cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota metro,
Lampung
INDONESIA
JURNAL ISTINBATH
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Metro Lampung
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Other
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 94 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
SISTEM PEMIDANAAN DALAM BIDANG PERBANKAN Hermanita, Hermanita
ISTINBATH JURNAL HUKUM Vol 1, No 2 (2004): ISTINBATH Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : STAIN Jurai Siwo Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Rule of Crime or banking crime system represent special shares (sub system) from overall of crime system. This means banking crime system have to integrate in (consistence with) general law (rules general). Require to conduct of repair/change crime system in legislation banking area, for example: qualification doing an injustice; doing an injustice subject and corporation crime responsibility; sanction type and formulation of sanction; amount of/the duration crime; weight comparison (minimum/maximum) serve a sentence with fine have to consistence. For a while not yet been made a change by legislation hence practice is straightening of law properly cope to fill insuffiency/existing weakness by innovate and construction punish pursuant to law logic, law science doctrines and theory, opinion all expert. Keyword: crime system, doing an injustice qualification, doing an injustice subject, crime responsibility.
QADZAF MENURUT HUKUM ISLAM DAN KHI Afifah, Nurul
ISTINBATH JURNAL HUKUM Vol 12, No 1 (2015): Edisi Mei 2015
Publisher : STAIN Jurai Siwo Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstrakIslam memandang zina merupakan perbuatan keji, dan termasuk dosa besar. Maka sebagai konsekuensi dari perbuatan tersebut Islam menjatuhkan hukuman (had) rajam bagi pelaku zina mukhsan dan hukuman dera 100 (seratus kali) bagi pelaku zina ghairu mukhsan. Sebagai penyeimbang terhadap beratnya sanksi hukum zina maka menuduh laki-laki atau wanita baik-baik melakukan zina adalah fitnah yang keji, karena jika tuduhan itu diikuti, tentunya tertuduh akan terkena konsekuensi hukum zina, dan memunculkan anggapan bahwa tertuduh adalah orang-orang yang melakukan perbuatan yang keji. Qadzaf  adalah menuduh orang lain berbuat zina, baik tuduhan itu melalui pernyataan yang jelas maupun menyatakan anak seseorang bukan keturunan ayahnya. Perbuatan ini termasuk dosa besar. Syarat seorang qadhif jika ingin selamat (dari hukuman de­ra) maka ia harus menghadirkan empat orang saksi laki-laki yang adil; jika tidak mampu maka hukuman (had) baginya adalah di dera sebanyak 80 (delapan puluh kali); tidak diterima kesaksiannya untuk selamanya dan termasuk golongan orang fasik.Di Indonesia belum ada ketentuan hukum khusus yang mengatur tentang hukuman bagi penuduh zina (qadzaf). Namun dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia (KHI) dijelaskan suami yang menuduh istrinya berbuat zina, dan atau mengingkari anak yang dikandung istrinya dan atau anak yang telah dilahirkan istrinya, sedangkan istrinya menolak tuduhan dan atau mengingkari hal tersebut maka keduanya dapat melakukan sumpah di depan majlis hakim. Akibat hukum dari sumpah ini adalah status perkawinan keduanya yang terputus untuk selamanya. Kata kunci : Perkawinan, qadzaf, zina, had, KHI AbstractIslam views that adultery (zina) is an indecency and it includes a great sin. So as a consequence, Islam impose penalties (had) of “rajam for mukhsan adultery” and penalty about 100 floggings (one hundred times). As a balance toward the severity of sanction adultery law, accusing man or a good woman doing adultery is slander vicious, because if the accusations were continued, of course the accused man or woman will be affected by the consequences of adultery law itself. It will raise the assumption that they are doing cruel acts. “Qadzaf” is accusing someone else that commits adultery, either allegations through a clear statement or utterance that ones children is not a descendant of his father. These action is included into major sin. The requirements of a “qadhif” that if she wants to be save (from the penalty of dera), he must provide four equitable male witnesses; if it is not capable to be done, the punishment (had) for him is trounced about 80 (eighty times); the testimony of himself will not be accepted forever and they are belong fasik people. In Indonesia there has not been a specific legal provisions that organize about the punishment for adultery accuser (qadzaf). But in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia (KHI), it is described that a husband who accuses his wife of adultery and deny the unborn child or children who have been born by his wife, while his wife refuses the accuse and deny it then they can take an oath in front of the judges council. The law consequence of the oath is the marital status of both will be severed forever. Keywords: Marriage, qadzaf, adultery, had, KHI
