cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Erwin Aditya Pratama
Contact Email
erwinadityapratamash@gmail.com
Phone
+6282322127257
Journal Mail Official
erwinadityapratamash@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Halmahera KM 1 Mintaragen Tegal
Location
Kota tegal,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Diktum
Published by Universitas Pancasakti Tegal
ISSN : 23385413     EISSN : 26553449     DOI : https://doi.org/24.905
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is open-accsess peer reviewed intended to be the journal publishing article the conceptual and/or the result of research law science for academicians, researchers, practitioners in law. Diktum invite manuscript in the various topic include, but not limited to, functional areas related to Law Science of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Socio Legal, Bussines Law, Legal Philosophy and another section related contemporary issues in Law.Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum accepted submission from all of the world. All submited article shall never been published elsewhere, original and not under consideration for other publication (for checking similarty, Diktum editorial board check using turnitin program. Since 2019 we are proud member of Crossref. Diktum doi prefix is 10.24905 . Therefore, all article published by Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum will have unique DOI number.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): November" : 2 Documents clear
Rekonstruksi Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia melalui Pembaruan Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif) Imam Asmarudin; Erwin Aditya Pratama; Mukhidin
Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24905/a94zcs74

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of reconstructing the principles governing legislative drafting in Indonesia in light of the Constitutional Court’s formal review of the Job Creation Law, particularly concerning the omnibus law model. The research addresses two central issues: (1) the implications of the Constitutional Court’s formal review decision for the legislative drafting process; and (2) whether the principles stipulated in Article 5 of Law No. 12 of 2011 on Law-Making are adequate to ensure legal certainty within Indonesia’s dynamic legislative framework. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, and is analyzed through a prescriptive legal framework. The findings indicate that the high frequency of judicial review, the phenomena of overregulation, regulatory overlap, and normative disharmony reflect the absence of anticipatory and responsive dimensions in the legislative process. The Constitutional Court’s decision, including the presence of dissenting opinions, underscores the necessity of more adaptive procedural standards capable of responding to evolving legal and societal demands. This study proposes the reconstruction of Article 5 of Law No. 12 of 2011 by incorporating anticipatory and responsive principles as normative instruments to enhance legislative quality and strengthen legal certainty. The scholarly contribution of this research lies in the conceptual formulation of integrating anticipatory and responsive principles into the framework of national legal development.
Keterbukaan Informasi Publik dan Partisipasi Bermakna dalam Perumusan RTRW Kalimantan Barat 2024–2044 Ivan Wagner; Weni Sentia Marsalena; Syarif Muhammad Ridho Rizki Maulufi Alkadrie
Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24905/f6tjev53

Abstract

The implementation of Public Information Disclosure (Keterbukaan Informasi Publik/KIP) and public participation in the formulation of the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) of West Kalimantan Province for 2024–2044 continues to face structural and procedural challenges. Although Law Number 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure guarantees the right of access to information, the practice of drafting the RTRW reveals a significant gap between legal norms and their empirical implementation. This study employs an empirical legal method with a socio-legal approach, conducted from January to August 2024, involving 18 informants comprising local government officials, members of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD), academics, and representatives of civil society. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and participatory observation, and were examined using Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation as an analytical framework. The findings demonstrate that proactive disclosure of strategic documents, particularly the Strategic Environmental Assessment (KLHS) and the draft Regional Regulation (Raperda), remains inadequate through official governmental channels. Public participation mechanisms tend to be procedural and formalistic, falling short of the principles of public information disclosure, Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and meaningful participation. Previous studies have not specifically examined the implementation of public information disclosure in the formulation of regional spatial planning regulations using Arnstein’s participatory framework, thereby leaving an empirical gap at the subnational level. The novelty of this research lies in integrating normative analysis of public information law with an empirical assessment grounded in participation theory to determine the actual degree of participation. Formally, participation reaches the level of consultation (tokenism), yet substantively it descends into therapy or manipulation (non-participation). These findings underscore the urgency of restructuring spatial governance to ensure substantive transparency and participatory legitimacy in regional policymaking.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Mei Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): November Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Mei Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Mei 2023 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): November 2022 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): Mei 2022 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Mei 2021 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): November 2020 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Mei 2020 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): November 2019 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Mei 2019 More Issue