cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dermiyati
Contact Email
dermiyati.1963@fp.unila.ac.id
Phone
+62721781822
Journal Mail Official
j.tnhtrop@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Jl. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1, Bandarlampung 35145, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Journal of Tropical Soils
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 0852257X     EISSN : 20866682     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.v25i1
Core Subject : Agriculture, Social,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Environmental Science
Journal of Tropical Soils (JTS) publishes all aspects in the original research of soil science (soil physic and soil conservation, soil mineralogy, soil chemistry and soil fertility, soil biology and soil biochemical, soil genesis and classification, land survey and land evaluation, land development and management environmental), and related subjects in which using soil from tropical areas.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Lingkungan (semua ketegori) - Konservasi Alam dan Lahan
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013" : 9 Documents clear
Zeolite Utilization as a Catalyst and Nutrient Adsorbent of an Organic Fertilizer Process From Palm Oil Mill Effluent as Raw Material Nursanti, Ida; Budianta, Dedik; Napoleon, Adipati; Parto, Yakup
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.177-184

Abstract

Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) cannot be directly used as an organic fertilizer source due to its high Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) thus it is not  environmentally safely. To increase the high quality of organic fertilizer obtained, the liquid wastes are needed to be processed in order to decrease the BOD to degrade both the soluble and suspension materials of organic materials. The altenative process to be conducted to make a better quality of POME is by adding the adsorbent. The aim of the research was to study the effect of zeolite utilization and duration of hydrolysis process in order to increase the nutrients content and to decrease the BOD of POME. The research was conducted at  the PT Sumbertama Nusa Pertiwi Jambi, Indonesia in August 2012 until February 2013. The sample of POME was taken from the inlet of the factory’s  acidulating pool. There were several doses of zeolite  as treatments which were 0, 5, 10, 15% and several durations of hydrolysis process which were 1,2,3 and 4 weeks. Active zeolite was added to POME and then it was fermented with different hydrolysis duration times as mentioned above. The research showed that application of  zeolite  and  duration of hydrolysis process significantly affected the pH, N,  P, K, Al, Fe, BOD of  POME and the adsorption of  N, P, K, Al, Fe by zeolite. It can be concluded that 10% of zeolite incubated  in  two weeks duration of hydrolysis process produced higher nutrient of N, P, K  with BOD, Al, Fe and pH matched  with the waste quality standard. The highest efficiency of  N, P and K adsorbent was show by the 15% of zeolite  which was incubated for two weeks of hydrolysis process.Keyword: Hydrolysis process duration, nutrient content, palm oil mill effluent, zeolite.[How to Cite: Nursanti I, D Budianta, A Napoleon and Y Parto. 2013.Zeolite Utilization as a Catalyst and Nutrient Adsorbent of an Organic Fertilizer Process From Palm Oil Mill Effluent as Raw Material. JTrop Soils 18 (3): 177-184. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.177][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.177] REFERENCESAno AO and CI Ubochi. 2007. Neutralization of soil acidity by animal manures: mechanism of reaction. Afr J Biotechnol 6: 364-368.Budianta D. 2005. Potensi limbah cair pabrik kelapa sawit sebagai sumber hara untuk tanaman perkebunan. Dinamika Pert 20: 273-282 (in Indonesian).Djajadi B Helianto and N Hidayah. 2010. Pengaruh media tanam dan frekuensi pemberian air terhadap sifat fisik, kimia dan biologi tanah serta pertumbuhan jarak pagar. J Littri 16: 64-69 (in Indonesian).Dhayat NR. 2011. Bioremediasi lumpur minyak bumi dengan zeolit dan mikroorganisme serta pengujiannya terhadap tanaman sengon                                      (Paraserianthes falcataria).http://pustaka. unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/bioremediasi_lumpur_minyak_bumi_ dengan_zeolit_dan_mikroorganisme.pdf       (accessed on 23   December 2011).Ersoy B and MS Celik. 2003. Effect of hydrocarbon chain length on adsorption of cationic onto clinoptilolite. Clay Clay Miner 51: 173-181.Fungaro DA. 2002. Removal of toxic metals from waters using zeolites from coal. J Environ Qual 2: 116-120.Feuerstein M, RJ Accardi and RF Lobo. 2000. Adsorption of nitrogen and oxygen in the zeolit. J Phys Chem 104: 1082-1087.Gu Z, F Buyuksonmez, S Gajaraj and N Edward. 2011. Adsorption of phosphate by goethite and zeolite: effects of humic substances from green waste compost. ProQuest Agric J  19 : 197-204.Jabri A. 2008. Kajian metode penetapan kapasitas tukar kation zeolit sebagai pembenah tanah untuk lahan pertanian terdegradasi. Jurnal Standardisasi. 10(2): 56-69 (in Indonesian).Karamah EF, Syafrizal and  AN Sari. 2010. Pengolahan limbah campuran logam Fe, Cu, Ni dan ammonia menggunakan metode flotasi-filtrasi dengan zeolit alam Lampung sebagai bahan pengikat. Proseding Seminar Nasional Teknik Kimia Lembaga Penelitian UGM. 26 Januari 2010.Yogyakarta (in Indonesian).Kundari NA,  A Susanto and MC Prihatiningsih. 2010. Adsorpsi Fe dan Mn dalam limbah cair dengan zeolit alam. Seminar Nasional VI Sdm Teknologi Nuklir Yogyakarta, 18 November 2010 (in Indonesian). Li Z, D Allesi and L Allen. 2000. Influence of quartenary ammonium of sorption of selected metal cations onto clinoptilolite zeolite. J Environ Qual 31: 1106-1114.Luturkey YA, A Ahmad and SZ Amraini. 2010. Uji kinerja bioreaktor hibrid anaerob bermedia tandan kosong dan pelepah sawit dalam penyisihan COD limbah cair pabrik minyak sawit. Prosiding Seminar Teknik Kimia. ITB, Bandung (in Indonesian).Ma AN. 2000. Environmental Management for the Oil Palm Industry. Palm Oil Dev 30: 1- 10.Oste LA, TM Lexmond and V Riemsdijk. 2002. Metal immobilization in soils using synthetic zeolites. J Environ Qual 31: 813-821.Raharjo PN. 2009. Studi banding teknologi pengolahan limbah cair pabrik kelapa sawit. J Teknol Lingk 10: 9-18 (in Indonesian).Raharjo PN. 2006. Teknologi pengelolaan limbah cair yang ideal untuk pabrik kelapa sawit. J Agr Indon 2 : 66-72 (in Indonesian).Simanjuntak H. 2009.  Studi korelasi antara BOD dengan unsur hara N, P dan K dari Limbah Cair Pabrik Kelapa Sawit [Thesis]. Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan (in Indonesian).Sumarlin LO, S Muharam and A Vitaria. 2008. Pemerangkapan ammonium (NH4+) dari urine dengan zeolit pada berbagai variasi konsentrasi urine. J Valensi 1: 110-117 (in Indonesian).Susanti PD and S Panjaitan. 2010. Manfaat zeolit dan rock phosphat dalam pengemposan limbah pasar. Prosiding Standardisasi 4 Agustus 2010. Banjarmasin (in Indonesian).Vaulina E. 2002. Potensi zeolit alam sebagai absorban logam-logam berat pada limbah perairan. Majalah Ilmiah  2: 1-8 (in Indonesian).Waluyo L. 2009. Mikrobiologi Lingkungan. Edisi 2. UMM Press. Malang. 341 p. (in Indonesian).
Dynamic of Saline Soil Cations after NaCl Application on Rice Growth and Yields Mindari, Wanti; Guntoro, Wuwut; Kusuma, Zaenal; Syekhfani, .
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.185-194

