Articles
9 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018)"
:
9 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 19 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PENETAPAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 1 TAHUN 2004 ]]>
<![CDATA[Jamilus, -]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (39.822 KB)
<![CDATA[The birth of the regulation No. 1 in 2004 which became Act No. 19 of 2004 led to a wide rejection by people in various areas mining and at the national level. The rejection at the national level is done by various non-governmental Organizations Coalition who joined in the rescue of protected forest Advocacy Team by doing a petition for annulment of law 19/2004 through judicial review to the Constitutional Court, arguing in a regulation is still on the run, the impact would cause bad for society around the mine. The purpose of this paper to discuss: (1) whether law No. 19 of 2004 warranties are material to the legal rights of citizens in order to honour, the fulfillment of human rights in the field of natural resource management and environment (2) whether law No. 19 of 2004 in line with the law reform in the field of natural resource management and the environment as well as the social and economic impact, (3) the impact of law 19/2004 for the community. The method used is the normative approach, data obtained from the research libraries. The results of the study indicate that: (1) determination of the regulation No. 1/2004 are considered to be weak and not in accordance with the provisions of article 22, paragraph (1) of the Constitution, (2) the substance of the arrangements of the mining licence less precise products is set out in the legislation because of the nature of the agreement and permission was temporary. (3) the impact of the community will cut off the economic value of ecological and environmental capital, and give rise to numerous conflicts experienced by the community. Need for harmonization with basing on scientific studies which can be objectively justified.]]>
<![CDATA[PENJATUHAN PIDANA MATI DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Anjari, Warih]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (38.419 KB)
<![CDATA[Criminal punishment is the most important part of the criminal justice process . Application of capital punishment by the state through the state court decision means taking the right convict life . The right to life is a human right that is non derogable . Therefore, its application should pay attention to the Human Rights convicted . The objective of this paper is to know: (1). whether the imposition of the death penalty for offenders is contrary to the Human Rights (2). The criteria for the imposition of the death penalty for crimes that do not conflict with the Human Rights. The method used is a normative juridical approach using secondary data. The conclusions that: (1) the imposition of the death penalty is contrary to human rights, but its application can be justified by reason of defending human rights, (2) only applied to crimes that are beyond the limits of humanity and the destruction of human civilization. Suggestions author implementation of the criminal justice process is transparent and fair.]]>
<![CDATA[STRATEGI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI MELALUI PENDEKATAN POLITIK HUKUM, PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN BUDAYA HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Yusyanti, Diana]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (59.982 KB)
<![CDATA[The practice of criminal acts of corruption that happens increasingly sophisticated Indonesia, systematic and widespread in all walks of life who have an impact on the amount of the financial loss to the State. Various laws and regulations that have attempted to eradicate the corruption that Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo Act No. 20 of 2001 even Government has ratified several articles of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003 through law No. 7 Th 2006. But so far this is still unable to put in place and are effective in eradicating corruption. The purpose of this writing is to know the: (1) the role of political and law-enforcement efforts in the eradication of criminal acts of corruption, (2) consistency of law enforcement efforts in the eradication of criminal acts of corruption that could influence the attitude of the law enforcement apparatus in legal norms and behaviour or attitude in the exercise of his profession in the follow-up process of the rule of law, (3) the role of the Legal culture in helping reduce and even eradicate behaviour a criminal offence of corruption.The methods used is the law normative approach and descriptive analytical data based on primary law materials, secondary and tertiary. It can be concluded that: (1) legal corruption eradication strategy should press, hold or curb corruption by giving heavy sanctions, improved coordination among law enforcement agencies and develop a culture of shame against corruption.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN SANKSI ADAT KEPADA PERUSAHAAN DAN PIHAK LAIN DALAM PERADILAN ADAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Junef, Muhar]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (41.589 KB)
<![CDATA[The existence of judicial custom is becoming increasingly important in the situation of countries that are not yet fully able to provide case resolution service via the formal route to remote villages. Because of that, the constitution give the recognition and tribute to the customary law along qualified: realitas, namely adat law it is alive and society; idealitas, according to the development, namely compatible with the principle of the unitary state of the republic of indonesia , and regulated in the law. The purpose of this research is to know: (1) the existence of customary courts in the judicial system of the country; and (2) form of application of sanctions the Customs on the company/the other party in violation of the provisions of the customs. The research found that: (1) the existence of judicial customary have been set in regulations perudang-undangan national although earlier through emergency act no. 1 1951 in particular the article 1 ( 2 ) letter b; continued with removal indirectly judicial village through act no. 14 year 1970 regarding basic law on judicial power; the last changed with act no. 48 / 2009 on judicial power.( 2 ) sanction inflicted on company government is in form of fines customary and companies convicted for supplying need customary and so on.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Anjari, Warih]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1071.378 KB)
