cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sujarwo
Contact Email
sujarwo@ub.ac.id
Phone
+62341-551665
Journal Mail Official
agrise@ub.ac.id
Editorial Address
Socio-Economics/Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Jl. Veteran Malang, 65145
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
AGRISE
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : 14121425     EISSN : 22526757     DOI : 10.21776/ub.agrise
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
AGRISE adalah Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian yang berada di lingkungan Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya yang berupa hasil penelitian, studi kepustakaan maupun tulisan ilmiah terkait. Jurnal ini diterbitkan pertama kali pada tahun 2001 oleh Jurusan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian FPUB. Pada tahun 2011, Jurnal Agrise bekerjasama dengan Perhimpunan Ekonomi Pertanian Indonesia (Perhepi) untuk meningkatkan kualitas dan kuantitas penerbitan. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Agrise diterbitkan tiga kali setahun (bulan Januari, Mei, dan Agustus). Frekuensi penerbitan akan ditambah bila diperlukan. ISSN cetak : 1412-1425 ISSN Elektronik : 2252-6757
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 472 Documents
 44   45   46   47   48 
IMPACT OF COLLECTIVE MARKETING ON THE INCOME OF CHILI PEPPER PRODUCERS IN SOUTHERN BENIN Tchogou, Bleck; Dedehouanou, Sènakpon Fidèle Ange; Kpenavoun Chogou, Sylvain
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2026.026.1.4

Abstract

Many farmers face difficulties accessing output markets for selling agricultural products, primarily due to high transaction costs resulting from poor infrastructure, market imperfections, a lack of price information, and weak connections between market actors. Producers collectively reorganize to diversify their commercial outlets in response to these challenges. Using a sample of 200 chili pepper producers randomly selected in Southern Benin, this study analyzes the impact of a collective marketing system on agricultural income. The results derived from the Endogenous Switching Regression (ESR) model show that collective marketing significantly enhances the income of participating pepper producers, an effect primarily facilitated by increased selling prices rather than cost reduction. The findings highlight the importance of human capital development and digital and financial inclusion in optimizing the advantages of collective marketing initiatives. 
KEY FACTORS FOR AGRICULTURAL WASTE MANAGEMENT IN INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS USING MICMAC ANALYSIS Santoso, Vidya Damayanti; Hariyadi; Falatehan, A Faroby
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2026.026.1.5

Abstract

The integrated crop-livestock farming system has great potential in creating synergy between agricultural production, food security, and environmental sustainability. However, the implementation of integrated agricultural waste management in Gadingkulon Village, Dau Subdistrict, Malang Regency still faces various challenges, particularly in aspects of technology adoption and coordination among stakeholders. This research aims to identify key success factors in integrated crop-livestock agricultural waste management to provide strategic recommendations for sustainable farming system development. The method is used MICMAC (Matrix of Cross-Impact Multiplications Applied to Classification) to analyze the influence strength and dependency of 10 variables divided into three aspects: ecological, social, and economic. The research results show that government regulations and policies are the main driving variables (key drivers), while land use efficiency and environmental quality are positioned as relay variables. The presence of farmer groups, waste management technology, operational costs, community participation, and community income are identified as outcome variables that are highly sensitive to changes in driving variables. The system shows dominance of direct influence with a simple and stable structure, providing strategic clarity that interventions can be focused on the main driving variables.

Page 48 of 48 | Total Record : 472

 44   45   46   47   48 

Filter by Year

2008 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026): JANUARY Vol. 24 No. 3 (2024): JULY Vol. 24 No. 2 (2024): APRIL Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024): JANUARY Vol. 23 No. 4 (2023): OCTOBER Vol. 23 No. 3 (2023): JULY Vol. 23 No. 2 (2023): APRIL Vol. 23 No. 1 (2023): JANUARY Vol. 22 No. 4 (2022): OCTOBER Vol. 22 No. 3 (2022): JULY Vol 22, No 3 (2022): JULY Vol 22, No 2 (2022): APRIL Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022): APRIL Vol 22, No 1 (2022): JANUARY Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022): JANUARY Vol. 21 No. 4 (2021): OCTOBER Vol 21, No 4 (2021): OCTOBER Vol 21, No 3 (2021): JULY Vol 21, No 2 (2021): APRIL Vol. 21 No. 2 (2021): APRIL Vol 21, No 1 (2021): JANUARY Vol 20, No 4 (2020): OCTOBER Vol 20, No 3 (2020): JULY Vol 20, No 2 (2020): APRIL Vol. 20 No. 1 (2020): JANUARY Vol 20, No 1 (2020): JANUARY Vol 19, No 3 (2019): AUGUST Vol 19, No 2 (2019): MAY Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY Vol 18, No 3 (2018): August Vol 18, No 2 (2018): MAY Vol 18, No 1 (2018): JANUARY Vol 17, No 3 (2017) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 16, No 3 (2016) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 15, No 3 (2015) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 14, No 3 (2014) Vol 14, No 2 (2014) Vol 14, No 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 3 (2013) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 1 (2013) Vol 12, No 3 (2012) Vol 12, No 2 (2012) Vol 12, No 1 (2012) Vol 12, No 1 (2012) Vol 11, No 3 (2011) Vol 11, No 2 (2011) Vol 11, No 1 (2011) Vol 10, No 3 (2010) Vol 10, No 2 (2010) Vol 10, No 1 (2010) Vol 9, No 1 (2009) Vol 8, No 2 (2008) Vol 8, No 1 (2008) More Issue