Abstract

Saline soil cation dynamic is determined by the proportion of salt cations dissolved either acidic or alkaline.  Common base cations in saline soil are in the proportion of  Na >  Ca >  Mg >  K.  They affects the availability of water,  nutrients, and plant growth.  The six level of  NaCl  were 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and  75 mM  and  two  types of  soil  (saline and non saline) from Gununganyar and Mojokerto were evaluated  to soil sample cations taken from  depth of  0-5, 5-10, 10-15, and 15-20 cm. Rice growth and yields were measured. The experiment indicated  that increasing doses of NaCl increased the soil Na after rice harvest and decreased K, Ca and Mg contents, both of non-saline and saline soil, decreased of rice growth and yield (straw, grain, number of tiller).  NaCl up to 30 mM  caused highest Ca:Mg ratio, about 8, suppressed nutrient available, inhibited root growth and reduced nutrient uptake.Keywords:  Cation dynamic,  NaCl,  rice yield , saline soil[How to Cite: Mindari W, WGuntoro, Z Kusuma and Syekhfani. 2013.Dynamic of Saline Soil Cations after NaCl Application on Rice Growth and Yields. JTrop Soils 18 (3): 185-194. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.185][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.185]REFERENCESAkram M, MY Ashraf, R Ahmad, EA Waraich, J Iqbal and M Mohsan. 2010. Screening for salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids at an early seedling stage. Pakistan J Bot  42: 141-154.Bohn H,  BL McNeal and GA O’Connor. 2001. Soil Chemistry, Third Edition. John Wiley and Sons. Inc. 307p. Carmona FC, I Anghinoni, MJ Holzschuh and MH Andrighetti.  2010.  Cation dynamics in soils with different salinity levels growing irrigated rice. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 34: 1851-1863. Ching PC and SA Barber. 1979.  Evaluation of temperature effects on K  uptake by corn. Agron J 71: 1040- 1044.da Silva EN, RV Ribeiro, SLF Silva,  RA Viégas and JAG Silveira. 2011. Salt stress induced damages on the photosynthesis of physic nut young plants Sci Agric  68: 62-68.Gacitua M, M  Antilen and M Briceno. 2008. K–Ca–Mg binary cation exchange in saline soils from the north of Chile. Aust J Soil Res 46:  745-750.Junita Y, YK Kazutake and K Takashi. 2005. Application effects of controlled-availability- fertilizer on the dynamics of soil solution composition in the root zone. http://natres.psu.ac.th/Link/SoilCongress/bdd/symp14/2095-t.pdf. Accessed on 20 February 2013.Korb N, C Jones and J Jacobsen. 2005. Secondary  Macronutrients: Cycling, Testing and Fertilizer  Recommendations.  Nutrient Management Module No. 5. Montana state University extension service.16 p. Landon JR. 1984. Booker Tropical Soil Manual. United State of America. Longman, New york, Academic Press. 227 p.Mindari W, Maroeto and Syekhfani. 2009. Efek pemberian air salin rekayasa pada EC tanah dengan amelioran bahan organik. Prosiding  Seminar Nasional Fakultas Pertanian dan LPPM UPN “Veteran“ Jatim, Surabaya (in Indonesian). Nakamura Y, K Tanaka, E Ohta and M Sakata. 1990. Protective effect of external Ca2 on elongation and the intracellular concentration of K   in intact mung bean root under high NaCl stress. Plant Cell Physiol 31:  815-821.Nassem I and HN Bhatti. 2000. Organic Matter and salt concentration effect cation exchange equilibria in non-calcareous soils. Pakistan J  Biol Sci  3: 1110-1112.Nosetto M D, E G Jobba´gy, T To´th and CM Di Bella. 2007. The effects of tree establishment on water and salt dynamics in naturally salt-affected grasslands. Oecologia 152: 695-705.Rachman A, GM Subiksa, D Erfandi  and P Slavich. 2008.  Dynamics of  tsunami-affected soil properties. In: F Agus and G Tinning (eds).  International Workshop on Post Tsunami Soil Management, Bogor, Indonesia, 1-2 July 2008, pp. 51-64.Rengasamy P. 2006. World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J Exp Bot 57: 1017-1023.Shani U and  LM Dudley.  2001. Field Studies of Crop Response to Water and Salt Stress. Soil Sci  Soc    Am J 65: 1522-1528.Slaton NA, D Dunn and B Pugh. 2004.  Potassium nutrition of flood-irrigated rice. Better Crops 88: 20-22Yuniati  R. 2004. Penapisan galur kedelai Glycine Max (L.) Merrill toleran terhadap NaCl untuk penanaman di lahan salin. Makara - Sains 8:  21-24.Zeng L and Shannon MC. 2000. Salinity effects on seedling growth and  yield components of rice. Crop Sci 40:  996-1003.
Effect Modification of the Rice Technology Package to Improve Production Gripped Iron Utama, M Zulman Harja; Sunadi, .; Haryoko, Widodo
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.195-202

