cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Filsafat
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Jurnal Filsafat is a scientific journal that first published in 1990, as a forum for scientific communication, development of thinking and research in philosophy. Jurnal Filsafat is published twice a year, in February and August with p-ISSN: 0853-1870, and e-ISSN: 2528-6811 The Editorial Team of Jurnal Filsafat accepts manuscript in the field of philosophy which has never been published in other media. Editorial Team has the right to edit the manuscript as far as not changing the substance of its contents. Jurnal Filsafat Address: Notonagoro Building, 2nd Floor, Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta; Jl. Olahraga Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, 55281; Email: jurnal-wisdom@ugm.ac.id; Website: jurnal.ugm.ac.id/wisdom; Phone: (0274) 515368 / (0274) 546 605.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 17, No 3 (2007)" : 7 Documents clear
DARI KONSUMERISME KE KONSUMTIVISME (Dalam Perpektif Sejarah Filsafat Barat) Armawi, Armaidy
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (207.658 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23090

Abstract

In this paper, the author tries to analyze of the consumptive behavior, especially the wasteful consumption of modern men and unfold of the intrinsic values and philosophical background of consumerism in the history of philosophy perspective (pre and modern western philosophy). He also tries to retrace the meaning movement of the consumerism to consumptivism (high mass consumption) and its social implication to the development of history of human civilization and their environment. The results are analysis on the comsumptive behavior describes the meaning of consumerism that has been changed from its positive sense, as a movement of consumer protection to its negative sense, as a wasteful consumption.
TITIK TOLAK EPISTEMOLOGIS FILSAFAT ALAM SEMESTA IMMANUEL KANT Amien, Miska M.
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (216.255 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23085

Abstract

Immanuel Kant denied metaphysical thought. According to Kant, men are not able to understand the nature of something but phenomena. So also in terms of the universe, men can not attain the nature of universe but phenomena that rose from universe. In this context, Kant denied traditional cosmology. However, Kant develops his own cosmology. He talks about the origin of cosmos. Although the origin of cosmos can not retrace clearly, but it is able to understood by nebular theory. Kant explained space and time base on epistemological principles. Space and time are an image in human mind, they rose in the same time, and the other things came later.
ARGUMEN FILOSOFIS INTEGRASI ILMU DAN AGAMA Perspektif Pemikiran Mullâ Sadrâ Kuswanjono, Arqom
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.695 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23091

Abstract

The problem of relationship between science and religion emerged in the first time at the Middle Ages, when the controversy about the center of universe occurred between scientists and theologians, that were geocentric view and heliocentric view. It was the starting point of the discourse of relationship between science and religion academically. Than, the discourse of the relationship develop in four types i.e. conflict, independence, dialogue and integration. The concept of integration between science and religion in philosophy of Mullâ Shadrâ perspective is an holistic integration which is built upon the unity of ontology, epistemology and axiology. Ontologically, the relationship is interdependent- integration, it means that science and religion dependent each other. There is no science without religion and there is no religion without science. Epistemologically, the relationship is complementary-integration; it means that all methods which are applied in science and religion (sense experience, reason, intuition and revelation) synergically used to find out the truth. Axiologically, the relationship is qualificative-integration, it means that all values (truth, goodness, beauty and Divineness) qualify each other. Science is not value free; science is not only related to the truth, but also to goodness, beauty and Divineness values.
PROGRAM RISET ILMIAH IMRE LAKATOS Mustansyir, Rizal
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (265.346 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23086

Abstract

The topic of this paper is related to the methodological thought of a philosopher Imre Lacatos. The methodological problem is a core problem in the area of philosophy of science. Science philosopher’s discourse shows the methodology of science as one of the scientific procedures in gaining the truth, but in fact, it caused the emergence of methodological mainstream; mono-methodology and pluri-methodology. Imre Lacatos’ tried to mediate the discourse of two fortifications by means of scientific research program. Some ideas developed by Lacatos’ in its relation to the scientific research programs are; first, Lacatos propose a sum of mathematics knowledge which is based on the heuristics idea, second, Lacatos’ criticism to Popper’s falsifiable concept, third, Lacatos’ effort in looking for a harmonious method that provides a sum of rational scientific progress, appropriately keeps its consistency with the historical fact, fourth, Lacatos’ connect the research program to scientists who protect the core of theory from falsification effort, fifth, a research program is qualified as progressive if it is signed by stunning novel facts and as deteriorative if the program is not directed to the new fact, sixth, the hard-core is determining characteristic of program, it is a general theory of hypotheses which is employed as a foundation of developed program, seventh, the negative heuristic of hard-core program is detailed program which states the basic assumption of program, eighth, the positive heuristic of hard-core program is an outline which indicates how the research program can be developed under additional assumption of new phenomenon clarification.
PENGARUH PEMIKIRAN WITTGENSTEIN TERHADAP MATEMATIKA Suyitno, Hardi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (438.72 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23087

Abstract

Wittgenstein is a unique philosopher. He criticizes his own opinion. Philosophers divide his views in two periods that are early and later. The early of Wittgentein’s view set by Tractatus Logico Philosophicus and the later set by Philosophical Investigations. Wittgenstein's conceptions of mathematics fall in three periods, that are early, midle and later. The early period Wittgenstein's conception of mathematics set by Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, the midle period set by Philosophical Grammar dan Philosophical Remarks, and the later period set by Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. The Wittgenstein’s view on mathematics is not belonging to logicism, formalism, or intuitionism. The later Wittgenstein on mathematics is that “Mathematics as a human invention”. He maintains his rejection for infinitely in mathematics.
REFLEKSI KRITIS ATAS METODE BERFILSAFAT DAMARDJATI SUPADJAR Santoso, Heri
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (301.805 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23088