<![CDATA[The corporation is the subject of a criminal act. As the subject of criminal law corporation does not have an inner attitude. As for the criminal charges can accountability their required mens rea / Schuld. Crimes committed so damaging to the corporation and the state. While conventional accountability system that is individualized, direct and based on Schuld, difficult to apply to the corporation. The purpose of writing is to analyze the system of corporate accountability in order to convict the corporation, and constraints convict against the corporation. The method used is the statute approach (approach legislation) and case approach (case approach), methods of analysis using qualitative analysis to interpretation, and the data collection method using a literature study (library research). It can be concluded that the corporation can be justified by using a system of absolute liability and replacement; and the problem is the application of conventional criminal liability system and the difficulty of proving fault corporation. It is suggested that there is a shared understanding among law enforcement about corporations can be punished.]]>
<![CDATA[KEJAHATAN JABATAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM PANCASILA ]]>
<![CDATA[Anjari, Warih]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (3311.751 KB)
<![CDATA[Official crime is a crime committed by civil servants using the power, facilities and infrastructure of his position. Officials as bearers of the state's mandate, are not allowed to use their positions to commit crimes. The Criminal Code aggravates officials who use their positions to commit crimes under Article 52. The practice of ransom under Article 52 of the Criminal Code is rarely applied to public servants committing crimes. The purpose of writing in this paper is: to describe the setting of crime of office in Indonesian criminal law, and to analyze the application of Article 52 of the Criminal Code against crime of office in the perspective of Pancasila law state. The research method is normative juridical with approach of legislation and case approach. Data used secondary data with qualitative descriptive analysis and systematic interpretation. The conclusion is that the crime of office is regulated in Book II and Book III of the Criminal Code and the penalty for offenses based on Article 52 of the Criminal Code and the objections under Article 52 of the Criminal Code against offenses in line with the implementation of the balance of rights and obligations in the Pancasila state law.]]>
<![CDATA[HAK REMISI TERPIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEMIDANAAN INTEGRATIF BERDASARKAN PANCASILA ]]>
<![CDATA[Anjari, Warih]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1153.607 KB)
<![CDATA[Pemberantasan korupsi menjadi salah satu tujuan dalam pembangunan Indonesia. Sebagai kejahatan yang bersifat luar biasa maka penegakannya dapat bersifat luar biasa pula. Namun penegakan tersebut tidak boleh menimbulkan pelanggaran dan korban bagi narapidana. Salah satunya adalah pemberian hak remisi kepada narapidana korupsi. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk: menganalisis pemberian hak remisi terpidana korupsi dikaitkan dengan hak-hak Narapidana, dan menganalisis pelaksanaan hak remisi terpidana korupsi yang tidak melanggar hak terpidana dalam perspektif pemidanaan integratif berdasarkan Pancasila. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitiannya yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Data yang digunakan data sekunder dengan analisis deskriptif kualitatif dan penafsiran sistematis. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa hak remisi bukan hak asasi manusia tetapi persyaratan remisi yang diatur dalam Pasal 34 A ayat (1) PP Nomor 99 Tahun 2012 mengakibatkan perlakuan yang berbeda antara narapidana korupsi dengan narapidana lainya. Hal ini melanggar Pasal 27 ayat (1) dan Pasal 28 I ayat (2) UUD 1945. Pencabutan hak remisi terpidana korupsi diintegrasikan dalam pidana tambahan.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN DISIPLIN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL DI LINGKUNGAN BADAN KEPEGAWAIAN NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Sukamto, -]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Rendahnya disiplin pegawai terlihat dari tingkat pelanggaran terhadap disiplin PNS yang telah diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku. Dalam praktek, dijumpai ketidak seragaman penerapan hukuman atas pelanggaran kewajiban atau larangan. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana prosedur penjatuhan hukuman disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil di lingkungan BKN, untuk mengetahui apakah keputusan hukuman disiplin yang dijatuhkan kepada PNS, baik secara formil maupun materiil, sesuai dengan peraturan-peraturan yang berlaku dan untuk mengetahui upaya-upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan seorang PNS yang dijatuhi hukuman disiplin. Metode Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Kesimpulan penelitian ini yaitu, 1. Proses pemberian sanksi administrasi disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Badan Kepegawaian Negara berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 Tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil dan Peraturan Kepala Badan kepegawaian Negara Nomor 21 Tahun 2010 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 53 tahun 2010 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil; 2.Pemberian sanksi administrasi disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Badan Kepegawaian Negara sering mendapat kendala seperti panjangnya proses yang harus ditempuh dalam pemberian sanksi. Penegakan disiplin juga harus terbentur oleh pihak lain yang berperkara seperti Penggugat dan Tergugat. 3. Pemberian sanksi administrasi terhadap kedisiplinan Pegawai Negeri Sipil di lingkungan BKN telah memenuhi persyaratan, baik secara formil maupun materiil.]]>
<![CDATA[DINAMIKA MENGADILI SENGKETA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH: Putusan MK Nomor: 26/PHP.BUP-XVI/2018 ]]>
<![CDATA[Samsudin, -]]>
<![CDATA[ E-Journal Widya Yustisia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[E-Journal Widya Yustisia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Pilkada serentak pertama kali diselenggarakan Tahun 2015 memberikan banyak pembelajaran dalam negara demokrasi, yaitu setiap warga negara mempunyai kesempatan yang sama dan efektif dalam memberikan suara dan seluruh suara harus dihitung secara bersama. UU Pemilu tidak menegaskan atau mengatur dengan jelas bagaimana dan melalui lembaga apa pihak-pihak yang dirugikan oleh keputusan KPU dapat menyelesaikan keberatannya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui ambang batas perselisihan perolehan suara Pemilihan kepala daerah calon Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Tabalong Tahun 2018 dan mengetahui lembaga peradilan khusus yang ideal untuk memeriksa mengadili dan memutus sengketa Pemilihan kepala daerah. Metode Penelitian menggunakan yuridis normatif yaitu fokus untuk mengkaji penerapan norma-norma dalam hukum positif. Kesimpulannya penetapan ambang batas sesuai dengan ketentuan; Pertama, Ketentuan ambang batas pengajuan permohonan ke MK adalah sebesar 2% dari seluruh suara sah. Lembaga peradilan khusus yang ideal untuk menyelesaikan sengketa perselisihan penetapan perolehan suara tahap akhir hasil pemilihan diperiksa dan diadili oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi sampai dibentuknya badan peradilan khusus.]]>