Abstract

Rice is an important food crop in the world’s second after wheat and estimated rice demand in 2015 reached 55.8 million Mg.  Ministry of health stated that approximately 100 million people in Indonesia are suffer micronutrient deficiencies (iron and iodine), because they cannot afford to buy nutritious food but rely solely on the nutritional intake of rice. This study aimed to get the rice technology package to increase rice production that gripped the iron. This study consisted of two experiments which were test technology package with sri cultivation system and test modification technology packet with conventional cropping system. The experiment was arranged in a factorial with a completely randomized design and  three replications. The experiments were conducted from May to October 2012 in Koto Baru of Dharmasraya District, West Sumatra. In rice cultivation gripped Fe2+ with the system rice intensificatin (SRI).  The results showed thta the best package technology was the combination of: Krueng Aceh + peat soil (saphrict) 20 Mg ha-1 + square (10 × 10) × 30 cm with one seed per hole (age 10 days) + 5.0 mg kg-1 auxin. In this package technology, production of milled rice was 7.06 Mg ha-1, while the iron content in rice grain varieties Krueng Aceh and Tukad Balian were 31.44 mg kg-1 and 34.99 mg kg-1, respectively.Keywords: Auxin,  Fe2+, rice package technology [How to Cite: Utama MZH, Sunadi and W Haryoko. 2013. Effect Modification of the Rice Technology Package toImproveProduction Gripped Iron. JTrop Soils 18 (3): 195-202. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.195][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.195]REFERENCESAmang B dan  MH Sawit. 1999. Kebijakan beras dan pangan nasional, pelajaran dari orde baru dan era reformasi. IPB, Bogor (in Indonesian). Anonymous. 2007. Kabupaten Dharmasraya dalam angka. Bappeda Dharmasraya dan BPS, Sumbar (in Indonesian). Anonymous. 2012. Padi berkadar besi tinggi dari kedelai, upaya mengatasi anemia.  Kompas, 22 November 2012 (in Indonesian). Audebert A and KL Sahrawat. 2000. Mechanisms for iron toxicity tolerance in lowland rice. J Plant Nutr 23: 1877-1885.Barchia MF. 2009. Agroekosistem tanah mineral masam. UGM, Press. Yokyakarta (in Indonesian).Becker M and F Asch. 2005. Iron toxicity in rice-condition and management concept. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 168: 558-573.Bilman  WS. 2008. Modifikasi lingkungan melalui sistem penanaman serta penambahan bahan organik dan zat pengatur tumbuh dalam upaya peningkatan produktifitas padi gogo (Oryza sativa L.). Disertasi, Unand. Padang (in Indonesian).Delhaize E and  PR  Ryan. 1995. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants. Plant physiol. 107: 315-321.Dorlodot S, S Lutts, and P Bertin. 2005. Effect of ferrous iron toxicity on the growth and mineral competition of an interspecific rice. J Plant Nutr. 28: 1-20. Haryoko W, Kasli, I. Suliansyah,  A Syarif and TB Prasetyo. 2012. Toleransi beberapa varietas padi sawah gambut berkorelasi dengan kandungan asam fenolat. J Agron Indon 40: 112-118 (in Indonesian).Hopkins WG. 1995. Introduction to Plant Physiology. The University of  Western Ontario. John Wiley and Sons, INC.Finesso GM. 2012. Mencari padi berzat besi tinggi, memanen matahari. Kompas, 12 Juni 2012 (in Indonesian).ageria NK, AB Santos, MPB Filho and CM Guimaraes. 2008. Iron toxicity in lowland rice. J Plant Nutr 31:  1676-1697.Ma JF. 2000. Role of organic acids in detoxification of aluminum in higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol 41: 383-390.Noor A, I Lubis, M Ghulamahdi, MA Chozin, K Anwarand and D. Wirnas. 2012. Pengaruh konsentrasi besi dalam larutan hara terhadap gejala keracunan besi dan pertumbuhan tanaman padi. J Agron Indonesia 40: 91-98Peng XX and M Yamauchi. 1993.  Ethylene production in rice bronzing leaves induced by ferrous iron. Plant Soil 149: 227-234.Rengel Z. 2000. Mineral nutrition of crops, fundamental mechanisms and implications. Food production press, Binghamton.Sahrawat  KL. 2004. Iron toxicity in wetland rice and the role of other nutrients. J Plant Nutr 27: 1471-1504.Sahrawat KL. 2010. Reducing iron toxicity in lowland rice with tolerant genotypes and plant nutrition. J Plant Stress 4:70-75.Salisbury FB and CW Ross. 1992. Plant physiology. Fourth edition. Wadsworth, Belmont, California. 681 p.Sunadi, M Kasim, A Syarif and N Akhir. 2006. Pertumbuhan dan hasil padi sawah dalam metode SRI dengan pengaturan jumlah bibit rumpun per rumpun  sistem tanam satu-satu. J Gakuryoku 12: 120-123 (in Indonesian).Sunadi,  I Wahidi and  MZH Utama. 2010. Penapisan varietas padi toleran cekaman Fe2+ pada sawah bukaan baru dari aspek agronomi dan fisiologi. J Akta Agrosia 13: 16-23 (in Indonesian).Utama MZH. 2008. Mekanisme fisiologi toleransi cekaman aluminium  pada spesies  legum penutup tanah  terhadap metabolisme Nitrat (NO3-), amonium (NH4+), dan nitrit (NO2). Bull Agron  36: 175-179 (in Indonesian). Utama MZH. 2010a. Penapisan varietas padi gogo toleran cekaman aluminium. J Agron Indon 38: 163-169 (in Indonesian).Utama  MZH. 2010b. Effect of  NaCl-stress on metabolism of NO3-, NH4+ and NO2- at several rice varieties. J Trop Soils 15: 189-194.  doi: 10.5400/jts.2010.15.3.189.Utama MZH,  W Haryoko, R  Munir  and  Sunadi. 2009. Penapisan varietas padi toleran salinitas pada lahan rawa  di  Kabupaten  Pesisir  Selatan. J Agron Indon 37: 101-106 (in Indonesian). Utama MZH,  I  Wahidi and Sunadi. 2012. Response of some rice cultivars seized with Fe2+  new opening paddy fields with multi package technology. J Trop Soils 17: 239-244. doi: 10.5400/jts.2012.17.3.239.Yang  J,  S  Peng,  Z  Zhang,  Z  Wang,  RM  Visperas, Q  Zhuand  and L Liu. 2002. Grain and dry matter yields and partitioning of assimilates in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Crop Sci 42: 766-772.Yayock  JY,  G Lombin and JJ Owonuhi. 1997.  Crop Science and production in warm climates. Mac Millan Intermediate Agriculture series. General of ochapa in Ozomi.
Soil pH and Solubility of Aluminum, Iron, and Phosphorus in Ultisols: the Roles of Humic Acid Ifansyah, Hairil
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.203-208

Abstract

Soil reaction (pH), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe) and phosphorus (P) are the parameters which presences in soil are related to each other. The role of each parameter on the grow than development of plants is very significant. Liming and organic mater amendment are some efforts that are frequently performed to increase the pH and P solubility and suppress the solubility of Al and Fe in the soil. Humic acid is one of the organic fractions which is presumed has roles and is closely related to the changes in soil chemical properties as mentioned above. Information about the role of humic acid on the soil pH, the solubility of Al, Fe, and P, especially in upland acidic Ultisols is still limited.  This study aims to: provide empirical data on the roles of various humic acids to soil pH and the solubility of Al, Fe, and P, specifically in upland acidic Ultisols.  The study was a laboratory experiment with a single factor which set by using a completely randomized block design and conducted in two sets of experiments. The first experiment is intended to study the roles of various humic acids derived from several sources (commercial humic acid, humic acids extracted from composted chicken manure, humic acids extracted from composted cow manure and humic acids extracted from composted goat manure) to the soil pH and solubility of Al, Fe, and P. The second experiment was aimed to see the patterns of relationships between application of humic acid (sold commercially) on pH and solubility of Al, Fe, and P. The results showed that humic acid was able to increase the soil pH, solubility of phosphorus, and suppressed the solubility of iron and aluminum with linear patterns of relationships. In increasing the pH, solubility of phosphorus, and suppressing the solubility of iron and aluminum in the soil, humic acid that is sold commercially, at the same amount of C-organics, has greater roles than those derived from organic matter of compost extracts and from organic matter of compost.Key words: Aluminum, Humic acid, iron, pH, phosphorus[How to Cite: Ifansyah H. 2013. Soil pH and Solubility of Aluminum, Iron, and Phosphorus in Ultisols: the Roles of Humic Acid. JTrop Soils 18 (3): 203-208. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.203][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.203]REFERENCESAgbenin JO.  2003.  Extractable iron and alumunium effects on phosphate sorbtion  in a Savanna Alfisol.  Soil Sci Soc Am J 67: 589-595Andrian RDP. 1990.  Hubungan Antara Susunan Asam Humat dan Asam Fulfat serta Kemasaman Total Bahan Organik Tanah dengan pH Tanah. Aluminium dan N Tersedia. [Skripsi]. FakultasPertanian Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.  Banjarbaru.Antelo J, F Arce, M Avena,  S Fiol, R Lopez and F. Macias.  2007.  Adsorption of humic acid at the surface of goethite and its competitipe interaction with phosphate.  Geoderma 138: 12-17.Arifin F, B Radjagukguk and BH Purwanto.  2009.  Phosphate and ferrous solubility on acid sulphate soils treated with rice straw. J Trop Soils 14: 119-125Balai Penelitian Tanah. 2005.  Petunjuk Teknis Analisis Kimia Tanah. Tanaman Air. Dan Pupuk.  Balai Penelitian Tanah Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian.  Bogor. (in Indonesian).Bohn HL, BL McNeal and GA O’Connor.  1985.  Soil Chemistry (second edition).  John Wiley  & Sons Inc.  New York. Chichester. Brisbane. Toronto. Singapore.  pp. 135-141.Gupta US.  1997.  Crop Improvement Volume 2: Stress Tolerance.  Science Publishers. Inc.  303 p.Hayes MHB and RS Swift.  1990.  Genesis, isolation. composition and structures of soil humic substances. In:  MF De Booth, MHB Hayes and A Herbilon (eds). Soil Colloids and their Associations in Aggregates. Plenum Press. New York. pp. 245-305.Kononova MM, T Z  Nowakowsky and ACD. Newman.  1986.  Soil Organic matter its Nature. its Role in Soil Formation and in Soil Fertility.  Permagmon Press.  Oxford.Leiwakabessy FM.  1989. Management of Acid Humic Tropical Soils in Indonesia. In: ET Craswell and E. Pushparajah (eds). Management of Acid Soils in the Humid Tropics of Asia. ACIAR  Monograph No.13 (IBSRAM Monograph No.1), pp. 54-61Minardi. 2006.  Peran Asam Humat dan Fulvat dari bahan Organik dalam Pelepasan P Terjerap pada Andisol. Ringkasan Disertasi (tidak dipublikasikan).  Program Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya.  Malang.  Prasetyo BH and DA Suriadikarta. 2006. Karakteristik. Potensi. dan Teknologi Pengelolaan Tanah Ultisol untuk Pengembangan Pertanian Lahan Kering di Indonesia. J Litb Pert 25: 39-46.Rima V.  2002.  Acidification of soil-the indicator of chemical soil degradation process.  World  Congress of Soil Science 17. 14-21 August 2002. Thailand.  Paper  No. 10: 1-7Stevenson FJ. 1994. Humus Chemistry: Genesis. composition. reactio. 2nded. John Wiley and Sons. Inc. New York. Subandi. 2007. Teknologi produksi dan strategi pengembangan kedelai pada lahan kering masam. Iptek Tanaman Pangan 12: 12-24.Suntoro. 2001. Pengaruh residu penggunaan bahan organik,  dolomit dan KCl pada tanaman kacang tanah (Arachis hypogeae,  L.)  pada  Oxic Dystrudept  di Jumapolo, Karanganyar. Habitat 12: 170-177.Tan KH.  1995.  Dasar-Dasar Kimia Tanah.  Gadjah Mada University Press.  pp. 37-53.Ulfin I. and D Setyowati.  2007.  Optimasi kondisi penyerapan ion aluminium oleh asam humat.  Akta Kimindo. 2: 88-90.USDA [United State Department of Agriculture].  1999.  Liming to Improve Soil Quality in Acid Soils.  Technical Note No. 8. May 1999.  Independence Avenue. SW. Washington. D.C.20250-9410Winarso S, E. Handayanto and A Taufik.  2010.  Alumunium detoxification by humic substance extracted from compost of organic wastes.  J Trop Soils 15: 19-24.  Yusran FH.  2008.  Existing versus added soil organic matter in relation to phosphorus availability on lateritic soils.  J Trop Soils 13: 23-34.
Leaching Behaviour of Nitrogen in Forage Rice Cultivation that Applied with Animal Manure Gusmini, .; Nishimura, Kazuyuki; Adrinal, .; Itani, Tomio
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.209-216