Abstract

The strength-ness of Damardjati Supadjar philosophical thought method is: unique, operational, and testified. Unique consist in that his thought are special and different from the other philosophers. The meaning of operational is applicable by one who ready to experience it. Testable has a meaning that someone who doing with the method, necessarily acknowledge that the method effective enough to developing the new consciousness. The weakness of the method are: style of the forwarding of ideas which sometime too vulgar (look-likes porno) and to the indigent beginner difficult to catch the substance of ideas, so that they impress the ideas less systematic. The contribution of Damardjati Supadjar method for the developing of philosophy, specially for Indonesian philosophy is to be able to offer the pattern of typical patterned thinking and attitude, representing result of cultural local genius of Java, Nusantara, Islam, And world culture.
EPISTEMOLOGI AL-FARABI: GAGASANNYA TENTANG DAYA-DAYA MANUSIA Hafid, Hafid
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (309.173 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23084

Abstract

The philosophy of al-Farabi is a review and commentary on the philosophical works written by Greek Philosophers. Al- Farabi’s thought exposes new nuance that is brought to the tradition of Islamic treasure. Al-Farabi carries both philosophy and religion discourses, primarily in matching the philosophy of language to the religion that was polarized into language terminologies. Religion is viewed as expression of philosophical truth in the popular language that uses art, logic, rhetoric, and poetry. Al-Farabi put rhetoric and poetry into the integral-part of philosophy. Poetry has ability in creating imagination (khayali) as a description of empirical data. The power of imagination is put into logic. This is an unusual construction of logic. By the power of imagination, al-Farabi confirmed the prophetic truth. Prophet is not only the owner of intellectual capability as philosopher has, but he has the high power of imagination; prophet is capable to formulate concrete formulation from abstract conceptions that is easily understood and accepted by society and his followers.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2007 2007


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 31, No 2 (2021) Vol 31, No 1 (2021) Vol 30, No 2 (2020) Vol 30, No 1 (2020) Vol 29, No 2 (2019) Vol 29, No 1 (2019) Vol 29, No 1 (2019) Vol 28, No 2 (2018) Vol 28, No 1 (2018) Vol 27, No 2 (2017) Vol 27, No 2 (2017) Vol 27, No 1 (2017) Vol 26, No 2 (2016) Vol 26, No 2 (2016) Vol 26, No 1 (2016) Vol 25, No 2 (2015) Vol 25, No 1 (2015) Vol 24, No 1 (2014) Vol 24, No 1 (2014) Vol 23, No 3 (2013) Vol 23, No 2 (2013) Vol 23, No 1 (2013) Vol 22, No 3 (2012) Vol 22, No 3 (2012) Vol 22, No 2 (2012) Vol 22, No 2 (2012) Vol 22, No 1 (2012) Vol 22, No 1 (2012) Vol 21, No 3 (2011) Vol 21, No 3 (2011) Vol 21, No 2 (2011) Vol 21, No 2 (2011) Vol 21, No 1 (2011) Vol 21, No 1 (2011) Vol 20, No 3 (2010) Vol 20, No 3 (2010) Vol 20, No 2 (2010) Vol 20, No 2 (2010) Vol 20, No 1 (2010) Vol 20, No 1 (2010) Vol 19, No 3 (2009) Vol 19, No 3 (2009) Vol 19, No 2 (2009) Vol 19, No 2 (2009) Vol 19, No 1 (2009) Vol 19, No 1 (2009) Vol 18, No 3 (2008) Vol 18, No 3 (2008) Vol 18, No 2 (2008) Vol 18, No 2 (2008) Vol 18, No 1 (2008) Vol 18, No 1 (2008) Vol 17, No 3 (2007) Vol 17, No 2 (2007) Vol 17, No 1 (2007) Vol 16, No 3 (2006) Vol 16, No 3 (2006) Vol 16, No 2 (2006) Vol 16, No 1 (2006) Vol 14, No 3 (2004) Vol 14, No 2 (2004) Vol 14, No 1 (2004) Vol 13, No 3 (2003) Vol 13, No 2 (2003) Vol 13, No 1 (2003) Vol 10, No 2 (2000) Jurnal Filsafat Seri 30 Oktober 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 29 Juni 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 28 Juli 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 28 Juli 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Edisi Khusus Agustus 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 26 Desember 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 26 Desember 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 25 Mei 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 25 Mei 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 24 Februari 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 24 Februari 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 23 November 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 23 November 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 22 Agustus 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 22 Agustus 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 21 Mei 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 21 Mei 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 20 Desember 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 20 Desember 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 19 Agustus 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 19 Agustus 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 18 Mei 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 18 Mei 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 17 Februari 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 17 Februari 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 16 November 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 16 November 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 15 Agustus 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 15 Agustus 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 14 Mei 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 14 Mei 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 13 Februari 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 13 Februari 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 12 November 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 11 Agustus 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 10 Mei 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 10 Mei 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 9 Februari 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 8 November 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 7 Agustus 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 6 Mei 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 5 Februari 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 5 Februari 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 4 November 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 3 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 1 1990 More Issue