cover
Contact Name
Aristoni
Contact Email
yudisia@iainkudus.ac.id
Phone
+6287833733055
Journal Mail Official
yudisia@iainkudus.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo PO BOX. 51 Kudus 59322 Telp. (0291) 432677 Fax. (0291) 441613
Location
Kab. kudus,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
ISSN : 19077262     EISSN : 24775339     DOI : 10.21043/yudisia
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Artikel yang diterima dan diterbitkan dalam Jurnal YUDISIA harus masuk dalam lingkup keilmuan bidang hukum dan hukum Islam. Bidang hukum mencakup (tapi tidak terbatas pada bidang) : hukum materiil dan formil, tinjauan hukum dari aspek politik, sosial, ekonomi, antropologi, psikologi. Bidang hukum Islam mencakup (tapi tidak terbatas pada bidang) : fiqh, ushul fiqh, masail fiqhiyyah serta masalah fiqh kontemporer.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 246 Documents
A Two-Sided Dilemma: Gender Construction and The Struggle For Equality In Early Marriage In Indonesia
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 16, No 1 (2025): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v16i1.25874

Abstract

Traditional gender stereotypes domesticate women, making their roles subordinated, marginalized, stigmatized, and burdened with multiple responsibilities while exposing them to violence. Early marriage often occurs before the legal age of 19 years as stipulated in Law Number 16 of 2019. This study examines the factors causing early marriage and its implications for fulfilling conjugal rights in Brangsong village during the first three years of marriage—a period prone to conflict. Using qualitative-descriptive methodology with a historical sociological approach and purposive sampling, the research involved early-married couples, parents, and village officials. The results revealed that the primary factor driving early marriage is adolescent curiosity about sexual intercourse motivated by dating relationships despite strong parental control, socialization, and religious knowledge. The implications for marital rights fulfillment belongedl into three categories: first, couples who responsibly work toward marriage goals with gender-equal roles; second, those using marriage to escape problems; and third, couples failing to achieve sakinah, mawadah, and rahmah due to gender inequality, resulting in divorce. This research demonstrates that successful marriages require deconstructing patriarchal frameworks and establishing equitable partnerships regardless of age.
A Comparative Study of Electronic-Based Sexual Violence: Maqashid Shari'ah Perspective on Indonesia's Law No. 12 of 2022 and Malaysia's Legal Framework
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 16, No 1 (2025): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v16i1.30938

Abstract

In order to combat the growing problem of sexual assault, particularly that which occurs through digital media, the Sexual Violence Criminal Acts Law (Law No. 12 of 2022) was introduced. It is crucial to determine if this law complies with the goals of Islamic law, or Maqashid Shari’ah, given that the majority of Indonesia’s population is Muslim. The types of Electronic-Based Sexual Violence that are covered by the law and their assessment from the standpoint of Maqashid Shari'ah are the two main topics of this study. Using a normative legal research approach with literature analysis, this study finds that the law identifies three forms of electronic-based sexual violence: (1) recording or taking sexual images without consent, (2) transmitting sexual content against the recipient's will, and (3) online sexual harassment or stalking. These actions contradict Maqashid Shari’ah as they cause harm and are explicitly prohibited in Islam. While the law seeks to provide protection and aligns with the broader goals of Maqashid Shari’ah, its implementation of Islamic values remains gradual (tadarruj) rather than comprehensive. This research contributes both theoretically and practically by offering insights into legal and Islamic perspectives on electronic-based sexual violence.
Legal Realism of Oliver Wendell Holmes Perspective: A Study of Madhiyah Livehood After Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 Of 2019
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 16, No 1 (2025): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v16i1.27337

Abstract

In the context of Islamic family law studies, problems between husband, wife, and children are part of variables that cannot be separated from each other. This research issue highlights the issue of legal protection for wives and children related to their right to madhiyah livelihood, which is the husband's responsibility to fulfill it. Previously, since 2003, the Supreme Court through Decision Number 608K/AG/2003 emphasizes that the issue of madhiyah livelihood cannot be sued in court, meaning that the court is reluctant to deal with this issue. Absolutely, this decision has sparked polemics because it deprives the wife and children of their rights to the husband's responsibility in providing for the livelihood. Since 2019, the model for fulfilling the rights of wives and children to madhiyah livelihood has changed through Circular Letter Number 2 of 2019. The Supreme Court emphasized that the issue of madhiyah livelihood can be challenged in court. Of course, this decision reflects an effort to improve a more progressive legal mechanism. This study aims to analyse the basic legal considerations of the Supreme Court justices in forming this circular letter, using the legal realism theory approach from Oliver Wendell Holmes's perspective, while the method used is normative-juridical. This research resulted in the finding that Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2019, is a form of actualization of the theory of legal realism in answering all madhiyah livelihood issues that have occurred in society. As a matter of fact that the implementation of this circular letter is not effective because it is induced by the absence of further instruments that are able to ensure whether or not the madhiyah support for wives and children is fulfilled. So this instrument is immediately needed, in order to protect and fulfil the rights of wives and children to madhiyah livelihood.
Reformulating the Prohibition of Interfaith Marriage: a Comparative Uṣūl al-Fiqh Analysis in Indonesia and Tunisia
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 16, No 2 (2025): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v16i2.33423