Abstract

Increased use of N fertilizer may substantially increase of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) leaching, which potentially pollutes groundwater.  Leaching behaviour of nitrogen (N) was observed in the paddy field of forage rice cultivation. Two kinds of animal manure, cattle manure (CM) and poultry manure (PM) at 5 levels of N application (0, 70, 140, 210, 280 kg N ha-1) as the organic N sources, and without any chemical fertilizers. “Tachisuzuka” forage rice variety was conducted in the experimental plot. Porous ceramic cups were installed in triplicate of each treatment at 45 cm depth to collect the percolation water samples during the cultivation rice periods. The concentration of total N, NH4-N, NO2-N and NO3-N of water (surface and percolation) and soil sample solution were analysed using a Hach DR/2800 spectrophotometer. Result showed that NO3-N leaching was higher than NH4-N in the percolation water during the cultivation of forage rice periods. The highest NO3-N leaching was found in 280 kg N ha-1 (6.3 mg L-1), that it was indicated on the polluted levels. The highest of biomass production was in N280 (16.22 t ha-1) and nearly similar result in N140, N210 and N280. It was concluded that the best application of N-fertilizer in 140 kg N ha-1 because it greatly enhanced N-fertilizer efficiency, and decreased steadily of NO3-N concentration leaching in the environment of the groundwater.Keywords: Ammonium (NH4-N), Forage rice, N behavior, Nitrate (NO3-N), N leaching[How to Cite: Gusmini, K Nishimura, Adrinal, and T Itani. 2013. Leaching Behaviour of Nitrogen in Forage Rice Cultivation that Applied with Animal Manure. JTrop Soils 18 (3): 209-216. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.209][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.209]REFERENCESAgrawal GD, SK Lunkad and T Malkhed. 1999. Difusse agricultural nitrate pollution of groundwater in India. Water Sci Technol 20: 67-75.Asada K, T Nishimura, C Kato, K Toyota and M Hosomi. 2013. Phyto-purification of livestock-derived organic waste by forage rice under subtropical climate. Paddy Water Environ 11: 559-571.Kamiji Y and T Sakuratani. 2011. Analysis of Optimum Spikelet Number and Plant N in Rice at Tanazawa Paddy Field. J Agric Sci 56: 93-102.Kato H. 2008. Development of rice varieties for whole crop silage (WCS) in Japan. JARQ 42: 231-236.Keeney DR. 1982. Nitrogen management for maximum efficiency and minimum pollution. In: Stevenson FJ (ed). Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils. Agron. Monogr. 22. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison. Wisc,  pp 605-649.Kumazawa K. 2002. Nitrogen fertilization and nitrate pollution in groundwater in Japan: Present status and measures for sustainable agriculture. Nutr Cyc Agroecocyst 63: 129-137.Kyaw KM, K Toyota, M Okazaki, T Motobayashi and H Tanaka. 2005. Nitrogen balance in a paddy field planted with whole crop rice (Oryza sative cv. Kusahonami) during two rice-growing seasons. Biol Fertil Soils 42: 72-82.Liu GD, WL Wu and S Zhang. 2005. Regional differentiation of non-point source pollution of agriculture-derived nitrate nitrogen in groundwater in northern China. Agric Ecosys Environ. 107: 211-220.Matsushita K, S Iida, O Ideta, Y Sunohara, H Maeda, Y Tamura, S Kouno and M Takakuwa. 2011. “Tachisuzuka”, a new rice cultivar with high straw yield and high sugar content for whole-crop silage use. Breeding Sci 61: 86-92.Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). 2013. Recent situation and research of rice for whole crop silage in Japan. Accessed 18 August 2013.Ookawa T, K Yasuda, H Kato, M Sakai, M Seto, K Sunaga, Motobayashi, S Tojo and T Hirasawa. 2010. Biomass production and lodging resistance in ‘Leaf Star’, a new long-culm rice forage cultivar. Plant Prod Sci 13: 58-66.Okajima H and H Imai. 1973. Nutrient supplying power of soils. II. Contribution of mass flow to the nutrient supply in flooded rice fields. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 44: 296-300. Sahu SK and PK Samant. 2006. Nitrogen loss from rice soil in Orissa. Orissa Review. India. Sakai M, S Iida, H Maeda, Y Sunohara, H Nemoto and T Imbe. 2003. New rice varieties for WCS use in Japan. Breed Sci 53: 271-275.Sakai M, M Okamoto, K Tamura, R Kaji, R Mizobuchi, H Hirabayashi, T Yagi, M Nishimura and S Fukaura. 2008. “Tachiaoba”, high yielding rice variety for whole crop silage. Breed Sci 58: 83-88.Suprapti H, M Mawardi and D Shiddieq. 2010. Nitrogen transport and distribution on paddy rice soil under water efficient irrigation method. Paper Presented on International Seminar of ICID, Yogyakarta. Indonesia. Toriyama K and H Ishida. 1987. Method of estimating time of NH4-N disappearance in paddy field by soil solution analysis. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 58: 747-749.Wang MY, MY Siddiqi, TY Ruth and ADM Glass. 1993. Ammonium uptake by rice roots. II. Kinetic of 13NH4+ influx across the plasmalemma. Plant Physiol 103: 1259-1267.Wang JY, SJ Wang and Y Chen. 1995. Leaching loss of nitrogen in double-rice-cropped paddy fields in China. Acta Agricul Zhejiangensis 7: 155-160.Zhu JG, Y Han, G Liu, YL Zhang and XH Shao. 2000. Nitrogen in percolation water in paddy fields with a rice/wheat rotation. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 57: 75-82.Zhuo S and M Hosomi. 2008. Nitrogen transformations and balance in a constructed wetland for nutrient polluted river water treatment using forage rice in Japan. Ecol Eng 32: 147-155.Zhuo S, H Iino, S Riya, M Nishikawa, Y Watanabe and M Hosomi. 2011. Nitrogen transformations in paddy field applied with high load liquid cattle waste. J Chem Engin Jpn 44: 713-719.
Improvement of Sand Tailing Fertility Derived from Post Tin Mining Using Leguminous Crop Applied by Compost and Mineral Soil Budianta, Dedik; Gofar, Nuni; Andika, Gusti Aditya
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.217-223

