project costs by up to 20–30%, reduces quality, and discourages private investment. The paper highlights systemic weaknesses in oversight mechanisms and calls for enhanced transparency, stronger institutional controls, and community monitoring to mitigate corruption risks. This research contributes to international debates on corruption’s economic impacts and provides policy recommendations relevant to other emerging economies grappling with infrastructure development challenges under governance constraints.
Corruption and Public Procurement: A Study of Budget Leakage in Regional Governments Yuda Abimanyu
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/mc05yr23

Abstract

Public procurement is a high-risk area for corruption, especially at the regional government level in Indonesia. This study examines budget leakage caused by corrupt practices in local procurement processes, focusing on the mechanisms, scale, and institutional factors that enable misuse of public funds. Employing an empirical approach combining audit reports, procurement data, and interviews with procurement officials and watchdog agencies, the paper identifies common corruption patterns including collusive bidding, fraud, and favoritism. Results indicate significant financial losses and inefficiencies, exacerbated by weak enforcement and limited transparency in local governments. The study argues for the urgent need to strengthen procurement regulations, enhance digital procurement systems, and promote civil society participation to curb corruption and improve fiscal responsibility. By highlighting regional procurement vulnerabilities, this research adds to the global understanding of corruption in decentralized governance systems.
State-Owned Enterprises and Corruption Risks: Accountability Challenges in Indonesia Siti Rahmawati
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/jw1gga60

Abstract

State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia occupy a critical space in the national economy but are often vulnerable to corruption due to weak governance and accountability mechanisms. This paper explores the corruption risks within Indonesian SOEs, analyzing regulatory frameworks, corporate governance structures, and documented corruption cases. Drawing on legal analysis, financial audits, and stakeholder interviews, the study identifies accountability gaps that facilitate corrupt practices such as embezzlement, nepotism, and procurement fraud. The research highlights the tension between political influence and commercial autonomy, which undermines effective oversight. It argues that strengthening SOE governance requires institutional reforms, enhanced transparency, and greater public scrutiny to mitigate corruption risks and align SOEs with national development goals. This study contributes to international debates on corruption in public enterprises, offering insights relevant to other emerging economies seeking to improve SOE accountability.
Fiscal Transparency and Corruption Control in Indonesia’s Budgeting Process Zio Aksara Bhiru
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/9sxy7x14

Abstract

Fiscal transparency is a cornerstone of effective corruption control in public finance management. This paper examines the role of transparency in Indonesia’s budgeting process as a tool for mitigating corruption risks. Using an evaluative framework, the study analyzes budget disclosure practices, public participation mechanisms, and oversight by legislative and civil society institutions. Data from government budget documents, transparency indices, and expert interviews highlight progress in open budgeting but also reveal persistent challenges such as opaque budget allocations, off-budget funds, and limited citizen engagement. These factors create opportunities for corruption and reduce accountability. The paper argues for institutionalizing comprehensive transparency reforms, strengthening parliamentary oversight, and fostering participatory budgeting to enhance anti-corruption efforts. By situating Indonesia’s experience within global fiscal governance debates, the study underscores the critical link between transparency and integrity in public financial management.
Foreign Direct Investment and Corruption: Is Indonesia Still a Risky Market? Muhammad Ismail; Arka Putra Atmadja
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/6bt3pg52

Abstract

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is vital for Indonesia’s economic growth, yet corruption remains a key concern for investors. This paper evaluates the extent to which corruption affects Indonesia’s investment climate and assesses recent reforms aimed at improving transparency and regulatory efficiency. Drawing on investment data, surveys of multinational corporations, and governance indices, the study examines corruption-related risks such as bribery, bureaucratic delays, and informal payments that investors encounter. Findings indicate that while progress has been made, particularly through digitalization and regulatory simplification, corruption still poses significant obstacles in some sectors and regions. The paper discusses the implications of corruption perceptions for Indonesia’s competitiveness in the global market and offers policy recommendations to strengthen anti-corruption enforcement and investor protections. This research contributes to the international debate on FDI and corruption by providing a nuanced understanding of challenges and reforms in a major emerging market.