Abstract

This study examines the regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia and Tunisia through the analytical framework of Uṣūl al-Fiqh, with particular emphasis on the principles of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (objectives of Islamic law), sadd al-dharīʿah (prevention from harms), and maṣlaḥah mursalah (public interest). Employing normative legal research with a comparative law approach, this study analyzes statutory regulations, judicial practices, fatwas, and classical as well as contemporary Uṣūl al-Fiqh (principles of Islamic jurisprudence) scholarship to understand how Islamic legal reasoning operates within contrasting legislative regimes. The findings demonstrate that Islamic law is epistemically flexible and context-sensitive rather than monolithic. Indonesia adopts a normative–taʿabbudī (religious acts) approach that prioritizes ḥifẓ al-dīn (the protection of religion) and ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of lineage) through preventive legal measures, whereas Tunisia applies a reconstructive–taʾlīlī (interpretation legal reasoning) approach that foregrounds public welfare and civil justice within a constitutional framework of equality. The study further reveals that these divergent models reflect differing methodological priorities in Uṣūl al-Fiqh shaped by political context, constitutional design, and social pluralism. Theoretically, this research contributes to Islamic legal studies by integrating classical Uṣūl al-Fiqh theory with contemporary socio-legal analysis. Practically, it underscores the need for adaptive marriage regulations that harmonize Sharīʿa objectives with pluralistic social realities while ensuring legal certainty and protection for vulnerable parties. This study recommends strengthening institutional ijtihād (effort) and developing responsive legal guidelines to address interfaith family issues without undermining the foundational principles of Islamic family law.
Negotiating Gender Roles: The Shift of Wives Role as the Main Breadwinners in Wijirejo Village, Indonesia
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 16, No 2 (2025): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v16i2.28517

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the transformation of wives’ economic roles as primary breadwinners in Muslim families in Wijirejo Village, Indonesia, and to examine its normative legitimacy through the perspectives of maṣlaḥah and Robert K. Merton’s structural-functionalism theory. The study addresses the tension between the normative construction of Islamic family law, which positions the husband as qawwām with primary financial responsibility, and the social reality in which wives increasingly assume the role of main breadwinners due to economic pressures and unstable husbands’ incomes. Employing a qualitative sociological approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with 12 wives who serve as primary breadwinners, participatory observation, and documentation, and analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model. The findings indicate that this role shift represents a form of structural and social adaptation grounded in the principle of maṣlaḥah. The wife’s role as the main breadwinner does not contradict the Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah as long as it generates benefits and prevents harm. Integrating maṣlaḥah with Merton’s functionalism reveals how Muslim families maintain social balance and religious values amid economic change. This study contributes to Islamic family law scholarship by offering an integrative socio-normative perspective on gender roles in contemporary Muslim society.
From Fatwa to Bureaucracy: How Indonesian Penghulu Negotiate Islamic Law and State Regulations on Post-Divorce Marriages
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 16, No 1 (2025): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v16i1.32605

Abstract

The state policy prohibiting men from remarrying during their ex-wife’s iddah period has generated varied responses among marriage registrars (penghulu). Within the framework of legal pluralism, this article analyzes the tension between classical fiqh and state regulation, as well as its institutional implications. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data were analyzed using condensation, presentation, and conclusion drawing, while source triangulation was used to ensure validity. The findings reveal different interpretations among penghulu, rooted in the enduring authority of classical fiqh as a normative reference amid the presence of state law. In practice, these differences have resulted in three implementation patterns: (1) partial application of the Circular Letter, (2) full implementation, and (3) complete rejection. This phenomenon illustrates that in the realm of Islamic family law, state regulation has not fully displaced Islamic legal authority as the primary reference in religious institutional practice.