Abstract

The research was aimed to study the potency of two leguminous cover crops in enhancing tailing fertility of post tin mining with and without addition of mineral soil  and compost. This pot experiment was carried out in Greenhouse of Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya University from November 2011 until March 2012. Design experiment used was a Completly Randomized Design (CRD) factorial with two factors. The first factor was type of cover corps which were Centrosema pubescens and Pueraria javanica. The second factor was plant media composition which were 100% sand tailing, 60% sand tailing + 40%  mineral soil, and  95% sand tailing + 5% compost. The result showed that N content on sand tailing after harvesting applied by compost and mineral soil was not significant by difference. Meanwhile, P content on sand tailing applied by compost was higher than mineral soil application and/or control (100% sand tailing).Keywords: Compost, legominous crop, N and P nutrients, sand tailing [How to Cite: Budianta D, N Gofar and GA Andika. 2013. Improvement of Sand Tailing Fertility Derived from Post Tin Mining Using Leguminous Crop Applied by Compost and Mineral Soil. JTrop Soils 18 (3): 217-223. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.217][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.93]REFERENCESAng LH. 2002. Problems and Prospecs of Afforestration on Sandy Tin Tailings in Peninsular Malaysia. J Trop Forest Sci 1: 87-105Budianta D, U Harun and R Santi. 2010. Perbaikan Sandy Tailing Asal Lahan Pasca Penambangan Timah dengan Kompos untuk Pertumbuhan Nilam. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, Masyarakat Konservasi Tanah dan Air Indonesia: 235-255, Jambi (in Indonesian).Djunaedi EK and F Djabar. 2003. Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Konservasi Sumber Daya Mineral di Daerah Bukit Sunur, Kabupaten Bengkulu Utara Provinsi Bengkulu. Kolokium Hasil Kegiatan Inventarisasi Sumber Daya Mineral – DIM, TA. 2003 (in Indonesian).Hakim N, MY Nyakpa, AM Lubis, SG Nugroho, MR. Saul, M A  Diha, G B  Hong and H H  Bailey. 1986. Dasar–Dasar Ilmu Tanah. Penerbit Universitas Lampung, Lampung (in Indonesian).Juhaeti N, N Hidayati, F Syarif and S Hidayat. 2009. Uji potensi tumbuhan akumulator merkuri untuk fitoremediasi lingkungan tercemar akibat kegiatan penambangan emas tanpa izin (PETI) di Kampung Leuwi Bolang, Desa Bantar Karet, Kecamatan Nanggung, Bogor. Berita Biologi 9: 529-538 (in Indonesian).Kasno A. 2009. Peranan Bahan Organik terhadap Kesuburan Tanah. Informasi Ringkas Bank Pengetahuan Padi Indonesia. Balai Penelitian Tanah, Bogor (in Indonesian).Mokhtaruddin A M and M Norhayati. 1995. Modification of Soil Structure of Sand Tailings: I. Preliminary Study on the Effect of Organic Amandment and Iron on Soil Aggregation. Pertanka J Trop Agric Sci 18: 85-88.Mustikarini E D, T Lestari, U Widyastuti and Suharsono. 2010. Konsentrasi Pb, Cu, dan Sn pada buah aksesi nenas lokal Bangka yang dibudidayakan di lahan pasca penambangan timah Bangka. Prosiding Seminar Naional, Masyarakat Konservasi Tanah dan Air Indonesia: pp. 293-301, Jambi (in Indonesian).Purwantari ND. 2007. Reklamasi area tailing di pertambangan dengan tanaman pakan ternak, mungkinkah?. Wartazoa  17: 101-108 (in Indonesian).Pusat Penelitian Tanah.  1983. Term of Refernce Type-A Proyek Penelitian Pertanian menunjang Transmigrasi (P3MT). Departemen Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Bogor (in Indonesian). Rahyunah W. 2011. Pengaruh pemberian kompos untuk tanaman caisim (Brassica juncea L.) sebagai rotasi tanaman setelah padi pada sistem pertanian terapung di lahan rawa lebak. Skripsi pada Jurusan Tanah. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Sriwijaya, Indralaya (unpublihed, in Indonesian).Risza R. 1995. Budidaya Kelapa Sawit. AAK. Kanisius. Yogyakarta (in Indonesian).Saptiningsih E. 2007. Peningkatan produktivitas tanah pasir untuk pertumbuhan tanaman kedelai dengan inokulasi mikorhiza dan rhizobium. BIOMA 9: 58–61 (in Indonesian).Setyorini D and RW Ladiyani. 2005. Cara Cepat Menguji Status Hara dan Kemasaman Tanah. Balai Penelitian Tanah. Bogor (in Indonesian).Sinar Tani. 2008. Teknologi Pencetakan Sawah Dan Pengelolaan Sawah Pada Lahan Tambang Timah. Available at http://www.sinartani.com/iptek/teknologi-pencetakan-sawah-dan-pengelolaan-sawah-pada-lahan-tambang-timah-1274070248.htm (diakses tanggal 25-4-2011) (in Indonesian).Sitorus SRP and LN Badri. 2008. Karakteristik tanah dan vegetasi lahan terdegradasi pasca penambangan timah serta teknik rehabilitasi untuk keperluan revegetasi. Prosiding Semiloka Nasional Strategi Penanggulangan Krisis Sumber Daya Lahan Untuk Ketahanan Pangan dan Energi, pp. 140-150 (in Indonesian).Sitorus SRP, E Kusumastuti and  N Badri. 2005. Karakteristik dan teknik rehabilitasi lahan pasca penambangan timah di pulau Bangka dan Singkep. J Tanah dan Iklim 27: 57-73 (in Indonesian)Sopian  A. 2009. Respon tanaman karet pada lahan pasca tambang batubara terhadap bahan amelioran berupa pupuk NPK dan kapur dolomit. J Agrifor 7(1): 1-7 (in Indonesian).Sudaryono. 2009. Tingkat kesuburan tanah ultisol pada lahan pertambangan batubara Sangatta, Kalimantan Timur. J Teknik Lingkungan 10: 337- 346 (in Indonesian).Suwandi. 2009. Menakar kebutuhan hara tanaman dalam pengembangan inovasi budidaya sayuran berkelanjutan. Pengembang Inovasi Pert 2: 131-147 (in Indonesian).Syarif F, N Hidayati and T Juhaeti. 2009. Tumbuhan Berdaun Lebar Berpotensi Akumulator. Tumbuhan Akumulator untuk Fitoremediasi Lingkungan Tercemar Merkuri dan Sianida Penambangan Emas. LIPI press, Jakarta (in Indonesian).Yani M. 2005. Reklamasi lahan bekas pertambangan dengan penanaman jarak pagar (Jatropha  curcas Linn). Pusat Penelitian Surfaktan dan Bioenergi. LPPM – IPB, Bogor (in Indonesian).Ye ZH, WS Shu, ZQ Zhang, CY Lan and MH Wong. 2002. Evaluation of Major Constraint to Revegatation of Lead/Zinc Mine Tailings Using Bioassay Techniques. Chemosphere 47: 1103-1111. 
Population and Distribution of Some Soil MesoFauna in the Inactive Tailing Deposition Areas of Freeport Indonesia, Timika-Papua Djuuna, Irnanda Aiko Fifi
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.225-229