METODE IJTIHAD ISLAM LIBERAL (STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP IJTIHAD JARINGAN ISLAM LIBERAL/JIL) Mustofa, Imam
ISTINBATH JURNAL HUKUM Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Edisi September 2013
Publisher : STAIN Jurai Siwo Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak Tulisan ini mencoba mengkritisi pemikiran para tokoh Jaringan Islam Liberal mengenai metode dan sumber hukum dalam ijtihad. Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi adanya pemikiran ijtihad kalangan Islam liberal tersebut yang berbeda dan bahkan bertolak belakang dengan pandangan mayoritas ulama yang selama ini diikuti oleh mayoritas umat Islam. Mereka bermaksud mereformasi metodologi ijtihad klasik yang menurut mereka problematis dari sudut ontologis-epistemologis tersebut. Reformasi ini dilakukan dengan merekonstruksi kaidah-kaidahh ushuliyah. Pembahsan dalam tulisan ini berdasarkan kajian pustaka yang bersifat kualitatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan ushul fiqh. Berdasarkan kajian yang penulis lakukan dapat disimpulakan bahwa kalangan Islam liberal menjadikan akal dan logika publik sebagai ukuran untuk menentukan kemashlahatan dalam pembentukan hukum. Rekonstruksi metodologi tersebut sebagai upaya untuk menghasilkan produk pemikiran Islam, khususnya fikih yang lebih solutif bagi problem-problem sosial dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Namun demikian, ukuran kemashlahatan dalam konsep mereka terlalu lentur dan cenderung mengabaikan nash. Kata kunci : Ijtihad, Jaringan Islam Liberal, Mashlahat, Akal publik. Abstract This article tried to criticize the thought, the method and the source of the laws used by the people that joined in liberal Islam network. The discussion was based on the thought of Ijtihad that is used by them was different and contrast with the view of the majority of Islamic scholars as they are followed by most moslem society. They thinked to reform classical Ijtihad methodology which is problematic based on ontological and epistemologic concept. This reformation is done to reconstruct ushuliyah principle. The discussion of this article is based on the library research qualitatively. The writer used Ushul fiqh approach. Referring to the analyzing the data, it can be concluded that liberal Islam network try to explore the ideas and logical public as the measurement to determine public welfare (mashlahat) in the law convention. This methodology reconstruction is produced as an effort toward new thought of Islamic product especially fiqh in order to solve the social problem in the living society. However, the measurement of public welfare (mashlahat) in their concept is too flexible and tend to avoid nash.Keywords : Ijtihad, Islamic Liberal Association, Mashlahat, Logical Public.
KEPUTUSAN LAJNAH TARJIH MUHAMMADIYAH DAN LAJNAH BAHSUL MASA’IL NAHDLATUL ULAMA SEBAGAI KEPUTUSAN IJTIHAD JAMA’I INDONESIA Sirajuddin, Azmi
ISTINBATH JURNAL HUKUM Vol 1, No 2 (2004): ISTINBATH Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : STAIN Jurai Siwo Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ijtihad (Independent Judgment in Legal Questions) is a source of the Islamic law. In the past, the ijtihad was made individually, but in modern time it is probably conducted collectively (Jama’i). The Muhammadiyah’s Committee of the Tarjih (taking a preponderant legal opinion) and the NU’s Committee of the Bahth al-Masa’il (Research on the Religious Questions) are actually two institutions of the Ijtihad jama’i (Collective independent Judgment in Legal Questions) in Indonesia.             Each institution representing opinion of Muhammadiyah and NU organizations has in principle the same concept of Islamic law, but they have differences in the methodology of formulating the law. Keyword : Decisions, Ijtihad Jama’i

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 94

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2004 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 2 (2015): Edisi November 2015 Vol 12, No 1 (2015): Edisi Mei 2015 Vol 11, No 2 (2014): Edisi September 2014 Vol 11, No 1 (2014): Edisi Mei 2014 Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Edisi September 2013 Vol 10, No 1 (2013): Edisi Mei 2013 Vol 9, No 2 (2012): Vol. 9, Nomor 2, Edisi September 2012 Vol 9, No 1 (2012): Vol. 9, Nomor 1, Edisi Mei 2012 Vol 8, No 2 (2011): Vol. VIII, Nomor 2, Nopember 2011 Vol 7, No 1 (2010): Volume 7 Nomor 1 Mei 2010 Vol 1, No 2 (2004): ISTINBATH Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 1 (2004): ISTINBATH Jurnal Hukum More Issue