Abstract

Soil fauna has played an important role in ecosystem functioning, especially as ecosystem engineers which contribute to soil fertility in tropical environment. A tailing deposition area is one habitat that has several types of soil fauna to live and growth as well as involves in the decomposition of organic matter. The objective of this study was to examine the number and distribution of soil fauna in the tailing area of Freeport Indonesia Mining and Gold Company, Timika. The study was located in some inactive tailing deposition areas in between Double Levee of the lowland area of ModADA (Modification Ajkwa Deposition Areas). Samples were taken from inactive tailing as 198 of ModADA for soil and soil fauna, the Kuadran Method was used to collecting soil fauna on the soil surface and in the soil. There were 17 types/ordo of soil fauna in the study area and the highest number was a group of ants (Hymenoptera/Formicidae). Population density (PD) and relative density (RD) of soil fauna (Formicidae) ranged from 0.03-2.41 Individu m-2 (PD) and 0.07-6.50% (RD). Both PD and RD were likely to increase as the number of soil fauna increase. The distribution of most soil fauna were found as a clump, while Pulmonata (Gastropods) were distributed normally in the tailing areas. The number and types (ordo) of these soil fauna had showed that inactive tailing deposition areas were considered a good habitat for soil fauna.Key words: Distribution, population, soil fauna, tailing[How to Cite: Djuuna IAF. 2013. Population and Distribution of Some Soil MesoFauna in the Inactive Tailing Deposition Areas of Freeport Indonesia, Timika-Papua. J Trop Soils 18 (3): 225-229. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.225][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.225]REFERENCESAdianto.1993.Agricultural Biology of Animal Manure, Organic Fertilizer and Insecticides. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni (in Indonesian).Anderson JM and JS Ingram. 1993. Tropical soil biology and fertility: A Handbook of Methods, 2nd ed. CAB International. Wallingford. UK, 221 pp.Battigelli JP. 2011. Exploring the World Beneath your Feet – Soil Mesofauna as Potential Biological Indicators of Success in Reclaimed Soils. Proceedings - Tailings and Mine Waste Vancouver, BC.Behan-Pelletier VM. 1999.Oribatid mite biodiversity in agroecosystems: role as bioindicators. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74: 411-423. Brussard L. 1998. Soil fauna, guilds, functional groupsand ecosystem processes. Appl Soil Ecol 9: 123-136.De Ruiter PC, B Griffiths and JC Moore. 2002. Biodiversity and Stability in Soil Ecosystems: Patterns, Processes and the Effects of Disturbance. In: M Loreau, S Naeem and P Inchausti (eds.). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: a current synthesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 102-113.Djuuna IAF, H Siby and S Baan.2008. Population and Distribution of Soil Fauna on the Below ground of Forest Trees in Gunung Meja Forest Areas of Manokwari. J Beccariana 1: 6. Fitter AH, CA Gilligan, K Holling Worth, A Kleczkowski, RM Twyman, JW Pitchford and the Members of the Nerc Soil Biodiverrsity Programme. 2005. Biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil. Funct Ecol 19: 369-377.Hanafiah KA, I Anas, A Napoleon and N Gofar. 2005. Biologi Tanah : Ekologi dan Makrobiologi Tanah. Edisi 1, PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta,165 pp. (in Indonesian). Picaud F and DP Petit. 2007.Primary succession of Orthoptera on mine tailings: role of vegetation. Ann de la Soc Entomol de France 43: 69-79Rusek J. 1998. Biodiversity of Collembola and their functional role in the ecosystem. Biodiver Conserv 7: 1207-1219.Sackett TE, AT Classen, and NJ Sanders. 2010.Linking soil food web structure to above and below ground ecosystem processes: ameta-analysis. Oikos 119: 1984-1992.Shao Y, W Zhang, J Shen, L Zhou, H Xia, W Shu, H Ferris and S Fu. 2008. Nematodes as indicators of soil recovery in tailings of a lead/zinc mine. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2040-2046.Suin NM. 2003. The Ecology of Soil Fauna. Penerbit Bumi Aksara Jakarta (in Indonesian).Sugiyarto. 2000.The Biodiversity of soil macro fauna on the different age of sengon in RPH Jatirejo, Kabupaten Kediri. Biodiversitas 1: 47-53. (in Indonesian).Sugiyarto, M Pujo and Nursihmiati. 2001. Relationship between the Soil Meso Fauna Biodiversity and Belowground Vegetation in Some Forest Trees of Jobolarangan. Biodiversitas 2: 140-145 (in Indonesian)Wallwork JA. 1970. Ecology of Soil Animals. London: Mc.Graw-Hill. 283 pp.Wallwork JA.1976. The Distribution and Diversity of Soil Fauna. Academic Press Inc. (London). 355 pp.
Land Suitability Study in Ultisols for Soybean Based on Soil Fauna Anwar, Ea Kosman; Nurlaily, Ridha; Sarmah, .; Purwani, Jati
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.231-239

Abstract

Evaluation of land suitability for soybean by involving the presence and biodiversity of soil fauna has been conducted. The research was done on thecenter of soybean plantations in Ultisols soils in Banten, Lampung, and Lahat (south Sumatera) Provinces. The objective of research was to determine the interaction between soil fauna diversity in Ultisols soil and productivity of soybean. The research used a Survey Method. Every location was divided into three categories of vegetation performance, such as, less vegetation, average vegetation, and very fertile vegetation with two replicates. The chemical, physical, and biological properties of soils from every unit sampling were analyzed. The results showed that nutrient and chemical properties of soil which directly influenced the growth and production of soybean was P-potential, P-available, K-available, B (Boron), Ca and pH; the physical properties were pores drainage, pores rapid drainage, soil water content, and soil permeability. The presence of earthworm did not have direct effect to soybean, except as the 3th between variables, meaning that the presence of earthworms affected soil physical properties, soil physical properties affected nutrient availability, nutrient availability affected the biomass and yield of soybean.Keywords: Earthworm, land suitability, soil fauna, soybeans, Ultisol [How to Cite: Anwar EK, R Nurlaily, Sarmah and J Purwani. 2013. Land Suitability Study in Ultisols for Soybean Based on Soil Fauna. J Trop Soils 18 (3): 231-239. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.231][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.93]REFERENCESAlexander M. 1977. Introduction of Soil Microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, New York-Chichester-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore, 467 p.Anwar EK. 2007. Pengaruh Inokulan Cacing Tanah dan Pemberian Bahan Organik terhadap Kesuburan dan Produktivitas Tanah Ultisols. J Trop Soils 12: 121-130 (in Indonesian).Anwar EK, RDM Simanungkalit, E Santoso and Sukristiyobubowo. 2010. Population density and distribution in wetland earthworm organic farming systems, semi organic and conventional. Biota, J Biol Sci 15: 113-117.Ayuke FO,L Brussard, BVanlauwe, J Six, DK Lelei, CN Kibunja and MM Pulleman. 2011. Soil fertility management: Impacts on soil macrofauna, soil aggregation and soil organic matter allocation. Appl Soil Ecol 48: 53-62.Balai Penelitian Tanah. 2005. Petunjuk Tekniks Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian. Bogor, 136 p. (in Indonesian).Dayan A, 1979. Introduction Methods Statistik. Jilid I, LP3ES, Jakarta (in Indonesian).Djaenudin D, H Marwan, H Subagjo and A Hidayat. 2003. Technical Guidelines for Agricultural Land Evaluation. Research Institute for Soil, Puslitbangtanak, Agricultural Research Agency, 154p.Djaenudin D, H Marwan, H Subagyo, A Mulyani and N Suharta. 2003a. Kriteria Kesesuaian Lahan untuk Komoditas Pertanian. Versi 3. Pusat Penelitian Tanah dan Agroklimat, Bogor (in Indonesian)Drapper N and H Smith 1976. Applied Regression Analysis, Second Edition. WileyIntersciencea division of John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 605 Third Avenue, New York N.10158Edwards CA and JR Lofty. 1977. Biology of Earthworms. A Boo Halsted Press, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 333 p.Giller KE, MH Beare, P Lavelle, AMB Izac and MJ Swift. 1997. Agricultural Intensification, Soil Biodiversity, and agroecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 6: 3-16.ICALRRD [Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development]. 2006. Soil Physical Properties and Methods of analysis. Agency for Agricultural Research and Development Department of Agriculture. 282p.ICALRRD [Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development]. 2007. Soil Biology Analysi Methods. Agency for Agricultural Research and Development Department of Agriculture. Kilowasid MLH, TS Syamsudin, FX Susilo and E Sulistyawati. 2012. Ecological Diversity of Soil Fauna as Ecosystem Engineers in Small-Holder Cocoa Plantation in South Konawe. J Trop Soils 17: 173-180.Lal R. 1995. Sustainable Management of Soil Resources in the humic Tropics. United Nations University Press, Tokio-New York-Paris, pp. 25-29.Rao S. 1994. Soil microorganisms and plant growth. Publisher University of Indonesia, 354 p.Soil Survey Staff. 1998. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 8th Edition. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington DCSubowo G, I Anas, G Djajakirana, A Abdurachman and S Hardjowigeno. 2002. Pemanfaatan cacing tanah untuk meningkatkan produktivitas Ultisols lahan kering. J Tanah Iklim 20: 35-46 (in Indonesian).Subowo G. 2010. Peranan biologi tanah dalam evaluasi kesesuaian lahan pertanian kawasan mega diversity tropika basah. Balai Besar Litbang Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. Badan Litbang Pertanian. J Sumberdaya Lahan 4: 93-102 (in Indonesian).Subowo G. 2011. Penambangan Sistem Terbuka Ramah Lingkungan dan Upaya Reklamasi Pasca Tambang untuk Memperbaiki Kualitas Sumberdaya Lahan dan Hayati Tanah. J Sumberdaya Lahan 5: 83-94 (in Indonesian).Zangarle A, A Pando and P Lavelle. 2011. Do earthworms and roots cooperate to build soil macroaggregates? Geoderma 167-168: 303 -309.
3D Agro-ecological Land Use Planning Using Surfer Tool for Sustainable Land Management in Sumani Watershed, West Sumatra Indonesia Aflizar, .; Idowu, Alarima Cornelius; Afrizal, Roni; Jamaluddin, .; Husnain, .; Masunaga, Tsugiyuki; Syafri, Edi; Muzakir, .
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.241-254

Abstract

Estimation of soil erosion 3D (E3D) provides basic information that can help manage agricultural areas sustainably, which has not been sufficiently conducted in Indonesia. Sumani watershed is main rice production area in West Sumatra which has experienced environmental problem such as soil erosion and production problem in recent years. 3D Agro-ecological land use planning based on soil erosion 3D hazard and economic feasibility analyses consist of production cost and prize data for each crop. Using a kriging method in Surfer tool program, have been developed data base from topographic map, Landsat TM image, climatic data and soil psychochemical properties. Using these data, the Universal Soil Loss Equation was used for spatial map of soil erosion 3D and proposed a 3D agro-ecological land use planning for sustainable land management in Sumani watershed. A 3D Agro-ecological land use planning was planned under which the land use type would not cause more than tolerable soil erosion (TER) and would be economically feasible. The study revealed that the annual average soil erosion from Sumani watershed was approximately 76.70 Mg ha-1yr-1 in 2011 where more than 100 Mg ha-1yr-1 was found on the cultivated sloping lands at agricultural field, which constitutes large portion of soil erosion in the watershed. Modification of land use with high CP values to one with lower CP values such as erosion control practices by reforestation, combination of mixed garden+beef+chicken (MBC), terrace (TBC) or contour cropping+beef+chicken (CBC) and sawah+buffalo+chicken (SBC) could reduce soil erosion rate by 83.2%, from 76.70 to 12.9 Mg ha-1 yr-1, with an increase in total profit from agricultural production of about 9.2% in whole Sumani watershed.Key words: CP-values, Erosion 3D, land use, Surfer Tool, USLE [How to Cite: Aflizar, AC Idowu, R Afrizal, Jamaluddin, E Syafri, Muzakir, Husnain and T Masunaga. 2013. 3D Agro-ecological Land Use Planning Using Surfer Tool for Sustainable Land Management in Sumani Watershed, West Sumatra Indonesia. J Trop Soils 18 (3): 241-254. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.241][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.241]REEFERENCESAflizar, A Roni and T Masunaga. 2013. Assessment Erosion 3D hazard with USLE and Surfer Tool: A Case study of Sumani Watershed in West Sumatra Indonesia. J Trop Soil 18: 81-92 doi: 10.5400/jts.2012.18.1.81Aflizar, A Saidi, Husnain, Hermansah, Darmawan, Harmailis, H Soumura, T Wakatsuki and T Masunaga. 2010. Characterization of Soil Erosion Status in an Agricultural Watershed in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Tropics 19: 28-42.Agrell PJ, A Stam and GW Fischer. 2004. Interactive multiobjective agro-ecological land use planning: The Bungoma region in Kenya. Eur J Operat Res 158: 194-217Agus F, DK Cassel and DP Garrity. 1997. Soil-water and soil physical properties under countour hedgerow systems on sloping oxisols. Soil Till Res 40: 185-199.Blake GR and R Hartage. 1986. Bulk Density. In: A Klute (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Minerological Methods. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, p. 364-367. Brady NC and RR Weil. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Fourteenth edition reviced. Pearason International edition. Pearson education Japan. p. 121-171.Chris SR and H Harbor. 2002. Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional scales-the role of geomorphologists in land management research and implication. Geomorphology 47: 189-209.Choudhury C, PM Chauhan, P Garg and HN Garg. 1996. Cost-Benefot ratio of triple pass solar air heates. Energy Convers Manage 37: 95-116. Crasswell ET, A Sajjapongse, DJB Hawlett and AJ Dowling. 1997. Agroforestry in the management of sloping lands in Asia and the Pacific. Agrofores Sys 38: 121-130.FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization]. 1993. Guidelines for Land Use Planning. FAO Development Series 1, FAO, Rome.FAO/IIASA [Food and Agriculture Organization/International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis]. 1991. Agro-Ecological Land Resources Assessment for Agricultural Development Planning; A Case Study of Kenya: Resource Database and Land Productivity. Main Report and 8 Technical Annexes. Rome, AGL-FAO. 9 vols. 1150 p. Gee GW and JW Bauder. 1986. Particle size analysis. In: A Klute (ed). Methods of soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and mineralogical Methods, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 399-404.Golden software. 2010. Surfer® 9 for windows. Golden, Colorado. Available online http://www.goldensoftware.com/products/surfer/surfer.shtml.Hammer WI. 1981. Second soil conservation consultant report AGOF/INS/78/006. Tech. Note No 10, Centre of Soil Research, Bogor.Irvem A, F Topaglu and V Uygur. 2007. Estimating spatial distribution of soil loss over Seyhan River Basin in Turkey. J Hydrol 336: 30-37.IITA [International Institute of Tropical Agriculture]. 1979. Selected Methods for Soils and Plant Analysis, Manual Series No. 1, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 70.Iwata T, S Nakano and M Inoue. 2003. Impact of past riparian deforestation on stream communities in a tropical rain forest in Borneo. Ecol Appl 13: 461-473.Karyono. 1990. Home garden in Java: their structure and function. In: Lan-dauer K, M Brazil (eds). Tropical Home Garden, The United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 138-146.Kravchenko A and DG Bullock. 1999. A comparative study of interpolation method for mapping soil properties. Agron J 91: 393-400.Kusumandari A and BR Mitchell. 1997. Soil erosion and sediment yield in forest and agroforestry areas in West Java, Indonesia. J Soil Water Cons 52: 376-380.Lee BD, RC Graham, TE Lauren, C Amrhen and RM Creasy. 2001: Spatial Distribution of Soil Chemical condition in a serpentinitic Wetland and Surrounding Landscape. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1183-1196.Margareth and Arens. 1989. World Bank Environmental Department Working paper No.18. The World Bank, Washington, DC.Paranginangin N, R Sakthivadivel, NR Scoot, E Kendy and TS Steenhuis. 2004. Water accounting for conjunctive groundwater/surface water management: case of the Singkarak-Ombilin River basin, Indonesia. J Hydrol 292: 1-22.Reeve RC. 1965. Particle-size Analysis. In: CA Black, DD Evans, JL White, Ensminger and FE Clark (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 528-530. Sarainsong F, K Harashima, H Arifin, K Gandasasmita and K Sakamoto. 2007. Practical application of a land resources information system for agricultural landscape planning. Landscpe Urban Plan 79: 38-52.Schob A, J Schmidt and R Tenholtern. 2006. Derivation of site-related measures to minimize soil erosion on the watershed scale in the Saxonian loess belt using the model erosion 3D. Catena 68: 153-160.Shi ZH, CF Cai, SW Ding, TW Wang and TL Chow. 2004. Soil conservation planning at the small watershed level using RUSLE with GIS: a case study in the Three Gorge Area of China. Catena 55: 33-48.Soil Survey Staff. 1990. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available online ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC/Soil_Taxonomy/keys/1990_Keys_to_Soil_Taxonomy.pdf.Stevenson M and H Lee. 2001. Indicator of sustainability as a tool in agricultural development: portioning scientific and participatory processes. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 8: 57-56.Svoray T, P Bar and T Bannet. 2005. Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: Habitat heterogeneity Model incorporated in a GIS using a multi-criteria mechanism. Landscape Urban Plan 72: 337-351.Takata Y, S Funukawa, J Yanai, A Mishima, K Akshalov, N Ishida and T Kosaki. 2008. Influence of crop rotation system on the spatial and temporal variation of the soil organic carbon budget in northern Kazakhstan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 54: 159-171.Wakatsuki T, Y Shinmura, E Otoo and GO Olaniyan. 1998. African-based paddy field system for the integrated watershed management of the small inland valley of West Africa. FAO Water Report no. 17. pp. 5-79.Wischmeier WH and DD Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation farming, USDA Handbook: No. 537 US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC pp 1-58.World Bank. 1989. World Bank Technical Paper Number 127. In: Doolette JB and WB Magrath (eds). Watershed Development in Asia. Strategies and Technologies Available online: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1999/09/17/000178830_98101904135527/Rendered/INDEX/multi_page.txt.Zhang Y, H Yang, M Du, X Tang, H Zhang and B Peng. 2003. Soil erosion study on hillside in Southern Jiangsu province the cesium-137 tracer technique. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49: 85-92.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2013 2013


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 30, No 3: September 2025 (in Progress) Vol. 30 No. 3: September 2025 (in Progress) Vol 30, No 2: May 2025 Vol. 30 No. 2: May 2025 Vol. 30 No. 1: January 2025 Vol 30, No 1: January 2025 Vol 29, No 3: September 2024 Vol. 29 No. 3: September 2024 Vol. 29 No. 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 1: January 2024 Vol. 29 No. 1: January 2024 Vol. 28 No. 3: September 2023 Vol 28, No 3: September 2023 Vol. 28 No. 2: May 2023 Vol 28, No 2: May 2023 Vol. 28 No. 1: January 2023 Vol 28, No 1: January 2023 Vol 27, No 3: September 2022 Vol. 27 No. 3: September 2022 Vol 27, No 2: May 2022 Vol. 27 No. 2: May 2022 Vol. 27 No. 1: January 2022 Vol 27, No 1: January 2022 Vol 26, No 3: September 2021 Vol. 26 No. 3: September 2021 Vol 26, No 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 1: January 2021 Vol 26, No 1: January 2021 Vol 25, No 3: September 2020 Vol. 25 No. 3: September 2020 Vol 25, No 2: May 2020 Vol. 25 No. 2: May 2020 Vol 25, No 1: January 2020 Vol. 25 No. 1: January 2020 Vol 24, No 3: September 2019 Vol. 24 No. 3: September 2019 Vol. 24 No. 2: May 2019 Vol 24, No 2: May 2019 Vol 24, No 1: January 2019 Vol. 24 No. 1: January 2019 Vol. 23 No. 3: September 2018 Vol 23, No 3: September 2018 Vol 23, No 2: May 2018 Vol. 23 No. 2: May 2018 Vol 23, No 1: January 2018 Vol. 23 No. 1: January 2018 Vol. 22 No. 3: September 2017 Vol 22, No 3: September 2017 Vol. 22 No. 2: May 2017 Vol 22, No 2: May 2017 Vol 22, No 1: January 2017 Vol. 22 No. 1: January 2017 Vol. 21 No. 3: September 2016 Vol 21, No 3: September 2016 Vol. 21 No. 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 1: January 2016 Vol. 21 No. 1: January 2016 Vol 20, No 3: September 2015 Vol. 20 No. 3: September 2015 Vol 20, No 2: May 2015 Vol. 20 No. 2: May 2015 Vol. 20 No. 1: January 2015 Vol 20, No 1: January 2015 Vol. 19 No. 3: September 2014 Vol 19, No 3: September 2014 Vol 19, No 2: May 2014 Vol. 19 No. 2: May 2014 Vol. 19 No. 1: January 2014 Vol 19, No 1: January 2014 Vol 18, No 3: September 2013 Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013 Vol 18, No 2: May 2013 Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013 Vol. 18 No. 1: January 2013 Vol 18, No 1: January 2013 Vol. 17 No. 3: September 2012 Vol 17, No 3: September 2012 Vol. 17 No. 2: May 2012 Vol 17, No 2: May 2012 Vol. 17 No. 1: Januari 2012 Vol 17, No 1: Januari 2012 Vol 16, No 3: September 2011 Vol. 16 No. 3: September 2011 Vol. 16 No. 2: May 2011 Vol 16, No 2: May 2011 Vol 16, No 1: January 2011 Vol. 16 No. 1: January 2011 Vol. 15 No. 3: September 2010 Vol 15, No 3: September 2010 Vol. 15 No. 2: May 2010 Vol 15, No 2: May 2010 Vol 15, No 1: January 2010 Vol. 15 No. 1: January 2010 Vol 14, No 3: September 2009 Vol. 14 No. 3: September 2009 Vol 14, No 2: May 2009 Vol. 14 No. 2: May 2009 Vol 14, No 1: January 2009 Vol. 14 No. 1: January 2009 Vol. 13 No. 3: September 2008 Vol 13, No 3: September 2008 Vol 13, No 2: May 2008 Vol. 13 No. 2: May 2008 Vol. 13 No. 1: January 2008 Vol 13, No 1: January 2008 More Issue